Rome and the Hellenistic world summary. Presentation on the topic "ancient greece and rome". Brief history of Greece

Brief excerpt from the beginning of the book(machine recognition)

$PEKO-
^//atin
Cabinet
USEUM
iraeco-
^ATINUM
VI. KASHCHEYEV
THE HELLENISTIC
WORLD AND ROME
ele
WAR, PEACE AND DIPLOMACY
220-146 B.C.
MUSEUM
GRECO-LATINUM
MOSCOW, 1993
V.I.Kashcheev
Hellenistic
MIRIRIM
WAR, PEACE AND DIPLOMACY
in 220-146 BC
GRECO-LATIN CABINET
Yu.A. SHICHALINA
MOSCOW. 1993
BBC 63.3(0)322
K31
Kashcheev V.I.
Hellenistic World and Rome: War, Peace and
K31 diplomacy in 220 - 146 BC. e. - M.:
Greco-Latin Cabinet, 1993. - 374 p.
The book deals with intense and dramatic
period in the history of the Eastern Mediterranean - the conquest
Hellenistic states by Rome. The era is presented to the reader
grandiose wars and intensive diplomatic activity.
Shows the specifics of war as the main means
interstate relations, the military organization of Rome and
Hellenistic states, various means and methods of diplomacy,
elements of international law, certain aspects of ideology and
religion. The author examines the diplomatic representations of that
time and trends in the development of Roman-Hellenistic
relations in the light of the most important moral values ​​of the Hellenes and Romans.
Reviewers:
Department of History of Ancient Greece and Rome
St. Petersburg State University (head
Department - Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor E.D.
Frolov);
Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor A.I. Zaitsev;
Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor A.S. shofman
Edited by Doctor of Historical Sciences,
professor V.G. Borukhovich
tg 0503010000-004
C C05(03)-93 Undeclared
ISBN 5^87245-007-9 About V.I. Kashcheev, 1993
IN MEMORY OF THE FATHER
IVAN GRIGORYEVICH KASHCHEEV
... Where to find a man so
frivolous or negligent, who does not
would like to understand how
under what political system
the entire inhabited world was in less than
fifty-three years under one authority
Romans? There's never been anything before
similar.
Polybius 1.1.5
When the strong with weapons guards
his house, then his estate is safe;
when the strongest of him will attack him and
defeat him, then take all his weapons,
that he hoped for, and will divide
stolen from him.
Gospel of Luke. 11.21-22
The judgment is that the light
came into the world; but people loved darkness more,
than light, because their deeds were evil;
for whoever does evil hates the light
and does not come to the light, lest the deeds be exposed
him, because they are evil, and he who does
the truth comes to the light, so that the deeds may be manifest
him, because they are made in God.
Gospel of John. 3.19-21
W&^^I^I
End of the 3rd - first half of the 2nd centuries. BC e. -
time of great changes in the history of the ancient world: in
confrontation came together the Hellenistic world and Rome,
ancient Greek civilization and Roman civilization,
two met in many ways different from each other
culture; the results of this confrontation were astonishing
only contemporaries, to whom Polybius belonged,
but also historians of subsequent eras. Many of them
tried to give their answer to the question that was
put by Polybius: “In what way and under what
political structure, almost the entire inhabited world
turned out to be in less than fifty-three years under a single
by the power of the Romans? But time passed, and to this
the researchers returned to the question again: not because
whether that in the past, as in a mirror, every era
trying to see his face?
The initial time limit of the study -
220 BC e. During this period, there were changes in
political life of the largest Hellenistic
states (rulers changed almost simultaneously in
Syria, Egypt and Macedonia), and the Romans
more regular and closer relations are being developed with
states of the Hellenistic world. It is no coincidence that the main
Polybius begins his narrative with this
dates. As a final time limit,
it would be to choose 168 BC. e. - year of completion
the Perseus War, the collapse of the Macedonian monarchy and
8
FOREWORD
lytic defeat of the Seleucids1, for on this date
originally intended to stop
narration by an ancient Greek historian. And yet, more accurately
this goal take 146 BC. e. - year of Roman victories
over the Carthaginians and the Achaean League, year
destruction of Carthage and Corinth, when the Romans in
international relations of the Mediterranean
put a dot over the "i".
Thus, the chronological framework of this
studies (220 - 146 BC) coincide with
temporary boundaries, which finally
chose Polybius for his "General History" -
the most important and valuable source for reconstruction
relations between the Hellenistic states in Rome.
Of the many economic problems
political, social and spiritual life of peoples
Eastern Mediterranean, I chose only one -
interstate relations 2. At the same time, complex
spectrum of relations between the Hellenistic states
and Rome in the field of ideology and religion is affected
only in so far as they have
direct connections with the political sphere: in war and
diplomacy. This also explains why the role of ideology,
propaganda and religion in relations between states
Eastern Mediterranean not covered here
deep and detailed, but only outlined in general
features. And the value of economic factors3 or, to
example, the Olympic Games2* in international relations
1 Compare, for example: Klose P. Die volkerrechtliche Ordnung der helle-
nistischen Staatenwelt in der Zeit von 280 bis 168 v. Chr. miinchen,
1972.
Compare: Zhigunin V.D. International relationships
Hellenistic states in 280 - 220 years. BC e. Kazan, 1980.
3 See: Larsen J.A. Roman Greece // An Economic Survey of
Ancient Rome. Baltimore, 1938. Vol. 4. P. 259-498.
4 See, for example: Bengtson Η. Die Olympischen Spiele in der An-
tick. Zurich; Stuttgart, 1971. S. 83ff.
9
FOREWORD
the yahs of the Hellenistic world are not affected at all:
these are good subjects for special works. Here
forms are considered first.
interstate relations and diplomacy^, so the means and
methods of foreign policy of the Hellenistic states
and Rome are not studied on their own, but in the context
moral values ​​of Hellenes and Romans.
The period of the formation of the Roman
Mediterranean power - this is the time when there was close
unity of peoples and states of all
Mediterranean: West and East. This unity seen
even Polybius, became the subject of his historiography.
However, while working on the book, I deliberately left in
side of the question of the role of Carthage in international
relations of the Mediterranean region at the end of III
- the first half of the II century. BC e. as because
Roman-Carthaginian connections are a theme
independent research6, and because
relations between Carthage and the Hellenistic states in
the period under review is unsatisfactory
presented in our sources. Main focus at work
made on interstate relations in
Eastern Mediterranean 7.
^ Compare: Gruen E.S. The Hellenic World and the Coming of Rome.
Berkeley; Los Angeles; L., 1984. Vol. 1-2.
" For the main writings on this problem, see: SAN. 2nd ed. Vol. 8.
Cambridge a.o., 1989. P. 558-560.
"In the book, I draw on some of the material and conclusions from earlier
published his articles: 1) The first Roman Macedonian
war in the interpretation of English and American antiquities //
ΑΜΑ. 1986. Issue. 6. S. 42-57; 2) The slogan of the liberation of the Greeks in
interstate relations of the Eastern Mediterranean
(III - II centuries BC) // ΑΜΑ. 1990. Issue. 7. S. 41-50; 3)
Treaty of Philip V and Antiochus III in the interpretation of ancient and
modern authors // ΑΜΑ. 1990. Issue. 8. S. 44-52; 4) Polybius and
The foreign policy of Rome at the end of the III - the first half of the II centuries. before
n. e. // From the history of socio-ethical and political-legal
ideas. Saratov, 1990, pp. 44-51; 5) Mediation and arbitration in
10
FOREWORD
I sincerely thank Professor F.U. Walban-
ka (Cambridge), who not only edited
English text of the summary placed in the book, but also
helped solve the financial problems of its publication; without
his works, advice and personal participation, this monograph
would never see the light of day.
I would like to thank the reviewers:
colleagues working at the Department of the History of Ancient Greece
and Rome of St. Petersburg University, first
the turn of the head of the department, Professor E.D.
Frolov and associate professor A.B. Egorov, Professor of Kazan
University A.S. Shoffman and, in particular,
Professor A.I. Zaitsev (St. Petersburg), whose
kind remarks and wishes contributed to
improving the book. My thanks to scientific
editor professor of Saratov University
V.G. Borukhovich, as well as associate professor T.P. Katz
(Saratov), ​​who gave valuable advice in preparing the manuscript
to print.
Candidate of Historical Sciences I.Kh. Garipzanov
(Kazan) and associate professor L.R. Rothermel (Omsk)
gave me the opportunity to get acquainted with the manuscripts
their dissertations on English,
American and German historiography
antiquity. ST. Vasiliev (Saratov) took the decision
some technical issues related to the publication
books, and (together with D.E. Lukonin) read
proofreading. L.S. Obraztsova (Moscow) and K. Transhel (Ch-
pel hill, Sev. Carolina) contributed important
corrections in proofreading resumes in English.
M.Yu. Neborsky (Moscow) assisted me in
compiling indexes. To all of them I am sincerely grateful.
I would like to express my gratitude to those who
helped: at Kazan University - to colleagues and friends
from the scientific seminar "Antique Monday", in Sa-
relations between the Hellenistic states and Rome // From
history of ancient society. Lower Novgorod, 1991. S. 38-49.
11
FOREWORD
Ratov University - colleagues in the department
history of the ancient world, in Moscow - to employees
Editorial Department of the Greco-Latin Cabinet. I am deep
I am grateful to Professor Yu.A. Shichalin (Moscow),
generously agreed to publish my book.
V. Kashcheev
February 1993
@X^fN©
ΦΦΦΓΓΊΦΦΦ
MAIN PROBLEMS OF HISTORIOGRAPHY
1. Polybius: History and Politics
Polybius is a writer deserving
the greatest trust.
Titus of Libya. History of Rome. 30.45.5
victorious wars and successful
diplomatic activity of Rome at the end of III - first half
2nd century BC e. in just a few decades
significantly changed the nature of international
relations throughout the Mediterranean, had a strong
influence on the fate of many states and peoples
ancient world. Witnessing the victories of the Roman
weapons, Polybius tried to understand and explain the complex
interrelations of various states during this period and
created a fundamentally new type of historical
narrative, embodied in his "Universal
history"1. Roman historians since the time of Fabius Pictor,
On the formation of the historical and political concept of Po-
libium, see: Erbse Η. Zur Entstehung des polybianischen Geschichts-
werk // Rheinisches Museum. 1951. Bd. 94. S. 157-179; Fritz K.v.
The Theory of the Mixed Constitution in Antiquity: A Critical Ana-
13
POLYBIUS: HISTORY AND POLITICS
pursuing their political and personal goals, each
covered Roman foreign policy in their own way
history; for obvious reasons, they had access to
information that cannot be found in Polybius.
Critically analyzed, this material
can be used by modern researchers
Roman history. And yet, it is Polibievo
description is basic for reconstruction
Roman foreign policy in the Eastern Mediterranean.
Life path and writings. Polybius was born
in 208 BC e.2 in Megalopolis in a well-known
family (his father Likorta was even a strategist A

slide 2

Stages of History

  • Crete-Mycenaean (late III-II millennium BC). Minoan and Mycenaean civilizations.
  • Polisny (XI-IV centuries BC). Ethnic consolidation of the Greek world.
  • Hellenistic (IV-I centuries BC). Short-term assertion of the world power of Alexander the Great. Origin, rise and fall
  • Royal period (mid-VIII century BC - 510 BC)
  • Republican (510-30 BC)
  • Imperial (30 BC - 476 AD)
  • slide 3

    Brief history of Greece

    • At the first Crete-Mycenaean or Helladic stage, the speakers of the Greek language - the Achaeans are just beginning to settle in the Balkans
    • They are dominated by tribal relations, their main occupation is the introduction of agriculture. At the end of this stage, they begin to develop writing.
    • The policy stage is divided into 3 stages:
    • Homeric (prepolis) period, "dark ages" (XI-IX centuries BC)
    • Archaic Greece (VIII-VI centuries BC).
    • Classical Greece (V-IV centuries BC).
  • slide 4

    Homeric period

    • The Homeric period is characterized by the transition of tribal relations into early class relations. But even more this period is characterized by uncertainty, because. almost the only source of information about him are the poems of Homer, which for a long time were considered a literary myth.
    • Based on the poems, during this period there was a war between the Achaeans (Greeks) and the Trojans. The people of that time were famous for their military exploits and sacredly believed in their gods.
  • slide 5

    archaic period

    Archaic period (VIII-VI centuries BC) The beginning of the period is considered to be the date of the establishment of the Ancient Olympic Games in 776 BC. e. It is characterized by three main processes that had a decisive influence on the development of Greek civilization:

    1. Great colonization - the development by the Greeks of the coasts of the Mediterranean, Black, Azov Sea. Development of commodity production and a significant increase in the number of foreign slaves, overpopulation of policies.
    2. Registration of the policy as a special type of community. The craft separated from agriculture, the Greek city-states became large craft centers. 2 types of policies are being formed: trade and craft (Athens) and agricultural (Sparta). The transition from bronze to iron. The introduction of iron in all spheres of production, economic recovery.
  • slide 6

    Development of production as a prerequisite for the crisis

    Contradictions begin to emerge in the minds of the people:

    • free - slave
    • rich - poor
    • community - personality
    1. The development of commodity production and economic recovery were directly related to the development of slavery
    2. Cheap slave labor made it possible to obtain a higher income and was more actively used in the main branches of production.
    3. The polis (or ancient) becomes the leading form of land ownership - only citizens had the right to own land on the territory of the policy; free people who were not citizens (meteks) did not have this right. There is a socio-economic stratification
    4. In this regard, there is an intensification of the political struggle between the tribal nobility and free citizens.
    5. The isolation of the individual from the community is manifested in the peculiarities of the literature of that time.
  • Slide 7

    Archaic Literature

    “I myself escaped death.
    And let my Shield disappear.
    No worse than a new one I can get"
    Archilochus 6th century BC

    • The heroic time of the dark ages, described in the Iliad and Odyssey by Homer, is being replaced by a lyrical time filled with intimate feelings and meditation.
    • Representatives of the lyrical genre were Archilochus, Sappho, Alkey, Alkman, and others.
    • It is noteworthy that in the Hellenistic time, the time when the crisis actually occurred, it was the canon of lyric poets (VI-IV centuries BC) that was assessed as worthy of study.
  • Slide 8

    Greek science

    • The motto is "Knowledge for the sake of knowledge!"
    • Great aptitude for theory. Greek thinkers neglected practical application, considering it the lot of the not free.
    • Discoveries in mathematics, physics, mechanics - served either the cause of destruction: military vehicles and weapons, or a means of entertainment: mechanical products on the stages of theaters. And only in the last turn to facilitate labor productivity. As a result, the gap between spiritual and material culture
  • Slide 9

    Science vs religion

    • Science, with its laws, laws and inventions, strongly influenced people's ideas about the essence of the world and its processes. Moreover, both positively, inspiring and facilitating life, and negatively undermining former values, customs and beliefs.
    • Therefore, in 433-432. BC e the Athenian soothsayer Diopif, an adherent of antiquity and an enemy of "sophistical" innovations, proposed a law on judicial responsibility for "non-recognition of recognized gods and the introduction of new deities." It was under this article that Socrates was convicted in 399 BC.
  • Slide 10

    Classical Greece (V-IV centuries BC)

    • The growing conflict between trade and craft types of policies with democratic forms of government and backward agrarian policies with an aristocratic system - the Peloponnesian War (431-404 BC) - the defeat of Athens
    • The overall result is the weakening of all Greek policies.
    • The war undermined the economic and political potential of Hellas
    • The flourishing of the economy and culture of the Greek city-states in the 5th century. BC.
    • The victory of the Greeks in the Greco-Persian wars (500-449 BC) is the rise of Athens, the Delian League is created (led by Athens).
  • slide 11

    Crisis of the policy - IV century BC. e.

    • A feature of the crisis was that it took place in conditions of economic recovery.
    • Wealth accumulated mainly in the hands of non-citizens - meteks and freedmen who performed the functions of "organizers" of handicraft production, financiers, moneylenders, creditors, merchants who profited from domestic and international trade. Citizens were forbidden to engage in all these activities, as well as the exploitation of the silver mines in Lavrion, as this was considered unworthy of their occupations.
    • Large land holdings were formed, in which land ownership was no longer associated with polis citizenship.
    • Tyranny was established in a number of policies. Tyranny limited the rights and freedoms of the citizens of the policy, controlled even their private lives. The policies could no longer defend themselves with the help of a citizen's militia. A clear sign of the crisis is mercenarism. Policies hire an army, which becomes paid.
    • The main measure of value is money, it is they who determine the position of a person in society.
  • slide 12

    Hellenism

    • Weakened policies by war among themselves, the loss of national unity - the disunity of society became easy prey for the Macedonian kingdom of Philip II in 338 BC. e.
    • Then, under the leadership of the son of Philip Alexander of Macedon (336-323 BC), the Greek-Macedonian state will expand its borders and establish itself as a world power
    • Due to even greater expansion of borders, even greater stratification of society, the mood of the inhabitants will be characterized by individualism and cosmopolitanism.
    • The urban economy gradually begins to decline even under Alexander, while the norms and ideals of ancient Greece spread throughout the world, but not in Greece. After the death of Alexander, intrigues and wars for the throne and division of the empire will begin.
    • In 146 BC. The Roman Empire will inflict another defeat on the Achaean League and subdue Greece
  • slide 13

    Roman Empire on its way to dominance

    • The early history of Rome is marked by the dominance of the tribal aristocracy, the patricians, except for whom no one could sit in the Senate.
    • And the Roman aristocratic education was reminiscent of the Spartan one with a special attention to patriotism, discipline, courage and military skill.
    • But already in 287 BC. e. the struggle of the plebeians with the patricians will end in favor of the former. This will lead to
    • to a change in the social structure of Roman society: having achieved political equality, the plebeian estate ceased to differ from the patrician estate; noble plebeian families, together with the old patrician families, constituted a new elite - the nobility. This contributed to the weakening of the internal political struggle in Rome and the consolidation of Roman society, which allowed him to mobilize all his forces for active foreign policy expansion.
  • Slide 14

    Rome is a world power, Rome is a decaying Republic

    • After the conquests of the III-I centuries. BC e. Rome became a world power, and the Mediterranean became an inland Roman lake.
    • But the expansion of borders, the increase in power, wealth, the penetration of other cultures (Hellenistic), the increase in population, mainly due to slaves and foreigners, inevitably undermines the old values ​​and standards. So it was with Greece, so it was with Rome
    • The Romans themselves of that time, feeling the changes in society not for the better, "sounded the alarm" developing - the theory of "decline in morals":
    • “Valery Maxim said that a tendency to a less strict lifestyle began to appear after the second Punic War (201). Livy believed that the occupying army returning from Asia (187) brought with them to Rome the habit of extravagance. Polybius, considered the disappearance of ancient modesty and frugality as a consequence of the war with Perseus (168). Posidonius began his period of decline with the destruction of Carthage (146), and in this he was followed by Sallust. Thus, the dating of the beginning of the decline of morals, given by the Roman authors themselves, fluctuates between 290 and 146.
  • slide 15

    Decline theory

    The activities of the "Censor" from 182 BC Cato the Elder:

    • The political program was based on the struggle against the "new abominations" (novaflagitia) and on the restoration of ancient customs;
    • In the first place were, undoubtedly, such vices, allegedly brought from a foreign land to Rome, as self-interest and greed (avaritia), the desire for luxury (luxuria), vanity (ambitus). The penetration of even these vices into Roman society was, according to Cato, the main cause of the decline of morals. Interests that take precedence over civil, public interests.

    Letters of Sallust to Caesar (approx. historically controversial moment)

    • The theme of the decline of morals is developed in the most detailed way by Sallust. He states first of all the depravity of the people, and then the weakness, impotence of the senate. The loss of land was the first impetus that caused the further decomposition of the people.
    • He identifies 2 main vices that develop in Roman society: the lust for power - ambitio and the passion for money - avaritia
    • Only wealth is respected, virtue is trampled on, poverty is considered a disgrace, honesty - as if ill-intention.
  • slide 16

    Policy Crisis

    • The cause of the crisis of ancient Roman morality was the crisis of the policy, and the "decline in morals", the breaking of traditions, the departure from ancient norms and foundations - only an inevitable consequence.
    • It is unthinkable to manage a huge state and exercise in it not only one's material but also spiritual superiority, based on moral criteria and norms that have developed in a small urban community and are designed specifically for members of this closed community.

    The crisis of the policy and morals - the fall of the Republic:

    • “the contradiction between the political form of the republic in the 1st century. BC e. and its social class content. The wide Mediterranean market, the new groups of provincial slave owners, the complex relationship between Italy and the provinces, between citizens and "non-citizens" urgently demanded a new system of government. It was impossible to manage a world power with methods and apparatus suitable for a small community on the Tiber. The old classes, whose interests were reflected by the Roman Republic, by the end of the 1st century. BC e. disappeared or degraded. The Italian peasantry has almost completely disappeared; nobility and equestrianism as a result of civil wars, in a significant part, died physically or went bankrupt.
  • Slide 17

    Fall of the Republic, 1st century BC e.

    • Seizure of power by the dictator and tyrant Sulla 82-79 BC
      The introduction of proscription - the hunt for "enemies of the people" and rewards for their heads - denunciations, murders, gaining some at the expense of the death of others
    • Rise of Spartacus 75-71 years. BC.
      Rebellion of slave gladiators thirsting for freedom and justice
    • Julius Caesar from 46 to 44 BC e. laid the principles of dictatorship in the Roman Republic, which became the basis for the emergence of the Roman Empire, which actually took shape under the rule of Caesar's heir, Octavian Augustus.
  • Slide 18

    Empire of intrigue

    • After the conspiracy and assassination of Caesar, an eternal struggle ensued for the throne.
    • For the title of the first emperor, troops were gathered, Caesar's adopted son, Augustus Octavius ​​(left) and Caesar's former ally Mark Antony (right) wove intrigues.
    • According to a similar scenario, the history of the empire developed until its collapse into Eastern and Western parts.
  • Slide 19

    Crisis of the 3rd century AD

    The crisis is preceded by constant successive emperors, barbarian raids, a civil war of 193-197. and corruption

    Military bloc:

    • demographic crisis. Unwillingness to serve in the army - young people chopped off the thumb of their right hand. Empire and ancestral conquest no longer inspired
    • Large landowners also did not want to give their labor to the public service.

    Economic block:

    • The decline of middle landownership. Crushing large holdings and renting them out. The high cost of taxes on the transportation of products leads to a rupture of ties between individual provinces
    • The destruction of the monetary system. So in Roman Britain it comes to the point that money completely loses its significance and trade relations begin to be introduced through barter.
  • Slide 20

    In the crisis of the Roman Empire, its further collapse, the English historian of the 18th century E. Gibbon names 5 reasons

    1. The destruction of the institution of the family
    2. Decreased sense of personal responsibility
    3. exorbitant taxes
    4. Striving for hedonism
    5. The Decline of Religion

    In 410, Rome was taken by the Visigoths, and on September 4, 476, the leader of the Germans, Odoacer, forced the last Western Roman emperor, Romulus Augustus, to abdicate. Thus ended the 12-century dominion of Rome.

    View all slides

    General history. Ancient world history. Grade 5 Selunskaya Nadezhda Andreevna

    § 45. Rome and the Hellenistic world

    Rome and the Hellenistic World

    The whole of Roman history appears to us sometimes as an uninterrupted series of wars. The causes of each subsequent war were, as it were, enclosed in the results of the previous one. The steady expansion of Roman boundaries inevitably led to a clash between Rome and the states, to the borders of which its possessions approached.

    Remember which states are called Hellenistic.

    By defeating Carthage, Rome became the master of the western Mediterranean. Now the eyes of the Romans turned to the east. There were rich lands. The most important of these were Egypt, Syria and Macedonia. The balance of power between these states for a long time decided everything in the Hellenistic world. There was a period when there was a balance recognized by all: alone, not one of the countries dared to oppose Egypt, but Egypt would not have been able to defeat the other two strongest states at the same time. Then the power-hungry rulers of Syria and Macedonia began to fight against the influence of Egypt in neighboring lands. Egypt could not stop them and began to surrender its positions. On the other hand, small states were indignant, whose freedoms were trampled under the onslaught of warlike neighbors. Thus, the inhabitants of the Greek cities began to look first at Carthage, and then at the victorious Rome in search of a counterweight to the influence of Macedonia. Rome took advantage of this, intervening in the struggle under the pretext of protecting the weak from enslavement.

    Notable Syrians. ancient mosaic

    Rome's wars with Macedonia and Syria

    The state of the Hellenistic world closest to Rome was the Macedonian kingdom, which at the end of the 3rd - beginning of the 2nd century BC. e. King Philip V ruled. He was a talented commander and an active ruler who tried to expand the boundaries of his kingdom to the entire Balkan Peninsula. Rome fell upon the Macedonian kingdom with all its might. During the two Macedonian wars, the Romans managed to drive Philip out of Greece. In order to firmly gain a foothold in the Balkan Peninsula, they entered into an alliance with the Greeks, who were at enmity with the Macedonian king.

    Coin of the Kingdom of Syria

    The Syrian king Antiochus III also sought an alliance with the Greeks, counting on their help in the fight against Rome. He crossed with the army to the Balkans, but the Greeks did not support him, and in the battle with the Romans the Syrian army was defeated. After that, the Romans moved the war to Asia Minor. Their legions were led by the brother of the famous Scipio, who was chosen consul that year. The winner of Hannibal himself, who was his adviser, actually led the troops. In 190 BC. e. Antiochus was defeated and, according to the concluded peace, lost all his possessions in Asia Minor.

    The forces of the once great states - the Macedonian and Syrian kingdoms - were exhausted. After the Battle of Pydna in 168 B.C. e. The Romans completely subjugated Macedonia. Twenty years later, the uprising of the Greeks, dissatisfied with the interference of Rome in their affairs, was suppressed. As a warning to the vanquished, the Romans completely destroyed Corinth, one of the ancient cities of Greece.

    Remember at what time the period of the highest power of the Macedonian state fell.

    "Carthage must be destroyed!"

    While the Romans did not remember Carthage, busy with affairs in the East, he gradually recovered from defeat, growing rich in maritime trade. However, Rome could not reconcile itself to the revival of its ancient enemy. Each speech of one of the most authoritative Roman senators, Mark Porcius Cato, ended with the words: “And yet, I believe that Carthage must be destroyed!” Finally, the Senate passed a verdict: Carthage was to be destroyed, and its inhabitants to be resettled away from the sea, which for centuries fed them and ensured the prosperity of the city.

    Senate meeting in Rome. Modern drawing

    In 149 BC. e. The Romans laid siege to Carthage and the Third Punic War began. At first it seemed that this war would be easy. But in the face of inevitable death, the inhabitants of Carthage showed amazing courage and resilience, defending themselves from their old enemy. Men and women, old and young, strengthened the walls and gates, forged weapons day and night without rest. The siege lasted for about three years. The assault on the city was led by Publius Scipio Emilianus, the grandson of the brave consul who died at Cannae, adopted by the family of Scipio, the winner of Hannibal. When Carthage was taken and plundered, a furrow was drawn through the whole city with a plow as a sign that it was forbidden to settle in this place forever and ever.

    Ruins of Carthage

    Mithridatic Wars

    The last powerful opponent of Rome in the Hellenistic East was the Pontic king Mithridates VI Eupator (120-63 BC). His kingdom was located on the northern coast of the Black Sea. Mithridates VI was a remarkable personality, he achieved power and glory in spite of many adversities. He was distinguished by his enormous growth, he knew no equal in the art of riding and archery. But Mithridates was tempted not only in military affairs, but also in the art of the ruler. Possessing the ability to enter into profitable alliances, he was able to unite around him all the opponents of Rome. The Armenian king, sea pirates of the Mediterranean, and Greek cities became his allies.

    In 88 BC. e. a huge army of the Pontic king attacked the Roman possessions in Asia Minor. Mithridates managed to win the sympathy of local residents who were dissatisfied with the Romans. The invasion of the Pontics at first seemed to them a deliverance from oppression. The Romans were expelled from many cities in Asia Minor. Then the army of the Pontic king landed in Macedonia, and soon the entire Balkan Peninsula rose up against the power of the Romans.

    Mithridates VI. Image on the coin

    The wars with Mithridates dragged on for a long twenty years. The first of them ended with the expulsion of the Pontics from Greece, the second led to the final collapse of the rule of Mithridates in Asia. The content of a large army forced the king to demand money from the Greek cities, to which he himself promised freedom from taxes. The Greeks stopped supporting Mithridates. In the end, the Pontic king lost all his allies and committed suicide. In Rome, the death of a formidable enemy was celebrated as the greatest victory. The wars with Mithridates effectively ended Rome's struggle for dominance over the Hellenistic world. Egypt was the last of the great Hellenistic states to recognize Roman power over itself in 30 BC. e.

    Using the map and text, tell about the wars of Rome with the Pontic kingdom.

    Summing up

    During the long wars, Rome subjugated the largest Hellenistic states - Macedonia, Syria, the Bosporan kingdom, Egypt.

    146 BC e. Destruction of Carthage.

    2nd-1st century BC e. Roman victories over the Hellenistic states.

    Questions and tasks

    1. What Hellenistic rulers and states did the Romans have to fight?

    2. Who in the Hellenistic world was the last dangerous enemy for Rome?

    3. Try to explain why the Romans chose to destroy the rich trading cities of Corinth and Carthage to the ground.

    From the book Sexual Life in Ancient Greece author Licht Hans

    From the book History of Europe from ancient times to the end of the 15th century author Devletov Oleg Usmanovich

    Question 4. Hellenistic period (late 4th-1st centuries BC) The young ruler was faithful to the oath given by his father, and soon began a war against Persia. The Persian state, at that time already quite weak, covered a vast territory: the highlands of Iran , most of Central Asia, all

    From the book History of the Ancient World [with illustrations] author Nefedov Sergey Alexandrovich

    Chapter V. The Hellenistic World

    From the book History of Ancient Greece author Andreev Yury Viktorovich

    Chapter XXIII. Hellenistic Egypt 1. Territory One of the largest and typical Hellenistic states was Egypt, ruled by the Ptolemaic dynasty, descendants of one of the closest commanders of Alexander the Great, a representative of a noble Macedonian family

    From the book Greece and Rome [The evolution of military art over 12 centuries] author Connolly Peter

    Hellenistic period After the death of Alexander, when his military leaders began to fight for power, the manufacture of siege engines reached unprecedented heights. When Demetrius Poliorketes ("Besieger of the Cities") laid siege to Salamis in Cyprus, he built a tower nine stories high.

    From the book Greece and Rome, an encyclopedia of military history author Connolly Peter

    Hellenistic period After the death of Alexander, when his military leaders began to fight for power, the manufacture of siege engines reached unprecedented heights. When Demetrius Poliorketes ("Besieger of the Cities") laid siege to Salamis in Cyprus, he built a nine-story tower

    From the book Civilization of the Etruscans the author Thuillier Jean-Paul

    CLASSIC AND HELLENISTIC PERIODS (475-27 B.C.) Kuma (474 ​​B.C.): a fatal blow? . BC e. and up to the beginning of the era of the Roman Empire, we will cover a large

    From the book Ancient Greece author Lyapustin Boris Sergeevich

    CHAPTER 22 The Hellenistic World THE STATE OF THE SELEUCIDS The general appearance of the Hellenistic era was primarily determined by several major monarchical states. The largest of these kingdoms in terms of territory was the so-called Seleucid state - after the name of the ruling

    From the book Ancient Greece author Lyapustin Boris Sergeevich

    ELLINISTIC EGYPT Egypt was under the rule of the Ptolemaic dynasty (without exception, all the kings of this dynasty bore the name Ptolemy in memory of their ancestor Ptolemy I, one of the most active participants in the wars of the Diadochi). The Ptolemaic kingdom was second in size, and

    From the book Essay on Gold author Maksimov Mikhail Markovich

    Hellenistic East Egypt After the death of Alexander the Great, on the council of the "Diadochi" - the heirs, who became six of his commanders - the state was divided. The so-called Hellenistic states were formed. A new period of ancient history began.

    From the book History of Culture of Ancient Greece and Rome author Kumanetsky Kazimierz

    Hellenistic Egypt The position of Greek culture in the Ptolemaic kingdom was determined by the fact that the Greeks there numbered at most a few hundred thousand, while the total population of the country was approximately 10-12 million people. supreme power in

    From the book Art of the Ancient World author Lyubimov Lev Dmitrievich

    Greece and the Hellenistic world.

    From the book General History. Ancient world history. 5th grade author Selunskaya Nadezhda Andreevna

    § 45. Rome and the Hellenistic World Rome and the Hellenistic World The whole of Roman history appears to us sometimes as an uninterrupted succession of wars. The causes of each subsequent war were, as it were, enclosed in the results of the previous one. The steady expansion of Roman boundaries inevitably led to

    From the book History of the Ancient World. Volume 2. The Rise of Ancient Societies author Sventsitskaya Irina Sergeevna

    Lecture 16: Hellenistic Egypt. Features of Hellenism. During the period of the fierce struggle of the generals for the division of the power of Alexander in the Eastern Mediterranean, elements of new economic and political relations took shape. Masses of Macedonians and Greeks - merchants,

    From the book King Herod the Great. The Embodiment of the Impossible (Rome, Judea, Hellenes) author Vikhnovich Vsevolod Lvovich

    Chapter 18. HEROD AND THE HELLENISTIC WORLD The end of the era of civil wars in the Roman state. The court life of Herod as a Hellenistic king, the multinational composition of his advisers and courtiers. patronage of the Hellenistic arts and sciences. Nicholas of Damascus and others.

    From the book History of Western Philosophy by Russell Bertrand

    Subject : story.

    Lesson topic In: Rome and the Hellenistic States.

    Class : 5.

    Lesson Objectives :

    subject : to ensure the assimilation of material about the conquests of the ancient Romans;to teach to draw conclusions about the features of the transformation of Rome into a great Mediterranean power.

    Metasubject : continue the formation of students' skills to structure educational material, work with various sources, compare

    Personal : to teach to give and explain a moral assessment of the actions of the Romans in the territories they conquered.

    Danilov D.D. General history. Ancient world history. Grade 5: textbook. for educational institutions / D.D. Danilov, E.V. Sizova, A.V. Kuznetsov, S.S. Kuznetsova, A.A. Nikolaev. – M.: Balass, 2012. – 288 p.: ill. (Educational system "School 2100")

    Lesson stages

    Teacher actions

    Student actions

    Formation of UUD, assessment technology

    I. Creation of a problem situation. Formulation of the problem.

    After the victory over Carthage, Rome began the struggle for the subjugation of the countries of the Eastern Mediterranean.

    Look at the map on page 222.

    Which states are the largest?

    Let's find out with you what opinions and facts historians express about the conquests of the Romans.

    We open with 221, read the conversation

    Archaeologist and Sources.

    What is the opinion of the Archaeologist about the conquering Romans?

    What is the opinion of the Source? What evidence does he support his opinion?

    What contradiction arises between the opinions of the Archaeologist and the Source Expert?

    Let's try to formulate the problem of today's lesson and write it in a notebook.

    Writes the question formulated together with the students on the board.

    Read the dialogue.

    Working with a map.

    Macedonian, Syrian, Egyptian.

    The archaeologist believes that the Romans

    were conquerors, even in their

    In prayers, they asked the gods for the expansion of the lands subject to them.

    In wars they defended the independence and honor of their people. According to Plutarch in 196 BC. the Greeks were declared "the Roman Senate and the consul Titus Quintius Flamininus, having defeated the Macedonian king Philip, give independence to the Greek cities, free from garrisons and taxes with the right of self-government."

    Together with the teacher, they formulate a question, write it down in a notebook.

    Regulatory UUD

    1. Define a problem.

    2. Put forward versions.

    3. Own semantic reading.

    4. Analyze (highlight the main thing).

    5. Compare objects according to specified criteria.

    6. Draw conclusions.

    7. Make tables.

    Communicative UUD

    1. Express your opinion, arguing it.

    2. Create oral and written texts.

    Personal UUD

    1. Evaluate the actions of the Romans.

    II. Activity planning.

    To answer the main question of the lesson, what do we need to do?

    Expressing points of view(you need to find out the goals that the Romans pursued in the conquests, which states were conquered).

    III. Finding a solution to a problem. Discovery of new knowledge.

    Read the 1st paragraph from item 1 on

    With. 221-222 and write down the objectives of the conquest in your notebook.

    We found out that the new conquests gave the Romans power,

    wealth and land.

    And now let's trace the chronology of the conquests of the Macedonian kingdom by the Romans.

    To do this, you now need to use the textbook (pp. 222-224) to compile a table "The conquest of the Macedonian kingdom by Rome."

    One of the students tells about the events, based on the table. The rest follow the map on page 222.

    They work with the textbook, write down the goals of the conquests in a notebook.

    Make up a table.

    Listen, work with the map.

    IV.Problem solution expression.

    What answer to the question for today's lesson can you give?

    Sample output on the issue:

    The Romans were conquerors

    since they subjugated the entire Mediterranean to power, establishing their own rules on these lands.

    Record the conclusion in a notebook.

    v.Application of new knowledge.

    Why did Rome manage to take over the Eastern Mediterranean?

    Did the Romans do justice to Carthage, Corinth?

    They give different versions.

    VI.Homework.

    Paragraph 36, paraphrase.

    Paragraph 37, answer questions orally (remember what we know).

    Recorded in a diary.


    Lesson plan: 1. Features of the socio-economic development of the Ancient Greek and Roman states 2. Skepticism: based idea, representatives 3. Epicureanism: based idea, representatives 4. Stoicism: based idea, representatives 5. Cynicism: based idea, representatives.






    Sextus Empiricus (n. II century) ancient Greek physician and philosopher Sextus Empiricus (n. II century) ancient Greek physician and philosopher Pyrrho from Elis (c. 360 BC 270 BC) ancient Greek philosopher Pyrrho from Elis (c. 360 BC 270 BC) ancient Greek philosopher Representatives of Stoicism


    Epicureanism is a philosophical doctrine based on the ideas of Epicurus and his followers. Tetrafarmakos: one should not be afraid of the gods; should not be afraid of death: “As long as we exist, there is no death; when there is death, we are no more”; the good is easily attainable; evil is easily tolerated.


    Epicurus (342/341 BC 271/270 BC) Ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus (342/341 BC 271/270 BC) Ancient Greek philosopher Titus Lucretius Kar (99 BC) 55 BC) Roman poet and philosopher Titus Lucretius Carus (99 BC 55 BC) Roman poet and philosopher Representatives of Epicureanism


    Stoicism is a philosophical school that arose during the early Hellenistic period and remained influential until the end of the ancient world. It is divided into logic, physics and ethics: the structural relationship of the three parts serves as a doctrinal expression of the universal "logicality" of being, or the unity of the laws of the world mind-Logos in the spheres of knowledge, world order and morality.


    Zeno of Kition (346/336//262 BC) Ancient Greek philosopher Zeno of Kition (346/336//262 BC) Ancient Greek philosopher Seneca (4 BC 65 AD) Roman Stoic philosopher, poet and statesman Seneca (4 BC - 65 AD) Roman Stoic philosopher, poet and statesman Representatives of Stoicism


    Cynicism - claims that the best life lies not just in naturalness, but in getting rid of conventions and artificialities, in freedom from possessing superfluous and useless things. to achieve good, one should live “like a dog”, combining: simplicity of life, following one's own nature, contempt for conventions; the ability to firmly defend their way of life, stand up for themselves; loyalty, courage, gratitude.


    Diogenes of Sinop c. 412 BC e.June 10, 323 BC BC) the ancient Greek philosopher Diogenes of Sinope c. 412 BC e.June 10, 323 BC e.) the ancient Greek philosopher Antisthenes of Athens 444/435 BC. e. 370/360 BC e.) Ancient Greek philosopher, founder of Cynicism Antisthenes of Athens 444/435 BC. e. 370/360 BC e.) Ancient Greek philosopher, founder of cynicism Representatives of cynicism


    Philosophy of the Hellenic-Roman period (IV century BC - V century AD) Hellenic periodRoman period Stoicism periodIV - II centuries. BC I-II centuries. representatives of the main idea of ​​skepticism period IV-I centuries. BC II-III centuries. representatives of the main idea of ​​Epicureanism period IV-III centuries. BC I-II centuries. representatives of the main idea of ​​Cynicism period V-I centuries. BC I-IV centuries. representatives main idea


    Task: arrange the proposed theses and the names of the founders in accordance with the philosophical concept: Zeno from Kition, Seneca, Epictetus, Marcus Aurelius Epicurus Titus Lucretius Car Antisthenes of Athens, Diogenes of Sinop, the first Christian sects Pyrrho, Sextus Empiricus 1. You should not be afraid of nature, because besides it, atoms and emptiness, there is nothing. 2. One should not be afraid of death, because there is no afterlife, and death is only the disintegration of the body into atoms. 3. There is no need to be afraid of the gods, who, although they exist, do not affect human life in any way, because they do not want to disturb their serene life. 1. It is in the power of a person to be a wise man to obey the reason of nature or a fool to ignore the reason of nature. 2. Only intelligent life is good. 3. Good agreement with the main law of all nature, the law of self-preservation. 4. Live virtuously follow this law in everything.


    1. Social cataclysms prove the illusory nature of the priority of the general over the individual. 2. Only the individual is natural and real. 3. Inner freedom is achieved by neglecting everything that is not necessary; reasonable self-restraint in food, clothing and other natural needs. Key questions: 1. What are things? 2. How should they be spoken about? 3. What is the use of our judgments? Answers: 1. Nothing definite can be said about things. Truth and falsehood are indistinguishable. 2. Therefore one should refrain from any categorical judgments about things. 3. Refraining from judgment is the best way to find peace of mind.


    Marcus Aurelius - (April 26, 121 March 17, 180) Roman emperor (gg.) Marcus Aurelius - (April 26, 121 March 17, 180) Roman emperor (gg.) Live every day as if he was the last, never fussing, never being indifferent, never taking theatrical poses - that's the perfection of character. Our life is what our thoughts turn it into Think about what the stoic wanted to say in this phrase



  • Have questions?

    Report a typo

    Text to be sent to our editors: