From the memoirs of contemporaries about A. A. Akhmatova (end). Questions and tasks
One of the peculiar features of Akhmatova’s early lyrics is the appearance of recognizable folklore motifs. Already, contemporaries were struck by the features of Akhmatova’s poetics, which made it possible, in the words of O. Mandelstam, “to discern a woman and a peasant woman in a literary Russian lady of the twentieth century.” Despite the fact that the most famous works of this sound belong to the collection "Evening", folklore traditions are also highlighted in "Rosary" and "White Flock".
A special attitude towards the folk poetic tradition distinguished Akhmatova in the Acmeist circle. In the poetic system of Acmeism, a change occurred in the functional role of folklore. In a certain way, this was connected with the declaratively declared Western orientation. Unlike the “younger” symbolists, who appealed to national roots in their work, Acmeism emphasized the continuity with the traditions of Shakespeare, Rabelais, Villon, and T. Gautier. According to A. Blok’s characterization, Acmeism “did not contain any native “storm and stress”, but was an imported “foreign thing.” Apparently, this partly explains the fact that Russian folklore did not become one of the organic elements of the artistic system Acmeists.
Against this background, the poetic face of Anna Akhmatova stood out especially clearly with her artistic searches, inextricably linked with the heritage of national culture. It is no coincidence that A. Blok, speaking against the aestheticism and formalism of the Acmeists, singled out Akhmatova as an “exception.” V.M. turned out to be right. Zhirmunsky, who already in 1916 connected the future of Russian poetry not with Acmeism, but with overcoming it: “We dream that new poetry can become broader - not individualistic, literary and urban, but nationwide, national, that it will include everything the diversity of forces dormant in the people, in the provinces, estates and villages, and not just in the capital, that it will be nourished by all of Russia, its historical traditions and its ideal goals, the joint and connected life of all people living not in a solitary cell, but in friendly connection with each other and with the native land" Zhirmunsky V.M. Overcoming symbolism. // Russian Thought, 1916, No. 12. It was along the line of overcoming Acmeism, from the subjectivity and isolation of the lyrical diary through the difficult search for an epic form to themes of great civil sound, that the evolution of Akhmatova’s lyrics took place.
Akhmatova's poetry is an unusually complex and original fusion of traditions of Russian and world literature. Researchers saw in Akhmatova a successor of Russian classical poetry (Pushkin, Baratynsky, Tyutchev, Nekrasov) and a recipient of the experience of older contemporaries (Blok, Annensky), and put her lyrics in direct connection with the achievements of psychological prose of the 19th century (Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Leskov). But there was another, no less important for Akhmatova, source of her poetic inspiration - Russian folk art.
Folk poetic culture was refracted in a very specific way in Akhmatova’s poetry, perceived not only in its “pure form,” but also through the literary tradition (primarily through Pushkin and Nekrasov). The interest that Akhmatova showed in folk poetics was strong and stable, the principles of selection of folklore material changed, reflecting the general evolution of Akhmatova’s lyrics. This gives grounds to talk about folklore traditions in Akhmatova’s poetry, the adherence to which was a conscious and purposeful process. V.M. Zhirmunsky, pointing to the need for a “more in-depth special study” of the role of folk poetic traditions in the development of Akhmatova as a national poet, warned against classifying her “in the category of poets of a specifically Russian “folk style.” “And yet it is not by chance,” the researcher notes, “ “songs” as a special genre category, emphasized by the title, run through all of her work, starting with the book “Evening”:
I'm at sunrise
I sing about love.
On my knees in the garden
Swan field
The folk song element turned out to be close to the poetic worldview of the early Akhmatova. The leitmotif of Akhmatova’s first collections is a woman’s fate, the sorrows of a woman’s soul, told by the heroine herself. The highlighting of the female poetic voice is a characteristic feature of the era, which uniquely reflected the general trend in the development of Russian poetry at the beginning of the 20th century - the strengthening of the lyrical principle in poetic creativity.
The desire to portray a female lyrical character with a special emphasis on the national, with an emphasized appeal to the folk principle, at first glance, is more characteristic of M. Tsvetaeva with her bright “Russian style” of the late 10s and early 20s. Not so obviously, but deeper and more seriously, similar processes took place in Akhmatova’s poetic thinking. Her lyrical “I” seems to split into two; the heroine, associated with the refined atmosphere of literary salons, has a “folklore reflection”. As L. Ginzburg notes, “Akhmatova’s urban world has... a double that arises from song, from Russian folklore... These song parallels are important in the general structure of the lyrical image of early Akhmatova. Psychological processes occurring in the specifics of the urban way of life occur simultaneously and in the forms of folk consciousness, as if primordial, universal" Chervinskaya O. Acmeism in the context of the Silver Age and tradition. - Chernivtsi, 1997. P.124. For example, this is clearly visible in the poem “You know, I am languishing in captivity”:
You know I'm languishing in captivity
I pray for the death of the Lord.
But I remember everything painfully
Tver meager land.
Crane at an old well
Above him, like boiling clouds,
There are creaky gates in the fields,
And the smell of bread, and melancholy.
And judgmental glances
Calm tanned women.
It is no coincidence that Akhmatova uses here the technique of contrasting a restless, “languishing” heroine and “calm tanned women” - through kinship with the land, Akhmatova tries to bridge this gap and show its relativity.
This is the main thing in the interpretation of the lyrical character of the early Akhmatova, who lives in two worlds: the metropolitan noble and the rural. Akhmatova’s method of constructing a lyrical image cannot be called a “folkloristic mask.” And already because her “folklore” heroine is devoid of declarative conventions. On the contrary, the poetess tries to emphasize the internal kinship and spiritual community of her heroines.
This unexpected duality provides the key to understanding the peculiarities of Akhmatova’s folklorism. The richest imagery and symbolism of folk song, folk-poetic linguistic element, folklore allusions and reminiscences (“Lullaby” (1915), “I will serve you faithfully...”) are refracted through the prism of individual poetic thinking, combined with the emotional anguish characteristic of the young Akhmatova , fractured, sometimes refined aestheticism.
Akhmatov's allusions are most often associated with folklore and religious motifs - stylistic figures that hint through a similar-sounding word or mention of a well-known real fact, historical event, or literary work. Russia's past, its spiritual history inspire the poet to recreate pictures of the past:
Dry lips are tightly closed,
The flame of three thousand candles is hot.
This is how Princess Evdokia lay
On fragrant sapphire brocade.
And, bending over, she prayed tearlessly
She's talking about the blind boy's mother,
Trying to catch the air with your lips.
And the one who came from the southern region
Black-eyed, hunchbacked old man,
As if to the door of heavenly paradise,
I approached the darkened step.
Here, as in many of her poems, Akhmatova contrasts the luxury of the prince’s bed (sapphire brocade, three thousand candles) and the squalor of those who came to him (a blind boy, a hunchbacked old man).
And in the poem “Confession,” Akhmatova turns to biblical motifs, drawing an analogy between the miraculous resurrection of a girl performed by Christ and her own spiritual renewal after communion.
He who forgave my sins fell silent.
The purple twilight extinguishes the candles,
And a dark stole
She covered her head and shoulders.
Heart beats faster, faster,
Touching through the fabric
Hands absentmindedly making the sign of the cross.
But Akhmatova’s allusions are not limited to Russian folklore - in one of the poems in the collection “The Rosary,” she turns to the European folklore tradition in order to, through a subtle allusion to the unfulfilled happy fairy tale about Cinderella, talk about her love sorrows and doubts.
And meet you on the steps
They didn't come out with a flashlight.
In the wrong moonlight
I entered a quiet house.
Under the green lamp,
With a lifeless smile,
A friend whispers: “Cendrillona,
The fire goes out in the fireplace,
Tomya, the cricket is cracking.
Oh! someone took it as a souvenir
My white shoe
And he gave me three carnations,
Without looking up.
Oh sweet clues,
Where should I hide you?
And it’s hard for the heart to believe,
That the time is near, the time is near,
What will he measure for everyone?
My white shoe.
The tetrameter song trochee, strongly associated in the literary tradition with folk themes, is indirectly associated with Akhmatova; again the parallel with the spiritual world and emotional state of the folklore heroine comes to the fore.
Akhmatova's early work is primarily the lyrics of love, often unrequited. The semantic accents that appear in Akhmatova’s interpretation of the love theme turn out to be in many ways close to the traditional lyrical song, in the center of which is the failed fate of a woman. Often in folk lyrics, passionate love is presented as a disease induced by divination, bringing death to a person. According to V.I. Dahl, “what we call love, the common people call corruption, dryness, which... is put on.” The motif of love-misfortune, love-obsession, misfortune, characteristic of a folk song, in Akhmatova acquires that spiritual breakdown and passion that the folklore heroine, restrained in expressing her feelings, does not know.
Akhmatova’s folklore motifs often take on a specific religious connotation and echo prayer, which is also reminiscent of folk songs. A sad song - Akhmatova’s complaint is filled with a vague threat, a bitter reproach:
You will live without knowing any trouble,
Rule and judge
With my quiet friend
Raise sons.
And good luck to you in everything,
Honor from everyone
You don't know that I'm crying
I'm losing count of the days.
There are many of us homeless,
Our strength lies in
What for us, blind and dark,
God's house is shining,
And for us, bowed down,
The altars are burning
In this poem, the appeal to God as the final judge emphasizes the hopelessness of grief and the heroine’s cruel resentment. There is an almost mystical belief in the highest justice.
The manifestation of folklore motifs is especially noticeable in the themes of bitter fate, mourning: a mother’s cry for her son, for her husband - these lines are almost prophetic, they will also echo in the “Requiem” with a bitter woman’s cry “Husband in the grave, son in prison // Pray for me.” And in the collection “White Flock” it is still a song of pity about a ruined young life.
Is that why I carried you
I was once in your arms,
That's why the power shined
In your blue eyes!
He grew up slim and tall,
Sang songs, drank Madeira,
To distant Anatolia
He drove his own destroyer.
On Malakhov Kurgan
The officer was shot.
Twenty years without a week
He looked at the white light
But, in addition, Akhmatova has noticeable tendencies towards laconic poetic expression of events in mental life, noted by the first critics; one of its manifestations was found in Akhmatova’s appeal to aphoristic genres of folklore - proverbs, sayings, proverbs. The poetess either includes them in the structure of the verse itself (“And here we have peace and quiet, God’s grace”; “And around is the old city of St. Petersburg, Which wiped the sides of the people (As the people said then)”), or by means of her verse she tries to convey the syntactic and the rhythmic organization of folk speech (two-part construction, internal rhyme, consonance of endings), a special, proverbial type of comparisons and comparisons, and in this case it only starts from the folklore model.
And here we have peace and quiet,
God's grace.
And we have bright eyes
No order to rise.
The creatively assimilated experience of Russian classical literature and folklore, loyalty to the best traditions of Russian culture contributed to the emergence of Akhmatova as a national poet. This path was long and difficult, marked by crisis doubts and creative ups. Without losing her own individuality, Akhmatova sought to give her searches a direction inherent in the main lines of development of Soviet poetry. And the guiding thread for her was the theme of the Motherland, which she reverently carried, the beginning of which was laid by her early lyrical works, including the collections "Rosary" and "White Flock", which was continued in other, later collections of A. Akhmatova.
The theme of repression in A. Akhmatova’s poem “Requiem”
Literature and library science
Akhmatova began writing her poem Requiem in 1935 when her only son Lev Gumilyov was arrested. Like other mothers, Akhmatova’s sister’s wife stood for many hours in the silent line that led to the St. Petersburg Kresty prison. Only in 1940 did Akhmatova complete her work; it was published in 1987, many years after the death of the author. Akhmatova talks about the history of the creation of the poem.
9. The theme of repression in A. Akhmatova’s poem “Requiem”
A. Akhmatova began writing her poem “Requiem” in 1935, when her only son Lev Gumilev was arrested. He was soon released, but was arrested, imprisoned and exiled twice more. These were the years of Stalinist repressions. Like other mothers, wives, and sisters, Akhmatova stood for many hours in the silent line that led to the St. Petersburg Kresty prison. The most important thing is that she was “ready” for all this, ready not only to experience it, but also to describe it. Akhmatova’s early poem “Walked Silently Around the House...” has the lines: “Tell me, can’t you forgive?” And I said: “I can.” The last words of the text for the poem written in 1957 (“Instead of a preface”) are a direct quote from this poem. When one of the women standing next to A. Akhmatova in line barely audibly asked: “Can you describe this?” She replied: “I can.” Gradually, poems were born about the terrible time that was experienced together with all the people. It was they who composed the poem “Requiem,” which became a tribute to the mournful memory of the people killed during the years of Stalin’s tyranny. Only in 1940 did Akhmatova complete her work; it was published in 1987, many years after the death of the author. In 1961, after the completion of the poem, an epigraph was written for it. These are compressed, strict four lines, striking in their severity: “No, and not under an alien firmament, And not under the protection of alien wings, I was then with my people, Where my people, unfortunately, were.”
“Requiem” is a work about the death of people, a country, and the foundations of existence. The most common word in the poem is “death.” It is always close, but never accomplished. A person lives and understands that he must move on, live and remember. The poem consists of several poems related to each other by one theme, the theme of memory of those who found themselves in prison dungeons in the thirties, and of those who courageously endured the arrests of their relatives, the death of loved ones and friends, who tried to help them in difficult times . In the preface, A. Akhmatova talks about the history of the creation of the poem. An unfamiliar woman, just like Akhmatova, who was standing in prison lines in Leningrad, asked her to describe all the horrors of the Yezhovshchina. In the “Introduction,” Akhmatova paints a vivid image of Leningrad, which seemed to her like a “dangling pendant” near the prisons, “convict regiments” that walked along the streets of the city, “death stars” standing above it. The bloody boots and tires of the black Marus (the so-called cars that came at night to arrest townspeople) crushed “innocent Rus'.” And she just writhes under them. Before us passes the fate of a mother and son, whose images are correlated with gospel symbolism. Akhmatova expands the temporal and spatial framework of the plot, showing a universal tragedy. We either see a simple woman whose husband is arrested at night, or a biblical Mother whose Son was crucified. Here before us is a simple Russian woman, in whose memory the crying of children, the melting candle at the shrine, the mortal sweat on the brow of a loved one who is being taken away at dawn will forever remain. She will cry for him just as the Streltsy “wives” once cried under the walls of the Kremlin. Then suddenly we see the image of a woman so similar to Akhmatova herself, who does not believe that everything is happening to her - the “mockery”, “the favorite of all friends”, “the cheerful sinner of Tsarskoye Selo”. Could she ever have thought that she would be three hundredth in line at Kresty? And now her whole life is in these queues. I have been screaming for seventeen months, calling you home, throwing myself at the feet of the executioner, you are my son and my horror. It’s impossible to make out who is the “beast” and who is the “man,” because innocent people are being arrested, and all the mother’s thoughts involuntarily turn to death. And then the sentence “stone word” sounds, and you have to kill your memory, petrify your soul and learn to live again. And the mother thinks about death again, only now about her own. It seems to her like salvation, and it doesn’t matter what form it takes: “a poisoned shell”, “a weight”, “a typhoid child” - the main thing is that it will save you from suffering and from spiritual emptiness. These sufferings are comparable only to the suffering of the Mother of Jesus, who also lost her Son. @But the Mother understands that this is only madness, because death will not allow him to take away with him Neither the terrible eyes of his son, Petrified suffering, nor the day when the thunderstorm came, nor the hour of the prison meeting, nor the sweet coolness of hands, nor the excited shadows of linden trees, nor the distant light sound Words of last consolation. So we have to live. To live in order to name those who died in Stalin’s dungeons, to remember, to remember always and everywhere who stood “both in the bitter cold and in the July heat under the blinding red wall.” There is a poem in the poem called "The Crucifixion". It describes the last minutes of Jesus' life, his appeal to his mother and father. There is a misunderstanding of what is happening, and the reader comes to the realization that everything that is happening is senseless and unfair, because there is nothing worse than the death of an innocent person and the grief of a mother who has lost her son. Biblical motives allowed her to show the scale of this tragedy, the impossibility of forgiving those who committed this madness, and the impossibility of forgetting what happened, because we were talking about the fate of the people, about millions of lives. Thus, the poem “Requiem” became a monument to innocent victims and those who suffered with them. In the poem, A. Akhmatova showed her involvement in the fate of the country. The famous prose writer B. Zaitsev, after reading “Requiem,” said: “Could it be imagined... that this fragile and thin woman would utter such a cry - a feminine, maternal cry, not only for herself, but also for all those suffering - wives, mothers, brides , in general, about all those crucified?” And it is impossible for the lyrical heroine to forget the mothers who suddenly turned gray, the howl of an old woman who lost her son, the rumble of the black marus. And the poem “Requiem” sounds like a memorial prayer for all those who died in the terrible time of repression. And as long as people hear her, because the whole “hundred-million-strong nation” is screaming with her, the tragedy that A. Akhmatova talks about will not happen again. A.A. Akhmatova entered literature as a lyrical, chamber poet. Her poems about unrequited love, about the heroine’s experiences, her loneliness among people and a bright, imaginative perception of the world around her attracted the reader and made him feel the author’s mood. But it took time and terrible events that shook Russia, war, revolution, for the poems of A.A. Akhmatova developed a civic, patriotic feeling. The poetess has compassion for her homeland and her people, considering it impossible for herself to leave it during the difficult years of trials. But the years of Stalinist repressions became especially difficult for her. For the authorities, Akhmatova was an alien person, hostile to the Soviet system. The 1946 decree confirmed this officially. She was not forgotten either that her husband, Nikolai Gumilyov, was shot in 1921 for participating in a counter-revolutionary conspiracy (according to the official version), or the proud silence since the late 20s of that unofficial “internal emigration” that she chose for herself poetess. Akhmatova accepts her fate, but this is not humility and indifference; she is ready to stand and endure everything that befell her. “We did not deflect a single blow,” Akhmatova wrote. And her “Requiem”, written from 1935 to 1940 not for publication for herself, “for the table” and published much later, is evidence of the courageous civic position of both the lyrical heroine of the poem and its author. It reflects not only the personal tragic circumstances of A.’s life. A. Akhmatova arrest of her son, L.N. Gumilev, and husband, N.N. Punin, but also the grief of all Russian women, those wives, mothers, sisters who stood with her for 17 terrible months in prison lines in Leningrad. The author speaks about this in the preface to the poem about the moral duty to his “sisters in misfortune”, about the duty of memory to the innocent dead. The grief of a mother and wife is common to all women of all eras, all troubled times. Akhmatova shares it with others, speaking about them as about herself: “I will, like the Streltsy wives, howl under the Kremlin towers.” The mother’s suffering, her inescapable grief, loneliness emotionally colors events in black and yellow colors - colors traditional for Russian poetry, symbols of grief and illness. Terrible loneliness sounds in these lines, and it seems especially piercingly sharp in contrast to the happy, carefree past: “I wish I could show you, the mocking one and the favorite of all friends, the cheerful sinner of Tsarskoye Selo, what will happen to your life Like the three hundredth, with the transfer, Under the Crosses You will stand and burn through the New Year's ice with your hot tears. Grief fills the consciousness, the heroine is on the verge of madness: “I have been screaming for seventeen months, Calling you home, Throwing myself at the feet of the executioner, You are my son and my horror. Everything is forever mixed up, And I can’t figure out now who is the beast, who is the man, And how long will it be to wait for the execution.” The most terrible thing in this whole nightmare is the feeling that the victims are innocent and in vain, because it is no coincidence that the white nights, according to the author, speak to the son “about your high cross and about death.” And the sentence of the innocent sounds like a “word of stone” and falls like the sword of unjust justice. How much courage and perseverance is required from the heroine! She is ready for the worst, for death “I don’t care now.” As a person of Christian culture, Akhmatova’s poems often contain those concepts that the Soviet government tried to erase as socially alien: soul, God, prayer. It turned out that the authorities were unable to deprive a person of faith, brought up over centuries, because, like women from the people, the heroine in difficult times turns to images that are holy for Russian people - the Mother of Christ, the personification of all maternal grief and maternal suffering. “Magdalene fought and sobbed, The beloved disciple turned to stone, And where the Mother stood silently, No one dared to look. And this brings the heroine closer to her people, makes her feel her responsibility as a Poet for ensuring that everything that happens is preserved in the people’s memory, came to the court of History.
As well as other works that may interest you |
|||
| 30074. | Visualization of numerical methods. Solving a 1st order differential equation | 1.2 MB | |
| There are many technical systems and technological processes, the characteristics of which continuously change over time. Such phenomena usually obey physical laws, which are formulated in the form of differential equations. And therefore, the ability to solve differential equations is a necessary factor in order to most fully understand the world around us and the processes occurring in it. | |||
| 30077. | Development and analysis of transient processes in the electric drive of the generator-motor system | 502.89 KB | |
| For the output data, it is necessary to: select the GPS stationary generator and the AD asynchronous drive motor; expand and enhance the static characteristics of the power supply and identify operating points on the mechanical characteristics and on the magnetization characteristics; determine the dynamic parameters of the unit; unlock the generator's wake-up factor; open the resistors at the generator's alarm winding; Vikonati the structure of transient processes when activating the generator and the anchor number of the graphical analytical gas generator system... | |||
| 30078. | 396 KB | ||
| The power supply consists of a power transformer, rectifiers, smoothing filters and, in many cases, voltage (or current) stabilizers. Let's start the calculation with the final element - the stabilizer, and then calculate the transformer. | |||
| 30079. | TRANSFORMER TM – 630/10 | 1.46 MB | |
| 1 Calculation of a screw winding 18 3.1 Calculation of a multilayer cylindrical winding 23 made of round wire 4 Calculation of short circuit parameters 27 4.2 where UH is the rated line voltage of the winding kV SH in kVA.8 kVA The voltage class of the transformer is considered to be the voltage class of the HV winding. | |||
| 30080. | General psychology: Textbook for universities | 6.29 MB | |
| Pavlova 82 Research on functional asymmetry of the brain 112 Learning theory 128 Theories of hearing 192 Theories of color vision 196 Phenomenal memory 280 Pathology of the will 381 This is interesting What are the mechanisms of consciousness 96 Does the phenomenon of psi exist 154 How does the transfer of information from the receptor to the brain occur 166 How does a person recognize objects 204 What allows a person to adequately perceive the world around him 226 Is it possible to study ideas 237 How does the encoding and storage of information in memory occur 256 Childhood amnesia... | |||
| 30081. | PEDAGOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY. TEXTBOOK FOR UNIVERSITIES | 3.36 MB | |
| The textbook covers modern approaches to psychological problems of education and training, expressed primarily in the characterization of the subject, principles and methods of educational psychology, science and the field of practical activity. The code of ethics of a psychologist in Russia has not yet become a regulator of his professional activities. The object of pedagogical activity is the processes of teaching and education, and the subject is the indicative part of the students' activities. Due to the complexity of the educational process, there are trends... | |||
| 30082. | PHILOSOPHY OF LAW. Chief Pos_bnik | 1.54 MB | |
| For centuries, the philosophy of law was respected by bourgeois science. The philosophy of law as a discipline was not taught in the law faculties of universities, but rather the methodological preparation of future lawyers. At the Department of Philosophy of the National Academy of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, an initial program was developed on the philosophy of law, which became the basis of this initial textbook. | |||
Valeeva Farida
The essay shows the tragedy of the individual, family and people in Akhmatova A.'s poem "Requiem".
Download:
Preview:
Essay on the topic
“The tragedy of the individual, family, people in the poem by A.A. Akhmatova "Requiem"
The tragedy of the individual, family, people in the poem by A.A. Akhmatova "Requiem"
The wound inflicted on the homeland, each of
feels us in the depths of his heart.
V. Hugo.
A person’s life is inseparable from the life of the state in which he lives. Each era in the formation and development of the Russian state forged and shaped the Russian national character, which was formed on the basis of love and devotion to the Fatherland, self-sacrifice in the name of the Motherland. At all times, patriotism, a sense of duty to the Fatherland, and the invincibility of the spirit have been valued and celebrated on Russian soil.
During the formation and development of the Soviet state, the sense of national identity, the sense of involvement in the destinies of the country, people, and history were revived and strengthened. A. Akhmatova, the great poetess of the 20th century, who wrote her wonderful poems in an era of great social changes and disasters, became an example of true patriotism and loyalty to the fatherland. The trials that befell the Russian people are embodied in her lyrics. Whatever Anna Akhmatova wrote about: about the First World War, the events of 1917, Stalin’s repressions, the Great Patriotic War, the “Khrushchev Thaw” - her civic and universal position remained unchanged: in all trials she was with her people. Her work was distinguished by a sense of involvement in the destinies of the country, people, and history. The bitter trials that befell Russia did not break Akhmatova’s determination to share the fate of her destroyed, hungry, bleeding wars, but still beloved and native country.
True poetry is beautiful because it expresses the high truth of the poet’s soul and the merciless truth of time. A. Akhmatova understood this, and so do we, the readers who love her poetry. I am sure that many generations of readers will love her poems that penetrate straight to the soul.
To understand the great courage of Akhmatova’s soul, let’s re-read the most tragic work, “Requiem,” dedicated to the events of a terrible era in the history of the Russian state - Stalin’s repressions. Truth is not only the death of innocent people, blood and tears, it is also cleansing of everything vile, dirty and terrible that happened during the period of Bolshevik terror against its people. Silencing this aspect of the life of our state threatens with new tragedies. Openness cleanses, makes it impossible for this to happen ever again in our history.
The poem "Requiem" was created from 1935 to 1940. In those distant years, the poem could only be read in handwritten copies. What truth did this work of Akhmatova contain that they were afraid to make it public for so long? This was the truth about Stalin's repressions. Akhmatova knew about them firsthand: her only son Lev Gumilyov was arrested, whose father, the famous Russian poet N. Gumilyov, a former tsarist officer, was arrested by the Bolsheviks.
Anna Andreevna spent seventeen long months in prison lines while the fate of her son was being decided. One day they recognized her in this mournful line and asked: “Can you describe this?” Akhmatova firmly answered: “I can.” It was an oath to the people with whom she was always together, sharing all their misfortunes.
Yes, Akhmatova fulfilled her oath. It was her duty to the people - to convey to future generations the pain and tragedy of that terrible time in the history of our state. It was a time, as the poetess figuratively writes, when “the stars of death ran over people and Rus', which had not broken either under the Horde or under the invasion of Napoleon, writhed “under the bloody boots” of its own sons...” Writing such a poem can be considered a heroic feat. After all, the text of the poem could have been a death sentence for Anna Akhmatova herself. She described a time “when only the dead smiled and were glad for the peace,” when people suffered either in prisons or near them. Akhmatova, “the three hundredth with a parcel and with her hot tear,” stands in line next to her “unwitting friends” near the Kresta prison, where her arrested son is, and prays for everyone who stood there “both in the bitter cold and in the July heat".
The arrest of Akhmatov’s son is correlated with death, because the very fact of restriction of freedom in those years became in fact a sentence. She compares herself with the Streltsy wives during the reprisal against the rebel Streltsy in the era of Peter I, who were exiled along with their families or executed by the Russian people. She is no longer able to make out now “who is the beast, who is the man, and how long will it be to wait for execution,” since the arrest of one of the family members in those years threatened everyone else with at least exile. And the slander was not supported by evidence. And yet Akhmatova resigned herself, but the pain in her soul did not subside. She and her son endure these “terrible white nights,” constantly reminding them of imminent death. And when the verdict is passed, one has to kill the memory and force the soul to petrify in order to “learn to live again.” Otherwise, only an “empty house” will remain. On the other hand, Akhmatova is ready to accept death, she is even waiting for it, because she “doesn’t care now.” The heroine is also indifferent to the form in which she accepts her last companion - death. Madness, delirium or humility?
The central position in the work is occupied by the crucifix. This is its emotional and semantic key. I think the climax is when the "Great Star" of death disappeared and "the heavens melted into fire." The crucifixion in the Requiem is the embodiment of the Way of the Cross, when Magdalene “fought and wept”, and the mother had to come to terms with the death of her child. The Mother’s silence is sorrow, a requiem for all those who were in the “convict holes.”
The epilogue is a continuation of muteness and madness and at the same time a prayer “for everyone who stood there with me.” The “red blind wall” represents those people who were behind it, who are in the Kremlin. They “went blind” because they had neither soul, nor compassion, nor any other feelings, nor sight to see what they had done with their own hands...
The second part of the epilogue, both in the melody of intonation and in meaning, can be correlated with the ringing of a bell, announcing a burial, a mourning:
The funeral hour has approached again,
I see, I hear, I feel you.
The autobiographical nature of “Requiem” is beyond doubt; it reflects the tragedy of the entire people, containing the drama of a woman who lost her husband and son:
Husband in the grave, son in prison e,
Pray for me...
The grief of a woman who has gone through all the circles of hell is so great that before her “the mountains bend, the great river does not flow...”. Maternal grief hardens the heart and kills the soul. A mother’s expectation of the most terrible thing—a death sentence for her child—almost deprives a woman of her sanity: “madness has already covered half of her soul.” Akhmatova turns to death, calling it for herself as a way of getting rid of inhuman torment. But the poetess speaks not only about herself, about her grief, she emphasizes that she shared the fate of many mothers. She would like to name all the sufferers who stood with her, “but the list was taken away, and there is no place to find out.” Separation from son. Maybe forever, maybe not. The yellow color that Akhmatova mentions is also symbolic. The color of separation and the color of madness. A woman who has suffered the death of her husband and the arrest of her son is distraught; she identifies herself with a lonely shadow and asks to pray with her. But the voice of Nadezhda, singing in the distance, permeates the entire work. Akhmatova does not believe in this horror:
No, it's not me, it's someone else who's suffering.
I couldn't do that...
She is simply “one woman.” She is also the “cheerful sinner of Tsarskoye Selo”, who previously had no idea about such a bitter fate to come, and, finally, the Virgin Mary. Akhmatova cannot find herself, cannot understand and accept this pain.
The poem “Requiem” is not only the poetess’s story about a personal tragedy, it is also a story about the tragedy of every mother of those years, about the tragedy of an entire country. The poetess mourns the fate of her homeland, but during the years of difficult trials she remains faithful to it:
No, and not under an alien sky,
And not under the protection of alien wings, -
I was then with my people,
Where my people, unfortunately, were.
Akhmatova hoped that, even if her mouth was clamped, “at which a hundred million people are screaming,” she would also be remembered on the eve of her “funeral day.” Akhmatova ends her poem with a testament: if someday, she writes, they want to erect a monument to her in Russia, then she asks not to erect it either by the sea, where she was born, or in Tsarskoye Selo, where she spent her happy youth,
And here, where I stood for three hundred hours
And where they didn’t open the bolt for me.
Akhmatova’s son, having spent almost twenty years in prisons and camps, surprisingly remained alive. He became a famous historian and ethnographer. In 1962, Akhmatova brought the poem to the New World magazine. Received a refusal. That same year, the poem was sent abroad and published in Munich. During her lifetime, Akhmatova saw only this publication. And only in the 80s we were able to read the poem “Requiem” published in our homeland.
Fortunately, the time of Stalinist repressions, which affected almost every family in the country, remains in the distant past. And we can consider Akhmatova’s “Requiem” a monument to the great grief of the people and the entire country, destitute and tortured. I would like to end the essay with the words of Anna Andreevna: “I never stopped writing poetry. For me, they represent my connection with time, with the new life of my people. When I wrote them, I lived by the rhythms that sounded in the heroic history of my country. I am happy that I lived during these years and saw events that had no equal.”
Lamentation
Worship the Lord
In His holy court.
The holy fool is sleeping on the porch
A star is looking at him.
And, touched by an angel's wing,
The bell spoke
Not in an alarming, menacing voice,
And saying goodbye forever.
And they leave the monastery,
Having given away the ancient vestments,
Miracle workers and saints,
Leaning on the sticks.
Seraphim - to the forests of Sarov
Graze the rural herd,
Anna - to Kashin, no longer a prince,
Tugging at prickly flax.
The Mother of God sees off
He wraps his son in a scarf,
Dropped by an old beggar woman
At the Lord's Porch.
Excerpt from the article by V. G. Morov “St. Petersburg Exodus”,
dedicated to the analysis of Akhmatov's poem
On May 21, old style, the Russian Orthodox Church celebrates the feast of the Vladimir Icon of the Mother of God, established in the 16th century in memory of the deliverance of Moscow from the invasion of the Crimean Tatars in 1521.
In the middle of the 16th century, surrounded by Metropolitan Macarius, evidence of this miracle was compiled into the story of “the newest miracle...”, which was included as an integral part in the “Russian Time Book”, “Nikon’s (Patriarchal) Chronicle” and in the “Book of the Degrees of the Royal Genealogy”.
“The Newest Miracle...”, depicting the events celebrated by the Church on May 31, sets the religious, historical and literary background of Akhmatova’s “Lamentations”. The memory of the Moscow sign not only suggests the name of Akhmatova’s holy fool (“the holy fool sleeps on the porch”—isn’t that the holy god-walker Vasily?), but also indirectly evokes the lines: “And touched by an angelic wing, / The bell began to speak...” - And abie hears, "to the great noise and the terrible swirl and ringing, "to the square bells...
Akhmatova’s treatment of chronicle evidence is alien to attempts to rehash an ancient legend, a romantic (ballad) retelling of the wonders and signs of 1521. Akhmatova is not “transported” anywhere and does not “get used to” anything; she remains faithful to her time and her destiny. The hidden conjugation of the saint’s exodus, separated by several centuries (1521-1922), is achieved in “Lamentation” by means that make Akhmatova’s poetic experience related to the techniques of medieval scribes: the poet borrows the plot frame of the chronicle narrative (more precisely, its fragment) and reveals in its forms the providential event of his era. The sources of binding symbolic dependencies are not only the coincidences and parallels of “The Miracle...” and the “Lamentation,” but also their oppositions, plot “twists” that separate the narratives: in Akhmatova’s sign, the host of saints and wonderworkers does not return to the abandoned monastery in which they remain The Virgin Mary with the Eternal Child. In addition to the first plan - an “artless” cry on the haystacks of an orphaned city, Akhmatov’s poem contains a second, symbolic plan, covertly testifying to the tragic breakdown of Russian life.
While maintaining a genetic connection with the funeral lament (and, consequently, with the oral folklore tradition), hagiographic and chronicle laments experienced the transformative influence of Christian views. Without denying the “legitimacy” and naturalness of crying for the dead, Christ himself shed tears at the tomb of Lazarus. The Church never tired of condemning the frenzied, screaming contrition for the departed. For a Christian, the death of a loved one is not only a personal loss, but also a reminder of the sin that once “conceived” death. The death of a neighbor should awaken repentant feelings in Christians and evoke tears of repentance for their own sins. “Why shouldn’t the Imam cry when I think about death, when I see my brother lying in the grave, inglorious and ugly? What do I miss and what do I hope for? Just grant me, Lord, before the end, repentance.” Often, book lamentations transformed the funeral lament into a tearful prayer, which made it easier to acquire the firstfruits of the Christian life of unceasing repentance.
|
|
The proximity in the “Lamentation” of the Sarov miracle worker and the blessed Tver princess is justified not only chronologically (the time of glorification of the saints), but also biographically (their place in the poet’s life). Akhmatova’s great-grandfather on the maternal side, Yegor Motovilov, belonged to the same family as Simbirsk conscience judge Nikolai Aleksandrovich Motovilov - “a servant of the Mother of God and Seraphim,” a zealous admirer of the Sarov ascetic, who left the most valuable testimonies about him. At the beginning of the 20th century, during the days of preparation for the canonization of St. Seraphim, the surviving papers of N. A. Motovilov were the most important source for the life of the saint.
A clear biographical motif, permeating the six-century historical layer, connects Akhmatova’s life with the fate of St. Anna Kashinskaya. The poet's birthday (July 11, old style) differs by only one day from the day of remembrance of the blessed Tver princess (July 12, old style), and the life destiny of the saint. Anna, who lost her husband and two sons in the Golden Horde, was perceived in 1922 (several months after the execution of N.S. Gumilev) as a tragic proclamation of the fate of Akhmatova herself.
The historical allusions that permeate “The Lamentation” are not limited to glances at the story of the “Newest Miracle...” and indirect allusions to the canonizations of the beginning of the century. Lines characteristic of Akhmatova’s poetry:
And they leave the monastery,
Having given away the ancient vestments,
Miracle workers and saints,
Leaning on the sticks
sounded in the fifth year of the revolution not so much in the lyrical, but in the “propaganda” register. By the end of 1921, famine, turned into an instrument of civil war, engulfed 23 million residents of Crimea and the Volga region. The Russian Orthodox Church and POMGOL, created with the participation of the “bourgeois” intelligentsia, rushed to help the suffering. Church and public charity, escaping the control of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), did not correspond to the views of the Bolshevik leadership. In an effort to curb the seditious initiative of the Church, on February 6 (19), 1922, the All-Russian Central Executive Committee adopted a resolution on the forced confiscation of church valuables, including sacred vessels and bowls used in worship. February 15 (28), 1922 St. Patriarch Tikhon said - ... From the point of view of the Church, such an act is an act of sacrilege, and We considered it our sacred duty to find out the Church’s view of this act, and also to notify Our faithful spiritual children about this...”
The very first lines of the “Lamentation” suggest what kind of “monastery” Akhmatova meant in her lament. Verse XXVIII of Psalm: Worship the Lord in His holy courtyard (slightly paraphrased in the beginning of Akhmatova’s poem) was inscribed on the pediment of the Vladimir Cathedral in St. Petersburg. (“The inscriptions taken down a long time ago: To this house befits the sanctity of the Lord in the length of days on the Engineering Castle, worship the Lord in His holy courtyard at the Vladimir Cathedral appeared on the pediments,” Akhmatova wrote in a prose sketch in 1962). Consecrated in honor of the Vladimir Icon of the Mother of God, the temple built by Starov embodied Moscow legends on the banks of the Neva, and, linking her “Lamentation” with it, Akhmatova initially, with the opening lines of the poem, indirectly pointed to the chronicle source of her lament.
Compared to the story of the miraculous salvation of Moscow through the prayerful intercession of the Cathedral of Saints, the opening of Akhmatova’s “Lamentation” looks much darker: the heavenly patrons of Russia are leaving the monastery, and no one is preventing their outcome. However, this night procession of miracle workers, filled with tragedy, still remains for Akhmatova a conditional (“unless you repent...”) prophetic sign, and not a fulfilled sign of an inevitable apocalyptic execution.
In Akhmatova’s lament, the saints and wonderworkers, leaving the monastery, do not shake the dust of the earthly world from their feet, entrusting Russia to its fatal fate. “Acmeistic” concreteness of Akhmatova’s “Lamentation”:
Seraphim in the forests of Sarov...
Anna in Kashin...
transforms the night exodus of the miracle workers into a saving mission, with which the patron saints of Russia are coming across Russian soil. The Mother of God herself remains in the suffering city ( The Mother of God sees off /He wraps his son in a scarf...), without taking away from Russia its intercession and protection...
What prompted Akhmatova, using the traditional poetic genre (lamentation), to revise the plot of “The Newest Miracle...” that lies at the heart of the poem? The narrative of the 16th century, attested by Church Tradition, makes it difficult to transform its plot in some other poetic text (especially one built on the biblical reminiscences of “Worship the Lord...”). The plot metamorphosis accomplished in Akhmatova’s “Lamentation” will be hardly acceptable poetic license if it is not will be justified by some other (recent) revelation that took place in the poet’s memory.
The heavenly signs of the revolutionary era mystically justified Akhmatova’s rethinking of the plot. On March 2, 1917, the day of the abdication of the last Russian sovereign, a miraculous image of the Sovereign Mother of God was found in the village of Kolomenskoye near Moscow. In the icon, the Mother of God appeared in a royal crown with a scepter and an orb in her hands, visibly testifying to the world that She, the Lady of Heaven, accepted the insignia of royal power over Russia, torn apart by turmoil. The concern of the Mother of God for the fate of the people possessed by revolutionary madness, clear to millions of Orthodox Christians, imparted providential significance to the ending of Akhmatova’s “Lamentation”, completed by the vision of the sovereign patroness of Russia on the hundred squares of the Neva capital.
The above judgments do not allow us to judge with decisive certainty how consciously Akhmatova connected her “Lamentation” with the Sovereign image of the Mother of God. However, any diligent research into Akhmatova’s innermost intentions is unlikely to require continuation. The true poetic word testifies to more than the poet intends to say. Already the ancients indisputably understood that it is not so much the poet who pronounces the word, but rather the word that is spoken through the poet. A poetic word once spoken is revealed in a horizon of semantic connections over which the author has no control. And, having seen the Virgin Mary seeing off a host of saints (among them St. Seraphim and St. Anna), Akhmatova gave her poem “the seventh and twenty-ninth meanings,” turning the “lost” on the pages of “Anno Domini” “Lamentation” into a lament for Russia and to her Martyr King.
The outstanding poetess Anna Akhmatova had the opportunity to experience the oppression of Soviet repression beyond measure. She and her family were constantly out of favor with the authorities.
Her first husband, Nikolai Gumilyov, was shot without trial, her son Lev spent many years in the camps, and her second husband, Nikolai Punin, was arrested twice. The apartment in the Fountain House was continuously bugged and monitored. Akhmatova was persecuted and, having been expelled from the Writers' Union, was practically declared an outlaw. In addition, as is already known today, final, physical reprisal was prepared for the poetess. Report “On the need to arrest the poetess Akhmatova” No. 6826/A dated June 14, 1950 was handed over to Stalin by the USSR Minister of State Security Abakumov. “To Comrade STALIN I.V. I report that the USSR MGB has received intelligence and investigative materials regarding the poetess A. A. AKHMATOVA, indicating that she is an active enemy of the Soviet government. AKHMATOVA Anna Andreevna, born in 1892 (in fact, she was born in 1889), Russian, comes from the nobility, non-party, lives in Leningrad. Her first husband, the poet-monarchist GUMILEV, as a participant in the White Guard conspiracy in Leningrad in 1921, was shot by the Cheka. AKHMATOVA is exposed as an enemy by the testimony of her son L.N. GUMILEV, who before his arrest was a senior researcher at the State Ethnographic Museum of the Peoples of the USSR, and her ex-husband N.N. PUNINA, a professor at Leningrad State University, who were arrested at the end of 1949. The arrested PUNIN, during interrogation at the USSR Ministry of State Security, showed that AKHMATOVA, being from a landowner family, was hostile to the establishment of Soviet power in the country and until recently carried out hostile work against the Soviet state. As PUNIN showed, even in the first years after the October Revolution, AKHMATOVA spoke with her poems of an anti-Soviet nature, in which she called the Bolsheviks “enemies tormenting the earth” and declared that “she was not on the same path with Soviet power.”
Beginning in 1924, AKHMATOVA, together with PUNIN, who became her husband, grouped hostile literary workers around her and organized anti-Soviet gatherings in her apartment. On this occasion, the arrested PUNIN testified: “Due to anti-Soviet sentiments, AKHMATOVA and I, talking with each other, more than once expressed our hatred of the Soviet system, slandered the leaders of the party and the Soviet government and expressed dissatisfaction with various measures of the Soviet government... Anti-Soviet gatherings were held in our apartment, which were attended by literary workers from among those dissatisfied and offended by the Soviet regime... These persons, together with me and AKHMATOVA, discussed events in the country from enemy positions... AKHMATOVA, in particular, expressed slanderous fabrications about the alleged the cruel attitude of the Soviet authorities towards the peasants, was indignant at the closure of churches and expressed her anti-Soviet views on a number of other issues.”
As the investigation established, in these enemy gatherings in 1932–1935. AKHMATOVA’s son, GUMILEV, at that time a student at Leningrad State University, took an active part. About this, the arrested GUMILEV testified: “In the presence of AKHMATOVA, we at gatherings without hesitation expressed our hostile sentiments... PUNIN made terrorist attacks against the leaders of the CPSU (b) and the Soviet government... In May 1934, PUNIN, in the presence of AKHMATOVA, figuratively showed how he would have committed a terrorist act against the leader of the Soviet people.” Similar testimony was given by the arrested PUNIN, who admitted that he harbored terrorist sentiments against Comrade Stalin, and testified that these sentiments were shared by AKHMATOVA: “In conversations, I made all sorts of false accusations against the Head of the Soviet State and tried to “prove” that the existing situation in the Soviet Union can be changed in the direction desired for us only through the violent elimination of Stalin... In frank conversations with me, AKHMATOVA shared my terrorist sentiments and supported malicious attacks against the Head of the Soviet State. Thus, in December 1934, she sought to justify the villainous murder of S. M. KIROV, regarding this terrorist act as a response to the excessive, in her opinion, repressions of the Soviet government against Trotskyist-Bukharin and other hostile groups.” It should be noted that in October 1935, PUNIN and GUMILEV were arrested by the NKVD Directorate of the Leningrad Region as members of an anti-Soviet group. However, soon, at the request of AKHMATOVA, they were released from custody.
Speaking about his subsequent criminal connection with AKHMATOVA, the arrested PUNIN testified that AKHMATOVA continued to conduct hostile conversations with him, during which she expressed malicious slander against the CPSU (b) and the Soviet government. PUNIN also showed that AKHMATOVA was hostile to the Resolution of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks “On the magazines “Zvezda” and “Leningrad”, which rightfully criticized her ideologically harmful work. This is also confirmed by the available intelligence materials. Thus, a source from the UMGB of the Leningrad Region reported that AKHMATOVA, in connection with the Resolution of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks “On the magazines “Zvezda” and “Leningrad”, stated: “Poor people, they don’t know anything or have forgotten. After all, all this has already happened, all these words have been spoken and retold and repeated from year to year... Nothing new has been said now, all this is already known to everyone. For Zoshchenko this is a blow, but for me it’s just a repetition of moral teachings and curses I once heard.” The USSR MGB considers it necessary to arrest AKHMATOV. I ask for your permission. ABakumov"
In 1935, Akhmatova managed to rescue her arrested son and husband after a personal meeting with Stalin. But before this happened, both were interrogated “with partiality” and were forced to sign false testimony against Akhmatova - about her “complicity” in their “crimes” and about her “enemy activities.” The security officers manipulated the facts masterfully. Numerous intelligence denunciations and eavesdropping materials were also constantly collected against Akhmatova. The “operational development case” was opened against Akhmatova in 1939. The special equipment in her apartment had been working since 1945. That is, the case has long been concocted, all that remains is to bring it to its logical conclusion - arrest. All that is required is the go-ahead from the Kremlin Master. In 1949, Nikolai Punin and Lev Gumilyov were once again arrested. And the head of the MGB, Abakumov, was already rubbing his hands, but for some reason Stalin did not give permission for Akhmatova’s arrest. Abakumov’s report contains his own resolution: “Continue to develop”... Why didn't the well-oiled mechanism work? The point here is the behavior of Akhmatova herself. No, she knew nothing about Abakumov’s report and was least worried about herself. But she desperately wanted to save her son. Therefore, she wrote and published a cycle of loyal poems, “Glory to the World,” including an anniversary ode to Stalin (No. 14 of Ogonyok magazine, 1950). And at the same time she sent a letter to Joseph Vissarionovich with a prayer for a son (“Motherland”, 1993, No. 2, p. 51). In fact, for the sake of saving her son, Akhmatova threw the last victim at the feet of the supreme executioner - her poetic name. The executioner accepted the victim. And that settled everything. Lev Gumilyov, however, was still not released, but Akhmatova was not arrested either. 16 painful years of loneliness awaited her ahead.