Bigfoot or Yeti. Yeti Bigfoot - Interesting Bigfoot Facts How Bigfoot Lures Women

Many secrets keep the expanses of our vast planet. Mysterious creatures hiding from the human world have always aroused genuine interest among scientists and enthusiastic researchers. One of these mysteries was Bigfoot.

Yeti, Bigfoot, Angry, Sasquatch - these are all his names. It is believed that he belongs to the class of mammals, the order of primates, the genus man.

Of course, its existence has not been proven by scientists, however, according to eyewitnesses and many researchers, today we have a complete description of this creature.

What does the legendary cryptid look like?

The most popular image of Bigfoot

His physique is thick and muscular, with thick hair covering the entire surface of the body, with the exception of the palms and feet, which, according to people who met the Yeti, remain completely naked.

The color of the coat can be different depending on the habitat - white, black, gray, red.

The faces are always dark, and the hair on the head is longer than on the rest of the body. According to some reports, the beard and mustache are completely absent, or they are very short and rare.

The skull has a pointed shape and a massive lower jaw.

The growth of these creatures varies from 1.5 to 3 meters. Other witnesses claimed to have met taller individuals.

Features of the Bigfoot body are also long arms and shortened hips.

The Yeti's habitat is a controversial issue, as people claim to have seen it in America, Asia, and even Russia. Presumably, they can be found in the Urals, the Caucasus and Chukotka.

These mysterious creatures live far from civilization, carefully hiding from human attention. Nests can be located in trees or in caves.

But no matter how carefully the snowmen tried to take cover, there were local residents who claimed to have seen them.

First eyewitnesses

The first who happened to see the mysterious creature live were Chinese peasants. According to available information, the meeting was not a single one, but numbered about a hundred cases.

After such statements, several countries, including America and Great Britain, sent an expedition in search of traces.

Thanks to the collaboration of two eminent scientists, Richard Greenwell and Gene Poirier, evidence has been found for the existence of the Yeti.

The find was hair that was supposed to belong only to him. However, later, in 1960, Edmund Hillary got the opportunity to examine the scalp again.

His conclusion was unequivocal: the “find” was made of antelope wool.

As expected, many scientists did not agree with this version, finding more and more confirmations of the previously put forward theory.

Bigfoot scalp

In addition to the hairline found, the identity of which is still a controversial issue, there is no other documented evidence.

Except for countless photographs, footprints and eyewitness accounts.

Photos are often of very poor quality, so they do not allow you to reliably determine if these frames are real or fake.

Footprints, which, of course, are similar to human ones, but wider and longer, scientists rank among the traces of famous animals living in the find area.

And even the stories of eyewitnesses who, according to them, met Bigfoot, do not allow us to establish for certain the fact of their existence.

Bigfoot on video

However, in 1967, two men were able to film Bigfoot.

They were R. Patterson and B. Gimlin from Northern California. Being shepherds, one autumn, on the banks of the river, they noticed a creature, which, realizing that it had been found, immediately set off on the run.

Grabbing a camera, Roger Patterson set off to catch up with an unusual creature, which was mistaken for a yeti.

The film aroused genuine interest among scientists who for many years tried to prove or disprove the existence of a mythical creature.

Bob Gimlin and Roger Patterson

A number of features proved that the film was not a fake.

The size of the body and the unusual gait indicated that it was not a person.

The video noted a clear image of the body and limbs of the creature, which ruled out the creation of a special costume for filming the film.

Some structural features of the body allowed scientists to draw conclusions about the similarity of the individual from the video frames with the prehistoric ancestor of man - the Neanderthal ( approx. the last Neanderthals lived about 40 thousand years ago), but very large in size: growth reached 2.5 meters, and weight - 200 kg.

After numerous examinations, the film was found to be authentic.

In 2002, after the death of Ray Wallace, who initiated this filming, his relatives and acquaintances reported that the film was completely staged: a man in a specially tailored suit portrayed an American Yeti, and unusual footprints were left by artificial forms.

But they did not provide evidence that the film was fake. Later, experts conducted an experiment in which a trained person tried to repeat the shots taken in a suit.

They came to the conclusion that at the time the film was made, it was not possible to produce such a quality production.

There were other encounters with the unusual being, most of them in America. For example, in North Carolina, Texas and near the state of Missouri, but unfortunately there is no evidence of these meetings, except for the oral stories of people.

A woman named Zana from Abkhazia

An interesting and unusual confirmation of the existence of these individuals was a woman named Zana, who lived in Abkhazia in the 19th century.

Raisa Khvitovna, Zana's granddaughter - the daughter of Khvit and a Russian woman named Maria

The description of her appearance is similar to the available descriptions of Bigfoot: red hair that covered her dark skin, and the hair on her head was longer than on her whole body.

She did not speak articulately, but uttered only cries and isolated sounds.

The face was large, the cheekbones protruded, and the jaw protruded strongly forward, which gave it a ferocious look.

Zana was able to integrate into human society and even gave birth to several children from local men.

Later, scientists conducted research on the genetic material of Zana's descendants.

According to some sources, their origin originates in West Africa.

The results of the examination indicate the possibility of the existence of a population in Abkhazia during the life of Zana, which means that it is not excluded in other regions.

Makoto Nebuka reveals the secret

One of the enthusiasts who wanted to prove the existence of the Yeti was the Japanese climber Makoto Nebuka.

He hunted Bigfoot for 12 years, exploring the Himalayas.

After so many years of persecution, he came to a disappointing conclusion: the legendary humanoid creature turned out to be just a Himalayan brown bear.

The book with his research describes some interesting facts. It turns out that the word "yeti" is nothing more than a distorted word "meti", which means "bear" in the local dialect.

The Tibetan clans considered the bear to be a supernatural creature that possessed power. Perhaps these concepts were combined, and the myth of Bigfoot spread everywhere.

Research from different countries

Numerous studies have been carried out by many scientists around the world. The USSR was no exception.

Geologists, anthropologists and botanists worked in the commission for the study of Bigfoot. As a result of their work, a theory was put forward that states that Bigfoot is a degraded branch of Neanderthals.

However, then the work of the commission was terminated, and only a few enthusiasts continued to work on research.

Genetic studies of available samples deny the existence of the Yeti. An Oxford University professor, after analyzing the hair, proved that they belonged to a polar bear that existed several thousand years ago.

Still from a film shot in Northern California 10/20/1967

At present, the discussions do not subside.

The question of the existence of another mystery of nature remains open, and the society of cryptozoologists is still trying to find evidence.

All the facts available today do not give one hundred percent certainty in the reality of this creature, although some people really want to believe in it.

Obviously, only a film shot in Northern California can be considered proof of the existence of the object under study.

Some people tend to believe that Bigfoot is of alien origin.

That is why it is so difficult to detect, and all genetic and anthropological analyzes lead scientists to wrong results.

Someone is sure that science is hushing up the fact of their existence and publishes false studies, because there are so many eyewitnesses.

But questions are only multiplying every day, and answers are extremely rare. And although many believe in the existence of Bigfoot, science still denies this fact.

Bigfoot - myth or reality? Billions of people on Earth want the answer to this question.

Are you interested in the topic bigfoot photo or bigfoot video film? This article is about just that! Bigfoot or, as he is also called, bigfoot, hominoid, sasquatch is a humanoid creature that is believed to be found in the highlands and forest regions of the world. There is an opinion that this is a mammal that belongs to the order of primates and to the genus man, preserved from the time of human ancestors. The Swedish naturalist, the creator of a unified classification system for the animal and plant world, Karl Linnaeus, defined it as Homo troglodytes, or, in other words, a caveman.

Descriptive Characteristics of Bigfoot

There is no exact description of Bigfoot. Some say that these are huge four-meter animals that are distinguished by mobility. Others, on the contrary, say that his height does not exceed 1.5 meters, he is passive and swings his arms strongly when walking.

All Bigfoot researchers are inclined to conclude that the yeti is a good creature, if it is not angry

According to unconfirmed reports, the yeti differs from modern humans in a pointed skull, a denser physique, a short neck, longer arms, short hips and a massive lower jaw. Its entire body is covered with reddish gray or black hair. The hair on the head is longer than on the body, and the beard and mustache are very short. It has an unpleasant strong odor. Among other things, he is excellent at climbing trees.

It is believed that the habitat of Bigfoot is the snowy edge, which separates forests from glaciers. At the same time, forest populations of snowmen build nests on tree branches, while mountain populations live in caves. They feed on lichens and rodents, and, before eating, the caught animals are butchered. This may indicate a close relationship with a person. In case of hunger, yeti approach people, and thus behave carelessly. According to the villagers, in case of danger, the humanoid savage makes a loud barking sound. But Chinese peasants talk about how snow people weave simple baskets, and also make axes, shovels and other elementary tools.

Descriptions suggest that the yeti is a relic hominoid that lives in married couples. However, it is possible that some people with overdeveloped unnatural hairline are mistaken for these creatures.

Early references to Bigfoot

The very first historical evidence of the existence of Bigfoot is associated with the name of Plutarch. He talked about how Sulla's soldiers caught a satyr who, according to the description, matches the appearance of a yeti.

In his short story Horror, Guy de Maupassant describes the meeting of the writer Ivan Turgenev with a female Bigfoot. There is also documentary evidence that in the 19th century there was a woman named Zana in Abkhazia, who was the prototype of the yeti. She had peculiar habits, but this did not prevent her from safely giving birth to children from people who, in turn, were distinguished by mighty strength and good health.

In the West in 1832 there were reports of a strange creature living in the Himalayas. B. G. Hodtson, an English traveler and explorer, settled in a highland region to study this mysterious creature. Later Hodtson B.G. in his works he talked about a tall humanoid creature, which the Nepalese called a demon. It was covered with long thick hair, differed from the animal in the absence of a tail and upright walking. The first mention of the Yeti Hodtson was told by local residents. According to them, for the first time about Bigfoot was mentioned in the fourth century BC.

Half a century later, the Briton Lawrence Waddell became interested in savages. At an altitude of 6,000 meters in Sikkim, he found footprints. After analyzing them and talking with local residents, Lawrence Waddell concluded that predatory yellow bears, which very often attack yaks, are mistaken for humanoid savages.

The growth of interest in bigfoot was observed in the 20-30s of the twentieth century, when one reporter called the hairy savage "a terrible bigfoot". The media also reported that several Bigfoot were caught and imprisoned, after which they were shot as Basmachi. In 1941, the colonel of the medical service of the Soviet army Karapetyan V.S. made an inspection of a snowman caught in Dagestan. Shortly thereafter, the mysterious creature was shot dead.

Bigfoot theories and film

To date, scientists do not have sufficient data to make an official confirmation of the validity of one of the theories. However, scientists are voicing rather bold hypotheses about the emergence of the Yeti, which have the right to exist. Their opinions are based on the study of hair and footprints, photographs taken, audio recordings, sketches of a strange creature, as well as video recordings that are not of the best quality.

For a long time, a short film directed by Bob Gimlin and Roger Patterson in 1967 in Northern California was the most compelling evidence for the Yeti's existence. According to the authors, they managed to capture a female Bigfoot on film.

This happened in the fall, when Bob and Roger rode horses along a densely forested gorge in the hope of meeting a yeti, whose traces were repeatedly seen in these places. At one point, the horses were frightened of something and reared up, after which Patterson noticed a certain large creature that was squatting on the bank of the stream near the water. Glancing at the cowboys, this mysterious creature got up and walked away towards the steep slope of the gorge. Roger was not taken aback and, having taken out a video camera, ran to the stream for the creature. He ran after the savage, shooting him in the back. However, he realized that it was necessary to fix the camera and follow the moving creature, after which he knelt down. Suddenly, the creature turned and started walking towards the camera, but then, turning a little to the left, it left the stream. Roger tried to rush after him, however, thanks to his fast walking and large size, the mysterious creature quickly disappeared, and the film on the video camera ran out.

The Gimlin-Patterson film was immediately rejected by specialists from the most important scientific center in the United States - the Smithsonian Institution - as a fake. American experts said that such a hybrid with a hairy chest, gorilla head and human legs simply cannot exist in nature. At the end of 1971, the film was brought to Moscow and shown to a number of scientific institutions. Specialists of the Central Research Institute of Prosthetics and Prosthetics positively assessed him and became very interested in him. After a detailed study of the film, a written conclusion was made by the professor of the Academy of Physical Culture D.D. Donskoy, who noted that the gait of the creature on the film is completely atypical for a person. He regarded it as a natural movement, in which there were no signs of artificiality, and which is characteristic of various deliberate imitations.

Renowned sculptor Nikita Lavinsky also believed that the Gimlin-Patterson film was authentic. Based on the frames of this film, he even created sculptural portraits of a female Bigfoot.

The participants of the seminar on hominology Alexandra Burtseva, Dmitry Bayanov and Igor Burtsev undertook the most in-depth study of this film. Burtsev made a photographic reproduction with various expositions of stills from the film. Thanks to this work, it was proved that the head of the creature on the film was not a gorilla, as the Americans claimed, and not an ordinary person, but a paleoanthropist. It is also clear that the hairline is not a special costume at all, since the muscles of the back, legs and arms are clearly visible through it. The Yeti also differs from a human in its elongated upper limbs, the absence of a visible neck, the landing of the head, and an elongated barrel-shaped torso.

The arguments on which Patterson's film is based are:

• The ankle joint of the mysterious creature, captured on film, has exceptional flexibility, which is unattainable for a person. The foot in the dorsal direction has more flexibility than a human. Dmitry Bayanov was the first to draw attention to this. Later, this fact was confirmed and described in his publications by Jeff Meldrum, an American anthropologist.

• The Yeti's heel sticks out much more than a human's heel, which is consistent with the structure of the Neanderthal foot.

• The then head of the department of biochemistry at the Academy of Physical Culture, Dmitry Donskoy, who studied the film in detail, concluded that the gait of a strange creature on the film is completely not inherent in Homo Sariens, which, moreover, cannot be recreated.

• The film clearly shows the muscles on the limbs and body, which in turn eliminates the assumption of a suit. The whole anatomy distinguishes this mysterious creature from a man.

• A comparison of the frequency of hand vibrations with the speed at which the film was shot proved that the hairy creature was rather tall, about 2 meters 20 centimeters, and if you take into account the complexion, then it weighs more than 200 kilograms.

Based on these considerations, Patterson's film was deemed authentic. This was reported in scientific publications in the USA and the USSR. However, if the film is recognized as authentic, then the existence of living relic hominids, which are considered extinct tens of thousands of years ago, is recognized. Anthropologists cannot yet agree to this. Hence the endless number of rebuttals of the authenticity of excellent film evidence.

Among other things, ufologist Shurinov B.A. contrary to popular belief, he claims that Bigfoot is of alien origin. Other researchers of the yeti mysteries insist that the origin is associated with interspecies hybridization on anthropoids, thus putting forward the theory that Bigfoot occurred as a result of crossing monkeys with humans in the Gulag.

Bigfoot photo real. Bigfoot family in Tennessee (USA)

Real photo of a frozen yeti

In December 1968, two famous cryptozoologists, Bernard Euvelmans (France) and Ivan Sanderson (USA), examined the frozen corpse of a hairy hominoid found in the Caucasus. The results of the survey were published in the scientific collection of cryptozoologists. Euvelmans identified the frozen yeti as a "modern Neanderthal".

At the same time, active searches for Bigfoot were also carried out in the former USSR. The most significant results were given by the studies of Maria-Janna Kofman in the North Caucasus, Alexandra Burtseva in Chukotka and Kamchatka. Scientific expeditions in Tajikistan and Pamir-Altai led by Igor Tatsl and Igor Burtsev ended very fruitfully. On Lovozero (Murmansk region) and in Western Siberia, Maya Bykova successfully searched. Vladimir Pushkarev devoted a lot of time to the search for the Yeti in Komi and Yakutia.

Unfortunately, the last expedition of Vladimir Pushkarev ended tragically: due to lack of funds for a full-fledged expedition, he went alone in September 1978 to the Khanty-Mansiysk district in search of bigfoot and went missing.

Janice Carter has been friends with the Yeti (Bigfoot) family for decades!

In recent years, there has been a revival of interest in the Yeti, and new regions of distribution of modern Neanderthals have appeared. In 2002, Janice Carter, a Tennessee farm owner, said in a television interview that a whole family of Bigfoots had been living near her farm for more than fifty years. According to her, in 2002, the father of the "snowy" family was about 60 years old, and their first acquaintance took place when Janice was a seven-year-old girl. Janice Carter met Bigfoot and his family many times in her life. This drawing was made from her words and clearly shows the proportions of the yeti and its peacefulness.

Recently, Russian hominologists (Yeti researchers) found information that in 1997 in France, in the small town of Bourganef, a frozen body of a Bigfoot was demonstrated, allegedly found in Tibet and smuggled from China. There are many inconsistencies in this story. The owner of the refrigerator in which the corpse of the yeti was transported disappeared without a trace. Gone was the van itself, with its sensational contents. Photos of the body were shown by Janice Carter, who confirmed that she did not rule out that this was not a falsification, but the real Bigfoot body.

Bigfoot video. Yeti speculation and falsification

In 1958, Ray Wallace, a resident of the American town of San Diego, launched a sensational story about the Bigfoot, which is a relative of the yeti living in the mountains of California. It all started with the fact that in August 1958, an employee of Wallace's construction company came to work and saw huge footprints around the bulldozer that looked like human ones. The local press dubbed the mysterious creature the Bigfoot, and thus America got its own kind of Bigfoot.

In 2002, after the death of Ray Wallace, his family decided to reveal the secret. The footprints, 40 centimeters long, were cut from boards at Ray's request, after which he and his brother put these paws on their feet and walked around the bulldozer.

This prank captivated him so much for many years that he could not stop and periodically delighted the media and the society of lovers of the mysterious either with a recording on which he makes sounds, or with photographs with blurry monsters. But the most interesting thing was that the relatives of the deceased Wallace announced the falsification of the film, which was shot by Patterson and Gimlin. Many experts assumed that the footage was genuine. However, according to relatives and acquaintances, this filming was a staged episode in which Wallace's wife starred, dressed in a specially tailored monkey costume. This statement was a solid blow to enthusiasts who are trying to find a humanoid mysterious creature.

But back in 1969, John Green consulted the Disney film studio, who created monkey costumes for the actors, in order to determine the authenticity of the film. They said that the creature that was filmed was wearing real skin, not a suit.

It should be noted that hundreds of volumes of scientific literature are devoted to the observations of the hominoid. But there is still no concrete answer to the question of its origin and existence. On the contrary, the longer the research and search lasts, the more acutely questions are raised. Why can't catch Bigfoot? Can small populations of these creatures survive in unconnected areas? And there are many more questions that have not yet been answered...

I bring to your attention an excellent film about the Yeti with good video quality, dedicated to all aspects of this most interesting topic, which has been exciting the minds of people around the world for many years.

Many modern scientists believe that Bigfoot is as much a myth as the Bermuda Triangle and UFOs. Let's assume it is. Then how can this view be linked to new reports of a meeting with this mysterious creature? One of the earliest historical evidence for the existence of Bigfoot (Yeti) goes back to the famous Plutarch. According to his report, in his time there was a case of the capture of a satyr by the soldiers of the Roman general Sulla. Maupassant's story "Horror" is known about the meeting of the outstanding Russian writer Ivan Turgenev with a female Bigfoot. It is documented that in the 19th century in Abkhazia, a woman, Zana, lived with people, who looked like a Bigfoot and had several children from people who normally integrated into human society. In 1921, the existence of the Yeti was reported by Howard-Bury, a famous climber who led an expedition to Everest. In the 20s of the 20th century, several Bigfoots were allegedly caught in Central Asia, imprisoned and, after unsuccessful interrogations, shot as Basmachi. Lieutenant Colonel of the Medical Service of the Soviet Army Karapetyan in 1941 made a direct examination of a living wild man caught in Dagestan, the “animal” was soon shot.

Last eyewitnesses Many stories about the "meeting" date back to 1970-1990. However, the most recent meeting took place on May 4, 2007. Gord Johnson, a resident of Cranbrook, British Columbia, Canada, was driving his truck on a scheduled flight. Suddenly, his headlights illuminated a strange human figure a few meters away from him. The meeting took place early in the morning, and the road was empty. As soon as the creature spotted Johnson's car, it began to move closer. Soon the truck driver realized with horror for himself that this was not an ordinary person: large hands reached to his knees, his head was cone-shaped, and his whole body was covered with blond hair. Dr. Helmut Lufs argues: “There are hundreds of reports of Bigfoot around the world: in the Himalayas they are called Yeti, in China - Yeren, in North America - Sasquatch or Bigfoot, in Indochina it is a “forest man”, and in Australia - Yahoo, Yowie or "hairy man". There is also information about the existence of these creatures in other countries and under other names. They have been seen in Indonesia, Malaysia, Burma, Pakistan, the Caucasus, Mongolia, Africa and even South America. My own hypothesis, based on years of research, is that there are indeed primates on Earth that are different from the great apes and Homo sapiens. These species are either apes that are still unknown to us, or non-sapiens hominids (people inferior to an ordinary person in mind), not evolved Neanderthals.

April 25, 2007 in the northern United States, a couple was picking mushrooms in the forest. Suddenly, the couple lost sight of each other. After another picked mushroom, the woman raised her head and, with horror for herself, saw a man standing about 15-20 meters from her. Looking closer, she realized that it was not quite a person: the creature was covered with dark brown fur, and its height exceeded 2 meters. It stood motionless and calmly looked at her. The longer the woman looked at it, the more it seemed to her like a statue, standing completely still. For a moment the woman turned away to look for her husband with her eyes. When she returned her gaze towards the strange creature, she discovered a small passage - the “snowman” was hiding behind a tree, so that only his shoulders could be seen. The frightened American woman, screaming, rushed towards the car that was standing at a distance. At her cry, an alarmed husband ran to the car, finding his wife sitting in the car and trembling. Later, the man recalled that, walking through the forest, he felt that someone was following him at a distance and muttering something in a low voice, like a rustle. Then he took it for a joke of his missus. And only after the story of his wife did he realize that the same creature was following him, since the woman at that moment was looking for mushrooms in a completely different place. Another recent evidence of a Bigfoot encounter dates back to March 2, 2007. Near the city of Indianapolis (Indiana, USA), an American hit a Bigfoot with a car. The witness, an Indiana resident, left work early that day and was driving home on the highway north of Indianapolis. Suddenly, his colleague, who was riding in a jeep in front of him, began to brake sharply. For some reason, the witness thought that, probably, a deer would now run out in front of him. However, he was wrong. A few seconds later, he saw a dark-furred creature walking along the road on two legs. The driver of the jeep could not avoid a collision with the Bigfoot - he hit him with the rear bumper. Having driven forward a little, the driver stopped and began to look out in the rear-view mirror for the victim of an accidental accident. For a couple of seconds he did not see anyone, when suddenly something began to slowly rise to its “feet”. The “strange, like a huge man” creature tried several times to stand on two legs, but kept falling down, uttering a piercing howl. This whole situation did not last long. Suddenly, the "Bigfoot" abruptly rushed deep into the forest. After what they saw, both witnesses could not come to their senses for a long time. We met the Bigfoot last year, in September. Sagre de Cristo mountains. New Mexico. Colorado. 67-year-old Arturo Martinez and his friend traveled through the forests and noticed a lot of uprooted and scattered aspens on the road. After examining the places where these trees grew, they did not find any traces. They were sure that neither a bear nor any other animal could do it. As soon as Arturo and his friend were about to leave the eerie forest, a piercing howl was heard nearby. Moreover, this howl was more like a scream, growing into a terrible scream. Literally a moment later, before their eyes, a giant creature about two and a half meters tall grew out of the ground. Stopping, the monster uprooted several aspens in a matter of seconds and threw them towards Martinez's car. According to the men, this creature stood on two legs and was covered with dark fur. “It clearly didn’t look like a bear,” Martinez later recalled. There was nothing left but to run as fast as possible. It would hardly have been possible to use the car - the tires were punctured. The men pulled at full speed, and Bigfoot (so says Martinez) ran after them for a long time, throwing trees at them. All his fierce behavior was accompanied by piercing cries. The scientific reality of the "snowman" The only serious researcher of snowmen in Russia, Professor Valentin Sapunov, has been collecting material about these creatures around the world for many years. Doctor of Biological Sciences Sapunov believes that “the riddle of Bigfoot has two aspects. Let's conditionally call them biological and anomalous. The biological aspect is reduced to confirming the reality of its existence as a biological species. The facts confirming this side can be divided into 6 groups: testimonies, traces, biological damage, feces, photographic and film materials, body parts. We can talk about each of these groups of evidence for quite a long time. But it hardly makes sense. So much has been written about this that we should confine ourselves to a general summary. You can argue about each specific circumstance associated with Bigfoot. We can talk about the reliability of certain findings. One can reason about the few fuzzy photographs, film and videotapes. But in its totality, this material cannot be deleted from the sphere of scientific knowledge. He unequivocally testifies: behind all the messages there is a real biological species belonging to the order of primates. Its place in evolution and in the structure of the biosphere is between man and great apes. This is not only my personal opinion, but also the official position of the USSR Academy of Sciences and its successor, the Russian Academy of Sciences. In 1958, there was a “commission to study the question of the Bigfoot”, headed by such undisputed authorities as S.V. Obruchev, K.V. Stanyukovich, B.F. Porshnev. The Nobel laureate I.E. Tamm was a member of it. The commission proceeded from the position that we are talking about primacy, a degraded branch of the Neanderthals that has survived to this day. The results of the commission were not annulled by the subsequent work of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR and the Russian Academy of Sciences. Moreover, the same position was further stated in the official reference manuals of the Academy, compiled by N.F. Reimers and other authors, edited by corresponding member A.V. Yablokov and reflecting the opinion of many prominent scientists. analogues are very interesting from the point of view of ethnography. The image of a huge scary man can reflect the natural fears of darkness, the unknown, relationships with mystical forces among different peoples. It is quite possible that people with unnatural hair or feral people are mistaken for Bigfoot.Curtain The problem of Bigfoot needs to be studied. But, using the usual methods of observing the wild "beast", you need to remember the following. This is not just one of the rare species. This is an alternative and unknown way of human development. Each step along it can bring amazing knowledge and threaten with unknown dangers.

Bigfoot is a humanoid creature allegedly found in the highlands of the Earth. There is an opinion that this is a relic hominid, that is, a mammal belonging to the order of primates and the genus man, which has survived to this day from the time of human ancestors. Carl Linnaeus designated it as lat. Homo troglodytes (caveman).

Judging by hypotheses and unconfirmed evidence, Bigfoot differ from us in a denser physique, a pointed skull, longer arms, a short neck and a massive lower jaw, and relatively short hips.

They have hair all over their body - black, red or gray. Dark faces. The hair on the head is longer than on the body. The mustache and beard are very sparse and short. They have a strong unpleasant odor.

Big Foot

They are good at climbing trees. It is alleged that the mountain populations of Bigfoot live in caves, forest people build nests on tree branches.

Ideas about Bigfoot and his various local counterparts are very interesting from the point of view of ethnography. The image of a huge scary man can reflect the natural fears of darkness, the unknown, relationships with mystical forces among different peoples. It is possible that people with unnatural hair or feral people are mistaken for Bigfoot.

If relict hominids exist, then they live in small groups, probably married couples.

They can move on their hind limbs. Growth should range from 1 to 2.5 m; in most cases 1.5-2 m; it was reported about the meeting with the largest individuals in the mountains of Central Asia (Yeti) and in North America (Sasquatch).

In Sumatra, Kalimantan and Africa, in most cases, growth did not exceed 1.5 m. There are suggestions that the observed relict hominids belong to several different species, at least three.

Bigfoot Existence

Most modern scientists believe Bigfoot is a myth.

Currently, there is not a single representative of the species living in captivity, not a single skeleton or skin. However, there are allegedly hair, footprints and dozens of photographs, videos (poor quality) and audio recordings.

The reliability of this evidence is in doubt. For a long time, one of the most compelling pieces of evidence has been a short film directed by Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin in 1967 in Northern California. The footage was said to be of a female Bigfoot.

However, in 2002, after the death of Ray Wallace, for whom this shooting was made, there were testimonies of his relatives and acquaintances who said (however, without presenting any material evidence) that the whole story with the "American Yeti" was from the beginning to the end is rigged; forty-centimeter "Yeti footprints" were made by artificial forms, and the filming was a staged episode with a man in a specially tailored monkey suit.

This was a serious blow to enthusiasts trying to find Bigfoot.

Bigfoot Wikipedia
Site search:

Yeti - snowman

The snowman is a creature that has become almost a legend. He has many names - Yeti, Sasquatch, Bigfoot. Carl Linnaeus called him "Homo troglodytes" - "a man from speleologists." Who first told the world that a snowball exists? Michel Nostradamus also said that there is a creature on earth whose appearance is something like a man of gigantic stature and a monkey.

The first of the yetis seems to have mentioned the traveler Colonel Wendell, who made a trip to the Himalayas in the 19th century.

Yeti Bigfoot Appears

The photo of the snowman does not give a clear idea of ​​what iti looks like.

Its appearance is based only on hypotheses and assumptions. The Yeti is said to have a very dense body, long arms, a skull shape with a bulbous head, and a very massive jaw. Here is what Carl Linnaeus described.

The Yeti snowman is much taller and more massive than the average man, standing at 2m or more.

Snowflake Yeti's body is covered in fur.

In some areas, people come across a jet scalp that was black, other eyes are red, others claim that snow people are covered with gray (white) hair.

Interesting fact. The fact that the snowman has a beard and mustache unites the opinions of all researchers and eyewitnesses.

Yeti, Sasquatch and Bigfoot are foul smelling, they live in caves and are excellent tree climbers. Although it is believed that snowmen build nests among the crowns. The lack of a portrait agrees.

However, there is some pattern.

Strange creatures. Snezhak - Yeti - Snegurochka

All eyewitnesses or those who consider themselves as such, claim that the relic hominids, the so-called Jewish scientists, move in two limbs. Their growth depends on the location. Thus, in Central Asia, where Homo troglodytes is called Yeti, and in North America, where the snowman is called Saskváč, their height does not exceed 1.5-2 m.

Large people live in the Himalayas and Tibet - up to 2.5 m. But African yeti - "children" - up to 1.5 m.

Have photos and videos about Yeti?

As she approaches the Snow Yeti, people get dizzy and pressured.

In addition, the beings act on the person's subconscious, which makes them oblivious to their presence. Dreams are scary. When it appears near the yeti, the birds stop barking and the dogs stop barking, and some avoid fear.

Yeti Snowman allegedly hypnotizes all those who meet him

Attempts to record Yeti videos or take pictures are very numerous, but the equipment stopped working as usual, so the researchers noticed poor quality footage and videos of the snow.

The Yeti moves very fast, and despite this rather large dimension, some researchers are trying to catch up with it, but without success.

Many eyewitnesses who have attempted to take a photograph say that when looking at a person for a long time, they enter a semi-conscious country and stop reporting their actions.

Perhaps that's why so many people forget to get and attach equipment to take pictures and videos of snow?

Interesting fact. All eyewitnesses claim to have seen an iti man and a yeti wife. And in different parts of the world. So the snowman not only exists, but also breeds? Where does the Yeti live?

So, who is really a snowmobile? An alien or an ancestor of the human race somehow managed to survive, retain primitive characteristics?

Perhaps the Yeti is the result of an unsuccessful attempt to cross primacy and man? It is well known that such tests were carried out by the Third Reich, but documentary evidence has not been preserved.

Is Space Bigfoot Snowman Africa or Asia?

Ancient Buddhist temples in Tibet have preserved ancient records of monks meeting with mysterious creatures of great stature, which are completely covered with hair.

In this part of Asia, the snowman was first discovered, the Yeti. By the way, Yeti is translated as "a creature that lives among the stones."

Interesting fact. The first reports of snowmen appeared in the world press in the mid-1950s. Their authors were climbers who were trying to climb to the top of Everest and found suitable paths between the Himalayan rocks. The experience was replaced by groups of scientists who were interested in stories about athletes. So he began the hunt for the legendary Yeti.

Gypsum was on the Iti Snowman tape found in Tibet

The prerequisite for the first serious study of the Yeti snowman was a series of fairly clear photographs by Eric Shipton during an expedition to the Himalayas (1951).

The photographs were taken in Menlung Glasir, located at an altitude of 6705 m. The image shows the traces of the jets, their size. - from 31.25 to 16.25 cm from that time, scientists from all countries where, before the presence of large ape people, began to take significantly. serious attempts to understand the origins of Saskovich and Bigfoot.

Snowball Yeti in Russia

The Yeti phenomenon has also been studied in Russia in the Caucasus region.

This included the historian B. Porshnev, later D. Kofman. Numerous local stories of snowy, hairy, and tall encounters confirmed that the explorers had found food. Caucasian Bigfoots are shy when they see a person disappear immediately.

According to eyewitnesses, a fog appears in front of your eyes, and when it disappears, Itachi can evaporate.

Interesting fact. In the 19th century, Przhevalsky, who was involved in research in the Gobi desert, met a snowman. However, the Russian government was afraid to allocate money for additional liquidation. Fear supported the statements of the clergy who spoke of the Yeti as hell.

Encounters with Yeti sneakers have also taken place in Kazakhstan, where they even refer to "kiik-ads" as "wild man", while in Azerbaijan locals refer to Bigfoot as bibabuli.

Predictably snowy park in northern Russia

A hunter in the Chelyabinsk region did not meet a light snowball with a snowman.

In Chelyabinsk in 2012, a local hunter had to study a humanoid creature, in which the hunter immediately recognized the legendary hoof. According to the hunter, he had "landline lines" but that didn't stop him from making a video about it on his mobile phone.

Since then, Yeti visits to the Chelyabinsk region have increased.

It is worth noting that they are not afraid to leave the forest and approach the places where people live. Perhaps the Yeti has become so much that they are trying to expand the boundaries of their habitat?

Livejournal

classmates

E-mail address

Tags: America, Africa, life on Earth

In the section: Countries and nations, 20:12, June 28, 2015 at 20:12.

your feedback

You can leave a comment!

Description

In testimonies about meetings with "snow people" most often appear creatures that differ from modern humans in a denser physique, pointed skull shape, longer arms, short necks and massive lower jaws, relatively short hips, with thick hair all over body - black, red, white or gray. Dark faces. The hair on the head is longer than on the body. The mustache and beard are very sparse and short. They are good at climbing trees. It has been suggested that mountain populations of snow people live in caves, forest people build nests on tree branches. Carl Linnaeus referred to it as Homo troglodytes(caveman). Very fast. He can overtake a horse, moreover, on two legs, and in the water - a motor boat. Omnivorous, but prefers plant foods, very fond of apples. Eyewitnesses described encounters with specimens of various heights, from the average human to 3 m or more.

Ideas about Bigfoot and its various local counterparts are very interesting from the point of view of ethnography. The image of a huge scary man can reflect the innate fears of darkness, the unknown, relationships with mystical forces among different peoples. It is possible that in some cases Bigfoot people with unnatural hairline or feral people were accepted.

origin of name

Bigfoot called him thanks to a group of climbers who conquered Everest. They discovered the loss of food supplies, then heard a heart-rending scream, and on one of the snow-covered slopes a chain of footprints similar to human ones appeared. The residents explained that it was a Yeti, a terrible bigfoot, and categorically refused to camp in this place. Since then, Europeans have called this creature Bigfoot.

Existence

Most modern scientists are skeptical about the possibility of the existence of Bigfoot.

... about Bigfoot, he said: "I really want to believe, but there is no reason." The words "no evidence" mean that the matter was studied, and as a result of the study it was found that there is no reason to trust the original statements. This: is the formula of the scientific approach: “I want to believe”, but since “there are no grounds”, then this belief must be abandoned.
Academician A. B. Migdal From conjecture to truth.

The attitude of a professional biologist to the question of the possibility of the existence of a "snowman" was illustrated by paleontologist Kirill Eskov in a popular article:

At least, I am not aware of the laws of nature that would impose a direct ban on the existence in the mountains of Central Asia of a relic hominoid - "ape-man", or simply a large anthropoid ape. It must be assumed that, contrary to its name, it is not connected with eternal snows in any way (except that it sometimes leaves traces there), but should live in the belt of mountain forests, where there is enough food and shelters. It is clear that any reports about North American "bigfoots" can be thrown away without reading with a clear conscience (because there are no and never have been any species of primates on that continent, and in order to get there from Asia through the polar Beringia, as people did, you must at least have fire), but in the Himalayas or the Pamirs - why not? There are even quite plausible candidates for this role, for example, megantrop - a very large (about two meters tall) fossil monkey from South Asia, who had a number of "human" features that bring it closer to African Australopithecus, the direct ancestors of hominids […]
So, do I admit (as a professional zoologist) the fundamental possibility of the existence of a relic hominoid? - answer: "Yes". Do I believe in its existence? - answer: "No". And since we are not talking about “I know / I don’t know”, but about “I believe / I don’t believe”, I will allow myself to express a completely subjective judgment on this subject, based on personal experience: [...] where a professional’s foot has once set foot, neither one animal larger than a rat has no chance of remaining "unknown to science." Well, since by the end of the twentieth century there were no more places where that professional foot would not have set foot at all (at least on land) - draw your own conclusions ...

- "Cryptus, sir!", article. Kirill Eskov, Computerra, 13.03.07, No. 10 (678): pp. 36-39.

Currently, there is not a single representative of the species living in captivity, not a single skeleton or skin. However, there are allegedly hair, footprints and dozens of photographs, videos (poor quality) and audio recordings. The reliability of this evidence is in doubt. For a long time, one of the most compelling pieces of evidence has been a short film directed by Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin in 1967 in Northern California. The film was said to be of a female Bigfoot. However, in 2002, after the death of Ray Wallace, for whom this shooting was made, testimonies of his relatives and acquaintances appeared, who said (however, without presenting any material evidence) that the whole story with the "American Yeti" was from the beginning to the end is rigged; forty-centimeter "footprints of the yeti" were made by artificial forms, and the filming was a staged episode with a man in a specially tailored monkey suit.

However, it should be noted that Patterson's film aroused the genuine interest of National Geographic Channel researchers. In "Reality or Fiction" (aired in December 2010), an attempt was made to study and investigate Patterson's film in terms of the possibility of its falsification. Experienced make-up artists, a tall actor imitating a gait, special effects specialists and scientists were involved as experts. The appearance of the creature in the film, its hair adjacent to the muscles, the proportions of the limbs, the dynamics of movement, the shooting distance, etc. were evaluated. As a result, according to the unanimous opinion of the experts involved, even at the current level of development of the media industry and video effects, already at the level of 1967, it is almost impossible to achieve such a degree of realism in the Bigfoot story.

On the other hand, from enthusiasts of this topic one can hear accusations against "official science" that its representatives simply brush aside the available evidence. Here is a typical text of this kind:

In fact, those who say “no reason” simply do not even want to get acquainted with what “dug up” by enthusiastic researchers. “We hear a lot of examples of this in history.” I will give only two. When Canadian Rene Dahinden brought us a copy of the film shot by Patterson in 1967 at the end of 1971, I personally approached the then director of the Institute of Anthropology of Moscow State University V.P. would recoil from the proposal and say; "Not! No need!" But this did not prevent him from declaring that there were no grounds ...
And when at the international symposium, which he (Yakimov) chaired, Professor Astanin went to the podium to present to the audience the materials of the anatomical study of the yeti hand from the Pangboche monastery (Tibet), Yakimov did not let him speak and drove him from the podium in violation of the democratic traditions of such forums - to the protesting exclamations of the participants ... As a result, some of them left the symposium session.
And a recent example: when I arrived from the USA after a five-week “investigation” of events at the Carter farm in the fall of 2004, where, according to the owner, the Bigfoot clan lived, and offered to speak and talk about the results in the anthropology department of the Institute of Ethnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, its head. S. Vasiliev declined under the pretext of being busy with other issues.
At the same time, when there was a fuss in the press about the existence of a “snowman” in the mountains of Shoria (south of the Kemerovo region), the same Vasiliev stated without hesitation: “Alas, we do not have data on the existence of humanoids, anywhere in the world"…
Igor Burtsev, Ph.D. ist. Sciences, Director of the International Center for Hominology, Moscow.

The Soviet scientist B. F. Porshnev paid great attention to the topic of Bigfoot.

Commission of the Academy of Sciences for the Study of the Question of the Bigfoot

Commission members J.-M. I. Kofman and Professor BF Porshnev and other enthusiasts continued to actively search for Bigfoot or its traces.

Society of Cryptozoologists

References in history and literature

Abstract drawing of Bigfoot.

Numerous images of creatures similar to Bigfoot are known (on art objects of Ancient Greece, Rome, Ancient Armenia, Carthage and the Etruscans and medieval Europe) and references, including in the Bible (in Russian translation shaggy), Ramayana ( rakshasas), in Nizami Ganjavi's poem "Iskander-name", folklore of different peoples ( faun, satyr and strong in Ancient Greece, yeti in Tibet, Nepal and Bhutan, ghoul baths in Azerbaijan, chuchunny, chuchunaa in Yakutia, almas in Mongolia, zhen (野人 ), maozhen(毛人) and renxiong(人熊) in China, kiik-adam and albasty In Kazakhstan , goblin, shish and shishiga the Russians, div in Persia (and Ancient Russia), chugaister in Ukraine , virgins and albasty in the Pamirs shurale and yarymtyk among Kazan Tatars and Bashkirs, arsuri among the Chuvash picene among the Siberian Tatars, abnahuayu in Abkhazia , sasquatch In Canada , terik, girkychavylyin, myrygdy, kiltan, arynk, arysa, rackem, julia in Chukotka, trampoline, sedapa and orangpendek in Sumatra and Kalimantan, agogwe, kakundakari and ki lomba in Africa, etc.). In folklore, they appear in the form of satyrs, demons, devils, goblin, water, mermaids, etc.

Opponents of the Bigfoot version of the existence, which include most professional biologists and anthropologists, point to the lack of unambiguous evidence (living individuals or their remains, high-quality photographs and videos) and the possibility of arbitrary interpretation of the available evidence. There are frequent references to a well-known biological fact: the long-term existence of a population requires a minimum number of about hundreds of individuals, whose vital activity, according to critics, simply cannot be imperceptible and leave numerous traces. The explanations put forward for the evidence generally boil down to the following set of versions:

Links

see also

Notes

1. K. Eskov. "Crypto, sir!"
2. Patterson film
3. B. F. Porshnev The current state of the issue of relic hominoids Viniti, Moscow, 1963
4. Soviet "snowman". Magazine "Itogi"
5. Jeanne-Maria Kofman
6. see for example, "Popular Biological Dictionary", 1991, Ed. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, edited by Corresponding Member A. V. Yablokov
7. V. B. Sapunov, Doctor of Biol. Sciences Bigfoot in two dimensions, or an alternative to the noosphere
8. J. Kofman At the origins of a new science (On the occasion of the 40th anniversary of the publication of the monograph by Professor B. F. Porshnev "The current state of the issue of relic hominoids" VINITI 412 since 1963) Mediana magazine No. 6 2004
9. KAZAKHSTAN CHRONICLE "P" Year 1988
10. Trakhtengerts M. S. Habitat of alamas primate species Journal of Natural and Technical Sciences ISSN 1684-2626, 2003, No. 2, pp. 71-76
11. Dmitri Bayanov, Igor Bourtsev In The Footsteps of the Russian Snowman 240 pages Pyramid Publications 1996 ISBN 5-900229-18-1 ISBN 978-5-900229-18-8
12. B. A. Shurinov Paradox of the 20th century"International Relations" 315p. 1990 ISBN 5-7133-0408-6
13. A Russian biologist considers the Sasquatch and other Yeti to be feral oligophrenics.
14. Beiko V. B., Berezina M. F., Bogatyreva E. L. et al. Great Encyclopedia of the Animal World: Nauch.-Pop. edition for children. - M.: CJSC "ROSMEN-PRESS", 2007. - 303 p. UDC 087.5, LBC 28.6, p. 285.

The Bigfoot or Yeti

Big Foot(Yeti, Bigfoot, Sasquatch) is a legendary humanoid creature that lives in the highlands of our planet. Many enthusiasts claim that the yeti exists, but so far no confirmation of this has been found.

There is an opinion that Bigfoot belongs to the genus of primates, i.e. is a distant relative of man. If you believe the hypotheses and unconfirmed data, Bigfoot differs significantly from modern Homo sapiens. Yeti has a larger and more dense physique, the shape of his skull is pointed, he has longer arms, a shorter neck, and a massive lower jaw. The entire body of a snowman is covered with hair, which can be of various colors: from black and red to gray. Yeti's face is dark in color. The hair on his head is longer than on his body. Bigfoot has a mustache and a beard, although they are rare. Yetis are great climbers. There is an opinion that mountain yeti live in caves, and forest ones make nests on tree branches. Carl Linnaeus named the mountain yeti Homo troglodytes, which means "caveman".

From the point of view of ethnography, the ideas about Bigfoot and its varieties are very interesting. The image of a terrible huge and wild man can only be a reflection of fears of the darkness of the night forest and the unknown. It is quite plausible version that the departed and feral people were taken for yeti.
If the relic bigfoot exists, then most likely they live in pairs. They can move on their hind limbs. Their height ranges from 1 to 2.5 m. Most of the meetings with the Yeti took place in the mountains of Central Asia and North America. In Sumatra, Africa and Kalimantan, there are individuals no more than 1.5 m tall. There is a version that there are three different types of Bigfoot. The first type has already been sufficiently studied and documented, it is he who owns the prints of bare feet found in the snows of Mount Everest at an altitude of 21,000 feet (6.4 km) in 1921.

This picture was taken by Colonel Howard-Bury, a respected and well-known climber. This happened when he led an expedition to Everest. After examining the footprints, local porters reported that the footprints were left by a kangmi sword. This is a bigfoot: "kang" means "snow", "mi" - "man", "sword" is translated as "disgustingly smelling". And so the word sword-kangmi was born. Until recently, it was believed that the Yeti lives only in the Himalayas and Tibet. At the moment, the Pamir, Central Africa, hard-to-reach areas of Yakutia, Chukotka, and the lower reaches of the Ob River are also considered to be the habitat of the Yeti. In the 1970s, there were reports of yeti sightings in the United States. There he was nicknamed "bigfoot".

The American scientist Roger Pattersen managed to capture the Bigfoot. In one of the gorges in Northern California, the scientist was able to approach the Bigfoot forty meters. The tape was sent for examination to Moscow, London. Forensic scientists, biomechanics, anthropologists, orthopedic prosthetists were involved in the analysis. The experts gave the following conclusion: the gait of the creature is not at all like the gait of a person. The British conducted research independently of the Russians, but the opinions of scientists coincided: Pattersen really filmed the yeti in its natural environment.