Slavic knives. Shoe knife: history, description, features of wearing. Cossack boot knife

The archaeological excavations and scientific works of historians involved in the study of Ancient Russia testify to the widespread use by ancient Russians of such edged weapons as a knife. Boot - this definition was given to a small blade, which was attached to a warrior's boot and was considered a weapon of concealed carry. According to other sources, he was an indispensable assistant to ancient Russian horsemen when refilling arrows. The Russian boot knife was found in many graves, which indicates the high efficiency and popularity of this weapon.

Slavic boot knife

How to wear a blade, they came up with, taking into account the features of the traditional footwear for all Slavic peoples at that time - boots. These shoes provided the owner with comfortable and safe movement in the steppe or in the forest - they protected the legs from blows from branches or snake bites. The absence of laces was very convenient, which made it possible to quickly put on shoes. And most importantly, it was very convenient to hide a knife behind the top of the boot. Over time, it became a tradition for the Slavs to hold a knife behind the top of their boots.

What did the Russian “bootmaker” look like?

The design of edged weapons made it possible to inflict piercing left side the enemy - in the hypochondrium. Characteristic features of the knife:

• Length - 25 cm.
• The curved shape of the narrow blade made it possible to reach the heart upon impact.
• The blade had a raised point.
• Sharpening - one and a half.
• Traditionally, the handle of a knife was wrapped with leather cord. It was designed to absorb sweat and blood. In combat conditions, this was necessary, as it prevented the knife from slipping in the hand.

• The presence of a lanyard - a special loop made of hemp or leather lace. The lanyard made it possible to quickly remove the weapon from behind the top of the boot, and prevented the risk of losing the knife during the battle. The boot blade in the presence of a lanyard could be used with a different grip.

In its structure, the blade resembled the tusks of a wild boar, which, when attacked, strikes from the bottom up, lifting the enemy. According to this principle damaging effect and a Russian boot knife was designed. The photo below represents the design features of traditional edged weapons.

Wearing features

One of the advantages of wearing a knife in a boot was the ability to get it in time. For this, the blade was most often located in the right shaft, and for the left-hander - in the left. The knife was attached in different ways:

• the scabbard was sewn to the wrong side of the boot;
• the sheath with the blade was tied to the leg;
• a special pocket for the scabbard was attached to the top of the trousers.

The following rules were followed:

• the handle must be hidden behind the top of the boot;
• if a lanyard was present, it could be seen;
• only a small part of the pommel could stick out of the bootleg.

Boot knife in 1917 - 1945

From the time of the revolution until the end of World War II, one of the attributes of the criminal element was a knife. The traditional boot option was now applied to the Finks, which were also convenient to hold behind the top of the boot. This arrangement freed the hands and hid edged weapons from prying eyes. A knife with this type of wearing was an ideal means of protection for criminals in various hopeless situations.

During the Second World War, this knife was also widely used by Soviet soldiers. The boot blade has undergone some changes by this time:

• the length was 250 mm;
• butt thickness - 7 mm;
• the blade was tetrahedral, convex and double-edged.

This form allowed to inflict mortal wounds on the enemy. The blows were delivered between the ribs, hitting the enemy on the spot.

Modern "boots" are even more different from traditional models. Now such knives are classified as household. For them, one-sided sharpening and a butt thickness not exceeding 0.4 cm are provided. According to these parameters, a boot knife is not a melee weapon, the acquisition of which requires an appropriate permit. Now, if desired, everyone can purchase a “shoemaker”.

Cossack boot knife

Cossack and weapons are inseparable concepts. A knife as one of the elements of equipment is considered a constant companion of every warrior.

The differences between the Cossack model of the “bootmaker” and the traditional Russian one are in the following parameters:

• the total length of the Cossack knife is 2 cm longer and is 29 cm;
• the length of the handle of the Cossack edged weapons - 13 cm;
• blade length - 16 cm;
• the presence on the Cossack blade of the stigma of the blacksmith-manufacturer;
• the wooden handle is equipped with a braided lanyard brush;
• for the manufacture of Cossack scabbards, bull skin is used.

"Will and Faith"

One of the very spectacular samples of the Cossack "boots" is the knife "Will and Faith". This product is made from Damascus steel. It contains elements of gold and silver. The knife is characterized by highly artistic design, which indicates talent, skill, perseverance and love for the knife as a reliable assistant.

The wooden handle is made from expensive breeds. The scabbard contains a special leather lining, which provides a smooth entry of the blade and its fixation, preventing loosening. At the top of the handle there is a nut recessed inside, containing a ring to which a braided leather cord is attached. On the surface of the knife there is an image of a Russian floral ornament. Nearby, in the style of Church Slavonic letters, there is an inscription “Will and Faith”. High-quality processing of metal and wood is admirable. This boot Cossack knife can be considered an example of arts and crafts.

A boot knife made by modern professional craftsmen will be a great gift for a hunter, tourist, fisherman or collector.

The history of blacksmithing among the Slavs, reconstructed according to archaeological data, goes back centuries, originating long before chronicle times. In order not to climb into such jungle, let's turn to the times of the annals and fast forward to Ancient Russia. Unusual national knives are more characteristic of small peoples living in any specific natural conditions. Such, for example, is the traditional multi-functional Eskimo ulu knife, originally made of stone (usually slate) or the large Malay parang knife, necessary for cutting your way through the jungle. Our Slavic ancestors, who lived in the middle latitudes, preferred to have multifunctional knives of a simple design and medium size on hand.

If we recall the main historical events that took place at the turn of the 10th-13th centuries, it is not surprising that the flourishing of crafts (including blacksmithing) is associated primarily with the northern lands of Russia. With the development of arable farming, which replaced fire, or slash-and-burn farming, the importance of blacksmithing sharply increases.
Here it is appropriate to recall how iron forging and all previous operations were carried out in those distant times. The process of turning the brown mass of marsh iron into knives, axes and swords is covered with myths and legends from the first to the last step. Finding the accumulation of iron ores was not easy. First, they drove a stake into the swamp swell and determined their luck by a specific sound. The mass adhering to the stake was tried on the tongue. The presence of a sour taste confirmed the finding. Having stripped off the moss, they removed the ore-bearing layer and loaded it into shoulder baskets in order to transfer it to a dry place. Then the mass, oozing with a rusty liquid, was dried, crushed, sieved, enriched and loaded into a house with charcoal. That's how they got the shout out. The blacksmith repeatedly forged iron, squeezing out slags from it and compacting its internal structure. By saturation of bloomery iron with carbon, it was turned into steel.

The study of forged products from Novgorod excavations allows us to conclude that metal processing is at a high technological level. There is a hypothesis according to which these technologies were mastered by the Novgorod masters not without the help of the Scandinavians. But this is only a hypothesis, and the indisputable fact remains that it was Novgorod Russia that became largest center metal processing, the influence of which then extends to all the surrounding regions, including the Volga-Kama interfluve.
The leading technological scheme for processing blades can be considered a three-layer package, when three strips of metal were welded - two (iron) on the sides and one (steel) in the center. With repeated sharpening, a harder steel always comes out on the tip. Novgorod craftsmen skillfully used forge welding and heat treatment (that is, hardening). The vast majority of welds are thin and free of slag inclusions. In order to qualitatively weld iron and steel with different carbon content, it is necessary to know the temperature regimes of welding. Until now, blade welding, when steel is forged in a package, is considered one of the most complex technological operations.
Outwardly, the knives of the Novgorod masters were simple and recognizable. However, their form was worked out for a long time, which made it possible to create an almost universal tool for any chore. Most of the knives found in Novgorod have a blade about 70-80 mm long and 18-25 mm wide, with a butt thickness of 3-4 mm. In cross section, the blade has the shape of a straight wedge (hence the word "blade" comes from). The butt of the blade is sustained either in a straight line, or lowered to the point. The hilt, as a rule, is made of wood or bone;

Old Russian knife

A typical old Russian knife of the X-XI century looked something like this. The length of the blades of such knives ranged from 4 to 20 centimeters. The handle is wooden, somewhat less often - bone, very rarely - metal.

The Old Russian combat knife of the same period differed from the usual Old Russian knife in a longer blade, a longer bone handle and such a sharpening of the blade, which, according to modern knife terminology, is very close to “one and a half sharpening”. Such sharpening significantly increases the penetrating power of the knife.

There are two more types of ancient Russian combat knives worth mentioning:

Firstly, a boot knife (bootmaker), mentioned in Russian chronicles from the 12th century. This is a narrow and curved knife, which the ancient Russian foot soldiers and cavalrymen supposedly wore in their boots as a cold weapon of the last chance. Alternative version lies in the fact that the boot knives were attached to the sheath on the saddle (behind the boot of the cavalryman).

Secondly, of interest is the underside knife (underside knife), which Russian soldiers wore under the saidak (cases for bows and arrows), that is, on the belt on the side. In historical sources, these knives have been mentioned since the 16th century, but perhaps this term was already in use in the 15th century. Things are ambiguous with the shape of the sling knives. The most convincing version looks like that, according to the place of wearing, they generally called large combat knives worn on the belt. And, accordingly, combat knives, both with curved and straight blades, could be called sub-knives - it all depended on the personal tastes and financial capabilities of the owner.

Mower

A mower, sometimes also called a "woman's ax", is a large utility knife with a wide and thick blade. It was usually made from a fragment of a scythe (hence the name), and when the scythes stubbornly did not want to break, they were made from any scrap metal that came to hand.

The mower can be safely called the Russian analogue of the machete - this huge rough knife is successfully used for chopping branches from cut down trees, clearing mowing from undergrowth, cutting bones, and even for scraping the floor in the house.

Hunting "Samsonov's Bear Knife" (late 19th century)

The author of the design of the "Samsonov's bear knife" is a well-known bear hunter (lived in St. Petersburg) Andrievsky Mikhail Vladimirovich (1849-1903), the Jägermeister of the Highest Court (Grand Duke Nikolai Nikolaevich Jr.). In 1894, in the journal Nature and Hunting, he published an article “On the newly invented mechanical horn”, in which he described in detail the history of the creation of a bear knife: “I consider the knife to be the most convenient knife American system with small, made personally by me, changes in the form. This knife has a double-edged blade that is sharp at the end. With notches on the sides, six inches long (26.7 cm), one inch wide (4.45 cm) and eight millimeters thick. The blade of the knife is separated from the handle by a steel crossbar, the handle is made of hardwood and is held on the blade with a wide screw. This knife is worn on a black waist belt in a wooden sheath covered with black leather, the ends of which are trimmed with blued steel. The dimensions of the knife and its balance are calculated so that it is comfortably held in the hand and it is excellent for chopping, cutting, stabbing and ripping open the belly with an upward or downward pressure. The first such knife was perfectly made for me by the Tula master Egor Samsonov, and then they began to make such knives at the Zlatoust state-owned factory. In the diary for April 1887 there is an entry about the knife that served Andreevsky as a model: “I always carry an American hunting knife with me, with which you can chop and stab, they built a raft with it.”

Yegor Samsonov made his knives from "English carriage springs" - the same steel. A description of the technological process of manufacturing this steel is known. “Spring steel was heated in a forge where oak or birch coal burned. Air was pumped by hand bellows. After that, the red-hot sheets were corrected on the anvil. Then blades were made from them in a locksmith's way, everything was done by hand. After that, the blades underwent a series of processes: cementation, regeneration, then hardening and tempering, and finally aging. In the groove made in the corner of the forge, blanks of blades were laid out. From above and below they were covered with a catalyst and charcoal. This was heated to 900-925 degrees Celsius and kept in this heat for 4-5 hours. This time is due to the calculation that carbon penetrates 0.1 mm into steel in 1 hour. Then the blanks were cooled and heated again, but without the presence of a catalyst. This process took 3 hours and was done to evenly distribute the carbon throughout the steel. After three hours, the blanks were immersed in oil. Half-cooled blanks in oil were kept in air until cooled to 300-325 degrees (steel blue), after which they were finally cooled in oil. As soon as the workpiece was completely cooled, it was heated to 175-150 degrees and again allowed to cool in oil. This process lasted for 12 hours. After that, the workpieces were wiped dry, and already passed the final sharpening.

parensky knife

Its name corresponds to the place of origin - the Kamchatka village of Paren. By design, the parensky knife is very similar to the products common in Finland. Currently, the term "parensky knife" means a hand-forged knife with a blade made of a dissimilar composite material - they say that with parensky knives it was even possible to remove shavings from the blades of ordinary table knives.

To date, the village of Paren has become a remote village, and the technology for making knives is considered lost - so, those very Paren knives remained in people's memory only in the form of legends. The knives now made under this name have little in common with these legends.

Bogorodsky knife

The name of this carving tool came from the village of Bogorodskoye, a center of traditional woodcarving, whose symbol is the well-known toy - "Blacksmiths", depicting a man and a bear, who take turns beating hammers on the anvil, one has only to pull the movable bar.

The Bogorodsk knife has a straight short blade. It is successfully used for both coarse and fine carving. It is often made by carvers for themselves, so the design, shape of the handle and the cost of such knives can vary greatly.

Yakut knife

Not a single sphere can do without the traditional Yakut knife - byhaha, the design of which has not changed for many centuries. economic activity Sakha people. Its shape is ideal for long, painstaking work, allowing it to be carried out with minimal energy consumption. Blade profile is asymmetrical.

Sharpening is subjected to a slightly convex left (if you hold the handle towards you) side of the blade, unlike other knives with an asymmetrical profile, in which, as a rule, sharpening is done on the right side. There is a logical explanation for this: the bulge on the blade facilitates the processing of wood, cutting meat and fish (including frozen), and skinning animals are simplified.

finca

In Russia, the knife that came to us from Finland long time was considered exclusively a weapon of criminal elements and was even banned until 1996. However, its true purpose lies elsewhere. The Finnish knife is multifunctional, it is perfect for cutting meat, cleaning fish, indispensable for camping and for household needs. The Finnish is characterized by a short straight blade, a bevel of the butt of the clip-point type or in Russian “pike” and a mounted handle.

Of course, not all traditional knives, the design of which was formed on the territory of Russia, are Russian knives. In my opinion, we should, in fairness, put traditional Caucasian knives out of the equation ( North Caucasus), Yakut knives, Buryat knives, and other ethnic types of knives formed by indigenous peoples living in Russia. There is at least one major exception, namely the Finnish knife (finka), which became so widespread in Russia/USSR in the first half of the 20th century that it actually became the Russian national knife. However, many Russian models of Finnish knives have significant design differences from traditional Finnish knives (puukko) that exist in Finland.

The knife is a symbol and a necessity. The knife has been and remains one of the most important items that accompany a person throughout his history. Now we sometimes stop noticing it, because the knife dissolves among the many other things that surround a person's life. But in the distant past, a knife was often the only metal object that a person possessed. was an attribute of any free person. A knife hung on the belt of every woman. A child, at a certain age, received a knife with which he never parted. Why was this subject given such importance?

The knife was not only an everyday functional thing. In ancient people, the perception of the world took place through the prism of magic. Therefore, the magical functions of the knife, in which our ancestors believed, were no less important. He possessed many magical properties, which he shared with his master and they tried never to give him into the wrong hands. They swore on him. They were protected from witchcraft. The groom gave it to the bride at the betrothal. When a person died, the knife left with him, he was placed in the grave of the owner.

This is, of course, a somewhat idealized picture. In real life, they lost knives and bought new ones, lent them, gave them away, and those that had worked out - knives worn almost to the butt - were simply thrown away. The knife was a versatile and most common tool. This is confirmed by the fact that knives are often the most massive finds during excavations. In Novgorod, at the Nerevsky excavation alone, 1440 copies of knives were found. During the excavations of ancient Izyaslav, destroyed by the Tatars, 1358 knives were found. The numbers are impressive, aren't they? It seems that the knives were simply lost in packs. But of course this is not the case. Even if we take into account the corrosion of metal that has lain in the ground for hundreds of years, it is still clear that many knives are chipped and broken, that is, they have lost their working functions. The conclusion suggests itself about not very high quality products of ancient blacksmiths ... In fact, their quality was relative - just like in our time. There were high-quality knives that were expensive, but there was cheap consumer goods. The first category just included those knives that in Russia any free person wore on his belt, regardless of his gender. Such knives were quite high quality and by modern standards. They cost good money. The second category consisted of those knives, whose quality was incomparably lower than Chinese stainless steel on layouts. They really often just broke. When this happened, they were given to blacksmiths for reforging. And more often, out of annoyance, they threw "to hell away, out of sight." But we will not allow ourselves disrespectful remarks about the ancient Russian blacksmiths. Their capabilities and technical arsenal were very limited. Our contemporary, even a very high-level blacksmith, deprived of high-quality steel and tools for its processing, will be able to do little in such conditions. Therefore, we bow deeply to the ancient blacksmiths - they are the best, because they were the first!

Geography

Ancient Russia occupied a vast territory. So huge that many question whether there was such a state at all? It says a lot about the fact that Russia was in essence a huge trading enterprise, like the “Hanseatic League”. (Or a closer example is the "Hudson's Bay Company" that existed in North America in the 18th century.) The main purpose of such enterprises was the enrichment of merchants and rulers, the exploitation of natural and human resources in territories that are difficult to manage due to their huge size. “The core of the state of Russia (called the armchair term“ Kievan Rus ”was, as you know, a relatively small area of ​​​​the middle Dnieper region - from the Desna to Ros, which led the process of the birth of feudal statehood in the vast expanse of Eastern Europe - from the Vistula to the Volga and from the Baltic to the Black Sea" (B. A. Rybakov).

An indirect confirmation of this assumption can be the work “On the Management of the Empire” by the Byzantine emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus (905-959), which mentions the lands of “Inner Russia” (only!), When it concerns the territories immediately surrounding Kyiv.

Exalted in the middle of the 6th century the Gothic “Empire of Germanarich”, the author of “Getika” (“History of the Goths”) Jordanes describes a vast territory from the Black to the Baltic Sea, listing many tribes that lived on it. Such a huge empire has never been ready, but the decoding of the names of the tribes and their order of listing in the book made it possible for E. Ch. Skrezhinskaya to suggest that Jordan took the guidebooks that once existed as the basis for his description. (Greek “Itineraria”). They described lands from the Baltic to the Caucasus. All these lands in the "itineraria" had the ethnic names of the tribes that lived on them. The existence of such guides is already in early Middle Ages testifies to the close trade ties of many peoples of Eastern Europe.

Many different peoples and tribes: Slavs, Finno-Ugrians, Balts, Varangians, steppe nomads, Greeks. Sometimes it even seems that it is difficult for any of them to give the palm! But still, we will proudly hand it over to our Slavic ancestors. Their language and culture became the basis of that territorial formation, which entered the history of human civilization under the name "Rus". But it absorbed a great deal from other peoples that enter or come into contact with it. Blacksmithing, in particular, is bright to that example.

From time immemorial, there have been two rival centers in Russia. These were Kyiv and Novgorod (later Moscow took over the baton of Novgorod). Sometimes they found ways of mutual understanding, but more often it was not. The lands of Kyiv and Novgorod were too different. Another nature, other neighbors. Too much distance separated them from each other. A one-way trip could take a month or more. At the same time, non-Slavs were often met along the way, and it was impossible to ignore this, bypassing their lands.

These differences are also confirmed by the peculiarities of blacksmithing in Kyiv and Novgorod. (And in a broader sense, these are the southern and northern lands of ancient Russia). Therefore, it is rather difficult to talk about ancient Russian knives “in general”. We will have to conditionally divide our story into two parts and talk separately about knives that were made and operated in different places - in the north and in the south. The time of their existence is also a very important aspect. During the entire existence of Kievan Rus, knives have undergone such an evolution that it is simply impossible to talk about some kind of generalized “Old Russian Knife”. It was always a subject related to a particular place and time. By the way, as a result of this evolution, two different directions in which the production of knives developed in the north and south came close and, over time, a certain common type of knife arose. But this fact is not characteristic exclusively for Russia. This happened all over Europe. The determining factors of this phenomenon were not the ethnicity of the knife, but the economic feasibility of its production, plus the available natural resources.

Among the studies in the field of ancient Russian blacksmithing, the work carried out by the famous Soviet archaeologist B. A. Kolchin remains the most fundamental and complete. He was an unusually inquisitive researcher. Already in his declining years, he found my teacher V.I. Basov and spent a lot of time in his forge, forcing him to melt iron in the blast furnace, to forge old Russian knives. He carefully recorded the results of his observations.

B. A. Kolchin subjected a huge number of archaeological finds relating to the era of "Ancient Russia". This allowed him to draw important conclusions regarding changes in the design and manufacturing technology, to divide the knives according to the types of functional purpose. True, he conducted his research, as a rule, on the basis of Novgorod archaeological material. The result of such a one-sided approach was somewhat hasty conclusions regarding the homogeneity of blacksmithing techniques and methods throughout ancient Russia, including its southern part. But the fact is that it was then required of him. He wrote his work in the 50s, and this was the time when the idea of ​​“Great and Mighty Russia” was developing. Within its boundaries, everyone had to understand each other perfectly and form a single whole of one huge people, somehow subtly reminiscent of the Soviet one. The Finno-Ugrians were mentioned in general somehow in passing. Well, how could it be that someone taught Russians how to forge?

Thank God, the students and followers of Kolchin lived not only in Leningrad and Moscow. Some of them firmly settled in Kyiv. As befits scientists, they undertook a thorough study of local material and made interesting observations that in some places supplement, and sometimes refute the conclusions of the master. G. A. Voznesenskaya, D.P. Nedopako and S.V. Pankov, staff Kyiv Institute Archaeologists, with their scientific work, substantiated the historical independence and originality of Southern Russia with their scientific work, which is clearly manifested in the blacksmith's craft.

Neighbours

The Novgorod Slavs lived next door to the Finno-Ugric tribes (Livs, Ests, Vod, Izhora, Korela, Ves, etc.). In addition, the Scandinavians actively visited them. Both of them were noble blacksmiths, especially the first ones. What is worth only the legendary blacksmith Ilmarinen from the famous Finnish epic "Kalevala"!

It is somewhat inappropriate to talk about the Slavic influence on the northern region in blacksmithing; rather, the Slavs were apprentices here. The Finno-Ugric tribes had such a high level of development of blacksmithing that you never cease to admire looking at their creations. And this should not be surprising!

First of all, the reason for their skill in wealth natural resources. Firewood is unmeasured - burn birch charcoal as much as you need. There are swamps everywhere, which means there is iron ore in them. In a word, there is where the working people can roam. But it is difficult to grow something here. The earth will give birth poorly, winters are long and cold. But I still want to eat. Therefore, all human energy and ingenuity went to the development of crafts.

Quality products found their customers everywhere. Kievan Rus, with its pronounced emphasis on international trade helped to establish sustainable sales. Many tribes fed blacksmithing. Looking ahead, I can say that Novgorod products were generally of better quality than Kyiv ones. But this is not the merit of the Slavs, who began to settle in this northern region. They came here possessing the same level of blacksmithing as the Slavs of the Dnieper region. But having begun to develop the lands that would later be called Novgorod and Pskov, the Slavs learned a lot from their neighbors, the Finno-Ugric peoples, in the field of blacksmithing technologies. And the local nature helped them to embody this knowledge in thousands of beautiful things, not caring especially about saving charcoal and metal.

Southern Russia. Little iron and firewood. A lot of food.

Unlike their northern neighbors, the Slavs who lived in the Dnieper region (the territory of present-day Ukraine) were not distracted by all sorts of crafts there, but traditionally engaged in simple and understandable business - they grew “their daily bread”. The natural conditions and available resources contributed to this activity here. Blacksmithing has always been their side trade, designed to serve the main activity - agriculture. Therefore, all products of the Dnieper Slavs were as simple and functional as possible. In other words, it was a balancing act between the least effort and the maximum result.

Living conditions dictated just such an approach. In the forest-steppe zone, there are few forests suitable for burning coal. But a lot of people live and everyone needs firewood for heating in winter. Swamps, too, thank God, less than in the north. Iron is often not locally produced, but imported - hence it cost more. Steel is in short supply. There was no time to excel in the craft: “the stubble is on the nose, but we still have to forge two hundred and fifty sickles for the whole district!”

Nevertheless, the blacksmiths here were not bad either. They forged everything that the local population needed. They could, if necessary, forge a sword. They were also familiar with blacksmithing techniques common in the north and used them when there was time and there was enough coal. The blacksmith craft of the Dnieper region in those days is characterized by very archaic techniques, but this is due to the desire for simplicity. The roots of these techniques go back to the ancient Celtic culture, to Scythia and Byzantium. It was with these peoples that the ancient Slavs of the Dnieper region contacted and they adopted blacksmithing skills at one time. The nature of their blacksmithing was focused on domestic consumption. The blacksmith, first of all, served the agricultural community in which he lived and of which he was an integral part. His access to the foreign market was limited, and it was hardly possible to establish some kind of more or less permanent production for “export” with a scarce raw material base. At the same time, there is always a demand for grain and other food products. And if you need a good knife, you can spend money, buy the one that the northerners brought. In general, we tend to underestimate the trade relations of those times. Everything you need could be bought even then. The main thing, as they say, "would be for what and why."

So let's not tip the scales in someone's favor when comparing technologies. The northern and southern Slavs were part of a single huge territorial entity, much larger than the territory now traditionally belonging to the state of Kievan Rus. Living in this huge system, consisting of a wide variety of components, each person nevertheless belonged to some certain place and did what Nature dictated to him and prompted by life itself.

Photo 1

The shape of the blade was determined by two factors. The first is, of course, the function of the knife, its purpose. The second important factor, often not taken into account, is the manufacturing technology. At a time when iron was scarce, steel was a rarity and the preparation of coal took a lot of effort and time - everything was aimed at optimizing the technology and reducing labor and material costs to a minimum. Northern blacksmiths are masters at what, but still they were no exception. They knew the limit in their aspirations to sophisticate blacksmithing technologies. Therefore, the shape of the blade often turned out to be the result of some specific sequence of blacksmithing operations, which seemed to be the most rational at that time.

In principle, the silhouette of the bulk of ancient Russian knives resembles modern ones. The back could be straight, could bend up or go down, just like now, depending on the purpose and personal preferences. The main difference between ancient Russian knives is a pronounced wedge shape in all directions: in length and thickness (Photo 01)

Why were ancient knives so different from modern ones? Now, in most cases, speaking of a forged knife, it means a plate flattened under an air hammer, from which the final shape of the blade is then machined using abrasive wheels or cutters. In ancient times, this technology did not exist (on a sandstone abrasive wheel with a manual or foot drive, you can’t grind off a lot of metal). But most importantly, the masters tried to ensure that not a single grain of precious iron was wasted. It is difficult for us to understand this, because we are surrounded by mountains of scrap metal. For an ancient blacksmith, the modern approach to making a knife is tantamount to making a rolling pin out of a log, and everything else is turned into chips. Therefore, in ancient times, knives were indeed forged. The knife blank was pulled with a hammer to the very tip, giving it the desired shape and section, so that in the end it only remained to slightly correct it on a wet sharpener (Photo 2). (In fairness, it should be noted that this is quite problematic with modern alloy steels. They are stiff and deform much worse during forging. In addition, modern alloy steels have a much narrower heating temperature range for forging than the steel that was dealt with the ancient blacksmiths overheated it a little and “goodbye, the piece of iron is gone!”)

Photo 2. Forging sequence

Such a wedge-shaped blade in some way compensated for the softness of the material from which the knife was made. And often it was ordinary iron. The wedge in the section of the blade corresponded to the angle of sharpening and was 15-25 degrees. Thus, the cutting edge was supported by the entire section of the blade, up to the butt. The vast majority of Slavic knives of the 10th-12th centuries found by archaeologists are very small according to modern ideas. The length of their blades does not exceed 10 cm, the width is about 2 cm, but the massive butt at the widest point reaches 6 mm. (The average size of the blade of these knives lies in the range of 7-8 cm). Such a knife, when sharpened, was placed on the stone with the entire side plane of the blade. Therefore, simultaneously with sharpening, the side edges of the blade were constantly polished and, consequently, it was cleaned from traces of corrosion. A good option for keeping a knife always in excellent condition in the absence of stainless steels! (By the way, with this method of sharpening a knife, the blade section gradually took the form of a convex wedge and the sharpening angle gradually increased. This happened because when sharpening his knife, the owner tried to press the blade harder against the stone).

Photo 3

Consider knives in terms of their functional purpose. B.A. Kolchin, on the basis of the archaeological material available to him, divided all ancient Russian knives into eight types, depending on their purpose.

The first type is household "kitchen" knives. Handles, wooden and bone, are purely functional and therefore without any special decorations. A characteristic feature of these knives (according to Kolchin) is that the axis of the handle is parallel to the straight butt of the blade. My opinion is that this feature for kitchen knives is secondary. The functional purpose is determined by the line of the blade, and the slope of the butt in this case is secondary - the straighter the blade, the more it goes down (Photo 03).

Photo 4

The second type is household “table” knives. They differ from the first ones in that they were larger and longer, and their handle was decorated with various ornaments (Photo 4).

It is difficult now to say how different the knives are for their intended purpose. And the theoretical "kitchen and dining" orientation of the use of these knives seems to me in this case not entirely appropriate. In my opinion, this is one type - a universal knife, the so-called "hozbyt" according to police classification, popularly called simply "worker". And the dimensions of such knives depended on the desire of the customer. However, such a knife could be very successfully used for hunting, and if necessary, as a melee weapon. Stops (crosshairs) are not found on Old Russian knives. By the way, they are not on the Finns either, but this circumstance did not prevent the Finns from successfully using their small knives as military weapons. The butt slope line on the blade of these knives could be different and this also speaks in favor of the fact that these knives were universal. And further. A decorated table knife, it seems to me, does not fit well with the way of life in ancient Russia. Most likely such a knife was a hunting knife.

Photo 5

Photo 6

Photo 7

The third type according to the classification of B.A. Kolchina are working “carpentry” knives. They are characterized by a downward curved blade resembling a scimitar (Photo 5). Kolchin writes that they resemble modern garden knives, but such a parallel seems far-fetched to me (Photo 6). However, pruning knives are designed mainly for cutting tree shoots with a transverse cut, and not for planing along the grain of the wood. And the task of the “carpentry” knife was planing, because for cutting there was a saw for wood, widely represented in archaeological finds. It is quite possible that this is just another kind of utility knife of such a shape, which is characterized by a straight blade and a butt curved downwards. And the pronounced “crescent” of the cutting edge is explained in this case simply by the wear of the blade. I showed the scimitar-shaped knife to woodworkers. They believe that it is extremely inconvenient for them to plan a tree. For planing, the so-called “jamb” is much more suitable - a knife in which the blade is directed at forty-five degrees to the handle and has one-sided sharpening (Photo 7). (In order to see for myself the functional suitability of knives with a straight blade and a scimitar-shaped one, I made several different samples. Planing a tree with a downward-curved blade turned out to be really extremely inconvenient. On the other hand, “peeling” potatoes with a knife with a straight blade turned out to be very easy (Photo 8). Of course in those days there were no potatoes in Russia, but turnips, for example, were a favorite addition to porridge - the main food of the Slavs.Probably, vegetables in those days were “cleaned” in the same way as they are now.Therefore, I believe that the primary sign of purely kitchen knives is a straight blade and, as a result, the line of the butt lowered to the point. The wear of the blade with the butt going down creates the illusion of sickle-shape, which, in my opinion, misled B.A. Kolchin in his classification. An indirect confirmation may be the shape of the blade of a Japanese kitchen knife (Photo 9) The line of the blade tends to straighten out, and with a certain number of resharpenings, it will take on a crescent shape.

Photo 8

Photo 9

The fourth type in this classification is working “bone-cutting” knives. Kolchin mentions them, but, unfortunately, he does not provide drawings in his works. To be honest, I find it difficult to imagine what specific samples from the found archaeological material the scientist attributed to this group.

Photo 10

Photo 11

The next, fifth type, is working "shoe" knives. They had a massive wide and short blade with a smoothly rounded end (Photo 10). In this case, there is no need to argue about the appointment. These knives were found in shoe shops.

There is also a group of knives for working with leather. They differ from the aforementioned "shoe" knives in the shape of their pointed tip. These are the so-called "cutting" knives. They were intended for cutting leather products. These knives were made of all-metal and at the end of the handle there was an emphasis for thumb(Photo 11). (This emphasis was in the form of a riveted “penny”, bent towards the blade at a right angle to the handle). By pressing vertically on the knife, from top to bottom, it was possible to cut out any figure from a piece of leather lying on the board.

Photo 12

The sixth type is, according to B.A. Kolchin, “surgical” knives. This conclusion was made by the scientist based on the fact that one of the found knives was made entirely of metal, that is, the metal handle was forged along with the blade. (But unlike the all-metal shoe-cutting knife, the “surgical” ones are larger and do not have an emphasis on the handle). Very similar to a scalpel. According to Kolchin, this knife was intended for amputations (Photo 12).

The seventh type is “small working” knives. They were used as special tools for various handicrafts. The length of their blade was 30-40 mm. But it could probably be children's knives or just small incisors.

The eighth type is something that cannot be confused with anything, “combat knives”. This is evidenced by the shape of the blade, and the fact that they are a frequent find in the burial mounds of warriors. These knives have a long blade with a massive butt. The handle, as a rule, is also massive, with an elongated handle. The end of the blade of a combat knife for 20-40 mm had a double-edged sharpening, which made it easier to deliver stabbing blows. Combat knives often worn behind the top of the boot, which is why they were called so, “bootmakers”. In the “Tale of Igor's Campaign” (XII century), it is the “shoemakers” that are the symbol of the valor of the Slavs.

Photo 13

“Tii bo demon of shields, cobblers
Cliques win with a click,
Ringing in great-grandfather glory.

“Those (Slavs) without shields, with boot knives with a click, the regiments win, ringing in great-grandfather glory” (translated by D.S. Likhachev).

Photo 14

A special group are knives, which Kolchin calls "folding". This is probably not the correct definition. The blades were not removed from them, they were replaced one by one with a “light movement of the hand”, because this part in the knife was double-sided. In this double-sided blade, there was a hole in the middle, into which a transverse pin was passed, on which a bone handle - a case - was fixed. In the handle itself there was a longitudinal cut, where one of the blades was hidden (Photo 14).

On both sides of the pin hole in the blade there were cutouts for fixing the knife in one of the working positions. This notch included a second transverse pin fixed in the handle, thus preventing further rotation of the double-sided blade. The blade rotated 180 degrees relative to the handle and one of the two working blades appeared outside, depending on the desire of the owner. One half of the double-edged blade had a straight butt with a rounded rise of the blade to the point, which was probably necessary for working with leather or, perhaps, for skinning and skinning. The second part of the double-sided blade was with a downward butt and a less rounded blade. This blade was probably more convenient to cut something. And the tip on this side is sharper - it is more convenient to pierce. Here is such an old Russian knife of a “Swiss officer”!

This is how Kolchin classified the ancient Russian knives. He did not note regional differences in the shape of knives, and this was probably done in order to emphasize the cultural homogeneity of Ancient Russia, as required by the ideology of the USSR in those years. However, I suspect that there were no sharp differences not only in the territory of Ancient Russia, but also everywhere in Europe, where only people used knives

Photo 15

But with regard to differences in time, Kolchin made some interesting observations, although they relate exclusively to the Novgorod finds. It turns out that the earliest type of Novgorod knife (X-XI c) has a narrow blade, and not very long (Photo 15). The width of the blade did not exceed 14 mm. The knives had a pronounced wedge-shaped section due to a rather thick butt. The ratio of the blade width to the butt thickness was 3:1. The shape of the butt of these knives was straight, or at the end of the blade it was slightly rounded down. The blade length of most knives did not exceed 70-80 mm. Sometimes there were small knives with a blade about 40 mm long, or vice versa large ones, with a blade reaching up to 120 mm. This form of the knife, according to Kolchin, is typical and unique for the X-XI and the beginning of the XII centuries. At the beginning of the XII century, sharp metamorphoses begin to occur with the Novgorod knife. It becomes much wider and much thinner, and this despite the fact that the length of the blade has increased in comparison with the previous period of time. The blade width of these knives is now 18-20 mm. The butt of the knife is usually straight. In the XIII century, the blade of the Novgorod knife becomes even thinner, wider and longer.

According to BA Kolchin, the evolution of the Old Russian knife (on the example of the Novgorod finds) took place in this direction. From ancient knives with a small narrow blade, but a very massive butt to larger and wider blades with a decreasing width of the butt. And although such a temporary dependence is built into a coherent system, I still dare to challenge the conclusions of the meter on this matter. But I will try to do this a little later, when we get acquainted with ancient Russian blacksmithing technologies. Then I, as a blacksmith, will have the right to do so.

Unlike Novgorod, southern Russia did not show such a pronounced evolution in the shape of the blade. Knives here looked more or less the same for many centuries. Unless the oldest samples are a little shorter, but this is unlikely to fit into any system. Perhaps this is due simply to the economy of metal. The knives of the ancient Dnieper region are close to the modern understanding of what a universal knife should be.

Concerning the method of the handle attachment, it should be noted that, as a rule, it was mounted on a shank pulled onto a wedge, as in a conventional file. The handle is most often of a simple shape, oval in cross section. The hole for the shank was burned with a pointed, red-hot piece of iron. No drills for you, everything is right there at the forge, near the forge. If the shank is notched with a chisel (“ruff”), then a very reliable nozzle is obtained. It is comparable in strength to that where epoxy resin is used. In addition, the burnt wood resists moisture well. This assembly method was used in almost all ancient Russian knives, regardless of the time or place of manufacture. Occasionally, the mounting of the handle was used, in which wooden or bone linings (cheeks) were riveted to the flat shank. About the installation of the handle on the shank, when it, having passed its entire length, is riveted at the end on a metal washer, I have not seen any mention.

Technology

It's amazing how much becomes clear when you stop speculating, and just go to the forge and start forging a knife with your own hands. On the scientific language this approach is called “experimental archeology”. But there may be danger lurking here, since a modern forge with an air hammer and a forge that runs on coal or gas is completely unsuitable. Recreating ancient blade-making techniques using modern tools and materials is like walking into a traditional martial arts gym with a Kalashnikov assault rifle. These are completely different things, incompatible with each other. That is why, at one time, I deliberately abandoned the “benefits” of civilization and began to work in the same conditions as the blacksmiths of antiquity. I will not hide, this approach requires effort and time, which is not easy to afford in our fast-paced era. But the reward was invaluable practical experience, which I am happy to contribute to the general treasury of knowledge. I hope that it will do good service to all those who are ready to contribute to the preservation of historical heritage through joint efforts.

simple technologies

Figure 16

Before proceeding with the presentation of the material, you should familiarize yourself with the basic concepts. All knives can be divided into “welded” and “solid forged”. Moving from simple to complex, let's start with "solid forged" knives. What is the simplest? The simplest thing is to take a piece of iron obtained in an old Russian domnitsa and giving it a certain shape with a hammer, forge a knife. That's how it was done before. No heat treatment will give anything in this case. Is it possible to make a cold hardening to seal the metal (as a braid is riveted). Such knives were “soft”, quickly worn down, but still somehow cut, and therefore there were a huge number of them.

The old Russian domnitsa was a pit with a nozzle at the bottom through which air was supplied. In other words, it was a very deep forge. The pit could be raised above the surface due to the fact that the walls were erected, and then a mine was obtained. Charcoal and marsh iron ore were loaded into this “pit” in layers (Fig. 16). The ore is a combination of iron and oxygen. Charcoal is almost 100% carbon. When coal burns, the carbon reacts chemically with the ore. At the same time, oxygen combines with carbon, forming gaseous carbon monoxide, and is removed from iron (this is the so-called recovery process, known from the school chemistry course). A very important point: the iron did not melt (!), since everything happened at a temperature of about 1000 degrees, and the melting point of iron is 1539 degrees. At the same time, only waste rock was melted, which formed slag that accumulated at the bottom of the mine. The iron itself had a porous shapeless appearance and was therefore called spongy. After restoration in the blast furnace, it had to be forged many times in order to “squeeze out” the slag, which at first runs - like “juice from a squeezed lemon”, only the juice is white-hot. Dangerous but beautiful work. By the way, in ancient times this slag was called “juice”. They said: "Iron let the juice go."

The next step in the complication of technology and improvement in the quality of products is the forging of a knife from a piece of steel. Under certain conditions, in the old Russian domnitsa, it was possible to obtain not only “bright” iron, but also material with a certain, very small carbon content (about 0.5%). This is the so-called raw steel. The material, of course, is very mediocre, but still, if it is heated and lowered into water, it becomes somewhat harder. This happened due to the fact that the temperature in the house rose and the proportion of coal in relation to ore increased somewhat. The excess carbon did not combine with the oxygen of the ore, but passed into reduced iron. The result was low-grade steel.

Now they basically do this: they take steel and forge a knife out of it. Only steel is taken high quality and hard. Previously, this was practically not done, except for small knives or cutters, which are pointless to weld because of their small size. There was, as I already mentioned, very little steel and it was saved.

In the modern blast furnace, things go even further and the reduced iron is carburized to such an extent that it turns into cast iron. Its melting point is much lower than iron, so it is released from the blast furnace in liquid form. After that, the excess carbon is “burned out” with the help of oxygen (the so-called open-hearth or Bessemer processes) and, thus, a material with the required amount of carbon is obtained. As you can see, it's the other way around!

And if there is no steel, there is only hot iron and it is necessary to make a solid knife? Is there really no way out? It turns out there is!

Probably, even in ancient times, blacksmiths noticed that if a soft iron object, heated to red, is left in smoldering charcoal for a while, and then lowered into water, it becomes hard. Why is this happening?

Figure 17. Cemented Blade

If you ask an ancient blacksmith about this, he would certainly tell about the magic and magic that takes place in the forge (I also adhere to this view). But scientists explained everything to us and destroyed the fairy tale. All this happens because carbon from coal passes into the surface layer of iron. Thus, steel is obtained. This process is called cementation. This is the oldest and easiest way to make steel objects. It is very difficult to control the process with this technology, since the temperature in the hearth can fluctuate and even fall below the level when the transition of carbon to iron occurs. And if you start to strongly inflate the furs, then the reverse process will begin - an excess of oxygen will begin to “burn out” carbon from the metal. In general, like this: "It is difficult, but possible." And at the same time without special technical intricacies (Fig. 17).

A further refinement of this "magic" process is that the object to be turned into steel is separated from the changing environment of the forge by enclosing it in a container, such as a pot, filled with charcoal. And you can wrap it with leather and coat it with clay. The skin, when heated, will turn into coal, that is, into carbon. Now blow as much as you want, and air will not get inside the container, while the temperature can be “caught up” with a fair amount. And at high temperatures, the process will go faster, and the carbon concentration may increase!

Welding technologies

Next, let's move on to "welded" knives. Welded blades are made up of several pieces of iron and steel that are forge welded into one piece. What is forge welding? This is when the metal is heated, in the words of my teacher, “to a pig squeal” (that is, white), so that it seems that it is about to burn out. If two pieces heated in this way are put together and tapped on them with a hammer, they will join into one whole, so that the seam will not be visible if it is well forged afterwards. Miracles, and more! There were two pieces, became one. For welding technologies, materials of various properties can be used, for example, steel and iron. The main goals that were pursued were the following:

1. Savings. In my opinion, this is the main reason why this technology was used. Steel was previously made from iron by carburizing. It was a lengthy, labor- and material-intensive process, and steel was much more expensive than iron. Therefore, the knives were recruited from several pieces of different quality.

2. To increase the strength of the blade. Good steel, though hard, is also brittle. This was especially pronounced in antiquity, when the resulting metal was dirty (it always contained slag, which degrades the quality of steel) and did not contain various alloying additives. And iron is the opposite: bend it in any direction - you won’t break it. If you make a knife from any one metal, it turned out badly. The way out was to combine metals with different properties together.

3. For beauty. This, of course, is now beloved by all Damascus. There is a special conversation about Damascus steel, but I will limit myself to stating the fact that the main purpose of Damascus is decorative and only secondarily - for the strength of the blade, but certainly not for hardness.

Welding technologies used in the manufacture of ancient Russian knives (by the way, exactly the same technologies were used all over the world, so you won’t hear anything new here) can be divided into the following groups:

Figure18

1.Steel core and iron side plates. This is the so-called three-layer technology or, as they say now, laminated steel (Fig. 18). Some visionaries attribute self-sharpening properties to such blades, but, unfortunately, this is not the case. Lamination technology has survived perfectly to this day and is used all the time: from Scandinavian mass-produced knives to safety razor blades (Photo 19).

Photo 20

2. A variation of the previous one is the “five-layer” technology, which, according to B.A. Kolchina, should give the knives additional bending strength. But, in my opinion, the reason here is most likely again in the economy of metal. Steel of much worse quality was used on the outer linings. And perhaps this is the most primitive example of decorating a blade using welding technology. The blade of such a knife has a beautiful wavy strip along the blade. white color, where the iron layer came to the surface (Photo 20).

3. And now the opposite is true - welding “in the girth”: steel on the outside, and iron on the inside (Fig. 21). Japanese trick, characteristic of katana swords. It was rarely used in ancient Russian knives, but it was still used, it is not clear, however, why. Completely uneconomical in terms of the use of steel. It gives good toughness, but who will thresh with a knife like a sword? (Is it only combat? ..).

If in the technologies described above steel was present in all parts of the cross section of the blade, then in the following groups it is located only on the cutting edge. This is economical, and, as practice shows, gives certain advantages in terms of strength. The only drawback is that when the steel is ground, the knife loses its properties. In the cases described above (with the exception of “girth” welding), the knife can be used until it is completely ground - it will always have steel on the blade.

Figure 22

Photo 23

4. End welding. The strip of steel is butt welded to the iron base (Fig. 22). The main disadvantage is the small area of ​​connection of two different materials. But, as a rule, with a certain skill, the weld is quite reliable. Like the three-layer laminated technology, end welding is still used today. An example of this are, in particular, high-quality hacksaw blades made by the Swedish company Sandvik. A strip of high-speed steel, on which teeth are cut, is welded to the base of the spring steel sheet by electron beam welding (Photo 23). The result is a highly flexible blade with strong and sharp teeth, good performance and long service life.

Figure 24

Figure 25

5. Lateral (“oblique”) welding. With this manufacturing method, the area of ​​the seam is somewhat increased, which makes it possible to reduce the number of “lack of penetration” and is guaranteed to improve the strength of the connection between the steel blade and the iron base (Fig. 24).

In fact, it is difficult to draw a clear line between the two technologies mentioned above. If, at the strip welded to the end, we begin to pull back the blade, striking only on one side of the blade, then as a result we will get almost lateral welding. So, in its pure form, side welding can be considered as such, when the angle between the butt and the weld approaches a straight line (in a cross section). This can be achieved when strips with wedge-shaped sections are taken as a blank for the package and folded into a “jack”. The result is a knife, on the one hand almost iron, and on the other - steel (Fig. 25).

Photo 26

Photo 27

6. Welding "spin". The connection area increases even more, but the complexity of the work also increases. Just do not think that someone chopped metal along with a chisel and put steel in it. It is actually a variation of the three-layer (“batch”) technology, just more economical in terms of the amount of steel used. For such welding, two iron strips were taken, drawn onto a wedge on one side, and a wedge-shaped steel strip was inserted there, with the side drawn inward. Then this package was forged and, thus, a blade blank was obtained (Photo 26)

There was another version of this technology. A strip of iron was bent along, like a gutter. A strip of steel was then inserted into this groove and welded together (Photo 27).

7. Welding "in the girth at the end." This is a variation of the technology mentioned above and again, the desire of blacksmiths to save steel (Fig. 28).

Figure 28

In addition, there were combined technologies. In this case, a three-layer (or five-layer) technology was used, but the steel center liner had only Bottom part, which was welded to the end or obliquely.

8. The production of Damascus steel is difficult to single out as a separate technology. This is a combination of the technologies already mentioned above. The main purpose of Damascus, as I already mentioned, is a decorative decoration that increases the cost of the blade. He did not perform other functions, since from a technical point of view, the combination of the same qualities can be achieved in much simpler ways. From the point of view of complexity, there are no particular difficulties in making Damascus. Anyone who was familiar with forge welding (and in ancient times every experienced blacksmith had such knowledge) could also make Damascus steel. And he did it when he came across a richer customer, because for its manufacture it was necessary to burn twice as much coal, spend more time, and even more metal was spent on waste. That's all. I think that this explains the small number of welding Damascus knives found on the territory of Ancient Russia. It was simply not profitable to do them. And even with regard to the few samples that have been found, there are doubts. Perhaps they are not locally produced, since spectral analysis shows that nickel is present in the metal, which was not found in local ores. It is similar to the case of an expensive foreign item purchased to show off. A large number of finds from welded Damascus in the places where they come across is determined, in my opinion, by one thing - the existence of a fashion for Damascus (which we observe today: Damascus has become fashionable again and therefore the market is saturated with it to the limit).

Photo 30. Damascus knife from Novgorod

In order to understand what an ancient Damascus welding knife was, one should understand the main thing: Damascus went only to the insert in the middle part of the blade, as a rule, when using end welding (Photo 29, 30). Very rarely - on the facings with the "three-layer" technology, mainly in the manufacture of swords. As you can see, in ancient times, the use of Damascus was limited, in contrast to the present time, when the entire blade is most often made from Damascus and then they try to convince you that this is a “super thing”. In ancient times, it never occurred to anyone to engage in such hack work. The same can be said about the “millions of layers” that are used to seduce the unlucky buyer. Ten layers give a wonderfully beautiful contrasting pattern, and this is sometimes all that is required (Photo 31). In fairness, I note that now there is a tendency to recruit Damascus from high-carbon and alloy steels. Such a blade will have an acceptable cutting edge, but you must admit that in this case we go far beyond the ancient technologies. In ancient times, Damascus blades had ordinary steel on the blade that did not have a pattern. Although, however, the process of manufacturing iron, and, consequently, steel, necessarily included “packing”, in which slag was squeezed out of “scream” porous iron with a hammer and the material was compacted and cleaned. So any piece of ancient iron is essentially Damascus. And if it is etched, then the “wild” pattern, as it is romantically called now, will appear on the surface. The Japanese have built this pattern into a cult on their katanas and achieve its manifestation on the blade by polishing. But the decorative purpose in this case is secondary, the pattern is, first of all, proof of compliance with the traditional technology of making a sword.

That, in principle, was all that was available to blacksmiths, regardless of where they lived - in Russia or in Africa.

Return to history

B.A. Kolchin established that the early Novgorod knives (narrow and with a massive butt - see "Blade" No. 1, 2005) were made according to the "three-layer" scheme. Its mass use in Ancient Novgorod is another proof of the continuation of the Finno-Ugric blacksmith tradition, which is characterized by this particular technology. It was used not only in knives, but also in other welded products with a steel cutting edge, such as spears, which was proved by relevant archaeological research.

Photo 32

Another interesting point. According to Kolchin, the wedge-shaped cross-section of the blade was given not by forging, but by grinding excess material from the side surfaces of the blade. This can be seen in the microstructure. If the knife were pulled back, the middle steel part would also be wedge-shaped (Photo 32)

Proceeding from the fact that with such a design of the blade, the knife can be used until complete grinding, Boris Aleksandrovich Kolchin decided that this was the most advanced technology. The further evolution of the Old Russian knife went, in his opinion, along the path of simplification. First, combined welding, when the central liner had a narrow steel blade on shallow depth. And then a complete transition to end and other technologies. Moreover, the steel part was constantly decreasing in size and by the XIV-XV centuries. turned into a completely narrow strip. Save, save, save! In addition, he sees the three-layer technology as more durable. Allegedly, it is this design of the blade that guarantees the knife resistance to breakage!

Photo 33

From the very beginning, I was intrigued by the description of the ancient Novgorod knife with its thick butt and narrow blade (I remind you - the ratio is 1: 3, that is, with a blade width of 18 mm - the butt at the base of the blade is 6 mm (Photo 33). Having made a knife according to these descriptions, I tried to use it. The result was very deplorable. Of course, you can cut something, but it is so difficult that it is not clear why the Novgorodians created so many problems for themselves. In short, I doubted Kolchin's statement that "this is the only form" of the blade for of that time. And a sinful thought crept into my mind. Indeed, a three-layer knife can be used almost until it is completely worn off. And what if the finds are exactly knives that have been sharpened to the utmost, which were thrown away (namely, this is the fate of many archaeological finds), when it is already completely it was impossible to use them because of the extremely narrow blade.This also explains the strange technology of turning a blade from a whole strip with abrasives, when it gets This is a “bulging wedge” rather than pulling back the blade by forging. At that time, turning a blade would have been, firstly, an insanely long task (with the means available at that time - a wet sandstone sharpener and a file with a rough hand-cut notch). But the most important thing is that it is not economical and fundamentally contradicts the ancient approach to such work. After all, the deeper into antiquity, the more expensive iron. In my opinion, they were simply “turned” to such a state during operation.

Photo 34

Remember, in the previous issue of “The Blade”, I said that the entire plane of the blade is sharpened on an ancient knife? And sharpening his knife, from time to time, the owner, pressing the cutting edge more strongly, involuntarily gave the blade section more and more convex shapes, thereby increasing the sharpening angle. And thus bringing the blade of his knife to a state where it is already problematic for them to cut something, the knife was simply thrown away. And this despite the fact that its core was steel, and theoretically it could be brought to working condition. And for this, it was necessary to slightly correct the edges of the wedge and make the butts thinner. But they didn’t do it, therefore, it wasn’t expedient! What can we say about completely turning a new knife?!

Kolchin himself took such an end result as the “starting point” of the new knife. Although he himself notes that the shape of one knife is not stable and changes by sharpening during operation (Photo 34). And he himself refuted the classification attempts put forward before him, proving that this is just one “universal” form of a knife that changes throughout its operation.

Meanwhile, knives with a welded steel cutting edge can have a wide blade only because they were thrown away much earlier, when the welded blade was ground. How much more progressive is the three-layer technology in this case? But didn’t the ancient blacksmiths reach the point in their economy that they welded steel on the blade only to the level when the blade section allowed the knife to be used normally?!

Regarding the strength of the blade, I also have certain considerations. The crack spreads across the blade, doesn't it? And she walks on steel. Therefore, there are no obstacles to its movement in the “three-layer” scheme. All that holds it is a fairly thick iron lining. Meanwhile, in face welding, an obstacle appears directly in the path of the crack. Based on my practical experience, I can say that three-layer knives break more often and immediately in half. But those welded to the end can “splinter”, they may have cracks on the blade, but the iron still does not allow the blade to break.

Three-layer knives have another very unpleasant feature, which I have repeatedly noted in the process of their manufacture. They are strongly “driven” during hardening. Warping, of course, is eliminated by cold straightening, after hardening, but I must say, again based on my practice, this is a rather risky operation, especially if the hardness of the steel insert exceeds 57 units on the Rockwell C scale. One false blow and a whole day of work down the drain - the blade shatters in half. Butt-welded knives “lead”, firstly, much less, and secondly, you can knock on them much more boldly after hardening. Isn't this the answer to the question why the vast majority of ancient European swords used end welding technology, and not a three-layer package? Indeed, for a sword, like nothing else, it is impact strength that is important, even to the detriment of hardness. A dull sword is better than a broken one.

Based on the foregoing, the following conclusion can be drawn: there was no decrease in the quality level of forging production in Ancient Russia. On the contrary, it evolved on the basis of accumulated practical experience, during which inexpedient, both for economic and technological reasons, production methods were discarded. Here I see a direct analogy with the “damask steel secret”, which was not so much lost as turned out to be unclaimed due to the appearance of such a material as alloy steel (steel, where, in addition to carbon, other elements are present in more or less significant quantities, such as chromium, molybdenum , vanadium, etc.). This made it possible to bring the steel closer in terms of technical characteristics to cast damask steel at much lower production costs. The main factor is the possibility of establishing large-scale production, which was especially important during the industrial revolution. As we can see, in our post-industrial era, interest in damask steel arose again and its secret was “rediscovered”!

But let's not dwell on this controversial issue. Let's go further. Now let's see how knives were made in Southern Russia, that is, in the vicinity of Kyiv and downstream of the Dnieper. Previously, it was believed that the same technologies were used here as in Novgorod. But thanks to the research of Ukrainian scientists, which I already mentioned at the beginning of the article, it turned out that knives were made differently here. It turns out that it was “one-piece forged” technologies that prevailed. According to Ukrainian scientists, more than half of the total number of finds made from iron and "raw" steel. A significant proportion of them are knives, "carburized" in ready-made. Welded technologies were used much less frequently. Knives made using these technologies - no more than a quarter of the samples found.

What is the reason for such a pronounced difference between Novgorod and Kyiv? At first glance, it is not clear what prevented the artisans of Southern Russia from using steel hardfacing of the blade, which significantly improves its working properties. But this is if there is finished steel! In the north, thanks to a good source of raw materials, iron and steel production was established as a separate industry, which was carried out by professionals. In addition, ready-made high-quality steel from Scandinavia arrived in Novgorod. Thanks to these circumstances, the northern cutler did not have to puzzle over where to get quality materials - he simply bought ready-made ones. In contrast to the north, in the southern Russian lands the problem of raw materials was much more acute. The communal blacksmith, and it was to this form that blacksmithing in the Kyiv lands gravitated, provided himself with raw materials. Therefore, the technologies used here are archaic and extremely simple. At the beginning of the article, a lot was said about the differences between the North and South of Russia, in terms of the availability of natural resources necessary for blacksmithing. Let me remind you once again of this very important conclusion, which was made due to the fact that I am not only a blacksmith, but also a student of ecology at the university. There is a lot of forest in the North (read firewood for burning charcoal) and swamp ore. But growing crops (food), due to the cold climate, is much more difficult than in the South. In the South, in the forest-steppe zone, the situation is exactly the opposite. The further back in antiquity, the more man depends on natural conditions. Therefore, first of all, those types of activity for which there were the most favorable natural conditions developed.

When a South Russian (Kyiv) craftsman needed to improve mechanical properties knife, the blade was subjected to cementation in finished form. After all, steel was prepared by the same cementation. What is the point of doing double work: first cementing the piece of iron for a long time, spending a lot of time on it, and then welding it to the product, spending a lot of coal on it. And the carbon that burns out at the same time degrades the quality of the steel. It is much more logical in such a situation to cement an already finished product.

Photo 35

According to B.A. Kolchin, this method (cementation) was very unproductive in comparison with welded technologies due to the complexity and duration of the process. For example, in order to create a more or less acceptable carburized layer on a knife, a minimum of 5 hours is required. But after all, cementation makes it possible to process several products at the same time. And it doesn't take much work. He dipped five knives into a pot of crushed coal, smeared it with clay and put it on the fire. Just know, throw firewood! And if you agree with a local potter, you can put several of these pots in the oven during firing! In this case, we can already talk about serial production of products in terms of the time, effort and fuel spent (Fig. 35).

Living mainly in an ordinary Ukrainian hut heated by a wood-burning stove, I came up with the following grouting method. I put a metal case filled with charcoal on the finished iron product, and then I simply put it in the furnace, along with firewood. As it turned out, a temperature of 900 degrees is achieved easily and simply, the main thing is that the firewood is dry (Photo 36). And if you drown with oak and chop them smaller, then in general the workpiece heats up almost white. So, along with heating my modest dwelling and cooking, I simultaneously work on the forge, moreover, not really straining and staying warm and full. A very Ukrainian approach, I must tell you! If a small layer is needed, a morning and evening firebox is sufficient. If deeper, then leave for two or three days).

Photo 36

I am sure that the blacksmiths of antiquity could not pass by such a method. I remember I even read somewhere about an old man who, at the beginning of the last century, melted damask steel in an ordinary Russian stove in a pot, and then the secret went with him to the grave. It is hardly possible to reach the temperatures necessary for melting the charge and preparing cast damask steel in a Russian furnace. But cementation followed by a long exposure, to form a coarse cementite network, in my opinion, is quite real (with the corresponding design features of the Russian furnace).

Summing up all the above, we can draw the following conclusion: technologies are determined not by the level of development of society or the ethnic characteristics of the people, but, first of all, by local natural conditions and economic feasibility.

Bogdan Popov.

It can be said without exaggeration that in the Iron Age, the knife, after ceramics, is the most massive category of archaeological material. These tools are found on almost every monument, and on some - in tens and hundreds. In Volkovysk, for example, 621 knives were found, and at the Nerevsky excavation site in Novgorod - 1444. The accumulated material is huge and it is impossible to indicate even approximately the total number of finds in Eastern Europe.

Knives are ordinary material, so they are published reluctantly and carelessly. Usually, researchers confine themselves to ascertaining the presence of these tools in archaeological complexes. Often, general considerations regarding their shape are illustrated by one or more drawings of knives, sometimes rearranged, without scale, without fixing areas of breakage and loss, without the information necessary for classification.

These circumstances make it so difficult to study knives that attempts to systematize them within Eastern Europe have never been made. At best, researchers stop at systematizing the knives of specific archaeological sites or certain archaeological cultures. But small volumes of the material under consideration, according to the law of small numbers, lead to excessively amorphous schemes, making it difficult to distinguish the most characteristic leading forms. Apparently, most archaeologists have an opinion about the complete uniformity of the forms of knives, because "a knife of the usual type" is a fairly common definition of these tools.

It should be said about one more, perhaps, universal delusion. In archaeological literature, the term "knife" refers only to the blade. It is not right. Blades of knives, sickles, braids. the tips of spears and arrows that came out from under the blacksmith's hammer are only parts of tools and weapons. Typically, the classification covers the preserved parts of objects. However, a single type of spearheads does not yet indicate a single type of spears themselves. The poles could be of different lengths, therefore, there could be different battle tactics. Arrowheads of the same shape could be from complex and simple bows.

The same applies to knives. The blades could be made locally, or they could be acquired as a result of an exchange or trade. Both at present and before, fragments of various tools were adapted for blades, which was reflected in the presence of random forms. So, for example, the results of a metallographic study of blacksmith products from the early Slavic settlement of Khanska-II, Kotovsky district of the Moldavian SSR, allowed G. A. Voznesenskaya to come to the conclusion that all the knives of this settlement were forged from a very heterogeneous metal used a second time. The raw material for the local blacksmith was mainly iron scrap 1 .

The external design of knives - scabbards, handles, methods of their manufacture, ornamentation, and the way they were worn were regulated by ethnic traditions. Only this set of concepts, and not a random set of features, can determine the "knife type". Therefore, it should be said with certainty. that there are no “ordinary type knives” at all, on the contrary, there are a huge number of types.

The author has been collecting data on the knives of the early Iron Age for a number of years. The richest collections of the State Hermitage, domestic and foreign literature were viewed. Total collected material about 10 thousand items. The collection of material and its systematization have not yet been completed, but what has been collected is sufficient for a number of preliminary conclusions that are directly related to the topic of interest to us.

Despite the apparent monotony, the knives of the second half of the 1st millennium AD. e. Eastern Europe clearly fall into four broad groups, in each of which, with a detailed study, numerous options can be distinguished.

Group I(Fig. 1) is represented by knives with the following characteristic features. The line of the edge of the back of the blades, representing a smooth arc with a peak in the center, directly passes into the handle. Blades come across with a weakly pronounced transition to the handle (Fig. 1, 5-6), but these differences are not fundamental. for both forms coexist and represent the same archaeological monuments. The blade, together with the handle, has a length of 6 to 20 cm. Fluctuations in size in either direction are known, but rare. A stalk in the form of a narrow triangle 4-5 cm long, as a rule, is separated from the side of the cutting edge by a smooth ledge. The maximum width of the handle is about half the width of the blade. It can be noted that the back of the knives (together with the handle) is identical in design to the back of the sickles common in the forest zone of Eastern Europe 2 , and this is not surprising, because the areas of these sickles and knives of the first group coincide.

The width of the blades of knives of group I is about 2 cm, the thickness is about 2 mm. The cutting edge of whole specimens is straight and only towards the end is bent upwards. The ratio of the length of the blade to the length of the handle is about 3:1 or 2:1. Heavily worn blades are extremely rare - the length of the blade, as a rule, exceeds the length of the handle.

The handles of the knives were wooden and round in cross section. The handle was hammered into the handle by about half its length. The scabbard was leather - there are no traces of wood on the blades.

The origin of Group I knives can be traced very clearly. Their prototypes are knives with a humpbacked back of the forest zone of the early Iron Age - Milogradskaya, Yukhnovskaya, Zarubnetskaya, Dnieper-Dvinskaya, Dyakovskaya, Gorodets and other cultures 3 . The process of straightening the back began in the first centuries of our era on the southern outskirts of the forest zone (Chaplinsky, Korchevatovsk, and other Zarubinets burial grounds) 4 . In the Upper Dnieper and Upper Volga regions, knives with a humpback back are still found in the 4th-5th centuries. (Trinity settlement near Moscow. Tushemlya in the Smolensk region, etc.) 5 . In the third quarter of the 1st millennium A.D. e. knives with a humpbacked back practically disappear, and knives of group I become the leading form in the territories of the Upper Dnieper region (starting from Novy Bykhov), the Upper Volga region. Baltic countries 6 and Finland 7 . They are found in the Baltic and Late Dyakovo sites around the settlement of Tushemlya (Tushemlya, Dekanovka, Uzmen, Bantserovskoye. Kolochin I, etc.), in the "long mounds" of the North-West of the RSFSR (Soviy Bor, Podsosonye, ​​Lezgi. Severik. Black Creek. Kryukovo) eight . In the VIII-XI centuries. these knives still exist 9 , but together with the knives of groups II and IV that appeared in the forest zone (see below).

Group II(Fig. 2) is represented by knives with the following characteristic features. The back of the blades is most often in the form of a weak arc, slightly raised at the edges. The handle is in the form of a narrow triangle, usually 3-5 cm long, separated from the blade by pronounced ledges 3-5 mm high. The ledges are most often asymmetric relative to each other and form obtuse angles with the back and the cutting edge. The greatest width of the cuttings is about half the width of the blade.

The width of the blades is up to 2 cm. The thickness is 1.5-2 mm. The cutting edge of well-preserved specimens is slightly S-shaped. The length of the blades ranges from 10 to 20 cm. Strongly ground blades are extremely rare. The ratio of the length of the blades to the length of the handle is approximately 3:1 or 2:1.

The handles of Group II knives were mostly wooden, round in cross section. The handle was driven into the handle about half its length. The scabbard was leather - there are no traces of wood on the blades.

The earliest pronounced forms of knives of group II appear on the so-called "post-Zaru Binets" monuments of the II-V centuries. and the Desenie and Middle Dnieper (Kazarovichi, Pochepskoe, Lavrikov Les, Tatsenkn, Khodorov, Shchuchnka) 10 . Since the second half of the 1st millennium, knives of this group have been the leading form on Slavic monuments in the territories of Czechoslovakia, Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, the GDR, Moldavia and the Ukrainian SSR 11 . In the Upper Dnieper region, knives of the P group appear around the 8th century. and. e. Them. along with knives of group I, they are found in the Smolensk and Belarusian groups of "long mounds" (Fig. 2. 12, 14-15) 12 . On the Gnezdovsky settlement, located on the right bank of the river. Mumps in the Smolensk region, the time of occurrence of which refers to the time not later than the start 9th century, her knives, with the exception of single ones, belong to group II 13 .

Unfortunately, published knives of the VIII-IX centuries. there are extremely few from the Upper Dnieper and the North-West of the RSFSR, so it is difficult to say how massively the I group is represented here. So far, one can only take revenge that these knives appear here no earlier than the 8th century, that they coexist with knives of group I, and that there is no evolutionary connection between these groups.

From the X-XI centuries. the vast majority of knives in graves and in rural-type settlements are already represented by group II 14 . The trend of separating the handle from the blade by ledges to the X-XI centuries. extends to all parts of the forest zone.

However, it would be wrong to consider only the influence of Group II knives as the reason for the change in the local traditional form. Approximately simultaneously with them, but already from the north, knives of the IV group appear (see below), under the strong influence of which, in contrast to the rural one, was the handicraft production of the northern Old Russian cities.

Group III (Fig. 3) is represented by tools in wooden scabbards. Knives in a wooden sheath were one of the elements of the cultures of nomadic tribes. steppe zone Eastern Qurope. North Caucasus, vast expanses of Siberia and Central Azin. The evolution of these antiquities is well traced from the Scythian and Sarmatian eras.

Of course, give a detailed classification, highlight all the nuances of the problem of the origin and division of knives group III impossible in one study. In this paper, the author considers only one of the variants of knives of this group - the early Middle Ages Alanian from the territories of the Don region and the North Caucasus. Nomads - Alans - were the eastern neighbors of the Iodneprovsk Slavs. The cultures of both have fundamental differences, and this can be clearly seen in the traditional forms of knives that characterize these ethnic arrays.

Alanian knives, represented by the antiquities of the Saltov culture, have already been considered in the literature. Several knives that characterize the Saltov culture as typical were noted by I. I. Lyapushkin 15 . S.S. Sorokin, examining the iron inventory of Sarkel and Velaya Vezha, divided all the knives found here into two sets and attributed about 40-50 items to the lower - Saltov - layer 16 . Recently, a group of Ukrainian archaeologists investigated the Saltovskaya knives of the basin of the river. Don. which they have divided into five different types 17 .

In these studies, mainly the material of the settlements was considered, a number of which are multilayer monuments. The richest material of burial grounds was not involved. Some details were not paid attention to, which are fundamental features for Saltovski knives. These shortcomings turned out to be so significant, and the identified features were so subjective, that the image of the early medieval Alanian knives, which can be imagined from these works, was distorted.

If we turn to the materials of the burial grounds of the VIII-IX centuries. In the Don region and the North Caucasus, one can be convinced that the Alanian knives represent a surprisingly stable, uniform series. They have the following characteristic features. The back of the blades forms a weakly pronounced arc, smoothly descending towards the nose. The cutting edge is arcuate, but steeper than the back. The central axis of the blade and handle is shifted towards the back. The length of the blades ranges from 6 to 14 cm. The thickness is 1.5 mm, the width of the blade at the base is 1-1.5 cm (depending on the length). The handle is subtriangular in shape, 2-4 cm long. The width of the handle at the base is about half the width of the blade. The ratio of the length of the blade to the length of the handle is slightly more than 3:1.

The handle is always separated from the blade by strictly perpendicular ledges, which are structural features. A narrow - 1.5-2 mm wide and thick iron clip was welded to the base of the blade, which is a kind of lock that locks the knife in the sheath. This is a very fragile, often unpreserved part. Its presence is evidenced by the strict perpendicularity of the ledges and the traces imprinted by it, which can be seen on the unrestored metal.

Several hundred such blades were found in Dmitrovsky. Ust-Lubyansky. Verkhnesaltovsky, Borisovsky 18 burial grounds and in burial grounds on the river. Durso near Novorossiysk, in North Ossetia, and in the vicinity of Kislovodsk 19 .

Group III knives, including Alanian ones, had a wooden scabbard. The Alanian scabbard was made from two halves of an originally split plank. The split edge was not subsequently processed, so the connection of the halves was perfect. After the wooden base was made, a leather sheath with a seam on the left side was stretched over it, apparently in a wet state. Very often, the scabbards were paired and built into one common leather sheath, and the cutting edges of the blades were located on opposite sides of each other. obviously to reduce the overall thickness of the scabbard. Sometimes a bronze or silver tip and clip were put on top of the scabbard. In cases of twin and triple scabbards, the clip and tip were common. The need for a leather case was determined by the fact. that the wooden planks of the Alanian scabbards were not fastened with pins.

The scabbard was narrow and thin. Their width slightly exceeds the width of the blade, the thickness is less than 1 cm. At the end, the scabbard is slightly tapered, at the end there is a straight or slightly arched cut. The length of the knives exceeds the length of the blade by about one third.

Unfortunately, several well-preserved Alanian scabbards have been published without a detailed description of their design 20 . The author did not have the opportunity to examine these finds. However, finds in the cemeteries of Polomsky, Brodovsky (Prikamye), Moshevoy Balka (Northern Caucasus), where sheaths of other variants of group III were found, make it possible to identify general patterns. characteristic of the whole group. Based on these materials, the missing parts of the Alanian sheaths can be reconstructed.

The socket for the blade was slightly oval in longitudinal section, so that only the clip and the tip of the blade were fixed in the scabbard. This feature is typical for all wooden scabbards, including ethnographic ones. If the nest ideally repeated the parameters of the blade, it would be impossible to pull the knife out of its sheath in conditions of high humidity.

In addition to the blade, part of the handle was also included in the sheath. This is evidenced both by the remains of the turf from the sheath on the handles, and the sheath from the Moshcheva Beam (Fig. 3. 12). The handles were unusually thin, oval in cross section. Their width was the same as the width of the blade, the thickness was about 0.5 cm. The handles were made from wood other than the sheath, or from a different material altogether. This is evidenced by the remains of a bright yellow substance preserved on the cuttings. One bone handle from the Dmitrovsky burial ground is known (Fig. 3,4). but this is a unique case. The shape of the handles was flat, long, slightly subtrapezoidal, with a slight expansion at the back end.

Paired and triple sheaths, a kind of cassettes, are known to the author only on Alanian monuments. In the burial grounds of Durso, sometimes up to 6 blades, i.e. 2-3 cassettes, were found with the buried. The thinness and lightness of the handles gives the Alanian knives good ballistic qualities, and the numerous knives in the graves and the completeness of their packaging allow us to make an assumption that the Alans used the scabbard as a throwing weapon.

Group IV(Fig. 4) is represented by tools with a narrow shank 6 to 12 cm long. The most common shank is 8-10 cm long. The tip of the stalk is awl-shaped. sometimes bent and riveted. Occasionally, there is a quadrangular iron or bronze washer on the bent tip. The bent tip and the washer, apparently, have been broken off and lost for many knives of this group. This design of the cutting is due to the fact. that he pierced the handle through and bent at the back end.

The blades of the sheath of group IV, as a rule, have clear ledges, about 2 mm high, separating them from the handle. The spine of the blades is straight and only slightly lowered at the end. The width of the blades is 1.5-2 cm, which is about two thirds of the width of the handle at the base. Back thickness 2-3 mm. It is difficult to indicate the true length of the blade, because this is, perhaps, the only group of knives in general, the blades of which are sharply worn, sometimes almost to the ground. Probably the most common were blades with a ratio to shank length between 2:1-1:1. The knives had a long cylindrical handle and a leather sheath - there are no traces of wood on the blades.

The origin of group IV knives can be traced quite clearly. In the Merovingian and Viking times they existed in Norway and Sweden 21 . From there, they spread to the territory of Finland, but here they exist along with knives of group I 22. In Eastern Europe, the same knives appear in the last quarter of the 1st millennium and. e. The earliest finds come from horizons E 3 -E 1 of the earthen settlement of Staraya Ladoga and from the hills in the vicinity of this settlement. In the future, these knives are distributed about Prnladoga. fall into the Baltic and the Yaroslavl Volga region. Wherever there are Scandinavian burials or Scandinavian materials, knives of group IV 23 are also known.

A very interesting situation develops in the northern territories of the Old Russian state in the 10th-11th centuries. Novgorod knives of this time have a strict narrow stern-backed blade with a slightly rounded end, giving it a dagger-like appearance, a long narrow handle, which is rarely less than 10 cm. A small but distinct ledge on the blade (Fig. 4, 17) 24 . Judging by the publications and constant references to Novgorodian materials, similar knives are known in the Baltic States, in all northern ancient Russian cities without exception, and in large burial grounds, such as Gnezdovo and others. 25

The shape and design of Novgorod knives of the 10th-11th centuries according to B. L. Kolchin was created on the basis of centuries-old experience in blacksmithing 26 . But whose experience? Knives of group I-III could not serve as a basis for Novgorod ones. In addition, they coexist with Group IV knives in parallel. Knives of the 10th-11th centuries, such as Novgorod ones, are closest to group IV, the evolutionary chain of which they continue. It is hardly possible to be mistaken in concluding that the Northern Russian urban craft production in the field of knife making in the 10th-11th centuries. was under strong Scandinavian influence.

At the beginning of the XII century. the picture changes dramatically. In Novgorod and other cities, knives appear, the blade of which has become wider and much thinner. The back on the blade slightly rises to the base and end, the ledges increase, the handle and stalk are shortened. the technological scheme of manufacturing is simplified (Fig. 2. 16) 27 . These are already Group II knives. Therefore, we can conclude that by the beginning of the 12th century, the influence of the Scandinavian form was weakening, and the urban North Russian handicraft production, following the rural district, switched to the manufacture of knives of a common Slavic type.

So, we have established that the Early Middle Ages Eastern European knives are divided into 4 broad groups with their own development history.

Group I is typical for the Baltic, Finnish tribes and the population of the Upper Dnieper and the North-West of the RSFSR in the second half of the 1st millennium AD. e.

Group II is typical for the population of the "post-Zarubinets" culture of the III-V centuries. in the Desenye and Middle Dnieper regions and for the Slavic population (starting from the 6th-7th centuries) living outside the forest zone. Around the 8th century group II knives appear in the Upper Dnieper region, and begin to spread by the 12th century. become universal.

Group III is typical for the nomadic population. In this paper, the Alanian version of the knives of this group was considered, which is one of the persistent elements of the culture of the early medieval Alans.

Group IV is typical for the German-speaking population of Northern Europe. In the middle of the VIII century. knives of this group appear on the northern borders of Eastern Europe, spread until the 12th century. have a strong influence on the Northern Russian urban handicraft production.

Bibliography

1. Voznesenskaya G. L. Results of a metallographic study of blacksmith products from the early Slavic settlement of Khanska-II of the Kotovsky district of the Moldavian SSR. Appendix to the monograph; R a f a l o v i ch M. A. Slavs of the VI-IX centuries in Moldova. Chisinau, 1972. p. 239-241.
2. Miiasyan R. S. Classification of sickles of Eastern Europe of the Iron Age and early Middle Ages. - ASGE, 1979. no. 20.
3. Tretyakov P. II., Schmidt E. D. Ancient settlements of the Smolensk region. M. - L.. 1963, p. 15, 165; Melny to about in with to and I O. II. Tribes of Southern Belorussia in the Early Iron Age. M.. 1967. p. 61.
4. Samoy l about in with and and I. M. Korchevatovskaya burial ground. - MIA, 1959, .Ms 70, tab. VIII; Pobol L. D. Slavic antiquities of Belarus. T. I, Minsk, 1071. fig. 66.
5. Smirnov K. A. Dkovskan culture. M.. 1974. tabl. II; Goryunova E. I. ethnic history Volga-Oka interfluve. - MIA. 1961, No. 94. p. 88.
6. Among the most famous monuments, Rekete, Pabariai can be mentioned. Raginians. Mezhuliany (Lithuania), Kalnieshn (Latvia), Leva (Estonia). Uzmsn (Pskov region). Tushemlya, Nekvasino. Demidovna (Smolensk region). Sarskoe. Popadya (Yaroslavl Volga region). Bantserovskoe. Kolochin. Voronin. Taimanovo (BSSR) and many others. Tretyakov I. P., Schmidt E. A. Ancient settlements ..., fig. 59. 8 10: Schmidt E. A. On the culture of the refuge towns of the Left Bank of the Smolensk region. - MIA, 1970, Jv® 176, fig. 3. 15-16; With peace and o in K. A. Dyakovskaya culture .... p. 38; Leontiev A.E. Classification of knives of the Sarsky settlement. - SA. 1976. No. 2. p. 33-44; Mooga I. Die Eisenzeit in Lettland bis etwa 500 n. Chr. /. Tartu Dorpat, 1929. Taf. XXXI; JJrtans V. Kalniesu otrais ka-pulauks.- “Latvijas PSR vestures muzeja raksti. Archeolo-gija*, Riga. 1962. tab. IX, 1-4.
7. Salo U. Die frUhromischc Zeit in Finniand. Helsinki. 1968. Abb. 100. S. 154; Kivikoski E. Kvarnbacken. Helsinki. 1963.
8. Burial ground on the lake. Kryukovo (Novgorod region). Report by S. N. Orlov to the Loya 24.03.72.
9. Danilov I. Excavations by students of the Institute of Mounds in the Gdovsky and Luga districts of St. Petersburg Province. and in the Valdai district of the Novgorod province. - In the book: Collection of the Archaeological Institute, book 3. St. Petersburg, 1880. v. 2. fig. 1. 3. 4; Essays on the archeology of Belarus. part 2. fig. 10. 12: Sizov V.I. Mounds of the Smolensk province. -MAR. SPb.. 1902, howl 28 p. 57-58.
10. Maksimov E. V., Orlov R. S. Settlement and burial ground of the second quarter of the 1st millennium. e. at the village Kazarovnch near Kyiv. - In the book: Early medieval East Slavic antiquities, l., 1974. fig. 6. 2: Maksimov E V. New Zarubinets monuments in the Middle Dnieper region. - MIA, 1969. No. 160. fig. 6. 8-Yu-. He is. Middle Podieprovye at the turn of our era. Kyiv, 1972. pl. XIII, 10, II. XIV. in: 3 a and o rn i s in F. M. Pochep settlement.-MIA. 1969. No. 160. Fig. 13. 19-21.
11 Rusanova I.P. Slavic antiquities of the VI-IX centuries. between the Dnieper and the Western Bug. - MYSELF. 1973, no. EI-25, tab. 32; Havlyuk P. I. Early-Vyanskns settlements in the basin of the Southern Bug. - In the book: Early medieval East Slavic antiquities. L, 1974. fig. 11, 20; Lyapushkin I. I. Novotroitskoye Settlement. - MIA, 1958, No. 74, fig. ten; Rikman E. A., Rafalovich I. A. Khynky I. G. Essays on the history of culture of Moldova. Kishinev. 1971, fig. 12; Yura P.O. Ancient Kolodyazhin. - Archaeological monuments of the URSR. Kiev. 19G2, v. 12, fig. 29. 10; Vzharova Zh- Slavic and Slavic-Bulgarian settlements in the Bulgarian land of the VI-XI century. Sofia, 1965, p. 18. 32; Hachulska-Ledwos R Material at archeologiczne Nowej Hut in Krak6w 1971, vol. 3; Cilinska Z. FrUhmittelalterliches Graberfeld in Zetovce - "Arehaeologica Slovaca-catalogi", Bratislava 1973. vol. 5.
12. Chernyagnn H. H. Long mounds and hills - MIA. 1941, No. 6. tab. VIII. 28; Sedov V.V. Long mounds of the Krivichi. - CAM, 1974. no. PI-8, tab. 27, 18.
13. Lyapushkin I. I. New in the study of Gnsz-lov. - AO 1967. M., 1968. p. 43-44; Schmidt E. A. To the question of ancient settlements in Gnezdovo. Materials for the study of the Smolensk region. Smolensk. 1974, no. VIII. rice. 7.13.14.
14. Schmidt E. A. Mounds of the XI-XIII centuries near the village. Kharlapovo in the Smolensk Dnieper region. .Materials for the study of the Smolensk region. Smolensk. 1957. issue. 2. with. 197-198; Sedov V. V. Rural settlements central regions Smolensk land. - MIA. 1960, .V? 92. fig. 36.
15. Lyapushkin I. I. Monuments of the Saltovo-Mayak culture. - MIA, 1958, No. 62. p. 125, fig. eighteen.
16. Sorokin S. S. Iron products of Sarkel - Belaya Vezha. - MIA, 1959, No. 75. p. 147.
17. Mikheev V.K., Stepanskaya R.B., Fomin L.D. Knives of the Saltovskaya culture and their production. - Archeology. Kyiv. 1973. issue. 9. p. 90-98.
18. Collections of Verkhnesaltovsky (partially), Ust-Lubyansky. Dmitrovsky. Borisov burial grounds are kept in the State Hermitage.
19. Shramko B. A. Antiquities of the Seversky Donets. Kharkov. 1962. p. 282; Kuznetsov V. A., Runich A. P. The burial of an Alanian combatant of the 9th century. - SA. 1974. No. 3. fig. 1.14; Koren I to V. A. Alanian graves of the VIII-IX centuries. North Ossetian. - SA. 1976, No. 2, p. 148-157; Runnch A.P. Rock burials in the vicinity of Kislovodsk. - SA, 1971, X? 2. with. 169. fig. 3.7;
20. Shramko B. A. Antiquities .... p. 282; Runich A.P. Burial - fig. 3.7.
21. Peterson I. Vikingetidens redskaper. Oslo. 1951, fig. 103-110, s. 518; Arbman H. Birka i die Griiber. Ta-fcln-Uppsala, 1940.
22. Hackman A. Die alterc Eisenzeif in Finnland. bd. 1. Helsingfors. 1905, S. 12-13.
23. Orlov S. N. Newly discovered early Slavic soil burial ground in Staraya Ladoga. - KSIIMK. 1956, hch 65. p. 94-98; Gurevich F.D. Works of the Slavic-Lithuanian detachment of the Baltic expedition-KSIIMK. 1959, No. 74. fig. 41: Leontiev A.E. Classification ..., fig. I, 7; Raudonikas W. I. Die \"or-mannen der Wikingerzeit und das Ladogagebiet. Stockholm. 1930; Nerman B. Grobin-Seeburg Ausgrabfungen und Funde. Stockholm. 1958. Abb. 209.
24. Kolchin B. A. Iron-working craft of Novgorod the Great. - .MIA. 1959. L? 65. p. 48.
25. Sizov V. I. Mounds .... p. 53.58; Leontiev A.E. Classification ..., fig. I.7.
26. Kolchi n B. A. Decree. op., p. 53.
27. Ibid., p. 48.

Slavic handmade knives: Damascus steel on the official website. The best shop in Russia.

According to archaeological excavations Slavs had knives almost from the very beginning of the formation of society. Over time, the knife has changed and improved. At the moment, the knives have a very attractive appearance and excellent quality. We make all knives by hand and when you receive your product, it will look even better in your hands than in the photo. We love our work and are proud of it.

• Russian knives
• Knives from the Slavs
• Damascus steel
• Store (official site)
• Handmade
• Buy
• Reviews

Russian knives

The knife helped Slavic ancestors to solve many issues. Such as the:

• economic
• food production (hunting, fishing)
• ritual

I want to say more, the knife in Slavic tradition played a huge role and is considered part of the Russian (and many other nations) costume. The centuries-old history of our people is filled with ups and downs, but at all times Russian knives have been distinguished by quality and aesthetics. Continuing the glorious tradition of our ancestors, our craftsmen make masterpieces that really please their owner.

Knives from the Slavs

The traditional Slavic knife is part of the culture and tradition of our ancestors. In Russia, the knife was considered a sign of a free person. Just recently, even in the Russian Empire, the sale of weapons was allowed and did not require any special permissions. The situation changed only in 1900 - 2000, when a sharp refusal began from the filing of the state. Early in 1900, knives were distributed throughout Russia in huge quantities.



Damascus steel

Making Damascus steel takes a lot of time and effort, but it's worth it. In order to make a product from this material, a deep understanding of blacksmithing and talent is required. For many people, Damascus steel is super technology and is the highest bar in knife and ax making. The most important quality is that the layers are alternated to achieve ideal parameters. All work is done by hand and the products in your hands will look much better than in the photo. In addition to the fact that the knife has the highest technical characteristics, it also enchants with its beauty and aesthetics. Our masters are number 1 specialists in Russia and for almost 10 years there has not been a single bad review. The works are really very worthy and suitable as a gift for the dearest people of your heart and of course for yourself.

Shop (official site) knives

Our site is an official store that operates through the work of hundreds of people. The Slavic site is a huge platform that develops and promotes old Slavic crafts. We have united the best specialists in one team and are guided first of all by quality. At your service we can offer a huge selection of knives from the best blacksmiths in Russia. Good work in good hands. Glory to Rod!



Handmade knives

The main advantage of our knives is handmade and individual approach to each product. In truth, knives and axes are made on a very high level. Vast experience in creating masterpieces. Absolutely all buyers are satisfied with their purchases from us and come back again. We became friends with many and became good friends.

Buy knives

In order to buy knives right now, you just need to call us:

• +7-988-896-83-12
• Viber +7-988-896-83-12
• Whatsapp +7-988-896-83-12

Knives reviews

In order to see the reviews, you need to find a group on the Vkontakte social network called: Slavic Lavka Grad. In the discussions you will find reviews and if it is convenient for you to place an order through a social network, then write to Natalya Slavina. The order will be placed within short time. To each buyer an individual approach.