Bigfoot or Yeti. Who is Bigfoot, where did he come from? All Known Yeti Facts So Far Yeti or Bigfoot

Bigfoot (Yeti) - a half-monkey, half-man, living most often in high mountainous regions and forests. Unlike humans, this creature has a denser physique, relatively short hips, elongated arms, a short neck, a strongly developed lower jaw and slightly pointed.

The entire body of a Bigfoot is covered with red, gray or black hair. This humanoid creature has a sharp unpleasant odor. Bigfoot Yeti climbs trees perfectly, which once again emphasizes his resemblance to a monkey. Forest populations of snow people build nests on tree branches, mountain populations live in caves.

The humanoid primate (Chinese savage) very often caught the eye of curious Chinese peasants. He had a height of about 2 m, was able to weave baskets and make simple tools. Hundreds of cases of peasants meeting with this creature were left without attention. In the late 1980s, six countries, including America and Great Britain, sent a research expedition into the sparsely populated forest areas of China to study evidence for the Bigfoot Yeti. .

The participants of the expedition were prominent professors of anthropology Richard Greenwell and Jean Poirier. They had no idea what an outstanding discovery awaits them! The two-year collaboration between the American and English professors has brought remarkable results. The expedition included an independent television crew led by Geraldine Easter.

What evidence was found

Confirmation of the presence of a "snow creature" is his hair, which were picked by Chinese farmers. English and American scientists, as well as their Chinese colleagues, came to the conclusion that the hairs found have nothing to do with humans or monkeys, which indicates the existence of Bigfoot (Chinese savage). Several thousand teeth and jaws of this ancient man have been found in India, Vietnam and China. The Chinese wild man is a little-studied creature. Somehow miraculously, he managed to avoid extinction in individual areas. He is a contemporary of the famous panda bears, and we all know that pandas also miraculously survived.

September 1952 was remembered by the locals for the fact that in the state of Virginia, several eyewitnesses observed a height of about 9 feet, exuding a very unpleasant odor. In 1956, a huge creature was seen in the state of North Carolina, whose offhand weight was about 320 kg. Year 1958 - the yeti appears near the state of Texas, in 1962 - near the state of California, in 1971 in the Oklahoma region, in 1972 the creature was seen near the state of Missouri.

There is evidence of a meeting with Bigfoot from a relatively recent period of time. In the early 90s of the last century, while climbing to an eight thousandth height, climber R. Meisner saw Bigfoot twice. The first meeting was unexpected, yeti Bigfoot quickly disappeared, and it was not possible to photograph him. The second meeting happened at night - the creature was seen near the place of spending the night.

Attempts to catch a man, nicknamed the snowman, were made repeatedly. In its issue dated August 19, 1988, the Pravda newspaper wrote that traces of a “snow creature” were found in the Kekirimtau mountains, and a farm worker K. Juraev encountered him personally.

The expedition sent to capture Bigfoot returned with nothing. But what is surprising, being at the lair of this strange creature, all members of the expedition experienced terrible psychological discomfort, a decline in mood and efficiency, lack of appetite, rapid pulse and high blood pressure. And this is despite the fact that the group included trained people who had acclimatized in high mountain conditions.

Who has seen Bigfoot?

In 1967, two shepherds R. Patterson and his partner B. Gimlin filmed Bigfoot. It was a warm autumn day at 3.30 pm. The horses of the men, frightened of something, abruptly reared up. Losing his balance, Patterson's horse collapsed, but the shepherd did not lose his head. With peripheral vision, he saw a large creature squatting on his haunches on the bank of the stream, which, noticing people, immediately got up and walked away. Roger grabbed his camera, turned it on and ran towards the stream. He managed to make out that it was Yeti Bigfoot. Hearing the chirping of the camera, the creature, continuing to move, turned around, and then, without slowing down, continued on its way. The size of the body and the unusual style of walking allowed him to rapidly move away. Soon the creature was out of sight. The tape ended and the stunned men stopped.

An in-depth study of the film, conducted by members of the Darwin Museum Workshop, and its frame-by-frame playback showed that the head of the creature filmed on film is identical to the head of Pithecanthropus. The clearly visible muscles of the arms, legs and back exclude the possibility of using a special suit.

Arguments supporting the authenticity of Patterson's film:

  • Increased flexibility of the ankle joint of the creature depicted on the film, which is impossible for a person.
  • The creature's gait is not typical of a human and cannot be reproduced by him.
  • A clear image of the muscles of the body and limbs, excluding the possibility of using a special suit.
  • Strongly protruding back heel, which corresponds to the structure of the Neanderthals
  • Comparison of the frequency of hand vibrations and the speed of the film on which the film was shot, they speak of the creature's height of 220 cm and weight of over 200 kg.

Based on these and many other facts, the film was recognized as authentic, as reported in scientific publications in the USA and the USSR. Entire volumes of scientific literature are devoted to observations of Bigfoot and their careful analysis. Many unanswered questions remain. Why do we meet only single individuals of the yeti? Can small populations of these amazing creatures survive? When can we fish out the snow creature? There are no answers to these questions yet, but there is confidence that in the near future they will definitely appear.

Many secrets keep the expanses of our vast planet. Mysterious creatures hiding from the human world have always aroused genuine interest among scientists and enthusiastic researchers. One of these mysteries was Bigfoot.

Yeti, Bigfoot, Angry, Sasquatch - these are all his names. It is believed that he belongs to the class of mammals, the order of primates, the genus man.

Of course, its existence has not been proven by scientists, however, according to eyewitnesses and many researchers, today we have a complete description of this creature.

What does the legendary cryptid look like?

The most popular image of Bigfoot

His physique is thick and muscular, with thick hair covering the entire surface of the body, with the exception of the palms and feet, which, according to people who met the Yeti, remain completely naked.

The color of the coat can be different depending on the habitat - white, black, gray, red.

The faces are always dark, and the hair on the head is longer than on the rest of the body. According to some reports, the beard and mustache are completely absent, or they are very short and rare.

The skull has a pointed shape and a massive lower jaw.

The growth of these creatures varies from 1.5 to 3 meters. Other witnesses claimed to have met taller individuals.

Features of the Bigfoot body are also long arms and shortened hips.

The Yeti's habitat is a controversial issue, as people claim to have seen it in America, Asia, and even Russia. Presumably, they can be found in the Urals, the Caucasus and Chukotka.

These mysterious creatures live far from civilization, carefully hiding from human attention. Nests can be located in trees or in caves.

But no matter how carefully the snowmen tried to hide, there were local residents who claimed to have seen them.

First eyewitnesses

The first who happened to see the mysterious creature live were Chinese peasants. According to available information, the meeting was not a single one, but numbered about a hundred cases.

After such statements, several countries, including America and Great Britain, sent an expedition in search of traces.

Thanks to the collaboration of two eminent scientists, Richard Greenwell and Gene Poirier, evidence has been found for the existence of the Yeti.

The find was hair that was supposed to belong only to him. However, later, in 1960, Edmund Hillary got the opportunity to examine the scalp again.

His conclusion was unequivocal: the “find” was made of antelope wool.

As expected, many scientists did not agree with this version, finding more and more confirmations of the previously put forward theory.

Bigfoot scalp

In addition to the hairline found, the identity of which is still a controversial issue, there is no other documented evidence.

Except for countless photographs, footprints and eyewitness accounts.

Photos are often of very poor quality, so they do not allow you to reliably determine if these frames are real or fake.

Footprints, which, of course, are similar to human ones, but wider and longer, scientists rank among the traces of famous animals living in the find area.

And even the stories of eyewitnesses who, according to them, met Bigfoot, do not allow us to establish for certain the fact of their existence.

Bigfoot on video

However, in 1967, two men were able to film Bigfoot.

They were R. Patterson and B. Gimlin from Northern California. Being shepherds, one autumn, on the banks of the river, they noticed a creature, which, realizing that it had been found, immediately set off on the run.

Grabbing a camera, Roger Patterson set off to catch up with an unusual creature, which was mistaken for a yeti.

The film aroused genuine interest among scientists who for many years tried to prove or disprove the existence of a mythical creature.

Bob Gimlin and Roger Patterson

A number of features proved that the film was not a fake.

The size of the body and the unusual gait indicated that it was not a person.

The video noted a clear image of the body and limbs of the creature, which ruled out the creation of a special costume for filming the film.

Some structural features of the body allowed scientists to draw conclusions about the similarity of the individual from the video frames with the prehistoric ancestor of man - the Neanderthal ( approx. the last Neanderthals lived about 40 thousand years ago), but very large in size: growth reached 2.5 meters, and weight - 200 kg.

After numerous examinations, the film was found to be authentic.

In 2002, after the death of Ray Wallace, who had initiated this filming, his relatives and acquaintances reported that the film was completely staged: a man in a specially tailored suit portrayed an American Yeti, and unusual footprints were left by artificial forms.

But they did not provide evidence that the film was fake. Later, experts conducted an experiment in which a trained person tried to repeat the shots taken in a suit.

They came to the conclusion that at the time the film was made, it was not possible to produce such a quality production.

There were other encounters with the unusual being, most of them in America. For example, in North Carolina, Texas and near the state of Missouri, but unfortunately there is no evidence of these meetings, except for the oral stories of people.

A woman named Zana from Abkhazia

An interesting and unusual confirmation of the existence of these individuals was a woman named Zana, who lived in Abkhazia in the 19th century.

Raisa Khvitovna, Zana's granddaughter - the daughter of Khvit and a Russian woman named Maria

The description of her appearance is similar to the available descriptions of Bigfoot: red hair that covered her dark skin, and the hair on her head was longer than on her whole body.

She did not speak articulately, but uttered only cries and isolated sounds.

The face was large, the cheekbones protruded, and the jaw protruded strongly forward, which gave it a ferocious look.

Zana was able to integrate into human society and even gave birth to several children from local men.

Later, scientists conducted research on the genetic material of Zana's descendants.

According to some sources, their origin originates in West Africa.

The results of the examination indicate the possibility of the existence of a population in Abkhazia during the life of Zana, which means that it is not excluded in other regions.

Makoto Nebuka reveals the secret

One of the enthusiasts who wanted to prove the existence of the Yeti was the Japanese climber Makoto Nebuka.

He hunted Bigfoot for 12 years, exploring the Himalayas.

After so many years of persecution, he came to a disappointing conclusion: the legendary humanoid creature turned out to be just a Himalayan brown bear.

The book with his research describes some interesting facts. It turns out that the word "yeti" is nothing more than a distorted word "meti", which means "bear" in the local dialect.

The Tibetan clans considered the bear to be a supernatural creature that possessed power. Perhaps these concepts were combined, and the myth of Bigfoot spread everywhere.

Research from different countries

Numerous studies have been carried out by many scientists around the world. The USSR was no exception.

Geologists, anthropologists and botanists worked in the commission for the study of Bigfoot. As a result of their work, a theory was put forward that states that Bigfoot is a degraded branch of Neanderthals.

However, then the work of the commission was terminated, and only a few enthusiasts continued to work on research.

Genetic studies of available samples deny the existence of the Yeti. An Oxford University professor, after analyzing the hair, proved that they belonged to a polar bear that existed several thousand years ago.

Still from a film shot in Northern California 10/20/1967

At present, the discussions do not subside.

The question of the existence of another mystery of nature remains open, and the society of cryptozoologists is still trying to find evidence.

All the facts available today do not give one hundred percent certainty in the reality of this creature, although some people really want to believe in it.

Obviously, only a film shot in Northern California can be considered proof of the existence of the object under study.

Some people tend to believe that Bigfoot is of alien origin.

That is why it is so difficult to detect, and all genetic and anthropological analyzes lead scientists to wrong results.

Someone is sure that science is hushing up the fact of their existence and publishes false studies, because there are so many eyewitnesses.

But questions are only multiplying every day, and answers are extremely rare. And although many believe in the existence of Bigfoot, science still denies this fact.

Since prehistoric times, human fear of the unknown has given rise to legends about bloodthirsty monsters living in places untouched by civilization. It is still unknown, for example, whether it exists only in fairy tales or whether there is real scientific evidence.

Myths and evidence of ancient peoples

The legendary animal has many names, depending on the region where it was seen:

  • Nepalese Yeti;
  • American Sasquatch or Bigfoot;
  • Australian yowie;
  • Chinese yeren.

Titles minche and zu-teh in the Tibetan language, they refer to an unknown animal as a bear.

The Indian Lepcha people, who live in the Sikkim region of the Himalayas, revere a "creature from a glacier" described as similar to prehistoric hominid, considers the deity of hunting and compares appearance with a bear.

In the Bon religion, the blood of the world, or "wild man", was used for special ceremonies.

Scientists study the yeti phenomenon

When eyewitness accounts were sketchy, records, bones or other physical evidence were not found, anthropologists suggested that Bigfoot is a hominid, a descendant of Neanderthals who has survived to this day. Carl Linnaeus came up with the name Homo troglodytes(caveman).

  • The first documented footprints were described by Lieutenant Colonel Charles Howard-Bury in his book Mount Everest. Intelligence" in 1921. A local Sherpa guide told the climber that he had seen what the Tibetans call the metoh-kangmi, or "wild man of the snows."
  • In 1925 photographer Tombazi on the slope of Zemu noticed a tall creature with red hair at an altitude of 4600m. above sea level, and also found footprints belonging to a bipedal five-toed hominid with a foot length of 33 cm.
  • A family lives on the territory of the former USSR in Abkhazia, whose ancestor, according to the stories of local residents, is the wild monkey-like Zana. At the end of the 19th century, Prince Achba caught her and presented her to his vassal, who brought the wild woman to Tkhina. Rural centenarians say that Zana's body was covered with gray long hair, her height reached two meters, she ran faster than horses and carried weights without much effort.
  • Since 1975 Igor Burtsev, Candidate of Historical Sciences, took up the study of Zana's descendants. He managed to get permission to dig up and send for examination the skull of the son of an unusual woman Tkhin. The results showed that these people originated from West Africa. It is also believed that Zana was just a mentally retarded runaway.

What does a snowman look like?

In mass culture, the image of the bigfoot has formed as a giant-sized ape-like creature with a white skin and elongated forelimbs. People are afraid of him as a monster that can drag and devour people. This view is different from the one that cryptozoologists make on the basis of eyewitness accounts.

If we sum up the impressions of the lucky ones who saw the traces of the animal and himself, the yeti really looks like a huge upright orangutan, whose height reaches 3m. The body of the beast is covered with brown, gray or red hair, the head is about twice the size of a human and has a pointed shape.

He deftly moves through the mountains and climbs trees, surpasses people in strength and speed. Scientists suggest that Bigfoot is omnivorous, eating small animals, insects and berries.

Where does the legendary Bigfoot live?

Judging by the legends, the descendant of ancient primates likes to hide in the mountains. Yeti is known in more than a dozen regions on three continents:

  1. They talk about meetings with an unknown "wild man" in the Himalayas, Dagestan, Abkhazia, Bhutan, Pamir, the Caucasus, the Urals, Chukotka;
  2. More than 300 testimonies have been recorded in China;
  3. Arriving on the Australian continent, the Europeans encountered wild ape-like natives and even fought with them;
  4. North America and Canada also have their own Sasquatch legend.

Since they met with bigfoot most often on the territory of the former USSR, in 1957. A Commission was created at the Academy of Sciences, which brought together scientists of related specialties (geologist, mountaineer, doctor, anthropologist) to study the phenomenon. However, this work did not give serious results.

Does Bigfoot really exist?

At the end of the 20th century, only cryptozoologists and fanatics believed in the reality of the Yeti. The scientific community considered all information regarding the hominid to be erroneous or fabricated. However, in 2013 Oxford University professor Brian Sykes and his team conducted a genetic analysis of the hair of a mummified Bigfoot from Ladakh, North India, and wool found by a Bhutanese resident. These specimens were between 20 and 40 years old. The result showed that the DNA of the samples coincided 100% with the genetic material of the ancestor of polar bears, who lived in the Pleistocene era, that is, from 40,000 to 120,000 years ago.

After publishing this news, Brian Sykes continued to collect genetic material from everyone who claimed to have encountered a monster. The rest of the received samples belonged to different types of predators, domestic dogs, some turned out to be vegetable and even synthetic fibers.

In 2016, a paper was presented at the 69th Annual Anthropological Research Conference in the USA. It dealt with the study of the traces of teeth discovered in 2013-2014. in the Mount St. Helena region of Washington state. Mitchell Townsend claimed that impressions on deer rib bones indicated a hominid with a jaw twice the size of a human. The scientist concluded that the animal that gnawed the ribs held them with one hand, as primates do.

At the beginning of the 21st century, the approach to the issue of searching for information about ancient monsters has changed. If earlier the subjective ideas of scientists about the finds and stories of witnesses played a big role, now there are tools that give accurate answers. Based on new data in the near-scientific environment, disputes do not subside whether Bigfoot exists or not. It remains only to wait for the next discoveries to put an end to this issue.

5 most reliable video facts of the existence of the yeti

In this video, anthropologist Vladimir Perevalov will show real-life footage in which Bigfoot was captured:


Publications about Bigfoot have long moved from the category of world sensations to the category of entertaining reading matter. Back in the 1970s, the well-known journalist Yaroslav Golovanov noted that on yeti worth the "stigma of a smile." And in recent years, almost not a single journalistic investigation on this topic can do without a certain amount of scoffing.

Representatives of "big" science call the researchers of the problem amateurs, arrogantly rejecting their discoveries. Nevertheless, research in this area continues and is replenished with more and more new evidence. DISCOVERY magazine begins a series of articles about Bigfoot and other unknown, controversial and extinct creatures.

It is generally accepted that in Russia the study of Bigfoot began a century ago. Back in 1914, the zoologist Vitaly Khakhlov, who since 1907 had been searching for the “wild man” and surveying the local population on the territory of Kazakhstan, sent a letter to the leadership of the Academy of Sciences, in which he substantiated the existence of human-like creatures.

Khakhlov gave them the species name Primihomo asiaticus (the first man of Asia) and insisted on organizing an expedition to find viable individuals. But the letter fell into the category of "having no scientific significance", and the events that followed, including the First World War, completely postponed the solution of this problem for many decades.

Bigfoot (aka Bigfoot, Yeti and Sasquatch) first attracted the attention of the general public in the 1950s, when climbers from many countries began to "explore" the highest peaks on the planet. A little more than half a century ago, in 1954, the first special expedition to search for the yeti in the Himalayas took place.

It was organized by the British tabloid Daily Mail on the initiative and under the direction of the newspaper's employee, journalist Ralph Izzard. The impetus for the preparation of the expedition was photographs of the traces of a mysterious bipedal creature in the snow, taken by the Englishman Eric Shipton during the climb to Everest in 1951.

Evidence has been found in high-altitude monasteries proving that the Himalayas are inhabited (or at least lived) by huge humanoid creatures covered with wool.

Izzard very thoughtfully approached the preparations of the expedition, which took almost three years. During this time, he got acquainted with all the publications on the topic in the libraries of different countries, carefully selected specialists for the main part of the expedition, and agreed on the assistance of the Sherpas, the indigenous inhabitants of the high mountains of the Himalayas.

And although Izzard did not catch Bigfoot (and such a task was also set), many reports of meetings with him were recorded, and evidence was found in high-mountain monasteries proving that huge humanoid creatures live (or at least lived) in the Himalayas covered with wool. According to the descriptions of local residents, an English anthropologist, the son of emigrants of the first wave, Vladimir Chernetsky recreated the appearance of the Yeti.

A unique photograph taken during an expedition in the forest near Vyatka (Orichevsky district) in 200B: a shaggy creature moving on two legs was filmed from a distance of about 200 meters, after which it ran away, leaving giant footprints.


In 1958, the USSR Academy of Sciences created a "Commission for the Study of Bigfoot" and sent an expensive expedition to search for the Yeti in the Pamir highlands, but, unlike Izzard, did not bother with any serious preparation. The mission was headed by the botanist Kirill Stanyukovich, and among his colleagues there was not a single specialist in large mammals.

Needless to say, the result turned out to be depressing: considerable funds were spent, as they would say today, on “non-targeted expenses”. It cannot be argued that Stanyukovich did not justify the hopes of high officials at all. Based on the data obtained, he created a geobotanical atlas of the Pamir highlands, but after his expedition, the Academy of Sciences officially closed the topic of studying Bigfoot. Since then, all searches for the Yeti in our country have been carried out exclusively by enthusiasts.

YETI ON FILM

Nevertheless, in the short period of its existence, the commission managed to collect a large number of eyewitness reports about meetings with "mountain dwellers". Several editions of information materials have been published. All work was carried out under the guidance of Professor Boris Porshnev, who founded a new direction in the science of man and his origin - hominology.

In 1963, marked “For Official Use,” with a circulation of only 180 copies, his voluminous monograph “The Current State of the Question of Relic Hominids” was published, in which Porshnev outlined the available data and the theory based on them.

These ideas in subsequent years were developed by the professor in articles in popular science publications and summarized by him in the book "On the Beginning of Human History" (1974), which was published after the death of the author. Boris Porshnev died of a heart attack when the publication of this work was canceled at the last moment, and the set of the book was scattered.

In his writings, Porshnev expressed the idea that "snow people" are Neanderthals who have survived to this day, adapted to natural conditions without tools, clothing, fire, and, most importantly, speech as a means of communication. Speech, according to the scientist, is the most important distinctive quality of a person, distinguishing him from the rest of the animal world.

In the 1960s, expeditionary work moved mainly to the Caucasus. The main merit in this belongs to the doctor of biological sciences Alexander Mashkovtsev, who traveled along and reproached several regions of the Caucasus and collected rich material.

The expeditionary work was headed and led by Maria-Zhanna Kofman for many years. Participants of the search exchanged information about the results obtained at the meetings of the seminar on the problem of relic hominids, founded in 1960 at the State Darwin Museum in Moscow by the famous naturalist Peter Smolin. After Smolin's death, the seminar is headed by Dmitry Bayanov to this day.

While in the USSR the Bigfoot problem was discussed from a theoretical position, in America and Canada there was a serious breakthrough in the field of field searches.

On October 20, 1967, American Roger Patterson managed to film a female hominid in a forest in Northern California and make several plaster casts of her footprints. The film was coldly received by the scientific community, without any study was rejected by the Smithsonian Center and declared a fake. Patterson died five years later from brain cancer, but materials still appear in the press trying to accuse him of falsification.

But back in 1971, Russian hominologists, among whom was your obedient servant, as a result of painstaking research, recognized the film as genuine. Our study of the film is still the most important testament to its truth. American specialists have only recently begun a serious study of it and are already confirming the conclusions made in the USSR almost 40 years ago.

EXAMINATION STUDYING THE PATTERSON FILM, RUSSIAN (THEN SOVIET) SCIENTISTS CONCLUDED THAT IT IS GENUINE. THEY BASED THEIR CONCLUSIONS ON THE FOLLOWING ARGUMENTS:

The exceptional flexibility of the ankle joint of the creature depicted on the film is unattainable for a person.
Greater, compared with a person, the flexibility of the foot itself is in the back direction. Dmitry Bayanov was the first to draw attention to this. Later, the American anthropologist Jeff Meldrum also confirmed this, which he described in his publications.

The Bigfoot's heel protrudes more backwards than a human's. This corresponds to the typical structure of the Neanderthal foot. For a creature of great weight, this is justified from the point of view of the rational application of muscle strength.

In researching the film, Dmitry Donskoy, Ph.D., then head of the department of biomechanics at the Institute of Physical Education, came to the conclusion that the creature's gait is completely atypical for Homo sapiens and practically cannot be reproduced.

In the film, the play of muscles on the body and limbs is clearly visible, which rejects the assumptions about the costume. The whole anatomy of the body and especially the low head set distinguishes this creature from modern man.

Measurements of the frequency of hand vibrations and comparison with the speed at which the film was shot testify to the high growth of the creature (about 220 cm) and, given the physique, large weight (exceeding 200 kg).

BIGFOOT CLAN IN TENNESSEE

In December 1968, two world-famous cryptozoologists, Ivan Sanderson (USA) and Bernard Euvelmans (France), examine the frozen corpse of a hairy humanoid creature. Later they publish the report in the scientific press. Euvelmans identified the deceased as a "modern Neanderthal", declaring that Porshnev was right.

Meanwhile, the search for Bigfoot continued in the USSR. The most significant results were given by the work of Maria-Jeanne Kofman in the North Caucasus, the search for Alexandra Burtseva in Kamchatka and Chukotka; very large-scale and fruitful expeditions were carried out in Tajikistan and in the Pamir-Alai under the leadership of Igor Tatsl and Igor Burtsev from Kiev, and in Western Siberia and Lovozero (Murmansk region) Maya Bykova conducted the search to no avail, Vladimir Pushkarev collected a lot of information in Komi and Yakutia.

Pushkarev's expedition ended tragically: in September 1978, he went on an expedition alone to the Khanty-Mansiysk District and went missing.

In 1990, search expeditions practically ceased due to a sharp change in the socio-political situation on the territory of the former USSR. After some time, thanks to the development of the Internet, Russian researchers were able to establish strong contacts with European and overseas colleagues.

In recent years, interest in the Yeti has intensified, and new regions of discovery of hominids have appeared. In 2002, Janice Carter, a farm owner in Tennessee, said in an interview that a whole clan of Bigfoot has been living near her property for more than half a century. According to the woman, the elder of the "snowy" family was about 60 years old, and "acquaintance" with him took place when Janice was only seven years old.

In the next issue, we will take a closer look at this amazing case and the main characters in the story. You will find a story about unique finds and incredible discoveries.

The mysterious creature from Burganef really looks like a Neanderthal

Janice Carter meets Bigfoot. The drawing was made from the words of a woman and accurately shows the proportions of the creature and demonstrates how their communication took place.

Some time ago, Russian hominologists accidentally stumbled upon information that in 1997 in France, at a provincial fair in the town of Bourganef, a frozen body of a “Neanderthal” was shown, allegedly found in the mountains of Tibet and smuggled from China.

There are many unknowns in this story. The owner of the trailer that carried the Neanderthal cold store disappeared without a trace shortly after images of the body of the dead Bigfoot were leaked to the French press.

The trailer itself has also disappeared with its priceless contents, all attempts to find it for 11 years have been in vain. Photos of the frozen body showed Janice Carter, who with a high degree of probability confirmed that this was not a falsification, but really the corpse of a Bigfoot.

Despite serious difficulties, mainly of a financial nature, research on the Bigfoot problem continues. The recognition of such anthropoid beings as official science will lead to serious changes in many branches of knowledge related to the study of man, will allow one to penetrate the secret of his origin, and will have a serious impact on the development of culture, religion, and medicine. Using the terminology of Porshnev, this will lead to a scientific revolution and to a fundamental revolution in the question of defining a person as such and separating him from the animal world.


An unusual structure made from tree trunks and branches, discovered in Tennessee. Similar structures are often found in difficult forests. Their purpose is still unknown, but, apparently, this is how the yetis somehow mark their territory. Igor Burtsev (pictured) is convinced that a huge Bigfoot family lives in Tennessee.

HUMAN AND ANIMAL HYBRID

Even Michel Nostradamus warned about the appearance of a hybrid of man and animal. Experiments on vivisection, that is, surgical intervention in a living organism in order to create another creature, in particular a person (or similar to him), were carried out back in the 19th century, but they did not lead to anything.

There is no such data about earlier "studies". At least, the doctors and alchemists of the Middle Ages did not resort to such experiments (it was the way to the fire of the Inquisition), being content with attempts to grow homunculi in test tubes.

Experiments on breeding humanoid creatures became widespread (in certain circles) in the early 1920s. A student of academician Ivan Pavlov, biologist Ilya Ivanov, began to conduct experiments on crossing humans and chimpanzees by artificial insemination. The experiments were carried out on volunteers and lasted more than 10 years, until Ivanov's death in 1932, which followed under very mysterious circumstances.

Why were these experiments carried out? The reason is simple at first glance - the possibility of creating some hybrids for working in difficult and harmful conditions and, possibly, for organ donation. However, the results of the experiments are unknown. True, there is unverified evidence that somewhere in the mines, Gulag prisoners met hairy ape-like people.

But is it possible to create such creatures and other humanoid monsters? Geneticists answer this question in the negative, since humans have 46 chromosomes, and chimpanzees have 48, which means that artificial (as well as natural) fertilization is simply impossible. But Ivanov, when exposed to the egg, could well use chemicals, drugs, radiation, and any other potent methods. After all, what is sometimes impossible in nature is quite possible in the laboratory.

JAPANESE VERSION

A Japanese climber claims to have uncovered the mystery of Bigfoot, and now this problem, which has been troubling the minds of seekers of mysterious phenomena for decades, is over. After 12 years of research, Ma-koto Nebuka concluded that the legendary yeti from the Himalayas is nothing but the Himalayan bear (Ursus thibetanus).

“Reality is rarely as terrifying as the imagination,” says a smiling Nebuka, one of the leading members of the Alpine Club of Japan, at a press conference in Tokyo for the release of his book, summarizing years of research into the Bigfoot problem.

In addition to unique photographs. Nebuka was also engaged in linguistic research. In particular, an analysis of interviews with residents of Nepal, Tibet and Bhutan showed that the notorious "Yeti" is a distorted "Meti", that is, "bear" in the local dialect. And the myth almost became a reality due to the fact that the Tibetans consider the yeti honey to be an omnipotent and terrible creature with supernatural powers.

These concepts combined and became Bigfoot, explains Nebuka. As proof of his position, he shows a photograph of a yeti bear, whose head and paws are kept by one of the Sherpas as a talisman.

DO YOU KNOW THAT...

The name "snowman" is a tracing paper from the Tibetan "metoh kangmi", as this creature is called there.
. Scientists studying Bigfoot agree that the life span of this creature is 250-300 years.
. Cryptozoologists have not only casts of footprints, hair and yeti excrement, but also fragments of his dwelling, built on the ground and on trees. Scientists are convinced that it takes a lot of strength and intelligence to build a structure out of twigs and seal the walls with grass, foliage, earth and excrement.
. Finnish scientists tried to offer the most incredible version of the appearance of Bigfoot. They claimed that the yetis are aliens, and when they disappear, they are transported to their planet.
. In Malaysia, the yeti is considered a deity, they call it "Hantu Yarang Jiji" (literally translated - "spirit with widely spaced teeth"), and in the Endau-Rompin National Park there is even a small chapel with a sculpture of a bigfoot, to which believers come to pray.
. The American Society of Cryptozoologists and in Tucson, Arizona, announced a reward of $100,000 to anyone who finds and delivers the corpse of Bigfoot to scientists, and $1 million to those who manage to catch him alive.

Igor Burtsev
Magazine "Discovery" No. 5 2009.

There are many unknown and unexplored things in the world. One of the controversial topics for scientists is Bigfoot, there are disputes about who he is, where he came from. Various opinions and versions are expressed, and each of them has its own rationale.

Does Bigfoot exist?

And yes and no, it depends on who and on what grounds belong to this category of living organisms:

  1. There are several names for it, for example, sasquatch, yeti, almasty, bigfoot and a number of others. It lives high in the mountains in central and northeast Asia, as well as in the Himalayas, but there is no reliable confirmation of its existence;
  2. There is an opinion of Professor B. F. Porshnev that it is the so-called relic (preserved from ancient times) hominid, that is, it belongs to the order of primates, which includes man as a biological genus and species;
  3. Academician A. B. Migdal, in one of his articles, cited the opinion of an oceanologist regarding the reality of the Loch Ness monster and Bigfoot. Its essence was that there is no reason to believe in it, despite the fact that we would very much like to: the basis of the scientific approach lies in its proof;
  4. According to the paleontologist K. Yeskov, this subject, in principle, can live in certain natural areas. At the same time, according to the zoologist, the location of the creature in this case should be known and studied by professionals.

The point of view is also expressed that the snowy man is a representative of an alternative branch of the evolution of the human race.

What does a snowman look like?

Yeti descriptions are not very diverse:

  • The creature has a human-like face with dark skin, fairly long arms, a short neck and hips, a heavy lower jaw, and a pointed head. The muscular and dense body is covered with thick hair, which is shorter in length than the hairline on the head. The length of the body varies from the usual average human height to about 3 meters in height;
  • There is great dexterity when climbing trees;
  • The length of the foot, according to available information, is up to 40 cm in length and 17-18 and even up to 35 cm in width;
  • In the descriptions there is information that the yeti's palm is also covered with wool, and they themselves look like monkeys;
  • In one of the regions of Abkhazia in the second half of the 19th century, there lived a wild, hairy woman named Zana, who had children from men from the local population.

Stories about encounters with Bigfoot are accompanied by descriptions of huge, furry creatures that inspire fear and horror, from which people can even lose consciousness or get mentally disturbed.

Who are cryptozoologists and what do they do?

The term is derived from the words "cryptos", which is translated from Greek as hidden, secret, and "zoology" - the well-known science of the animal world, which is man:

  • At the end of the 80s of the last century, enthusiasts created a society of cryptozoologists in our country, which was engaged in the search and study of Bigfoot as a special branch of humanoid creatures that have been preserved since ancient times and exist in parallel with “reasonable man”;
  • It is not part of academic science, although at one time it was "assigned" to the Ministry of Culture of the Soviet Union. One of the most active founders of the society was the doctor M.-J. Kofman, a member of the expedition to the Pamirs to search for Bigfoot, organized by the Academy of Sciences in 1958, and a member of a special commission, which included well-known scientists in the field of geology, botany, anthropology, physics;
  • Professor B.F. Porshnev played a huge role in developing the issue of relic hominids, who considered this problem not only from the point of view of paleontology, but also included an ideological approach based on the social role of modern man, in contrast to his purely biological functions.

This society still exists today, and its members publish their works.

What is the correct name for hominids?

The name "Bigfoot" appeared in the 20s of the last century, and according to one version, it is associated with an inaccurate translation:

  • It does not at all indicate that the creature constantly lives in the snows of the highlands, although it can appear there during its movements and transitions. At the same time, it finds food below this zone, in forests and meadows;
  • Boris Fedorovich Porshnev believed that this creature belonging to the family of hominids not only cannot be associated with snow, but, by and large, no reason to call a man in the sense that we understand it. Residents of the areas in which the studies were carried out do not use this name. The scientist generally considered this term random and not corresponding to the essence of the subject of study;
  • Professor-geographer E. M. Murzaev mentioned in one of his works that the name "Bigfoot" was a literal translation of the word "bear" from some languages ​​of the peoples of Central Asia. It was understood by many in a literal sense, which introduced a certain confusion of concepts. This is quoted in his work on Tibet by LN Gumilyov.

In different regions of the country and the world, he has many local "names".

Bigfoot Theme in Art

He is present in various traditions and legends, is the "hero" of feature films and animated films:

  • The part of the Bigfoot in the folklore of the northern peoples of Siberia was played by the half-fantastic "Wandering Chukchi". The indigenous and Russian population believed in its existence;
  • About the wild people called chuchuns and mules, says Yakut and Evenki folklore. These characters wore animal skins, had long hair, tall stature, and slurred speech. They were very strong, ran fast, carried a bow and arrows with them. Could steal food or deer, attack a person.
  • The Russian scientist and writer Pyotr Dravert published an article in the 1930s on the basis of local stories about these, as he called, primitive people. At the same time, his reviewer Ksenofontov believed that this information belongs to the area of ​​ancient beliefs of the Yakuts, who believed in spirits;
  • There have been several films based on the Bigfoot theme, ranging from horror to comedy. These include the film by Eldar Ryazanov "The Man from Nowhere", a number of American films, the German cartoon "Trouble in the Himalayas".

In the state of Bhutan, a tourist route has been laid through the mountains, called the Bigfoot Trail.

Just like in Marshak's poems about an unknown hero whom everyone is looking for but cannot find. They even know his name - Bigfoot. Who he is - only so far it has not been possible to determine exactly, and whether he exists in principle.

6 rare yeti videos

In this video, Andrei Voloshin will show rare footage proving the existence of Bigfoot:

Have questions?

Report a typo

Text to be sent to our editors: