Kate Middleton's bare chest was estimated at one and a half million. Crazy paparazzi and kate middleton Kate Middleton in a transparent dress

ALL PHOTOS

"Oh my God! Photos that will fly around the world ... the future Queen of England as you have never seen her before ... and never will see again," reads the loud headline on the cover of the yet unreleased issue of the magazine published on the website
closermag.fr

The possible publication of the French magazine has already been reported to William and Kate, who are on their ten-day tour of the Far East, who in turn issued an official statement in which they noted that they were "saddened by the fact of violating their privacy
Global Look Press

French magazine editor Laurence Pugh says the exclusive issue will see the light of day, ironically that Prince Harry, whose "naked" photos have made a lot of noise, will feel "not so lonely" when Closer publishes pictures of his sister-in-law
The Daily Mail

The British royal family, apparently, is waiting for another scandal associated with the publication of candid photographs. French magazine Closer has announced its new issue, which is said to feature exclusive topless photos of Kate Middleton, Duchess of Cambridge, BBC reports.

"Oh my God! Pictures that will fly around the world ... the future Queen of England as you have never seen her before ... and never will see her again," reads the loud headline on the cover of the still unreleased issue of the magazine published on the website. The statement is illustrated by blurry low-quality footage, according Apparently taken from a distance and subsequently greatly enlarged. The photo, however, guesses the famous married couple. In the very issue, as Closer promises, readers are waiting for 12 more exclusive shots on two spreads.

The scandalous photos of a young woman sunbathing by the pool were taken during a short vacation of Prince William and his wife in the French castle of the Queen's nephew Lord Lineley in Provence. At the same time, it is specified that the British media were initially offered to buy them out, but they refused the dubious deal.

The possible publication of the French magazine has already been reported to William and Kate, who are on their ten-day tour of the Far East, who in turn issued an official statement in which they noted that they were "saddened by the fact that their privacy was violated."

Meanwhile, advisers to the royal family have already recognized the authenticity of the racy photos and are now negotiating with lawyers and actively discussing all possible scenarios. "It is possible that the British royal court will try to impose an international ban on their distribution," a source at St. James's Palace, the London residence of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, told ITAR-TASS. However, it is also possible that Buckingham Palace will allow the publication to be published, leaving it to the judgment of the public, representatives of the royal family emphasized.

"All this is very sad and takes us back 15 years (when Princess Diana died). We have always adhered to the position that the Duke and Duchess have the right to privacy, even more so when they are on vacation in their own pool," the royal concluded. representative.

Meanwhile, French magazine editor Lawrence Pugh is confident that the exclusive issue will see the light of day, ironically that Prince Harry, whose "naked" photos from a Las Vegas vacation made a lot of noise earlier this month, will feel "not so lonely" when Closer posts pictures of his sister-in-law.

According to British media, the couple hope that the publishers of Closer magazine, on the cover and pages of which provocative pictures were published, will compensate them for moral damage.

ON THIS TOPIC

This story happened a long time ago, but the townsfolk still remember the luxurious, uncensored flaunted on the front pages of several tabloids at once.

French paparazzi in 2012 took a telephoto lens resting by the pool, Kate and William. Middleton was sunbathing topless that day. Photographers also captured how William affectionately smeared his wife with sunscreen, and Katherine substituted him with various parts of the body, including the buttocks.

In total, more than 200 shots were taken, some of them photographed the potential future Queen of Great Britain. Reporters captured how Middleton, hiding behind a towel, changed her swimming trunks from a bathing suit on the balcony of a private house.

The Royal Court of Great Britain condemned the publication of private photographs of the duchess obtained in this way. William and Catherine themselves called the situation "grotesque" and "passing the limits of the permissible." The British prime minister's office also said that members of the royal family "have the right to privacy."

Several people involved in the distribution of defamatory images will go to court in a friendly formation at once: the editor of Closer magazine in France, the executive director Ernesto Mauri and the main culprits - photographers Cyril Moreau and Dominique Jacovides. All these people are accused of invasion of privacy.

Immediately after the publication of these images, there was already one court that banned the further distribution of images. But this order was violated. The Topless Duchess was shown on their pages by other European publications, in particular the Italian, Irish newspaper Daily Star and glossy magazines about stars in Sweden and Denmark. Still naked, Kate appeared in the newspaper La Provence, whose employees will also stand trial.

Immediately after the publication of candid pictures, the duke and duchess issued a statement in which they admitted that they were "saddened by the fact that their privacy was violated." Moreover, it was said that Catherine was literally seething with indignation. After all, up to this point, Middleton had never in her life found herself in such an awkward situation when everyone could see her “uncomfortable” photos anywhere in the world.

It was said that the published pictures could hit hard on the impeccable reputation of Kate Middleton. Others, however, assumed that provocative photos would only increase Katherine's popularity rating and give her a "pepper". And so it happened. The British adore their duchess, and she has crowds of fans all over the world.

In this story, I am interested in the ethical aspect. It's no secret that the shamelessness of the paparazzi has repeatedly been the cause of tragedies for public people. Recall at least Princess Diana, who tried to break away from persecution.
The incident I am talking about did not end in tragedy, fortunately, but it is scandalous. Probably, many people remember him, although everything was 5 years ago, then a decent storm broke out. The matter went to court. The story surfaced again today in the media, because the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have decided on the amount they want to get through the court for photos in which Kate is depicted with bare breasts.

The ducal couple demanded one and a half million euros from the defendants.

According to British media, the couple hope that the publishers of Closer magazine, on the cover and pages of which provocative pictures were published, will compensate them for moral damage. Many people still remember the magnificent chest of the Duchess, uncensored on the front pages of several tabloids at once.
French paparazzi filmed Kate and William, who were vacationing by the pool, with a telephoto lens from the highway. Middleton was sunbathing topless that day.

The pictures were candid, but Closer is convinced that they in no way degrade Middleton. According to them, the photos show a "beautiful, loving and modern" couple.

On the morning of Tuesday, May 2, employees of the glossy magazine appeared before the court of the city of Nanterre on charges of violating the right to privacy.

Several people involved in the distribution of defamatory images will go to court in a friendly formation at once: Laurence Pio, editor of the Closer magazine in France, Ernesto Mauri, the chief executive, and photographers Kirill Moreau and Dominique Jacovides, the main culprits. All these people are accused of invasion of privacy.

Immediately after the publication of these images, there was already one court that banned the further distribution of images. But this order was violated. The topless Duchess was shown on their pages by other European publications, in particular the Italian magazine Chi, the Irish newspaper Daily Star and glossy magazines about stars in Sweden and Denmark. Still naked, Kate appeared in the newspaper La Provence, whose employees will also stand trial.

It was said that Katherine was literally seething with indignation. After all, up to this point, Middleton had never in her life found herself in such an awkward situation when everyone could see her “uncomfortable” photos anywhere in the world.
It was said that the published pictures could hit hard on the impeccable reputation of Kate Middleton.

Others, however, assumed that provocative photos would only increase Katherine's popularity rating and give her a "pepper".
And so it happened.
The British adore their duchess, and she has crowds of fans all over the world.

You can sympathize with people who fell under the scope of paparazzi lenses. Just try to imagine what it's like to find out that your photos are procrastinating in a public space.
Is it possible to film people without their consent? Is it okay to post photos of unsuspecting people online?

The post is decorated with romantic photographs of the heirs to the throne of Great Britain.

The impudence of the paparazzi who hunt famous people goes beyond any limits. Sometimes this even leads to tragedies - take, for example, Lady "Dee", who crashed in a car trying to hide from prying eyes and lenses. In our case, there is no place for tragedy, but there is every reason for scandal.

It was five years ago when a significant storm raged. The case even went to court. The story has again become relevant in today's media because the grandson of the British Queen and his wife, who bear the title of the Dukes of Cambridge, decided on the amount they wished to take through the court for photographs in which Kate Middleton is depicted with bare breasts.

2

The ducal couple are demanding 1,500,000 euros from the defendants.

3

4

According to the British media, the famous couple hopes that the publishers of Closer magazine, on the cover and pages of which provocative pictures were printed, will compensate them for moral damage. And men all over the world still remember Kate's magnificent breasts, which, without any censorship, flaunted on the covers of several newspapers and magazines at once.

5

Paparazzi from France caught a couple relaxing by the pool with a telephoto lens from the highway. Kate was sunbathing without a bra that day.

6

The pictures were very candid, but representatives of Closer are sure that they in no way humiliate the dignity of the Duchess. They say that the photo shows a "beautiful, loving and modern" couple.
Yesterday morning, employees of the gloss appeared before the court of the city of Nanterre on charges of violating privacy rights.

7

Several people who were involved in the distribution of defamatory images were put on trial at once: Laurence Pio, editor of the French magazine Closer, Ernesto Mauri, the chief executive, and photographers Kirill Moreau and Dominique Jacovides, the main defendants. These people are accused of invasion of privacy.
Almost simultaneously with the publication of these photos, a court took place, which banned the subsequent use of the pictures. However, this ban was violated. Topless Keith featured on his pages a number of European publications, in particular the Italian magazine Chi, the Irish newspaper Daily Star and glossy magazines about stars in Sweden and Denmark. In addition, almost naked Middleton appeared in the newspaper La Provence, whose employees will also appear in court.

8

Gossip testified that Kate was seething with indignation. After all, before that, she had never hit as “chickens in cabbage soup”, when the whole world could see her “naked” photos.
It was also said that the published photos could hurt the duchess' impeccable reputation.

9

Others hoped that such pictures would only increase Kate's popularity ratings and give her "pepper".
And so it happened.
The British love their duchess very much, besides this, she has almost the whole world in her fans.
We sympathize with the people who fell under the scope of the paparazzi cameras. Just imagine what it's like to find out that your photos are procrastinating in a public space.

More recently or a long time ago, or more precisely, in 2012, a photo of Princess Kate Middleton hit some European media. Naturally, the royal family did not like this. Some representatives simply became furious))) These pictures are called

"Photo on the balcony"

The photos were taken on vacation in Provence, on an open balcony. And how to call it an invasion of privacy if the Princess of Cambridge takes off her top on the balcony, I repeat, the open balcony, and then she also changes her underpants, and mind you also on the balcony)))

And then the invasion of privacy and prosecution, not even the paparazzi who made extremely bad pictures, but the publishing houses that published them.

The daughter of Silvio Berlusconi spoke about this even then

- In our work, we adhere to the principles of complete publishing freedom in all cases, even when it comes to the first persons of states.

And I think Kate herself is to blame for this turn of affairs. She very often finds herself in such delicate situations. Here is a small selection of the Princess of Cambridge's joints. I think if you are a princess, then you need to watch yourself and think with your head, too, royally smart.

The British Queen is concerned about the appearance of the wife of Prince William. Queen Elizabeth II insisted that the Duchess of Cambridge, Kate Middleton, abandon short skirts in favor of more conservative outfits.

Photo during a visit to Australia. Again the wind, again the sparkle of the fifth point)))

In this photo, Kate Middleton is returning from her bachelorette party. Glad to madness, but you have to move your legs. In the comments to this photo I saw: Kate secretly celebrated a bachelorette party from the paparazzi. What a mystery is here, there it is all))) Between the legs.

This photo of the princess's butt with lace panties was taken in London on May 31, 2007. So why is it glowing like this? Correspondents forced to do this?

This was also caught somewhere, but I think it’s just nosy paparazzi, Katya has nothing to do with it. Cunning bastards caught, one moment and all. Running to sell a photo)))

Well, this is also, only a side view))))

As the world media write at the flower-laying ceremony at the memorial in New Delhi, the effect of Marilyn Monroe happened to the Duchess, probably everyone remembers the film star on the ventilation grill?

By the way, such a case is not the first one that got into the lenses of cameras. Previously, Middleton has reluctantly demonstrated her underwear in public several times. What, according to rumors, Queen Elizabeth II is terribly angry, promising to assign a special person to her daughter-in-law who will hold the hems of her dresses.

Well, what the hell to wear such a dress in windy weather (I read it in the comments to the post, it seems) The dress is of such a cut that it’s not that the hem will pull up, but you can fly away.