Soviet period of history 1917 1991. Political history of the USSR (1917-1991). Iron Curtain and Cold War

The end of the topic “Statehood of Russia in the Soviet period

(1917 - 1991)"

... V.I. Lenin did not consider the NEP as a retreat from the strategic line of the party, he saw in it the possibility of "using private capitalism and directing it into the mainstream of state capitalism" ...

The NEP methods proved to be effective in restoring the country's economy. The growth of industrial production was carried out at a high rate: in 1921 - 42.1%, in 1922 - 30.7%, in 1923 - 52.9%, in 1924 - 42.1%, in 1925 .- 66.1% . By the end of the 1920s, the economy had reached its pre-war level. The size of the sown area has increased, the procurement of grain and the number of livestock have increased. Transport was quickly restored. The material situation of the workers and peasants improved somewhat. However, the lack of internal and external investment, the administrative-market system of the economy did not provide opportunities for the construction of new production facilities, the renewal of the machine park, and the increase in production capacity.

The years of the NEP are characterized by some economic liberalization and, at the same time, increased ideological pressure on social thought. In 1922, more than 160 prominent representatives of Russian culture were sent abroad, among them N.A. Berdyaev, P.A. Sorokin, A.S. Izgoev, S.L. Frank, B.D. Brutskus, A.A. Kiesewetter. The remnants of the multi-party system were finally liquidated: in 1921 the Bund “self-dissolved”, in 1923 the Menshevik organizations in Georgia, in 1924 in Ukraine. In the summer of 1922 open trials were held in Moscow against the leaders of the Social Revolutionaries and other political groups. A number of codes regulating legal relations were developed and adopted (Civil, Land, Labor, Criminal, etc.), but at the same time (1924) the Cheka was transformed into the OGPU, giving it the functions of control over political security. Anti-religious propaganda and the struggle against church influence are intensifying. Measures are being taken to guide education, culture and science.

An essential moment in the life of the country was the formation of the USSR and the adoption of the new Constitution of 1924. The USSR was formed on December 30, 1922 at the Congress of Soviets. This was preceded by heated discussions in 1921-1922. The complexity of this problem was not in the formal unification of peoples with a common historical destinies, connected by a single economic system, transport network, postal and telegraph service, common domestic markets, but in the need to develop the main trends of national policy, the joint survival of the established political regimes. The “Declaration of the Rights of the Working and Exploited People”, adopted in January 1918 and included in the first Constitution of the RSFSR, stated that “the Soviet Republic is established on the basis of a free union of free nations as a federation of Soviet free republics.” But there was no mechanism for implementing this constitutional norm.

The Constitution was approved by the II Congress of Soviets on January 31, 1924. The USSR was created as a federal state with the right for each republic to secede from it. Asserting the sovereignty and state independence of each republic, the Constitution introduces the obligation to "direct execution throughout the entire territory of the USSR" of all decrees, resolutions and orders issued by the Union Central Executive Committee. A single state budget, a single citizenship, a single monetary and credit system, etc. are being introduced. Thus, under the guise of federal slogans, a single economic organism was formed, and under the conditions of functioning of the same type of party regime, a unitary state with an authoritarian system of government was formed.

Summarizing the question of the impact of the NEP on the formation of Soviet statehood, it should be emphasized that during this period the trend of centralization of state administration and intervention in the economy and other spheres of the country's social and cultural life was continued and strengthened, ideological and repressive pressure on the spiritual life of society increased. The role of the party in the leadership of the soviets and in replacing their functions has increased, to which the large-scale purge of the party has contributed to a large extent. In 1920, accounting and distribution departments were formed in the Central Committee and provincial committees of the RCP (b) to promote and transfer responsible party workers. All appointments were approved by party bodies.

It should be added that it was during the NEP period (since 1923) that the struggle for leadership in the RCP (b) began, which intensified after the death of V.I. Secretary of the RCP(b) I.V. Stalin.

By the end of the 1920s, the myth of the world revolution was finally dispelled, the level of the NEP was determined, but the country's political ideology was still preserved, the international position of the USSR was vulnerable. The country faced a dilemma: either the continuation of the NEP course with a low rate of economic growth, or the accelerated development of the industry, primarily of importance for increasing the military-economic potential. The decision was made by the XIV Congress of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks (December 1925), which agreed with the concept of I.V. Stalin on the possibility of building socialism in one single country. The resolution of the congress states: “To carry out economic construction from such an angle that the USSR will be transformed from a country that imports machinery and equipment into a country that produces machinery and equipment ...”.

The years of collectivization and industrialization of the country left a huge imprint on the development of Soviet statehood. Speaking at the Plenum of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks in July 1928, Stalin emphasized the development of industry through internal accumulation, the source of which is “firstly, the working class, which creates values ​​and moves industry forward; secondly, the peasantry. The consequence of this was a sharp reduction in real wages, an increase in the daily rate of output, forced labor, and most importantly, the principle of “proclaiming the worker the master of the means of production” and at the same time removing him from them was preserved for many years. The combination of violence with enthusiasm, the use of youth romanticism, the use of various forms of moral stimulation (awarding orders and medals, presentation of letters, placement of photographs on the Board of Honor, then Stakhanov and other movements and, finally, the title of "Shock Worker of Socialist Labor" (later - "Drummer of Communist Labor"), "Drummer of the Five-Year Plan".

Industrialization was carried out in the context of a reduction in social spending, with a shortage of production, housing, and consumer goods. Even more rigid was the policy towards the peasantry. JV Stalin declared the need for "tribute", "excess tax" on the peasantry in order to maintain high rates of industrial development. Collectivization was accompanied by violence, restrictions on the movement of peasants (prohibition of passportization), which was tantamount to their enslavement, “dispossession”, expulsion of the dispossessed with the complete confiscation of their property. Within a few years, the vast majority of peasant farms were socialized. The number of “dispossessed” people amounted to 15 million people, more than 400 million rubles worth of property was confiscated.

The causes of the February Revolution were the same as those of the First Russian Revolution. However, over the past decade the size of the working class has increased, and the stratification of the peasants in the countryside has intensified. The Stolypin reform accelerated the development of capitalism. The World War caused economic devastation in the country and exacerbated social contradictions.

The main feature of the revolution is that it ended in dual power. It is generally accepted that before the execution of the Petrograd demonstration at the beginning of July 1917, there was a peaceful development of two democracies (bourgeois - in the person of the Provisional Government and socialist - in the person of the Petrograd Soviet).

Bolshevik leader V.I. Lenin, returning from exile in early April 1917, delivered a report in Petrograd "On the Tasks of the Proletariat in the Present Revolution" (April theses). It was a concrete program for the implementation of the socialist revolution by the Bolsheviks. However, one of the leaders of the Mensheviks, G.V. Plekhanov believed that the conditions for the transition to socialism did not yet exist in Russia.

Programs of political parties, crises of the Provisional Government, changes in its composition.

The supporters of socialist reorganization had a different approach to socialism. Following M. Bakunin, Russian anarchists understood socialism as a free association of workers and peasant communities. Anarchist P. Kropotkin and legal Marxist M.I. Tugan-Baranovsky considered cooperation as a way to socialism. Many Mensheviks saw the path to socialism in the all-round development of self-government by the working people. From the point of view of G.V. Plekhanov, the socialist revolution in Russia is possible only when the proletariat constitutes the majority of the population. Objecting to him, V.I. Lenin believed that "it is enough for the proletariat to seize state power" and the transition to building socialism would be ensured. Socialism, in his opinion, should be based on public property and direct product exchange, all citizens should become workers and employees of the state syndicate, and the revolutionary vanguard of the workers in the person of the Bolshevik Party will lead this process.

The question of whether there was an alternative to the October armed uprising of the Bolsheviks remains open in historical science. Many scientists believe that there was no such alternative, because. The provisional government continued the war, postponed the elections to the Constituent Assembly, and economic ruin was growing in the country. The Bolsheviks, who were not part of the Provisional Government, supported the demands of the masses, were active in suppressing the speech of Kornilov, who was trying to establish a military dictatorship. They achieved a preponderance in the capital Soviets from 11% (in the spring of 1917) to 31% (by the autumn of 1917). Other socialist parties experienced splits.

Composition of the II Congress of Soviets, its decisions. At the II Congress of Soviets, the All-Russian Central Executive Committee (VTsIK) was elected, in which the two-party system was maintained until July 1918 (until the uprising of the Left Socialist-Revolutionaries), and in the Council of People's Commissars the block of Bolsheviks with the Left Socialist-Revolutionaries remained until March 3, 1918 (the Left Socialist-Revolutionaries left from the Council of People's Commissars in protest against the signing of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with Germany).

The elections to the Constituent Assembly in January 1918 brought the Bolsheviks only 24% of the seats. This showed that the Bolsheviks had little popular support. The defeat of the Constituent Assembly is considered by some historians as a step towards the elimination of the multi-party system. Gradually the dictatorship was strengthened.

As a result of the economic policy of the Bolsheviks, conditions were created for the formation in the future of an economy of a non-market, directive type, with the absence of private ownership of the means of production, with the creation of economic ties not on the basis of commodity-money relations, but on the principle of distributing products from a single administrative center. The Bolsheviks relied on the idea of ​​the poor strata of the population about the need for equal distribution. This policy further contributed to the formation of the totalitarian system of the state.

In the spring of 1918, V.I. Lenin wrote the work “The Immediate Tasks of Soviet Power”, in which he called for organizing “nationwide accounting and control over the production and distribution of products, strengthening labor discipline, raising the cultural and technical level of workers”, and achieving higher labor productivity compared to capitalism.

Discussion in the Soviet leadership and the party on the conclusion of the Brest peace. The point of view of N.N. Bukharin (leader of the "Left Communists"), L.D. Trotsky (People's Commissar for Foreign Affairs, who headed the Soviet delegation in Brest). The position of V.I. Lenin on the Brest peace. German demands during negotiations.

The civil war is the greatest tragedy of our people. This struggle gave rise to mutual cruelty, terror. The Bolsheviks believed that they were defending the ideas of socialism. Many Mensheviks and Socialist-Revolutionaries were in favor of Soviet Russia, but without the Bolsheviks.

The white camp was heterogeneous, as it was made up of monarchists, liberal republicans, supporters of the Constituent Assembly and supporters of the military dictatorship. White movement program. Military intervention intensified the civil war.

The position of the peasantry depended on the policies of the Reds and Whites. The Reds gave land to the peasants, but then introduced a surplus appropriation for bread, which caused discontent among the peasants. Anarchists (Nestor Makhno) advocated the creation of cooperatives and factory committees independent of the state. At the beginning of 1919, Makhno's detachments provided great support to the Red Army, but in early 1920 Makhno began to fight against the Bolsheviks, as they transferred to the collective farms and state farms part of the land confiscated from the landowners.

It is customary to distinguish four stages of civil war and military intervention.

The first stage - spring-autumn 1918. A mutiny of Czech prisoners of war broke out. The first foreign military landings appeared in Murmansk and the Far East. In the Volga region, the Socialist-Revolutionaries and Mensheviks (former members of the Constituent Assembly) created the Committee of the Constituent Assembly. Twice Krasnov's army made campaigns against Tsaritsyn.

In the summer of 1918, the Socialist-Revolutionaries and Mensheviks raised uprisings in Moscow, Yaroslavl, and Rybinsk. An attempt was made on Lenin, Uritsky was killed. Mutual terror intensified. In September 1918, the All-Russian Central Executive Committee adopted a decree proclaiming the Soviet Republic a single military camp. The Red Terror was proclaimed in response to the White Terror. In November 1918, the Council of Workers 'and Peasants' Defense was created, headed by V.I. Lenin. The Revolutionary Military Council of the Republic was headed by L.D. Trotsky.

The second stage of the civil war covers the period from the autumn of 1918 to the spring of 1919. In the autumn of 1918, World War I ended, and a revolution began in Germany. The Soviet leadership annulled the terms of the Brest Treaty, but on the other hand, foreign states got the opportunity to intensify their intervention.

At the third stage (spring 1919-spring 1920), the armies of white generals began to act as the main force. These were the campaigns of A.V. Kolchak (spring-summer 1919), A.I. Denikin (summer 1919 - March 1920). At the same time, the Red Army repulsed two campaigns of General N.N. Yudenich to Petrograd.

The fourth stage lasted from April to November 1920. It was the Soviet-Polish war and the fight against Wrangel.

The policy of "war communism" was carried out during the civil war. Its goal was to mobilize all forces for the victory of the Red Army, but then V.I. Lenin acknowledged that this policy "manifested utopian ideas about the possibility of the rapid introduction of socialism." Therefore, it is important to take into account both the objective foundations of war communism and the need to abandon it in peacetime conditions.

The policy of war communism assumed:

1) the introduction of a food dictatorship (in May 1918);

2) accelerating the pace of nationalization of industry;

3) transition to food distribution for bread (in accordance with the decree adopted in January 1919);

4) introduction of universal labor service;

5) the establishment of an emergency tax for the bourgeoisie;

6) egalitarian distribution of products among workers;

7) strengthening the centralized management of the economy through the Supreme Economic Council.

Foreign policy of the Soviet state in the early 1920s. The beginning of the breakthrough of the economic blockade of the Soviet state was the signing of trade agreements with the leading capitalist countries in 1921-1922.

Chronological framework of the NEP. The internal situation in the country after the end of the civil war. The first step towards the NEP is the replacement of the food appropriation with a food tax.

The Bolsheviks, in their first party program in 1903, recognized the right of nations to self-determination. The national policy of the Soviet government played a big role in a country where Russians made up less than half of the population. In 1917 V.I. Lenin formulated the principle of a federation of free republics. Then, in January 1918, this principle was enshrined in the "Declaration of the Rights of the Working and Exploited People", which spoke of the right of peoples to independently decide questions about joining the federation. In December 1917, the Soviet leadership recognized the independence of Finland, and in August 1918, Poland.

IN AND. Lenin criticized Stalin's "autonomization project". According to the Constitution of 1924, the USSR was represented by a union of equal sovereign republics, which had the right to freely secede from the federation. In the Constitution, the Soviets were the highest body of state power, but in fact power was concentrated in the hands of the Communist Party. The USSR acquired the character of a unitary state.

Reasons and goals of industrialization. Party struggle on the development of the USSR in the mid-20s, decisions of the XIV Congress of the CPSU (b), which at the end of 1925 took a course towards industrialization. Fulfillment of tasks I and II of the five-year plans, the struggle to increase labor productivity, forms of socialist competition. In the first five-year plan, 1,500 large industrial enterprises were built, and in the second five-year plan, 4,500. The "industrial leap" was carried out at a great cost, there was a "mass transfer of funds from the countryside to the city." By the end of the Second Five-Year Plan, the Soviet leadership proclaimed the transformation of the USSR into an industrial power. Now historians believe that this was a premature conclusion, because. The rural population significantly outnumbered the urban population.

In the course of collectivization in the USSR, in a short period of time (1929-1937), large collective farms were created, which were entrusted with the task of solving the food problem in the country and restoring the export of agricultural products.

Proposals of agricultural economists A.V. Chayanova, N.D. Kondratiev and others who proposed to develop different types of cooperations. In 1927, a grain procurement crisis arose, as the peasants did not hand over grain to the state at low prices. Collectivization was accompanied by "dispossession". Collective farms were state-owned, mandatory grain deliveries to the state were introduced.

In the 20s. A struggle for power unfolded in the Bolshevik Party and the state apparatus. As a result, the winner in the fight with L.D. Trotsky, L.B. Kamenev and G.E. Zinoviev came out I.V. Stalin. In the 30s. in the USSR, a rigid vertical of power was established, which forced people to talk about the administrative-command system of government and the totalitarian state, as well as about the personality cult of I.V. Stalin. Show trials were held in the country over people who had different points of view on its development from the leadership of the state. There was a practice of mass repressions. The Gulag was created - a system of concentration camps.

In the field of culture in the 20-30s. an active campaign against illiteracy was carried out. In 1919, a decree was adopted on the elimination of illiteracy, and in 1923, the society "Down with illiteracy!" In the early 30s. universal primary education was introduced. In the 20s. the construction of a Soviet higher school began. To prepare young people for universities, workers' faculties were created. The Russian Academy of Sciences, the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, the All-Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, creative unions and organizations of workers of art and literature arose. The achievements of Russian culture before 1917 were completely rejected. Many cultural figures were subjected to unjustified repressions.

In the second half of the 20s. a new confrontation was outlined between the USSR and the leading capitalist countries. The Soviet leadership sent military specialists to China (at the request of the Chinese government). The leaders of the USSR hoped for a world revolution, led the activities of the Comintern. In the early 1930s, Western countries successfully overcame the economic crisis and proved that capitalism has a sufficient margin of safety. Zinoviev and Kamenev were expelled from the Comintern for calling for a world revolution.

After Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933, a dangerous hotbed of tension arose in Europe. The USSR pursued a policy aimed at creating a system of collective security in order to stop the aggressor with a united front. The USSR proposed to conclude agreements on mutual assistance in case of war. Japan became another military center, which attacked Soviet territory in the Far East near Lake Khasan in 1938 and attacked Mongolia, an ally of the USSR, in the area of ​​the Khalkhin Gol River in 1939.

On the eve of the war, a rather significant military and economic potential was created in the USSR, but its capabilities were not effectively used, which was one of the most important reasons for the retreat of the Red Army at the beginning of the war.

Features of the development of the USSR in the 3rd five-year plan. On the eve of the war, new models of military equipment were successfully tested, but their mass production was not organized and the rearmament of the Red Army was not completed by the beginning of the war.

Periodization of World War II.

The beginning of the Second World War is the period from September 1, 1939 to June 22, 1941. The war began with the German attack on Poland. Treaties between the USSR and Germany in 1939. The defeat of Poland and a temporary alliance with Stalin provided Hitler with the opportunity to carry out a blitzkrieg on the Western European front.

The second period of the World War (June 22, 1941 - November 18, 1942). The beginning of the Patriotic War of the Soviet people. Nazi Germany, on the basis of the Barbarossa plan, attacked the USSR, violating the non-aggression pact. It was a defensive stage, which included the battle for Moscow, the Luban operation, the first defensive stage of the Battle of Stalingrad.

The third period of the Second World War (November 19, 1942 - December 1943) is characterized by a radical turning point in the war as a result of the defeat of the Nazi troops near Stalingrad and on the Kursk Bulge. The result was the liberation of the left-bank Ukraine and the forcing of the Dnieper.

The fourth period of the Second World War (beginning of 1944 - May 1945). Liberation of the territory of the USSR and European countries. Victory over fascism and Europe.

Fifth period (May 9, 1945 - September 2, 1945) - the defeat of Japan. (Entry of the USSR into the war against Japan on August 8, 1945).

The restructuring of the economy on a war footing was basically completed in the middle of 1942. New wartime buildings in the Urals, Siberia, the Far East, the production of the first military equipment. During the war years, a movement of women and adolescents for mastering male specialties, a movement of high-speed workers for the introduction of in-line methods into production, and a movement of front-line brigades unfolded. Overtime work was introduced, holidays were canceled, the working day was extended to 11 hours.

The creation of the anti-Hitler coalition played a huge role in the defeat of Germany. Joint agreements of the USSR with Great Britain, the USA, France. An increase in the composition of the anti-Hitler coalition (in January 1942 - 26 states, in 1943 - 35 states).

During the winter-spring of 1944, Soviet troops carried out operations to lift the Leningrad blockade, liberate the right-bank Ukraine, Crimea, and from the summer of 1944 launched operations to liberate the northern territories. As a result, in 1944 the entire territory of the USSR was liberated from occupation. The Soviet Army began military operations on the territory of the allies of fascist Germany and the countries occupied by it.

In the post-war seven years, the country focused on restoring the destroyed economy in the western regions. The victory in the war convinced I.V. Stalin that the economic and socio-political model chosen back in the 1930s does not require its replacement or modernization. This led to the continuation of reliance on the development of heavy industry, and in agriculture - on the growth of the collective-farm-state farm system.

In the political sphere in the late 40s. repressions resumed, which primarily affected young wartime nominees. Freethinking was not encouraged in culture, much attention was paid to the rise of national self-consciousness, which at times grew into nationalism. In the field of foreign policy, the main line has become a confrontation with the West and, above all, with the United States. The world has entered a period of cold war.

Mid 50's - first half of 60's. it is customary to call it a “thaw”, because democratization processes have begun; processes of "restoration of socialist legality". There was a rehabilitation of victims of repressions.

In agriculture, grain problems were solved; in 1954, the development of virgin and fallow lands began. It was the period of economic reforms by N.S. Khrushchev. The Soviet leadership determined the main tasks for strengthening the material and technical base of socialism.

It should be noted that in the mid-1960s The Soviet leadership recognized the need for fundamental changes in the planning of the country's economy, in material incentives for commodity producers. Decisions of the March and September (1965) Plenums of the Central Committee of the CPSU on the further improvement of methods of managing and managing the country's economy. Reasons for the inefficiency of reforms negative phenomena in the life of Soviet society in the 70s - the first half of the 80s, called the "period of stagnation".

A radical restructuring of the country's economic and political life in the second half of the 1980s. 20th century The restraining role of the administrative-command control system in the development of the country's productive forces. The beginning of economic and political reform. The problem of the democratization of Soviet society. Repeal of Art. 6 of the Constitution of the USSR on the leading role of the CPSU, the creation of a multi-party system.

Political history of the USSR (1917–1991)

In the Soviet socialist state, as in the pre-revolutionary monarchical state, much depended on first person, in whose hands huge official and unofficial power was concentrated. Leader the only political party that was called RSDLP(b), RCP(b), VKP(b), CPSU(since 1952), was also the real leader of the country.

Around each leader there was an environment of associates, like-minded people, trusted people, through whom the leader led various spheres of the country's life. A change in leader led to a change in the “team”: V. I. Lenin(1917–1924) – L. D. Trotsky, G. E. Zinoviev, L. B. Kamenev, N. I. Bukharin, F. E. Dzerzhinsky, I. V. Stalin and etc.; I. V. Stalin(1924–1953) – V. M. Molotov, K. E. Voroshilov, L. M. Kaganovich, A. I. Mikoyan, M. I. Kalinin, S. M. Kirov, L. P. Beria, G. M. Malenkov, N. S. Khrushchev; N. S. Khrushchev(1953–1964) – M. A. Suslov, L. I. Brezhnev; L. I. Brezhnev(1964–1982) – M. A. Suslov, N. V. Podgorny, A. N. Kosygin, A. A. Gromyko, D. F. Ustinov; M. S. Gorbachev(1985–1991) – N. I. Ryzhkov, A. I. Lukyanov, E. K. Ligachev, B. N. Yeltsin. The leader and members of the "team" betrayed each other from time to time, which was common in Soviet political history. G. M. Malenkov(1953–1955), Yu. V. Andropov(1982–1984), K. U. Chernenko(1984-1985) were at the head of the country for a short time.

In the conditions of formal Soviet democracy, the political line of the country was determined not at party congresses, not in the highest official bodies of state power, but in a narrow circle of members. Political Bureau Central Committee of the Communist Party. Some decisions were made by the leaders themselves or in a narrow circle.

In the political sphere, since the mid-1920s, a monopoly the Communist Party, which led advice, Soviet, state and public institutions, all organizations, no matter how they were called at different stages of the Soviet era ( All-Russian Congress of Soviets, All-Russian Central Executive Committee, SNK; Supreme Soviet of the USSR, Council of Ministers of the USSR). The power structures (police, army, security service - VChK, OGPU, NKVD, KGB). Was overclocked constituent Assembly, the royal family was shot (1918). Period uprisings were suppressed civil war, "Antonovshchina", Kronstadt rebellion (1921), resistance to the Russian Orthodox Church, peasant demonstrations of the period of collectivization, performances in the Gulag in the 1950s and in Novocherkassk (1962), movement dissidents, entire peoples were evicted (Volga Germans, Kalmyks, Chechens, Ingush, etc.). Under the leadership of the Communist Party, the courts, the prosecutor's office worked: the "cases" of the Socialist-Revolutionaries, Patriarch Tikhon, the "Shakhtinsk", Moscow trials of the 30s, the "Leningrad case".

It was explained to the population that for the sake of building socialism and communism you can be patient and make any sacrifices. The party and Soviet leadership of the country, right up to perestroika, suppressed critics of its policy without hesitation.

From the book Russia: Criticism of Historical Experience. Volume1 author Akhiezer Alexander Samoilovich

From the book Chronology of Russian History. Russia and the world author Anisimov Evgeny Viktorovich

Soviet period 1917-1991 October 25, 1917 Seizure of power by the Bolsheviks in Petrograd The mutiny of October 25 (November 7, according to the new style) in 1917 did not look like a real revolution with street fights, barricades, paralysis of city life, as happened in 1905. With complete inactivity

From the book Russia in 1917-2000. A book for everyone interested in national history author Yarov Sergey Viktorovich

1.4. Political struggle in the Soviet leadership (1985–1991) in 1985–1988 managed to oust from the Politburo almost all the people who remained there from Brezhnev's inner circle - A.A. Gromyko, V.I. Dolgikh, G.A. Alieva, G.V. Romanova, V.V. Grishina, D.A. Kunaev. Having passed his supporters

From the book Domestic History: Cheat Sheet author author unknown

105. SOCIO-POLITICAL STRUGGLE 1985–1991 The second stage of “perestroika” (1989–1991) was marked by growing social and political tension in society. The central government was less and less able to control the processes taking place throughout the entire space of the USSR,

From the book Philosophy of History author Semenov Yuri Ivanovich

4.3.10. Recent history (1917-1991). The second wave of socio-liberation revolutions Having come to power, the Bolsheviks initially limited themselves to putting into practice the slogans of the bourgeois-democratic revolution. This can be clearly seen in the example of decrees II

From the book ISSUE 3 HISTORY OF A CIVILIZED SOCIETY (XXX century BC - XX century AD) author Semenov Yuri Ivanovich

6. MODERN HISTORY (1917-1991) Having come to power, the Bolsheviks initially limited themselves to putting into practice the slogans of the bourgeois-democratic revolution. This can be clearly seen in the example of the decrees of the Second All-Russian Congress of Soviets. The Bolsheviks at first did not put

From the book Russian history in faces author

Section VI Soviet Russia, Russia in the composition

From the book Rulers of Russia author Gritsenko Galina Ivanovna

Soviet power (1917–1991)

author Fortunatov Vladimir Valentinovich

Political history of capitalist Russia (1861-1917) After the defeat in the Crimean War (1853-1856), Russia sought to overcome its backwardness in political and socio-economic development from the advanced European countries. Alexander II (1855–1881) abolished serfdom

From the book Domestic History [Cheat Sheet] author Fortunatov Vladimir Valentinovich

Soviet Russia (1917–1991) Leading trends in historical development 1. The establishment of a monopoly, the dictatorship of the Communist Party in the political life of society, carried out by the nomenklatura administrative layer.2. All-encompassing socialization of all resources,

From the book Domestic History [Cheat Sheet] author Fortunatov Vladimir Valentinovich

Territory and foreign policy of the USSR (1917-1991) The Bolsheviks, criticizing the national policy of the autocracy, proclaimed the right of nations to self-determination up to secession and the formation of independent states. Lenin saw no problem in the collapse of imperial Russia, which

From the book Domestic History [Cheat Sheet] author Fortunatov Vladimir Valentinovich

Socio-economic history of the USSR (1917-1991) The Soviet era was the time of building a new society. New words, new terms appeared. In the economic sphere after nationalization, confiscations, requisitions, industrialization and especially collectivization since the 1930s

From the book Domestic History [Cheat Sheet] author Fortunatov Vladimir Valentinovich

Culture in the USSR (1917–1991) By the mid-1930s, illiteracy among the adult population was eliminated, on-the-job education (evening, correspondence, courses, circles, public universities, etc.) became widespread. During the 1930s, universal

From the book Domestic History [Cheat Sheet] author Fortunatov Vladimir Valentinovich

Political history (1991-2011) December 25, 1991 President of the USSR MS Gorbachev resigned. On the same day, the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR adopted a new name for the country - the Russian Federation (Russia). Above the Kremlin in Moscow, which became the residence of the President of the Russian

From the book Course of Lectures on Social Philosophy author Semenov Yuri Ivanovich

8. Modern times (1917-1991) The October Revolution of 1917, led by the Bolshevik Party, won. As a result, Russia's dependence on the West was destroyed and it broke away from the periphery. Peripheral capitalism was eliminated in the country, and thus capitalism

From the book Political Censorship in the USSR. 1917-1991 author Goryaeva Tatyana Mikhailovna

Chapter IV POLITICAL CENSORSHIP IN THE 1940s-1991 Features of political censorship during the Second World War and post-war confrontation (1941-1956) Late 1930s was illuminated by the glow of an imminent war. Despite the outwardly peaceful nature of life, the entire mass culture in the USSR is already

Support the project Comments

sokrytoe

miklKIP wrote:

And then I see that this Pindos is an honorary doctor of the Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Malvador

ljazzy wrote:

67469899yes, for a wadded cattle brought up by the first channel, the book may seem like complete nonsense

Glory to Ukraine!
Are you from Dneproukropsk?

oandreya

miklKIP wrote:

67454491 I started listening and immediately abandoned it after the frank nonsense that the author flogged! It may be an excellent book to improve the general education of the Pindos, but for a Russian person it is complete nonsense. The view of a person from the outside, who does not understand either Russians or Russia. With the same success, you can ask a blind man to tell about a rainbow or a ram about cellular communications.

If the shaft of the tricolor does not press on the sphincter and there is time and desire, I can ask you to describe in more detail from the words "complete nonsense". And then somehow such a tearing of a vest on his chest with or without a loud fart into a puddle does not give an idea of ​​\u200b\u200bthe book. But rather, it inclines to the idea that the "ripper" did not read it.
(this is just a postmodern paraphrase of the classic "We knew all of Feuerbach's mistakes without reading a single line of him")
And who knows, maybe it's not worth listening to, this book.

ljazzy

Malvador wrote:

67474021Glory to Ukraine!
Are you from Dneproukropsk?

Glory to the heroes!
No, I'm from Kharkovukropsk =)

castrakis

sokrytoe wrote:

And then I see that this Pindos is an honorary doctor of the Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

So what?
Following the logic of "since quilted jackets get hot, it means a worthwhile book" why not give all assholes an honorary member in the same way?
Well, for the good cause of de-Stalinization and de-Sovietization?
Look, the idiot neighbors are knocking down monuments: they probably expect that after the next defeated plaster Lenin, there will definitely come a happy life and European integration.
But instead of real history, they are being told at least some kind of ersatz in return about "proto-Ukrainians" for national pride, and we are offered to spoil our entire past and forget it like a bad dream.

Malvador

Almayson wrote:

67489190 Since it's hot for quilted jackets, the book is clearly worth attention.

Logically.
Quilters don't like a lot of things. For example, - g ... but eat.

nkos_ur

Malvador wrote:

Quilters don't like a lot of things. For example, - g ... but eat.

Why do you lie that they do not like? But what about Channel One and RTR? They love and ask for more.
P.S.
If there is no criticism besides the hysteria of the slaughtered, then apparently there is nothing to criticize meaningfully?
Then I'll listen.
P.P.S.
Ukrainian brothers, don't judge us by this cattle. We ourselves are ashamed of our fascist Russia. Hang in there. Together we will win.

Malvador

nkos_ur wrote:

67531777 Hang in there. Together we will win.

ljazzy

nkos_ur wrote:

67531777 Ukrainian brothers, don't judge us by this cattle. We ourselves are ashamed of our fascist Russia. Hang in there. Together we will win.

Yes, we ourselves have enough such cattle - Yanukovych and all other scum, someone chose at one time

ljazzy

Malvador wrote:

67575379 Thank you very much, gentlemen, for the transition to personalities, teachings and insults.
As far as I understand, European authority does not allow you to simply answer your questions.
Well, I dare not bother further.
Good luck in building a democratic and tolerant society under the banner of Dontsov-Konovalets-Bandera!

And the same to you, Vlasov underdog

Malvador

ljazzy wrote:

67588419 and the same to you, Vlasov underdog

I'll explain, sir froze.
Our Vlasovites are a bunch of outcasts who run to the so-called Russian marches.
I, like most of my compatriots, believe this:

Hidden text

oandreya

Malvador wrote:

Our Vlasovites are a bunch of outcasts who run to the so-called Russian marches.

Hmm, in order of enlightenment:
Vlasov - ROA soldiers under the command of General Vlasov.
Russian Liberation Army, ROA - the historical name of the armed forces of the Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Russia (KONR), who fought on the side of the Third Reich against the USSR, as well as the totality of the majority of Russian anti-Soviet units and units from Russian collaborators as part of the Wehrmacht in 1943-1944,
In total, these formations, according to various sources, numbered about 120-130 thousand people.
Most of them are Russians. It doesn't look like a "bunch" at all.
Z.Y. Also explain the meaning of the word collaborator? Until it turned out that this is a "bunch" of residents of Kolabino, Lipetsk Region

Malvador

oandreya wrote:

67603693In total, according to various sources, there were about 120-130 thousand people in these formations.
Most of them are Russians. It doesn't look like a "bunch" at all.

It was about the Vlasovites in modern Russia, and not about the Vlasovites of the 1944 model.
But even 70 years ago, even if your numbers are correct, the strength of the ROA was less than 1% compared to the strength of the Red Army. So in those days they, alas, were marginalized.

oandreya wrote:

67603693Z.S. Also explain the meaning of the word collaborator? Until it turned out that this is a "bunch" of residents of Kolabino, Lipetsk Region

Reduce your aplomb, please.
Thank you.

omat

miklKIP wrote:

67454491 I started listening and immediately abandoned it after the frank nonsense that the author flogged! It may be an excellent book to improve the general education of the Pindos, but for a Russian person it is complete nonsense. The view of a person from the outside, who does not understand either Russians or Russia. With the same success, you can ask a blind man to tell about a rainbow or a ram about cellular communications.

I have listened to half so far - I have no complaints about the author - everything is quite objective and not biased. If a question has not been fully studied or there is not enough data for a certain opinion, he directly warns about this every time.
And yet, the USSR is far from being only Russians and Russia, even if they are so incomprehensibly mysterious.

Malvador wrote:

67565487nkos_ur
ljazzy

1. Please explain, gentlemen, euro-intellectuals, to me, a redneck: why are the current rulers of Ukraine better for the people than those that were before the Maidan? Excuse me, of course, but it seems to me that if it was just bad under Yanukovych, now it's full f...pa. Please give links to articles and videos where you could see how the life of Ukrainians has improved over the past year, how successfully the reforms are going on, the GDP is growing, the public debt is decreasing, etc. Otherwise, we, you know, have all the information blocked . Putin's propaganda fakes the entire YouTube on Mosfilm, and there are only horrors.
2. And more. Gentlemen European humanists, explain to me, a citizen of fascist Russia: what will Ukraine celebrate in May? Defeat of Nazism? But after all, this defeat put an end to the noble plans of your national heroes - Bandera and Shukhevych? Or will it be a day of victory for the whole of Europe, and a day of mourning for you? But you are civilized Europeans! Sorry, but my Colorado brain just can't handle that kind of cognitive dissonance.

The points:
1. The current rulers saw the Maidan. And they know that where there are two, there will, of necessity, be a third and a fourth. They were shown that the president and the prosecutor general and the head of the SBU are just salaried officials, who can always be replaced. Take the trouble to look for visual stimuli yourself if it itches like that.
2. Both the day of reconciliation and the day of victory were celebrated - no one died from breaking the template. Bandera and Shukhevych are the same absolute heroes as Stenka Razin and Emelka Pugachev. Don't exaggerate. As for the Ukrainian nationalists themselves, they fought much longer than the Nazis.
There is right there on Rutracker - it will be useful for you: [Lecture] Kirill Alexandrov - Bandera: Ukrainian nationalism and anti-communist struggle in Ukraine in the 1940s
And finally: does your "Colorado brain" suffer from "cognitive dissonance" when you see Lenin under the tricolor? Most of the dissonances you mentioned are your own creations. While you are faced with real ones every day and do not notice them.
UP: Listened to the end. I recommend it to everyone, especially people with an incomprehensible mental organization. It also helps to understand the current situation in and around Russia.

nkos_ur

Malvador wrote:

67565487nkos_ur
ljazzy
I don’t dare, due to my wretchedness, to argue with you, but still I can’t resist and ask two questions.
1. Please explain, gentlemen, euro-intellectuals, to me, a redneck: why are the current rulers of Ukraine better for the people than those that were before the Maidan?
2. And more. Gentlemen European humanists, explain to me, a citizen of fascist Russia: what will Ukraine celebrate in May?

1. But everything is not so good in Ukraine because it has to wage war with fascist Russia, which treacherously attacked Ukraine without declaring war.
2. Unlike fascist Russia engaged in victory, in Ukraine on May 9 they honored the memory of those who died in this bloody war.

PLextar

nkos_ur wrote:

Fixed typos
.

omat

PLextar wrote:

nkos_ur wrote:

1. But after all, things are not so good in Little Russia because they are not allowed to enter into a customs union with Russia, which, as the most faithful ally, keeps Little Russia from becoming a class of a country like Bulgaria or Latvia.
2. Unlike Great Russia, which is engaged in celebration, in Little Russia they tried to celebrate on May 9, but by decree of the radical government, it was necessary to mourn how our ancestors won the war, and now we are trampling the Earth to spite them.

Fixed typos
.

"Great Russia", "Little Russia", "the most faithful ally". The lexicon speaks for itself. From a meeting with this most faithful ally, the coffins come home for the second year. Go n@xyy with such an alliance, brothers.

The events of 1985-1991 cannot be considered without knowing the background, so in this chapter we will briefly outline what lay at the origins of this state and what led it to perestroika.

The stage of 1985-1991 is associated primarily with the name of Gorbachev, so first we will consider the stage from 1917-1985, from Lenin's coming to power to Gorbachev's coming to power. In 1917, taking advantage of the chaos that reigned in the country, with the help of a military coup, the Bolsheviks led by Lenin came to power. This was the beginning of the creation of an unprecedented state.

First of all, the Bolsheviks were in a hurry to satisfy the needs of that part of the population, thanks to which they came to power. This resulted in the so-called "expropriation of the expropriators". The authorities justified the robbery of property acquired through commerce and entrepreneurship.

Peasants, as you know, most of all needed their own land. The Bolsheviks deceived the peasants with their "Decree on Land", declaring later that the land is the property of the whole people, understanding by this the property of the state. The state has taken over all the functions of the exploiter, with the only difference being that in order to fight against a particular exploiter, you can create a trade union or go on strike, and this will be within the law, while the exploiter-state itself issues laws, and immediately recognizes the trade union as a "counter-revolutionary formation", and strike "sabotage" and shoot the instigators.

Lenin was late, but he realized his mistakes by introducing the New Economic Policy, but it was too late to correct anything. A cohort of those who liked to goad the masses and threaten with a Mauser was created around him, and this cohort gradually removed him from power, and soon he himself died.

In the thirties, when Stalin ruled the country, collectivization was carried out, which led to the mass death of peasants, both from starvation and as a result of general deportations. The poor peasants wanted to become richer, but they did not see any other way how to take property from the rich. The kulak was for the most part uprooted during the revolution, but the needs of the poor had to be met somehow, and the rich middle peasants were promoted to kulaks, and they were exterminated. Peasants were forbidden to change their place of residence - in fact they were made serfs. The reign of Stalin went down in history as the years of mass terror. A passport system was introduced, enslaved peasants did not have passports.

During the reign of Stalin, the Great Patriotic War also fell, almost lost due to the incompetence of the top leadership and, above all, because of Stalin himself. All smart military leaders were destroyed by him: Tukhachevsky, Blucher, etc. The number of Soviet people who died in this war, according to some estimates, exceeds thirty million, and such a number is due to their unpreparedness for war and the loss of a huge territory as a result.

After the death of Stalin in 1953, Khrushchev came to power, who three years later at the XX Congress announced the cult of personality of Stalin and the harm brought by this cult. Many thousands of innocent victims were rehabilitated. From this moment begins the "Khrushchev thaw", overshadowed by the beginning of the "cold war".

Khrushchev's reign went down in history as a time of great reforms. Literally everything was affected: agriculture, industry, the financial system. The standard of living of the people began to slowly rise, prices were reduced, cards were canceled. The peasants received passports. The "iron curtain" was lifted, blocking the way abroad.

Khrushchev's name is associated with the first artificial Earth satellite (1957) and the first man in space (1961). During Khrushchev's leadership, there were manifestations of subjectivism and voluntarism on his part. Khrushchev's fascination with rocket technology almost led to the disbandment of the artillery troops. Khrushchev is the only ruler of the USSR who left the post alive. On October 14, 1964, during Khrushchev's vacation in Pitsunda, the opposition in the Central Committee removed him from the post of general secretary.

The reign of the new General Secretary Brezhnev was marked by total corruption penetrating into all spheres of society: the internal affairs bodies, the prosecutor's office, the party leadership, trade, and so on. The standard of living of the people grew due to the receipt of currency from the sale of oil abroad. Total distribution, suppression of initiative, enterprise, lack of economic incentives for labor, its replacement with political slogans lead to the stagnation of the legal economy and the prosperity of the "shadow" economy, in which all normal commodity-money relations were present.

After the death of Brezhnev at the age of 76 (November 10, 1982), a dizzying "carousel" begins: first, the 74-year-old (KGB chairman since May 1967) Andropov becomes General Secretary. On February 9, 1984, Andropov dies and the 73-year-old Chernenko becomes General Secretary. He left practically no memory of himself and died again on March 12, 1985.

From this moment begins the reign of Gorbachev. He is only 54 years old, compared to previous general secretaries, he looks quite young. After Gorbachev came to power, the people expect changes...

Have questions?

Report a typo

Text to be sent to our editors: