Universal electronic card as a sign of the last times
The machine of world power, the global System, is replacing the shattered conglomeration of nation-states. Orthodox see in it the visible features of the predicted kingdom of Antichrist. Secular thinkers call it the matrix of "electronic fascism"...
The publicized economic crisis, the threat of a food crisis looming over the peoples, fads, tsunamis, and man-made disasters seem to be preparing the advent of some kind of global police state capable of distributing resources and “shepherding peoples with an iron rod.” What are the possible parameters of this superproject?
Obviously, this state will be based on the ideas of social, and perhaps national, and some other segregation. Humanity will be divided into a narrow layer of selected sages and an uneducated majority, reduced to a state of homogeneous gray biomass. Already, social elevators have been stopped in many countries of the world. This is especially noticeable in Russia.
The collapse of the education system, the systematic destruction of the national culture - is this not part of the project of a world state?
The ideology proposed to the masses will probably be some kind of quasi-religious doctrine based on the mechanical mixing of all religions into one ecumenical, esoteric compote. With this hastily brewed spiritualistic brew, they will try to spiritually feed all the peoples of the planet.
It is especially important that the creation of a new system of governing the peoples will be carried out on the basis of the latest media, information, computer and nanotechnologies. In the Charter of the Global Information Society, adopted by the heads of eight states in Okinawa on July 22, 2000, the first paragraph reads: “Information and communication technologies (IT) are one of the most important factors influencing the formation of society in the twenty-first century. Their revolutionary impact concerns the way people live, their education and work, and the interaction between government and civil society.”
The construction of such a world state presupposes the destruction of paper money, which is still valid all over the world, and its replacement with "electronic money". This will significantly strengthen the system of control over both macroeconomic and other processes on the planet.
Already, all over the world, electronic cards are being forcibly introduced to replace ordinary paper passports.
Personal code, TIN, last name, first name, religious affiliation, biometric parameters, biographical data, medical history, driver's license, account number, insurance - all this information is easily placed on a tiny strip of a microchip sewn into a rectangular piece of plastic.
Such a card will allow the authorities to instantly accurately establish not only the financial situation, but also the location of every person on Earth. The next step in this direction, excluding the loss of the card, should be the so-called stitching or mark on the human body. The same microchip from the contents of a wallet or pocket will become an integral part of the human body itself.
Orthodox publicists quite rightly draw attention to the fact that “the most convenient place for such a mark is the right working hand or the open part of the forehead, which is almost always naked, and therefore accessible for scanning. Which directly correlates with the well-known verse from the Apocalypse: "And he will do that for everyone - small and great, rich and poor, free and slaves - a mark will be put on their right hand or on their forehead, and that no one will be able to buy, nor sell, except one who has this mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Whoever has a mind, count the number of the beast, for its number is human; his number is six hundred and sixty-six.
It is clear that a person without a card or a label will not be able to buy or sell anything. And also will not be able to receive a salary, pension and medical care. He will not be able to use any means of transport, and in general be in any proximity to civilization.
After all, it is quite logical that people without a chip will be outlawed, recognized as robbers, dangerous outcasts and terrorists.
Arguing about the cumbersome last state, one cannot bypass the notorious "number of the beast". It is a well-known fact that the UPS-type barcode most common today, applied to all store products without exception, contains the same apocalyptic three sixes.
One authoritative preacher explains this phenomenon in this way.
»A barcode is a computer type of numeration, where each digit corresponds to lines of different thicknesses. The numbers from 0 to 9 are recorded by the computer in two or three sets. The barcode indicates the country of origin, quality, name, cost of the product. Naturally, the barcodes of different products differ from each other, but there is something that unites them all without exception - on all continents and on all products. This is the number 666. Each of you can easily see it on any barcode - two thin parallel lines that are somewhat longer than all the others and are always at the beginning, in the middle and at the end of the barcode. These are computer sixes of the second set. They are called "security parallels". Less often, but it happens that sixes and other sets are used, but this does not change the "security code", the number 666. "
So, double strokes of the code, by chance or by someone's intent, denote the number 6, at the beginning, in the middle and at the end of any numerical information reproduced using this barcode.
It is striking that other official theologians, recognizing the presence of the "number of the beast" in the coding of goods, do not see anything apocalyptic in this. Like, so what?
It is with the beginning of the introduction of the mentioned barcode and electronic cards that we are faced with the literal fulfillment of prophecies about the end times.
The Russian Orthodox Church promised to help Orthodox citizens who do not want to use a universal electronic card.
The head of the Synodal Department for Relations between the Church and Society, Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin, spoke cautiously on this subject: “A certain number of people live in Russia who, for one reason or another, will never take this card. Today it is very important to raise the issue that these people are not discriminated against and, moreover, do not switch to an illegal existence.”
However, the Russian authorities make it clear that the acceptance of a universal electronic card is not a right, but a duty of every citizen of the Russian Federation.
On March 9, the Moscow City Duma adopted a law on a mandatory universal electronic card designed to receive public services, necessary when applying to executive authorities, when going to educational institutions, to provide free and paid meals to schoolchildren, as well as when attached to a clinic and when registering for a hospital . It is supposed to transfer all types of benefits, subsidies and pensions to the card, to place on it information about benefits, registration of property rights, payment of taxes, duties and fines.
Why are the Russian authorities so persistently and zealously pushing through the adoption of electronic cards? Perhaps this is the main condition for Russia's accession to the WTO? Or is the desire to hastily impose electronic cards on the inhabitants of Russia dictated by something more? For example, a strict directive of the world state?..
The authorities, by means of an electronic card, will distinguish their wards by an identification number, which is assigned to each for life and is preserved posthumously.
This is how hitherto unprecedented social relations are built, where a person is likened to a numbered thing, props. The gloomy metaphysics of the digital name has already found its researchers: "With the advent and development of computer digital technologies, with the change in social relations, sequences of numbers have arisen that look like a number, but at the same time are neither quantities nor serial numbers."
Thus, a digital identifier is not a serial number, but a special digital name that replaces a human name, which changes the basis of the legal, social and spiritual status of an individual.
Another sign is that in the World State all people will have the same type of digital names.
We are talking about improving the systems of control, management, surveillance, isolation and destruction. About the spiritual, social and bodily enslavement of the peoples of the planet - an electronic concentration camp.
The global project for the introduction of digital identification of a person is being carried out, with varying degrees of lagging and advancing, in all countries of the world. In some Western countries, the implantation of chips under the human skin has become widespread. So far, patients of psychiatric hospitals and inmates of prisons are being subjected to forced “chipping”. But dashing trouble is the beginning!
And the Russian authorities decided to support the indicated trend, being, in a sense, ahead of the rest.
We read the Order of the Ministry of Industry and Energy No. 311 dated August 7, 2007 "On Approving the Strategy for the Development of the Russian Electronic Industry for the Period up to 2025": "The introduction of nanotechnology should further expand the depth of its penetration into the daily life of the population. Every individual must be in constant communication with global information and control networks such as the Internet. Nanoelectronics will be integrated with bio-objects and provide continuous monitoring of maintaining their vital activity, improving the quality of life, and thus reducing the social costs of the state. Built-in wireless nanoelectronic devices that ensure constant contact of a person with his surrounding intellectual environment will become widespread, and means of direct wireless contact of the human brain with surrounding objects, vehicles and other people will become widespread. The circulation of such products will exceed billions of pieces per year due to its ubiquitous distribution.
I repeat once again: this is not a fragment of a dystopia! Not the eccentric prospectus of a computer corporation! The ideology of creating cyborgs is openly declared in an official document of the Ministry of the Russian Federation!
After reading the order to implant chips in the brains of Russian citizens, a specialist in biological cybernetics and control systems, Valery Filimonov wrote: “Today, many have no idea that a great, global information revolution is underway, which can really lead to the creation of a new world on planet Earth. formations where the use of high information technologies will be used for political purposes, and the laws of control of cybernetic systems will be transferred to human society.
By the way, Mr. Chubais, who is currently working in the field of nanotechnology, is developing and producing radio-frequency identification devices for goods sold in specially equipped supermarkets, the so-called "smart stores". The tiny chip sends out a radio signal at a frequency of 125 kilohertz. This signal is sent to special scanners that read the identification number through it. The RFID tag is very durable and can store the data recorded on it for more than 10 years. Industrial readers can simultaneously read information from more than a thousand tags per second.
As always, in his activities Chubais tends to confuse the interests of the state and large corporations. However, perhaps there are no fundamental contradictions between these objects and cannot arise? Especially if both are controlled parts of a world state?
As a basis for "smart trading", Chubais offers the same individual electronic card that replaces both a passport and a wallet.
So, information about your purchases in supermarkets becomes the property of retail chains, fully reveals your lifestyle, becomes the basis of targeted marketing, the foundation for manipulating your needs.
Experts note: “Insurance companies will be happy to know, for example, about the amount of alcohol you buy when calculating health insurance, the same data will be of interest to your potential employers from large corporations…”
Chubais spoke about plans to deploy a whole network of "smart" stores throughout the country over the next three years.
Recently, global surveillance of Internet users in the EU countries has begun. A directive has come into effect that requires ISPs to save data about the network activity of customers: about sent letters, visited sites and phone calls made through the network. There is an opinion that the instant spread in the world of social networks is associated not only with the needs of citizens in virtual communication, but also with the involvement of such projects in the shadow projects of the total collection of information about everyone and everything.
In Russia, the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications fostered a draft order obliging Internet providers to transfer information about the IP addresses of their subscribers to law enforcement agencies. The order also contains a requirement to provide information related to "ensuring the process of rendering communication services". Translating into human language, we are talking about a user account and its passwords for accessing certain network resources.
The world state, under the cries of "democracy" and "protection of human rights", is rapidly forming a technical base that allows tracking the location and network of any of us.
These are the signs of the times. Such is the secret, but firm step of the World State, familiar to us from the lines of Revelation, written almost two thousand years ago by the hand of Christ's beloved disciple on the island of Patmos.

If we look at the historical facts, we will see two series of opposite phenomena that excite these two opposite evaluations of the idea of ​​a world state.

In the human spirit there is an unstoppable desire for all-humanity and universality. But at the same time, we see that the nations that create states instill in them various the basic ideas of power, each of which has the character of universality, and therefore they cannot merge organically. On the contrary, as development progresses, they are more and more opposed to each other. In any union of people, as a result of the combined action of many individuals, some middle lines of further development are formed, which acquire an organic character, that is, an internal tendency to develop the existing type of joint existence, according to its internal logic, to the last conclusions.

At the same time, the higher the development of various national-state types, the less able they are to move from one to another. We constantly observe in history that nations and states, once firmly embarking on one or another path of development, are already, as it were, incapable of changing it. Their past determines the future. They are able to act only in those ways that are laid down in their past. Quibus mediis fundantur, iisdem retinentur - says the old rule of empirical politics. A new type sometimes appears, but only at the cost of the death of the former state. And we constantly see several such different, stable, incapable of merging types of state, simultaneously existing in the world.

But with such stubborn stability of individual non-merging types of nationalities and states, unable to retreat from their individuality and sovereignty, nevertheless, in humanity * Undoubtedly, the association is developing and strengthening.

* I'm not talking about humanity in the sense of a fantastic "collective personality" - Etre Supreme l "Humanite, - in which an unbelieving thought created a surrogate for a deity for itself. Neither "humanity", nor a nation, nor a state constitute a "personality." The only real person is himself "man". Humanity in this sense does not exist, since it is an abstract concept, and not an "object". But the human race as a collection of individuals exists. It is not a "political reality" only because it has not formed into one common union. And such a connection is logically conceivable if people found a common principle of power on which they could unite.

The human race did not hitherto constitute a single union. But some interaction between these hundreds of millions of disparate personalities has always existed, so that even the "history of mankind" appears to our mind. People in their earthly existence, even without knowing each other, go to some common goal, due to the unity of their psychological and material nature.

The idea of ​​"world history", which has some general providential meaning and purpose for all mankind, is by its origin a religious idea, and even "God-revealed". It was brought into the world by Israel, the Jewish people, and it is closely connected with the idea of ​​man's connection with the Divine. In Christianity, “world history”, the history of the entire human race, became even more clear, and in the prophetic visions of the Old Testament seers and in the Apocalypse even presented a general picture of the existence of mankind from its creation to the end of the world. Of course, the unity of mankind in the common destinies of the world is not a state unity. But nevertheless, the very fact of the unity of the nature of individuals who, as people, as children of the Heavenly Father, are incomparably closer to each other than as members of political unions - this unity brings each person psychologically closer to all of humanity more than to his own state. It is brought together with the state by common power, common interests, joint activities with citizens. With humanity, it is the very nature of the individual. This is such a powerful fact of psychology that once revealed to people by religion, it has already remained indestructible for consciousness even with the loss of religion.

In the course of historical life, this psychological closeness of man to all other people has made tremendous progress. But it must not be forgotten that all your social associations are fundamentally psychological phenomena. Consequently, the growing awareness of the closeness of people to each other can also lead to the unity of an external union. In addition to this internal psychological fact that develops in history, the actual relations between all parts of the human race develop in it.

History is a process of bringing peoples closer together. At first they sting, not even knowing about the mutual existence. Now they all know each other. They had never before had any intercourse outside the circle of immediate neighbors. Now constantly the closest ties cover the entire globe. Previously, people considered strangers as enemies, barbarians, "Germans" (non-speaking). Now, in the man of all tribes, the same inner dignity is generally recognized, and contempt for other peoples has been extremely reduced. The idea of ​​universal brotherhood is spread by Christianity even among non-Christians. The commonality of science has become a fact in all parts of the world. In the same way, material ties are expanding between the most diverse peoples not by the day, but by the hour. In short, the actual rapprochement of peoples during the course of history has made tremendous progress, and in this respect the pre-Christian world and the Christian world differ beyond recognition. External means - mental, moral and material for the unification of all peoples in certain allied relations have developed to the extreme. The general trend of these facts, of course, enhances the possibility of uniting people in one world state.

But it is impossible to draw a conclusion from this about the emergence of a world state. All this rapprochement of various tribes, states and countries of the world creates a certain cultural unity in human life. This does not yet mean state unity.

Spiritual, mental, industrial unity - all these are forms free communication of people. But social and especially state phenomena are unthinkable without general power.

World state: utopia or probable future?

"World state: utopia or probable future?"

The question of whether the existence of a world state is possible has worried the minds of people for more than one century. The beginnings of this theory appeared in antiquity, so it, like history, passes from generation to generation. Opinions, both before and now, are divided into two opposite camps: one side believes that the construction of a world state is a utopia, and the other that it is an inevitable phenomenon of the evolution of mankind. Each point of view is not accidental, because there are a number of reasons that can reasonably prove whether the unification of people in one state is a utopia or an inevitable future.

Some scientists believe that the processes taking place in modern society have strengthened the mood of the supporters of the theory of the world state, for whom it has become a kind of program for the development of society. This is explained by the fact that the need to build a global state is dictated by the needs of mankind, many real forces can contribute to its creation or, on the contrary, slow down this process, and there are also a number of principles on which it will be based. One of the main ones will be a single world religion, but it should be more simplified, generalized and accessible for understanding a wide range of people who are completely different in their origin, and, most importantly, in their worldview. Through this religion, human thoughts and motives can be turned away from their own ego, directed towards the achievement of universal human unity and power. A single state is obliged to provide all segments of the population with education of a quality and scale that surpasses all previous experience. The process of education, in accordance with the needs, will continue throughout life, this will contribute to the fact that the inhabitants of this state will engage in self-education. Extensive employment opportunities in obtaining a certain profession will help to avoid unemployment, in the ideal sense, each person will be involved in the field of activity that is closest and most interesting to him, which means that he will make a greater contribution to the development and functioning of the state and society. Such an outcome of events will contribute to a favorable economic organization of the state, based on the equal distribution of all natural resources, production will be more aimed at general consumption, and not profit. state global humanity

It will be possible to speak about the beginning of a new historical era. Also, the main principle will be to reduce the consumption of all natural resources associated with the military-industrial complex, because even the very concept of "defense" will become meaningless. There will be no wars, which means there will be no reason to create weapons, an army and other elements of defense.

There will be a significant increase in the standard of human life, it will be possible to release a huge potential of talents and opportunities that were previously restricted by social injustice. The world state will allow the destruction of stupefying, hard physical labor by creating various robots, but this does not mean that people will completely stop working, they will work freely, meaningfully and actively.

It is impossible to ignore the environmental problems that are particularly relevant in modern society. The creation of a world state would mark the beginning of a more effective solution to this problem, since it would be in the interests of people to save the entire planet, and not just a separate territory of their state. The protection of animals and endangered species would take on a new meaning, because this would become a problem for the whole world. The economic equality of people would help save the lives of animals from poachers who kill them for their own benefit and the accumulation of wealth.

Of course, the creation of a world state will entail changes in the field of justice, because the existing judicial system will be unusable. Young people will have to be prepared for the activities of this plan from the school bench, this is necessary for the development of insight, understanding of the ailments of the human soul. Such a detailed study will enable an extremely cautious approach to the defendant, and for judges - the issuance of a more objective verdict. The role of such judicial workers is very great. Most likely, prisons as a form of punishment will no longer be so relevant, because the main form of punishment will be correction by labor and psychological assistance to convicts. It is possible to create specialized institutions, the main function of which will be the correction of the offender.

As for state administration, this system will include the training of personnel who can be true professionals in their field, as well as those who have a high degree of interest in the prosperity and smooth functioning of the state.

But, unfortunately, no matter how ideal the idea of ​​a world state is, no matter how many prospects for the development of mankind it carries, I believe that the construction of this form of organization of people's lives in the foreseeable future is a utopia.

I see the root cause of the doubtfulness of this theory in its illusory nature and inconsistency with modern world trends and the realities of life. For example, in the more than fifty years that have passed since even detailed plans for the construction of this world structure began to appear, nothing has changed in the system of international law. Nothing happened that could indicate, if not the beginning of the construction of what was planned, then at least the formation of the prerequisites for the further evolution of the idea.

In connection with these conditions, it should be noted that the idea of ​​building a world state is similar to the same majestic and, as the experience of a number of countries has shown, illusory idea of ​​building communism. Both ideas carry the goal of making all of humanity happy, but this is even theoretically impossible to implement.

In order to understand and more objectively evaluate the theory of the world state, and at the same time the theories of the world government, the citizen of the world and others related to it, it is necessary to pay attention to its political, social and economic, as well as historical origins. This means that not a single theory claiming recognition and long-term existence arises from scratch. Speaking about the theory of the world state, it should be noted that it is closely connected with cosmopolitanism. In a certain period of time, some ideas of cosmopolitanism were transformed into the ideas of world law and world state. However, what's the point? After all, the possibility of the existence of a world state in a contradictory world, consisting of a huge number of peoples, nations, states interconnected and interacting with each other, is extremely small. The main problem is that this theory does not take into account the existing realities of modern society, as well as the contradictions that stand in the way of building a world state.

When developing this theory and making claims for its viability, a number of factors were not properly taken into account.

And the first of these factors will be a rather contradictory perception of the idea of ​​world unification by various sections of various national societies. This is not so much about the presence of interethnic, class or other contradictions that traditionally exist in every society, but about a different kind of contradictions, born of incompatibility of interests and views on the world around us and the prospects for its further development between narrower groups of people. For example, supporters of cosmopolitanism and patriots of their homeland and people, respectively, between supporters of building a world state and its opponents.

The second factor is the contradictions that exist between religious denominations, cultural and everyday ways of different nationalities, which often transform into open confrontation and which do not at all contribute to the formation of some kind of human association, and further creation of a world state on the basis of it. In addition to the problems generated by the cultural orientation of individuals and entire nationalities, there are problems that generally call into question the idea of ​​creating such a state, or at least create huge obstacles to its implementation. Under these problems it is necessary to understand the elusive compatibility of such civilizations and their representatives as Eastern and Western culture, as the Muslim and Christian worldview and worldview, as left-wing and right-wing radical ideology, and others. There is also the problem of the incompatibility of Western civilization and Russian civilization, which is justified by the peculiarity of the development of Western countries and Russia.

The third factor is interstate conflicts that have arisen since the formation of the first states on Earth and in certain periods, escalating to extremes. These circumstances do not create a favorable environment for the formation of a world state. This refers not only to the contradictions between developed and undeveloped countries, but also only between highly developed states that set the pace for the life of the whole world. Basically, the struggle between countries takes place in the economic, technological and financial spheres. The enormous moral and material damage caused by the First and Second World Wars, it would seem, has not been ignored and should contribute to a conflict-free, world state, but in reality everything is not so perfect: the sad experience of losses and destruction is repeated many times.

Also, the negative aspect of this theory lies in the fact that, being created in the interests of the transnational oligarchy and the countries dominant in the modern world, as G.I. Tunkin: "Disorients peoples, both in domestic and international law", "distracts attention from the pressing problems of improving international relations and organizations as tools for ensuring peace and developing international cooperation"

Thus, I believe that the creation of a world state, at least in the foreseeable future, is an unattainable phenomenon. This is explained by a number of reasons due to the peculiarities of the modern world community. Firstly, this is a confrontation between various religious movements that will never be able to come to a common compromise. Secondly, conflicts based on national grounds, when one nation exalts itself above others. Thirdly, it is the desire of some, stronger and more developed states to manage others, to control all their activities. And, finally, a different attitude to the very theory of the world state.

Ever since mankind remembers itself within the framework of state formations, attempts at globalization have been continuously carried out, that is, attempts to create some kind of universal world state. We will not touch on the time of the Egyptian cosmopolitan pharaohs, we will turn to more recent examples.

No. 1 "The Power of Alexander the Great"(years of life of Alexander the Great 356-323 BC). A native of the Macedonian ruling elite, he exterminated all potential competitors (including his closest relatives), subjugated the city-states of Ancient Greece and organized the "campaign of revenge" of the Greek world against the huge Persian kingdom at that time.

As a result of military victories, a huge power was organized on the territory of part of Europe, the Near and Middle East. The ruler died in the capital of Babylon at a fairly early age. There are suspicions of poisoning. Alexander the Great is considered perhaps the first known globalist. He tried to mix peoples and establish uniform orders. Alexandria as a trade and financial center (New York of that time) formed as a result of an attempt at globalization.

No. 2 "Ancient Rome". Beginning - 754 BC. (royal period), ending - the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (476). A fairly well-known story: the growth of coverage areas and the change in the quality of the universal state. The most ancient tsarist period - the republic - the empire - the general crisis of the economy and morality - the collapse. The “world state” of that time, however, the population in comparison with the present in the same territories is extremely small.

The expansion of the Romans in all directions around the Mediterranean was replaced by barbarization, economic and demographic crisis and decay under external influence. The empire, while it was strong, established its laws and customs throughout the world.

#3 Arab Caliphate(632 - 1517). Huge territories from the "heart" - the Arabian Peninsula east to Asia, west through the Middle East and North Africa to modern Spain. The states currently professing Islam give an idea of ​​the boundaries of this civilization. The caliphate in Europe was stopped by purely military means. Lost to Europe (at the last historical stage) for technological and political reasons.

Islam unified the population according to religious principle, Islamic law, Islamic traditions and so on. Currently, the process of renaissance of the idea as a geopolitical technology in new historical conditions is taking place. Europe is actively Islamized due to migration and the organization of religious (rather, religious and political) parishes. The process is informally encouraged by local authorities within the previously created multicultural (cosmopolitan) society. Europe repeats the socio-political trajectory of ancient Rome.

No. 4 "Mongolian impulse"(1206 - 1368). In 1294, the vast Mongol Empire split into independent uluses. The "Golden Horde" lasted until 1483. An attempt by the Mongolian military elite to subjugate all peoples to the "will of Heaven". Vast territories from China to the Middle East and Eastern Europe. The state collapsed and was liquidated in the process of degradation of the ruling elite.

A handful of desperate warriors captured the vast territories of Eurasia, which their descendants could not hold on to over time. Universal laws and customs. In particular, “deception of trust” (misrepresentation for selfish purposes) was punishable by death. Gradual Islamization of the elite and intra-family armed disputes. Fragmentation and collapse.

№5 Time of universal Christian monarchies of Europe. The first attempt to create a worldwide Christian state was made back in ancient Rome, when Christianity was made the dominant religion of the empire (religions can also be perceived as political parties). Ideology - "any power is from God", humility is the best quality, pride is the worst quality.

This is practically a managerial political technology. egocentrism and monotheism. However, Christianity did not prevent the collapse of the western part of the empire. The stable eastern part of the Roman Empire, Byzantium (395-1453), promoted the idea of ​​Orthodoxy as a universal religion as best it could (as far as the strength of the population was sufficient). However, as a result of the impact of a number of factors (constant wars, the economy, the crisis of the elite, the degradation of morality), the state gradually reduced the area of ​​​​its territory until it was finally destroyed.

Since the 15th century, the Christian monarchies of Europe (including the Moscow kingdom with the idea of ​​"Holy Russia") tried to achieve the same, but without success. The year 1918 summed up all the imperial undertakings of continental Europe, because it was not faith that won, but political technologies and money.

#6 Napoleon Bonaparte's Attempt. As a result of the intrigues after the French Revolution (1789-1799), the young ambitious general, using his military genius, tried to create a common European (and world) state with a “French firmware”. In London, this project was categorically not welcomed, so it ended as soon as the human resources of France were completely undermined on the battlefields. Napoleon surrendered to the British, was isolated and died in exile.

#7 "The British Empire on which the sun never sets". Control of the world sea is like control of the world through trade routes. A combination of diplomacy, war and economics. Metropolis and colonies, the pound as the world's trading currency.

The project was gradually closed due to the organization of the US Federal Reserve in 1913 (including with the participation of bankers from England). At present, Great Britain (what is left of it) is being pushed into the European Union as a territory of supranational control, dependent on the United States. Not everyone in Britain likes it, but no more. The metropolis and the colony were in fact swapped.

#8 The Soviet Union and the "Third Reich of the German Nation". Both states pursued globalization in their own way, and in 1942 the collapse of Germany was not absolutely a foregone conclusion. Due to the blood of "subhuman Slavs" and other military-political and economic aspects, London and New York have retained their leading positions in the world.

The Germans with their "Aryanism" were completely compromised. The fact of the military defeat of Germany and Japan created the UN as a "modernized" League of Nations on the terms of the banking families that controlled the US, Britain, France and had interests in the "Chinese world". In 1948, the state of Israel was created by the hands of Stalin and Western conceptualists, and as a result, globalism no longer needed the Soviet Union. The British Empire has ceased to be needed in its former capacity. The collapse of European colonial empires and the Soviet Union confirmed this.

No. 9 "The United States of America as a universal benchmark". Until the beginning of the 20th century, it was a utopian country that was built by banking capital with the hands of European emigrants. Since 1913 (the creation of the FRS), world finances have begun to formalize the world state of the provinces. Something similar to the Roman Empire with a different technological structure and a significantly increased population. The power center in Washington, the financial center in London and New York, the religious center in Jerusalem.

At this stage, under the pretext of a crisis, an attempt is being made to modernize the existing "world state", to transfer human society to a new quality. Thus, as long as a person remembers himself in state forms, these forms have always sought to increase the coverage of territories, that is, they have carried out globalization on their own basis. Competition intervened. The main question is the place of this or that people in this historical process.

Actually, all modern conflicts and find out in what capacity certain territories will be presented further. Metropolises and colonies, consumers and donors, administrators and outside controlled. For the rights and opportunities of the territories, for the status of influential families, there is only competition now, even in conditions of formal consensus.

Many great undertakings and imperial peoples have long since come to naught, others, as they say, are surviving. The main modern geopolitical trends: the Iranian and Chinese issue (the quality of these territories in a world state), the settlement of Europe with new residents, the prospective integrity or collapse of the Russian Federation. Note that after the collapse of the USSR, Russia is used by the world state exclusively as a territory - a donor. Ideologically and economically dependent territory will completely repeat European trends with a step of one generation (biblical 40 years). That is, for the Russian population, 2018 is approximately the same as in Europe once 1978.

AN NA
NE WS Join us on our channel!

2 comments:

05.08.2018

A lot has been said, but... In view of the non-naming of the cause, purpose, driving forces (more precisely, the driving force), much remains unnamed, including the essential, and the named appears in the form of some kind of random mess. (From the little things: well, for example, the Turkic Empire was not named, the important remnants for our country were the Khazar Khaganate, the Volga Tatars, the Ottoman Empire, Turkey. China also sought to subjugate everything around it, and not without success: Japan, Korea, Vietnam , for example, they used, and in some places still use Chinese characters and principles, and China itself was not at all so homogeneous before. different: in the USSR, the mechanism of undermining was initially laid down (“sovereign union republics”; the same, but in a weaker form, the mechanism exists in the USA - if management gets out of control there, they will begin “perestroika”; would you please try to explain why and by whom was this mine laid?); and Germany was united (which means that the authors were slightly different). It is not even mentioned that Byzantium with its “orthodoxy” (not “Orthodoxy”!) was destroyed by the “good Christians” of the Latin Christian Church; Turks only plentiful; and not at all "internal contradictions", etc. And the Maya, the Aztecs, the Incas…) This point of view on “geopolitics”, as if everything happens “naturally” and “spontaneously” in it, is similar to the theory of the emergence of life from the “primordial soup” - which, it seems, everyone has already abandoned. “Globalization” is indeed in our nature, like the desire to create a “unified field theory” in physics. At least within the bounds of our observable space.
According to legend, humanity was already one in the beginning, with a single language; only the machinations of the "Prince of this world" divided him. And the reunification of mankind would be a very positive thing. However, seeing the inevitability of such a reunion, the Evil Prince led it in order to pervert and put it at his service. (It must be borne in mind that all these are "metaphors" that can be interpreted quite "realistically".)
The milestone event in the history of "globalization" was indeed the activity of Alexander Filippovich. And not only because he defeated the Persians and reached their sphere of influence in India. These conquests of his were purely "symbolic", he could not keep and administer them. But the main thing is that the post-Alexander "Hellenistic" "Ptolemaic" states gave rise to modern Judaism. Before Alexandro-Hellenism there was no such Judaism!
Alexander was a student of Aristotle (Aristotle was his home teacher), Aristotle was a student of Plato (a boxer like Klitschko). Plato, as it were, created a “philosophy of unity” and an absurd theory of ideas as separate entities (for example, the idea of ​​yellow allegedly exists separately from yellow objects in a certain realm of “pure ideas”).
In the era of Alexandro-Hellenism, Aristotle and Plato (philosophers not so famous during their lifetime; Democritus, for example, had much greater fame) were raised to the shield, and not only because Aristotle was the teacher of the hegemon, but, most importantly, adherents of the dark the cult of Jehovah-Adonai (Prince of this world), based in Babylon (as the only real city of those times), and then in "New York" - Alexandria. It was in Alexandria, in the 2nd - 1st c. "BC." The Jewish Bible, the Tanakh, was written. Before that, there was no Bible!
The official ideology in Alexandria was Neoplatonism, a slightly corrected and supplemented teaching of Plato. The Jews (Iamblichus and others) took an active part in the formation of Neoplatonism. Before the Alexandrian Jewish sages combined their dark cult with Platonism, Judaism was not at all monotheistic. It would never have occurred to anyone to attribute to Jehovah: a) uniqueness (there are no other gods); b) omnipotence and, in particular, the creation of everything; c) omniscience; d) "all-goodness" (whatever he does, everything is fine). All these properties passed to Jehovah from Platonism. Properties such are contrary to logic; but Platonism, the heir of the Sophists, was not troubled by this. (Just like the modern Plato - Klitschko is not embarrassed by the contradiction: “Not everyone can look into the future. Or rather, not only everyone can look ...”)
A well-developed worldview is a great and terrible force! (We saw this in the example of Marxism.) Judaism, starting from the Alexandrian era, first went through "intrauterine development." Less than 200 years after the formation of Judaism, it gave rise to Christianity, which already possessed all the necessary qualities for the conquest of the globe by the Jews.
If the theory of Judaism was written by scholars who know the tradition, Christian scriptures by "fishermen", then the next son of Judaism, "Islam", represents the greatest degradation of the intellect, presenting no reasonable criteria for judgment. (Perhaps the "Islamization" of Europe is precisely intended to sow complete chaos in the minds of the slaves, the Slavs.)
The role of Judaism, or rather proto-Judaism, pre-Alexandria Judaism, has not actually been studied. But here is a revealing fact: Catholic missionaries were surprised to find in the Chinese city of Kaifeng in the bend of the Yellow River, in the place where the “Silk Road” to the Middle East began and where they find the oldest “artifacts” of Chinese civilization, they discovered there the Jewish community that existed there from time immemorial (the Kaifeng Jews were yellow and cross-eyed and also revered Confucius). The missionaries found Torah scrolls in their synagogue. And two sisters from this community - one became the wife of Chiang Kai-shek, the other - Mao Zedong.
Conclusion: "globalization" is different. "Our" globalization is good, "theirs", i.e. directed by the devil is bad.

Justifying their desire for world domination, violating the sovereignty of other states, in particular through the construction of their military bases, influential circles in the United States also widely use the theory of a "world state", according to which peoples must renounce their sovereignty and submit to a single "world government" in the interests of supposedly deliverance of mankind from wars” and crises allegedly caused by sovereignty.

This theory was based for a long time on the confidence of the US ruling classes in the monopoly possession of atomic weapons, in the advantage of having a system of foreign military bases around the USSR. The reactionary essence and utopian nature of this theory have already been revealed in the works of Soviet scientists. However, its most important official function - an apology for military bases in foreign territories - still remains in the shadows.

American lawyer W. McClud in his extensive work “The World Legal Order. The Possible Contribution of the People of the United States” advocates the creation of a “world community”, a “world order” based on “universal law” and supposedly already in force “supranational customary law”.

Modern bourgeois jurists and sociologists see the reason that the UN was not up to the task assigned to it not in the creation of aggressive blocs and military bases, not in the desire for "world leadership" on the part of the reactionary circles of the United States, but in the sovereign independence of states. They try to prove that the rapid development of science and technology allegedly eliminates the democratic principles of international communication between states and international law, that sovereignty is supposedly an “outdated” and “dangerous” idea for the very existence of mankind, which it should abandon as soon as possible.

The idea of ​​creating a "world state" practically means the denial of the peaceful coexistence of states with different socio-economic systems and the liquidation of the UN with its principle of unanimity of the great powers. In a “world state”, disputed issues should not be resolved by agreement of sovereign states, but under the coercion of the so-called “international police”, based on military bases attached to it in all corners of the globe and being an instrument of military violence of some powers led by the United States over others.

The theory of the "world state" is an ideological cover for the organization of such expansionist, aggressive blocs directed against the socialist countries, such as NATO, SEATO, CENTO, the Western European Union, etc., which, in turn, are steps on the path to the military-political integration of capitalist countries under the auspices of the United States.

Calling on the United States to create a world base system, J. Weller says: “The most appropriate basis on which a nation can establish a specified system of military bases (besides such a basis as the threat demonstrated to us during the war) is to assume responsibility as global citizen". Such a "world citizen" (i.e., the United States) is conceived by him as an armed leading center of the "world state", owning military bases in foreign territories.

Many supporters of the "world government", for example, J. Burnham, directly put on the agenda the question of the need for war using a system of military bases against "recalcitrant" states and peoples who do not want to enter the "world state" under the auspices of the United States. He writes: “We see that in our time no world federation can be achieved voluntarily. Other than the Communists, only the United States has the power to enforce the idea of ​​federation by force. It can only be created if the United States, while retaining monopoly control over atomic weapons, assumes responsibility for leading the world.

Under the conditions of the "world state", according to the plans of its authors, the peoples will be subordinated to the "world police", based on a system of military bases in the hands of the United States. Granting the "world government" the right to establish its military bases as "police posts" on the territories of all the united states, to dispose of these countries as a springboard, to quarter the troops of one state on the territory of another, etc., would in fact mean the complete dominance of American financial and military circles in foreign territories. It would be "the American armed world".

Relying on these bases and troops, the "world government" would have unlimited opportunities to suppress the struggle of the peoples against colonialism, against enslaving treaties and concessions, for their self-determination and liberation from capitalist slavery. The creation of a "world state" would mean further expansion and consolidation of the American empire, "legally" relying on American military bases and troops in foreign territories. Fortunately, the peoples are firmly guarding their independence, and even such an ardent geopolist as N. Spykman had to admit that the plans of a "world state" were unrealistic. The peoples, including the American people, do not want the creation of an "international police" either.

World government- the concept of a single political power over all mankind. Various conspiracy theories assign the function of world government to various real or fictional structures (UN, G7, G20 - G20, Freemasonry, Jewish Freemasonry, Bilderberg Club, Committee of 300, Illuminati). There is currently no world army, executive, legislative or judicial power with jurisdiction covering the entire planet.

"Secret world government"- one of the main terms of the conspiracy theory, denoting a narrow group of people, for example, the owners of the largest international corporations, which, according to supporters of such theories, determines the emergence and controls the development of the main events taking place in the world, on the way to the "new world order" .

One of the goals of the secret world government attributed to it by conspiracy theorists is creation of a society built on the principle of the "golden billion". According to adherents, such a "golden billion" includes members of the "highest guilds" and representatives of the "most worthy and developed" nations. Other nations (Africans, Asians) are assigned the role of serving black production, mining, and the entire infrastructure. This “useful part” allegedly amounts to about one and a half billion, while the rest of the population (more than 4 billion), according to supporters of the theory, is classified as “superfluous” and is systematically destroyed with the help of alcohol, smoking, drugs, and revolutions.

Freemasonry is one of the most popular groups featured in secret world government conspiracy theories. Sometimes the secret world government is presented as fused with the world's financial institutions.