Definition of international economic law • and its subject. International economic law (MEP): concept, subject, system New economic order

§ 1. The concept of international economic law

International economic law- a branch of international law, the principles and norms of which regulate interstate economic relations.

Modern international economic relations are a highly developed complex system that combines heterogeneous in content (object) and subjects, but closely interacting types of social relations. The unprecedented growth in the importance of international economic relations for each country is due to objective reasons. The trend towards the internationalization of public life has reached a global scale, covering all countries and all major spheres of society, including economic.

The globalization of the economy is an important factor in its development. But it also creates a lot of problems. The main one is that not all states can take full advantage of the benefits of this process. First of all, these are developing countries, to some extent, countries with economies in transition.

Developing countries, relying on their majority in the UN, tried to change the situation and create a new economic order based on equal opportunities to participate in world economic relations. Thus, in 1974, the Declaration on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order and the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States were adopted (and before and after that, numerous resolutions were adopted in the same field). These documents had a dual effect. On the one hand, they formulate indisputable fundamental provisions that are the general principles of international economic law, but on the other hand, they contain many unilateral provisions that provide for the rights of developing countries and do not take into account the interests of industrialized countries. As a result, these provisions are not recognized by the world community and remain non-binding declarations.

As an example of provisions that have not received international legal consolidation, one can name provisions on rendering assistance to developing countries. Until now, developed countries consider this a voluntary matter, at best recognizing its moral character. The International Court of Justice is in the same position, which considers that the provision of assistance "is mainly unilateral and voluntary".

All this confirms that international economic law can become an effective tool for managing international economic relations, subject to the obligatory observance of two conditions: taking into account the legitimate interests of all states and taking into account the real state of affairs.

Despite the noted facts, the concept of a new economic order has had an impact on international economic law. It contributed to the formation of international legal consciousness about the need to take into account the special interests of developing countries as a necessary condition for stabilizing the world economy. Its expression was the idea of ​​establishing a system of preferences for developing countries. It has found recognition from the international community both at the national legal level (for example, the US Trade Act of 1974) and at the international legal level (for example, in the GATT system during the Tokyo Round of 1973-979), which makes it possible to consider this system as an established international legal custom.

A continuation of the concept of the new economic order was the concept of sustainable development law. Its main content is that in order to ensure economic and political stability, to protect the environment, etc., sustainable social and economic development is necessary, and above all in the third world countries. Each state is responsible for the external results of its economic policy and therefore must refrain from measures that cause significant damage to other states, especially developing ones. The concept has been embodied in many resolutions of the UN General Assembly and other international organizations.

In accordance with the right to sustainable development, the task of sustainable development of the international community as a whole is brought to the fore, which is impossible without the development of each country. The concept reflects the further globalization of the community and the internationalization of the interests of its members.

An essential specific feature of international economic relations is the unification into a single system of relations that are different in subjective structure, causing the use of various methods and means of legal regulation. There are two levels of relations: first, relations between states and other subjects of international law (in particular, between states and international organizations) of a universal, regional, local nature; secondly, relations between individuals and legal entities of different states (this includes the so-called diagonal relations - between the state and individuals or legal entities belonging to a foreign state).

International economic law regulates only relations of the first level - interstate economic relations. States establish the legal basis for the implementation of international economic relations, their general regime. The bulk of international economic relations is carried out at the second level - by individuals and legal entities, so the regulation of these relations is of paramount importance. They are governed by the national law of each state. A special role belongs to such a branch of national law as private international law. At the same time, the norms of international economic law play an ever-increasing role in regulating the activities of individuals and legal entities, but not directly, but indirectly through the state. The state influences the norms of international economic law on private law relations through a mechanism enshrined in national law (for example, in Russia, this is paragraph 4 of article 15 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, article 7 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and similar norms in other legislative acts).

The foregoing testifies to the deep interaction of the two systems of law (international and national) in the regulation of international economic relations. This gave rise to the concept of international economic law, which combines international legal and national legal norms governing international economic relations, and a broader concept of transnational law, which includes all norms regulating relations that go beyond the borders of the state, into a single system of law.

No matter how close the connection in the process of regulating international economic relations of the norms of international and national law, they are independent systems of law based on their own subjects. Combining the norms included in different systems of law is possible only for some specific purposes, for example, when writing a training course. Undoubtedly, the joint presentation of all norms, regardless of their nature, which in interaction regulate the entire complex of international economic relations, is of practical value.

The complexity of the object of regulation of international economic law lies in the fact that it covers diverse, differing in content types of relations relating to various aspects of economic relations. These include trade, transport, customs, financial, investment and other relations. Each of them has its own specific subject content, which gives rise to the need for special legal regulation, as a result of which sub-branches of international economic law have been formed: international trade law, international transport law, international customs law, international financial law, international investment law, international technological law.

Each sub-sector is a system of international legal norms governing interstate cooperation in a specific area of ​​economic relations. All of them are combined into a single branch of international law - international economic law - a common object of regulation, common goals and principles. In addition, a number of institutions of international economic law are elements of other branches of international law: the law of international organizations, the law of treaties, the law of peaceful settlement of disputes.

The non-standard complexity of the object of regulation of international economic law, the growing importance of its functions require close attention to this branch of international law. It should also be taken into account that it is going through a period of active development (some experts even speak of a revolution in international economic law).

The regulatory role of international economic law is especially great within the framework of integration associations of states developing at the regional level. Among them: European Union (EU), Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), North American Free Trade Association (NAFTA), Latin American Integration Association (LAI), Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Organization (APEC) and etc.

The European Union is characterized by the highest degree of integration. Here, economic integration is accompanied by significant changes in other spheres of relations (political, military): already now we can talk about the development of confederal state-legal foundations. In the economic sphere, a common market for goods and services has been created, uniform customs regulation has been established, freedom of movement of capital and labor is ensured, a monetary and financial system has been created, etc. The number of EU members is increasing, including due to the countries of Eastern Europe and the Baltic republics former USSR (see Chapter XI of this textbook).

Russia actively cooperates with the EU. In February 1996, the Interim Trade Agreement between Russia and the EU came into force, and in December 1997, the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement for a period of 10 years came into force. These agreements ensure the development of economic relations on a non-discriminatory basis and create the possibility of Russia's gradual integration into the European economic space.

The main state economic interests of Russia are connected with the improvement and deepening of economic integration within the CIS.

§ 2. Subjects of international economic law

In the system of regulation of international economic relations, the central place is occupied by the state. It is the main subject of international economic law, as well as international law in general. The sovereignty of the state, as an immanent quality inherent in it, extends to the economic sphere as well. However, in this area, the interdependence of the members of the international community is especially visible. World experience shows that the maximum exercise by the state of its sovereignty, its sovereign rights in the economic sphere is really possible only with the active use of international economic relations in the interests of its national economy within the framework of international economic law. And such cooperation in no way means limiting the sovereign rights of the state.

Two international covenants on human rights (clause 2, article 1 of both covenants) contain a provision that, by virtue of the right to self-determination, all peoples can freely dispose of their natural wealth, however, "without prejudice to any obligations arising from international economic cooperation based on the principle of mutual benefit, and from international law≫. A similar provision is formulated in the 1974 Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States in relation to the state and its sovereignty.

International economic law as a whole reflects the laws of a market economy. However, this does not mean limiting the sovereign rights of the state and reducing its role in the economic sphere. On the contrary, there is a complication of the tasks of managing economic processes, which leads to a strengthening of the role of the state and, consequently, to an increase in the possibilities of international economic law in the development of both the national economy and the world economy as a whole.

The state can directly enter into economic relations of an international nature with individuals and legal entities belonging to other states (create joint ventures, conclude concession agreements or production sharing agreements in the field of mining, etc.). Such relations are private law and are regulated by national law. Nevertheless, the participation of the state introduces certain specifics into the regulation of such relations. It is expressed in the fact that the state, its property, transactions with its participation are immune from the jurisdiction of a foreign state. By virtue of immunity, a state cannot be sued in a foreign court as a defendant without its consent; in relation to the state and its property, coercive measures for the preliminary securing of a claim and for the execution of a foreign judgment cannot be applied; transactions involving the state are subject to the law of the state that is a party to this transaction, unless the parties agree otherwise.

The growing importance and complexity of international economic relations make it necessary to strengthen their management by the joint efforts of states through international organizations, which leads to an increase in the number of international organizations and their role in the development of economic interstate cooperation. As a result, international organizations are important subjects of international economic law. The fundamental basis of international economic organizations is the same as that of other international organizations. But there are also some specifics. In this area, states tend to give organizations more regulatory functions. Resolutions of economic organizations play an important role, supplementing legal norms, adapting them to changing conditions, and, where they are absent, replacing them. In some organizations, there are rather rigid mechanisms for the implementation of decisions made.

International organizations operating in the sphere of economic relations can be conditionally divided into two groups. The first includes organizations that, by their action, cover the entire sphere of economic relations; the second group includes organizations operating within certain sub-sectors of international economic law (for example, trade, financial, investment, transport and others). Some organizations from the second group will be discussed below in the relevant paragraphs.

In the first group of organizations, the main place in its importance is occupied by United Nations, having an extensive system of organs and organizations (see Chapter XII). The development of international economic cooperation, which is one of the goals of the UN, is carried out by its two central bodies: the General Assembly and the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). The General Assembly organizes studies and makes recommendations to states in order to promote international cooperation in the economic, social and other fields (Article 13 of the UN Charter). Under her leadership, ECOSOC functions, which bears the main responsibility for the implementation of the functions of the UN in the field of economic and social cooperation.

ECOSOC coordinates the activities of all bodies and agencies of the UN system in the economic sphere. It discusses economic and social problems of a global nature. Five regional economic commissions work under his leadership: for Europe, Asia and the Pacific, Latin America, Africa, Western Asia. ECOSOC coordinates the activities of UN specialized agencies, some of which mediate economic cooperation.

First of all, we note United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), created in 1967 and in 1985 received the status of a specialized agency of the United Nations. It coordinates all activities of the UN system in the field of industrial development in order to accelerate the industrialization of developing countries. For example, the Action Plan for Industrial Development and Cooperation, developed within the framework of UNIDO and adopted in 1975, affirms the right of the state to sovereignty over natural resources and to control the activities of private capital and TNCs. Other UN specialized agencies operate in certain areas of economic cooperation: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), UN financial institutions (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development- IBRD, International Monetary Fund -IMF, International Finance Corporation -IFC, International Development Association- MAP).

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) was established in 1964 as a subsidiary body of the UN General Assembly, but has grown into an independent international organization. Its system includes numerous subsidiary bodies, such as the Committee on Industrial Goods, the Committee on Commodities, etc. The main task of UNCTAD is the formation of principles and policies in the field of international trade aimed at accelerating economic development. Adopted in 1974 by the UN General Assembly, the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States was prepared within the framework of UNCTAD. It should be noted that it is UNIDO and UNCTAD that play an important role in shaping the principles of international economic law.

Literature, especially Western, discusses the issue of international legal personality transnational corporations (TNCs), which, along with states and international organizations, are often considered as subjects of international economic law. This situation is explained by the fact that TNCs are becoming more and more important subjects of international economic relations, having an increasing impact on both the national and the world economy.

Indeed, TNCs with their investment mobility, a wide system of ties, including those with governments, with great opportunities for organizing knowledge-intensive, high-tech production, serve as an important factor in the development of the world economy. They are able to have a positive impact on the national economy of the host countries by importing capital, transferring technology, creating new enterprises, training local personnel. In general, TNCs differ from states in a more efficient, less bureaucratic organization, and therefore they are often more successful in solving economic problems than the state. True, TNCs should not be exaggerated. Numerous facts testify that TNCs place environmentally harmful production on the territory of the host states, avoid paying taxes; using the import of goods, they impede the development of national production, etc. Moreover, using their economic power, TNCs are able to influence the policy of the host state.

Peculiarity TNK manifests itself in that they have economic unity with legal plurality. This is a group of companies created under the laws of different states, which are independent legal entities and operate on the territory of different states, but are in a relationship of interdependence, in which one of them (the parent, or supertransnational corporation) occupies a dominant position and exercises control over all the rest. Consequently, GNK is not a legal, but an economic or even political concept. The subjects of law are those companies that are united in a single system. The subject of law can also be a combination of companies. In any case, both individual companies and their associations are subjects of national law, not international law. In this case, two approaches are used: they are subjects of law either of the state in which they are registered, or of the state in whose territory they have settled (the location of the administrative center or the place of the main economic activity). It follows that the activities of TNCs are governed by national law.

The principle of subordination of TNCs to national law is fixed in the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States: each state has the right to "regulate and control the activities of transnational corporations within the limits of its national jurisdiction and take measures to ensure that such activities do not contradict its laws, norms and regulations and comply with its economic and social policy. Transnational corporations should not interfere in the internal affairs of the host state” (Article 2).

Given that the activities of TNCs are transboundary in nature, that they are capable of causing damage to the national economy of the host state even without violating its laws, international legal regulation of their activities is also desirable. However, it can be stated that there is no such regulation yet, although attempts have been made to regulate it. There are only some general provisions in international documents, which are mostly declarative in nature. Thus, within the framework of ECOSOC, a Center for TNCs and a Commission on TNCs were created, which was entrusted with the task of developing a Code of Conduct for TNCs. The draft Code was prepared, but in the final version it was not adopted by the states. The states whose citizens control the majority of TNCs believe that the Code should be advisory, not legally binding.

At the same time, the role of TNCs both in the implementation of international economic relations and in the development of international economic law continues to grow. Using their influence, they achieve an increase in their status in international relations. Thus, the report of the Secretary General of UNCTAD to the IX Conference (1996) speaks of the need to provide corporations with the opportunity to participate in the work of this organization. However, this does not mean granting them an international legal status. They can take part in the work of UNCTAD as individuals, that is, subjects of national law.

§ 3. Sources, goals and principles of international economic law

International economic law has the same sources as international law in general: an international treaty and international legal custom, although there is a certain specificity associated primarily with the activities of international economic organizations.

The main source is multilateral and bilateral agreements regulating various aspects of economic relations. Economic treaties are as diverse as international economic relations. Such agreements as trade, investment, customs, settlement and credit and others contain norms that make up the normative body of the relevant sub-branches of international economic law. They are mainly concluded on a bilateral basis.

Among such treaties, there are qualitatively new agreements that appeared in the second half of the 20th century, when the economic cooperation of states began to go beyond the scope of purely trade relations, - agreements on economic, industrial and scientific and technical cooperation. They determine the general directions and areas of cooperation (construction and reconstruction of industrial facilities, production and supply of industrial equipment and other goods, transfer of patents and other intellectual property, joint ventures, etc.); contain the obligations of the states to promote cooperation between citizens and legal entities of the contracting states in the indicated areas; determine the basis for financing and lending, etc. Such agreements provide for the creation of intergovernmental mixed commissions.

With the development of multilateral economic cooperation, the role of multilateral agreements increases. An example of a universal treaty in the field of international trade is General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1947 More than 150 states participated in various legal forms in GATT. The USSR in 1990 received observer status, but so far Russia has not yet become a full member of this Agreement. The sources of international economic law are multilateral agreements on the creation of economic organizations (for example, the Bretton Woods agreements on the creation of the IMF and IBRD). In 1992, Russia became a member of both organizations. Multilateral agreements on commodities, the so-called international trade agreements. Examples of multilateral agreements are conventions aimed at unifying the legal norms governing private law relations in the economic sphere (for example, the 1980 UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods).

From the short list of multilateral treaties, it is clear that in the field of international economic cooperation there are no multilateral (universal) treaties that would create a common legal basis for the development of such cooperation. General provisions, principles of economic cooperation are formulated only in numerous resolutions and decisions of international organizations and conferences, which is a feature of international economic law. Among them, we note the most important: the Geneva Principles, adopted at the first UNCTAD conference in Geneva in 1964 (≪Principles governing international trade relations and trade policies that promote development≫); the Declaration on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order and the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States, adopted in the form of resolutions of the UN General Assembly in 1974; resolutions of the UN General Assembly "On confidence-building measures in international economic relations" (1984) and "On international economic security" (1985).

These and other decisions and resolutions adopted by international organizations are not legally binding and are not, in the strict legal sense, sources of international economic law. But it is they who determine its main content. A number of provisions that meet the basic patterns and needs of world economic development have received universal recognition and serve as the fundamental basis of international economic law. Their legal obligation follows from international practice that took place both before the adoption of these international acts and after their adoption (fixing the relevant provisions in numerous bilateral treaties, in the internal legislative acts of states, their application in arbitration and judicial practice, etc.). Consequently, the fundamental norms of international economic law exist in the form of international legal custom.

Finally, a feature of international economic law and its sources is the significant role of the so-called “soft” law, i.e. legal norms that use the wording “take measures”, “promote development or implementation”, “seek implementation”, etc. Such norms do not contain clear rights and obligations of states, but nevertheless are legally binding. In agreements on cooperation in various spheres of economic relations, the norms of "soft" law are quite common.

The goals and principles of international economic law are determined by the goals and principles of international law as a whole. In addition, the UN Charter paid special attention to economic cooperation. In accordance with the Charter, the objectives of international economic law are: promoting the economic and social progress of all peoples; creation of conditions of stability and well-being necessary for peaceful and friendly relations between peoples; raising the standard of living, full employment of the population in conditions of economic and social progress.

All the general principles of international law are also applicable to international economic cooperation. But some of them received additional content in the economic sphere. In accordance with the principle of sovereign equality, all peoples have the right to freely choose their economic system and pursue economic development. In accordance with the principles of non-use of force and non-intervention, the use of force or the threat of force and all other forms of interference directed against the economic foundations of the state are prohibited; all disputes in economic relations must be resolved exclusively by peaceful means.

According to the principle of cooperation, states are obliged to cooperate with each other in order to promote economic stability and progress, the general well-being of peoples. It is clear that the principle of conscientious fulfillment of obligations also applies to international economic agreements.

The fundamental international instruments relating to international economic cooperation emphasize the importance major principles of international law for the international economic order. At the same time they formulate special principles of international economic relations and international economic law. These include:

The principle of all participation, which means full and effective participation on the basis of equality of all countries in resolving world economic problems in the common interest;

The principle of the inalienable sovereignty of the state over its natural resources and all economic activities, including the right of the state to own, use and exploit natural resources, the right to regulate and control foreign investment and the activities of TNCs within the limits of its national jurisdiction;

The principle of preferential treatment for developing countries;

The principle of international social justice, which means the development of international economic cooperation on the basis of equality and mutual benefit with the provision of certain unilateral benefits for developing countries in order to achieve de facto equality;

The principle of free access to the sea for countries that do not have access to it.

In addition to general international legal principles and special principles of international economic law, there are legal regimes, which also serve as the legal basis for economic cooperation. However, unlike principles, legal regimes are not generally applicable. These are treaty regimes, that is, they are applied only when the states concerned agree on this.

Most favored nation treatment means that one state provides another state, its citizens and legal entities with an equally favorable treatment (rights, benefits, privileges), which is granted or will be granted in the future to any third state. At the same time, the area of ​​​​relationships in which the regime will be applied is agreed. As a rule, these are trade relations: import and export of goods, customs formalities, transportation, transit. Of great importance are the exceptions to the regime stipulated in the agreements. Typical is the non-distribution of the regime to the advantages enjoyed by neighboring countries in the field of border trade, member states of integration associations, and developing countries.

National Treatment means that citizens and legal entities of one state enjoy the same rights on the territory of another state that are granted to local citizens and legal entities. Compared with the most favored nation treatment, the national treatment is general, as it is applied in the entire sphere of private law relations. Some aspects of this area are important for the implementation of economic cooperation: the legal capacity of foreign citizens and legal entities, the right to judicial and other protection of their rights. Beyond these limits, the national regime in the foreign economic sphere is not applied. Equalization of foreigners with local citizens and legal entities in economic activities can pose a threat to the national economy.

Preferential treatment- granting special advantages to any state or group of states. It is used in relations between neighboring states or within the framework of integration systems. Granting preferences to developing countries is a principle of international economic law.

§ 4. Resolution of international economic disputes

The specificity of the resolution of international economic disputes is associated with the heterogeneity of international economic relations. Economic disputes between states are resolved on the basis of international law, like other interstate disputes. International organizations play a significant role in resolving economic disputes (see § 5 of this chapter). But since international economic cooperation is carried out mainly in the relationship between individuals of different states, the resolution of disputes between them is of great importance for the stability and efficiency of the international economic system.

Disputes between individuals and legal entities of different countries are subject to national jurisdiction. They can be considered by the courts (of general jurisdiction or arbitration) of states or by international commercial arbitration (ICA). Participants in international economic relations prefer MICA.

The ICA is established by national law and is guided by it in its activities. The definition "international" refers only to the nature of the disputes under consideration - economic disputes of an international nature between individuals. Some ICAs have become highly respected centers for dealing with international economic disputes. These include the Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (Paris), the London International Arbitration Court, the American Arbitration Association (New York), the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, etc. In Russia, these are the International Commercial Arbitration Court and the Maritime Arbitration Commission at the Commercial and Industrial chamber of the Russian Federation.

The functions of international economic law in the field of resolving international commercial disputes are as follows: a) unification of arbitration procedural rules in order to ensure uniformity in the procedure for considering international commercial disputes in arbitrations of different states; b) creation of an international legal framework for the recognition and enforcement of arbitration awards of one state on the territory of other states; c) creation of specialized international centers for the consideration of commercial disputes.

The purpose of unification of arbitration procedural rules is a number of international acts prepared within the framework of the UN. Under the auspices of the UN Economic Commission for Europe, the European Convention on Foreign Trade Arbitration (Russia participates) was prepared and adopted in Geneva in 1961, which contains rules regarding the formation of arbitration, the procedure for considering a case, and making a decision. The UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) prepared the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, which was adopted by a resolution of the UN General Assembly in 1985 and recommended to states as a model of national law (the Law of the Russian Federation on International Commercial Arbitration of 1993 was adopted on this model .). In practice, arbitration rules developed within the framework of the UN are quite often used, which are sets of procedural arbitration rules that are applied only if there is an agreement on this between the parties to the dispute. The most popular is the 1976 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules.

Particularly complex and important is the problem of enforcement of a foreign arbitration award in the event that one of the parties evades its execution. This problem is solved with the help of international economic law. In 1956, at the UN conference in New York, the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards was adopted. The very fact of participation in it of 102 states, including Russia, testifies to its significance. The Convention obliges states to recognize and enforce arbitral awards made in the territory of foreign states, as well as decisions of their own arbitrations.

Within the framework of the CIS in 1992, an Agreement was signed on the procedure for resolving disputes related to the implementation of economic activities. It solves a set of issues related to the consideration of economic disputes not only in arbitration, but also in court, including disputes involving the state and its bodies. The agreement contains rules on mutual recognition and enforcement of arbitral and judicial decisions, as well as an exhaustive list of grounds under which enforcement may be refused (Article 7).

The third area of ​​cooperation between states is the creation of specialized international centers to resolve certain types of economic disputes that are of particular importance for the development of international economic relations. Thus, on the basis of the Washington Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Foreign Persons of 1965, the International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). The convention was developed under the auspices of the IBRD, the Center operates under it. More than one hundred states participate in the Convention. Russia has signed it, but has not yet ratified it.

International economic law is usually characterized as a set of principles and norms governing relations between states and other entities in the field of economic cooperation.

This area covers a wide range of relationships - trade, manufacturing, scientific and technical, transport, monetary and financial, customs, etc. International economic relations are implemented in the form of: purchase and sale of goods and services (export-import operations), contract work, provision of technical assistance, transportation of passengers and cargo, provision of credits (loans) or their receipt from foreign sources (external borrowings), resolution of customs policy issues.

In international economic law, there are sub-sectors covering specific areas of cooperation, - international trade law, international industrial law, international transport law, international customs law, international monetary and financial law, international intellectual property law, etc. (some of them are sometimes referred to as branches).

An essential specific feature of international economic relations is the participation in them of entities that are different in nature. Depending on the subject matter the following varieties can be distinguished: 1) interstate - universal or local, including bilateral, character; 2) between states and international organizations (bodies); 3) between states and legal entities and individuals belonging to foreign states; 4) between states and international (transnational) economic associations; 5) between legal entities and individuals of different states.

The heterogeneity of relations and their participants gives rise to the specifics of the applied methods and means of legal regulation, testifying to the interweaving in this area of ​​international public and international private law, the interaction of international legal and domestic norms. It is through international regulation of economic cooperation that states influence civil law relations with a foreign (international) element. This is connected with numerous references in national civil, economic, customs and other legislation to international treaties (for example, Article 7 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Articles 5, 6 of the Law "On Foreign Investments in the RSFSR" of July 4, 1991, Article 3, 10, 11, 16, 18-22 of the Federal Law "On Railway Transport" of August 25, 1995, articles 4, 6, 20, 21 and others of the Customs Code of the Russian Federation).

The most important factor determining the content of international economic law are integration processes at two levels - global (worldwide) and regional (local).

An essential role in integration cooperation is played by international organizations and bodies among which the most influential are the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), the World Trade Organization (WTO), the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD). At the regional and interregional levels, the European Union, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), as well as the UN regional economic commissions should be noted.

Sources of international economic law as diverse as the relationships they regulate. The universal documents include the founding acts of the relevant international organizations, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade of 1947, the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods of 1980, the Convention on the Limitation Period in the International Sale of Goods of 1974, the UN Convention on the carriage of goods by sea 1978, various agreements on commodities. Bilateral treaties make a great contribution to the formation of international economic law. The most common are agreements on the international legal regime of economic relations, agreements regulating the movement of goods, services, capital across state borders, payment, investment, credit and other agreements. Further expansion and deepening of interstate cooperation gives rise to new, more complex, combined types of economic agreements.

Among the fundamental factors that determine the relationship of states in the economic sphere is the establishment of the type of legal regime applicable to a particular state, its legal entities and individuals.

There are the following modes.

Most favored nation treatment means the obligation of the state to provide (as a rule, on the basis of reciprocity) to another state party to the agreement the advantages and privileges that are granted to them or may be granted in the future to any third state. The scope of this regime is determined by the agreement and can cover both the entire sphere of economic relations and certain types of relations. From the most favored nation treatment, certain exemptions are allowed in relation to customs unions, free customs zones, integration associations, developing countries and border trade.

In relation to the sphere of foreign economic relations, this term has an independent meaning, different from the problem of the most favored nation treatment in characterizing the status of foreign citizens (see § 7, Chapter 15).

Preferential treatment means the provision of benefits in the field of trade, customs payments, as a rule, in relation to developing countries or within the framework of an economic or customs union.

National Treatment provides for the equalization of certain rights of foreign legal entities and individuals with the state's own legal entities and individuals. Usually this concerns issues of civil legal capacity, judicial protection, etc.

special mode, established by states in the field of economic cooperation, means the introduction of any special rights for foreign legal entities and individuals. This regime is used by states when regulating such issues as increased protection of foreign investments, provision of customs and tax benefits to missions of foreign states and employees of these missions when purchasing and importing certain goods.

One of the features of international economic law is the active participation in the regulation of acts of international organizations and conferences. Among the numerous UN resolutions are the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States, the Declaration on the New International Economic Order of 1974, the resolution of the UN General Assembly "Unification and progressive development of the principles and norms of international law relating to the legal aspects of the new economic order" of 1979.

Specific forms and methods of legal regulation are discussed further on the examples of two sub-sectors - international trade law and international customs law.

International economic law began to develop dynamically only in the second half of the 20th century. due to the understanding that the liberal approach to the regulation of international economic relations, which provided for complete freedom and deregulation of the actions of economic entities, is not so effective and does not take into account the interests of the world community as a whole and, in this regard, there is a need to create international institutional mechanisms and legal norms for coordinating international economic cooperation between states.

International economic law is a branch of international public law that regulates economic relations between states and other subjects of international public law.

The subject of international economic law is interstate economic, in a broad sense, commercial relations, as well as international economic cooperation between states, MOs and other subjects of international public law in various areas of world economic activity: international trade, international monetary and financial and credit relations, international investment relations , international customs relations, relations of international economic assistance, in the field of transport, communications, energy, intellectual and other property, tourism, etc.

A feature of international economic law as an independent branch of international law is its complex nature, which is determined by the close interdependence in this area of ​​public law and private law regulatory mechanisms.

It is important that one of the first in 1928 proposed the concept of international economic law as a special regulator of international economic relations, on the basis of modern international economic law, the outstanding Ukrainian international lawyer V. M. Koretsky, who at one time was the Vice-President of the International Court of Justice UN in The Hague.

international economic law is based on the norms and principles of international public law, it also has its own system and constituent elements, branches and institutions. Depending on the scope of legal regulation, the following branches of international economic law are distinguished:

International trade law, within the framework of which the legal regulation of trade is carried out not only in goods, but also in services, intellectual property rights, etc.;

International financial law, which regulates the transnational movement of capital through settlement, currency, credit relations;

International investment law, which is closely related to international financial law and regulates relations in the field of foreign investment;

International labor law, which regulates public relations in the field of international labor movement;

International transport law, which regulates relations in the field of international economic cooperation on the use of different modes of transport.

Separately, one can also name the branches of international economic law that regulate relations in the field of regional economic integration (in particular European), industrial, agricultural, scientific and technical cooperation.

The modern system of international economic law, like other branches of law, includes the General and Special Parts. The sub-sectors mentioned above constitute the Special Part of International Economic Law.

in turn, the General part of international economic law consists of international legal institutions that determine the subject, sources and special (branch) principles of international economic law, the legal status of states, international economic law and other subjects of international economic law, the features of responsibility and the application of sanctions in international economic law , as well as other general principles for the formation of the modern international economic legal order.

The complex of international economic relations is the subject of international economic law. These relations are very diverse, since they include not only trade relations, but also production relations, monetary, scientific and technical, in the field of the use of intellectual property, affecting the service sector (transport, tourism, telecommunications). The criterion that makes it possible to delimit the scope of application of the norms of various branches of international law to this significant part of international relations is the commercialization of these relations. That is, the application of the element of trade (in the broad sense) to the objects of these relations.

International economic law can be defined as a branch of international public law, which is a set of principles and norms governing relations between states and other subjects of international law in the field of international economic relations in order to harmonize and mutually benefit their development.

International economic law is a relatively young branch of international law, which can be said to be still in its infancy.

The significance of the norms of this industry lies in the fact that they communicate order to economic relations, contributing to their further development and, ultimately, the establishment of a single international economic order.

The decisions of international organizations cover a very wide range of issues related to the regulation of international economic relations. Of particular importance for the creation of a new international economic order are the resolutions of the UN General Assembly, the acts of the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), and other UN specialized agencies. Among the fundamental sources of international economic law are documents such as the Principles of International Trade Relations and Trade Policy Conducive to Development, adopted by UNCTAD in 1964, the Declaration on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order and the Program of Action for the Establishment of a New International Economic Order, adopted at VI special session of the UN General Assembly in 1974, the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States, adopted at the 29th session of the UN General Assembly in 1974, General Assembly resolutions "On confidence-building measures in international economic relations" (1984) and "On international economic security” (1985).

The 1974 Charter is one of the clearest examples of the documents that form modern international economic law. The provisions of the Charter, on the one hand, contain generally recognized principles of international law (such as the principle of the sovereign equality of states or the principle of cooperation) as applied to economic relations; on the other hand, the Charter articulates many new principles to ensure that the special interests of developing and least developed countries are taken into account and that favorable conditions are created for their development, economic growth and bridging the economic gap between them and developed countries.

Although the Charter was adopted as a resolution of the General Assembly and has no binding force, it can nevertheless be noted that the provisions contained in it have an impact on international economic relations and on the subsequent rule-making process in this area.

Trade relations form the basis of international economic relations, since all other relations (credit and financial, currency, insurance) are somehow connected with them and serve them. Like any other, international trade relations need legal regulation in order to ensure the protection of mutual interests in trade, put the development of international cooperation on a legal basis and increase its efficiency.

international trade law- it is a set of principles and norms governing relations between states and other subjects of international law related to the implementation of international trade.

There are various kinds of trade and economic associations of states:

- free trade zones (associations), which establish a more favorable regime for trade in all or certain types of goods between the participating countries (by removing customs and other restrictions). At the same time, the trade policy and terms of trade of these countries with third countries remain unchanged. Examples include the North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA) and the European Free Trade Association (EFTA); free economic zones in Kaliningrad, Chita and other regions;

- customs unions, meaning the introduction of a single tariff and the implementation of a common trade policy of the countries participating in such unions;

- economic unions as a way of integrating the economies of the participating countries and building a common market for goods, services, capital and labor;

- preferential systems, which provide special benefits and privileges (customs, for example) for a certain range of countries, usually developing and least developed (global system of trade preferences (GSTP), developed for developing countries).

Sources of international trade law. As sources of international trade law should be considered primarily bilateral and multilateral international treaties. They can be conditionally divided into:

International trade agreements that establish general conditions for cooperation between states in the field of foreign trade;

Intergovernmental trade agreements concluded on the basis of trade agreements and containing specific obligations of the parties in relation to trade between them;

Commodity supply agreements (commodity agreements) as a type of trade agreements that provide for a specific list of mutually supplyable goods;

Agreements on the turnover and payments (among other things, they contain the main conditions and the procedure for paying for the delivered goods);

Clearing agreements providing for the settlement procedure for mutual deliveries by offsetting amounts for exports and imports;

And finally, trade conventions that define relations between states on special issues in the field of trade (for example, customs conventions).

Other sources of international trade law include:

International trade usages, that is, international practices repeated over a long period in international trade relations;

Judicial precedents of international courts and arbitrations;

Decisions and resolutions of international organizations adopted within their competence, if they do not contradict the principles of international law.

The UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) deals with the issues of systematization and codification of international legal norms in the field of international trade.

The system of international trade law. With the globalization of the world economy and the rapid development of cross-border trade, states increasingly began to feel the inadequacy or at least the insufficient effectiveness of their national means of regulating trade relations. Based on this, the states came to the need to create a global integration agreement. To this end, in 1947, a multilateral General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GA7T), supplementing the post-war "international economic constitution" based on the Bretton Woods agreements of 1944, which, however, remained unfinished due to the non-ratification of the Havana Charter of the International Trade Organization of 1948. The initial number of participants in the Agreement was 23, and by April 1994 it increased to 132. The development of the GATT eventually led to the formation of a de facto international organization of the same name with a permanent Secretariat. The progressive transformation of GATT from a temporary short-term treaty on reciprocal tariff liberalization into a comprehensive long-term system of more than 200 multilateral trade agreements has had a very tangible impact on international trade. GATT has played a key role in its development through the holding of multilateral trade negotiations (rounds) that systematized the development of international trade, and the creation of rules and regulations of international trade law, giving the international trade system the necessary clarity and legal force.

GATT did not contain a clear enumeration of its goals and principles, but they can be deduced from the meaning of its articles. The goals of GATT can be defined as follows: the establishment of the most favored nation treatment, which means non-discrimination, compliance with the obligations assumed, a single treatment for developing countries; tariff reduction; a ban on discriminatory taxes on foreign exports; anti-dumping policy; trade liberalization.

The basic principles of GATT can be seen as branch principles of international trade law:

Trade without discrimination;

Predictable and increasing market access;

Promoting fair competition;

Freedom of trade;

The principle of reciprocity;

Development of trade through multilateral negotiations.

Although during the 48 years of its existence, the GATT has achieved a lot in the development of international trade and its legal principles, there have been many mistakes and disappointments: in many areas not covered by GATT law, such as the international movement of services, individuals and capital, problems of bilateralism, sectoral agreements market sharing (for example, in relation to air and sea transport), monopolies, cartelization and other forms of protectionism. Even in areas covered by GATT law, such as trade in agricultural products, steel, textiles, governments have often resorted to protectionist pressures, departing from their GATT commitments to open markets and non-discriminatory competition. The sectoral destruction of GATT legal free trade provisions also exposed broader and more serious "constitutional imperfections" in national systems and international trade law. This once again confirmed that legal guarantees of freedom and non-discrimination cannot remain effective either at the national or international level until they are included in an integrated constitutional system of institutional "checks and balances".

The last, eighth round of GATT multilateral trade negotiations, which took place from 1986 to 1993 and was called the Uruguay Round, was designed to bring the GATT system in line with modern international trade requirements. The final act, consolidating the results of the Uruguay Round, was signed at the ministerial meeting of the Trade Negotiation Committee on 15 April 1994 in Marrakech, Morocco. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade was significantly improved and was called "GATT-1994". The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) were adopted, and finally the Marrakesh Agreement establishing World Trade Organization (WTO), which entered into force on January 1, 1995.

The WTO Agreement, adopted by 124 countries and the EU on April 15, 1994, is not only the longest agreement ever concluded (containing over 25,000 pages), but also the most important worldwide agreement since the 1945 UN Charter. It includes a preamble and 16 articles regulating the scope and functions of the WTO, its institutional structure, legal status and relations with other organizations, decision-making procedures and membership. Its legal complexity comes from the 28 Additional Agreements and Arrangements included in the four Annexes to the WTO Agreement and its incorporation into the Final Act integrating the results of the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations, including 28 subsequent ministerial decisions, declarations and one agreement regarding the Uruguay Round Agreements .

The preamble of the WTO Agreement contains the goals of the new organization: raising living standards and incomes, achieving full employment, increasing production and trade in goods and services, and the rational use of world resources. The preamble also introduces the idea of ​​"sustainable development", linking it to the need for the rational use of world resources, protection and preservation of the environment, taking into account the uneven level of economic development of countries. It also points to the need for further efforts to ensure that developing countries, especially the least developed, share in the growth of international trade in line with their economic development needs.

As a global integration agreement in the field of international movement of goods, services, individuals, capital and payments, the WTO Agreement eliminates the current fragmentation of individual international agreements and organizations regulating relations in these areas. After 50 years since the Bretton Woods Conference, its entry into force on January 1, 1995 completed the formation of the legal structure of the Bretton Woods system based on the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank Group and the WTO. Moreover, since the Statutes of the IMF and the World Bank contained only a few substantive rules related to government policy and dispute settlement, the WTO was created to perform also constitutional and rule-making functions in addition to its exclusive functions of supervision and settlement of disputes in the field of foreign trade. member countries policies:

WTO promotes the implementation, management and implementation of the provisions of the Uruguay Round and any new agreements that will be adopted in the future;

The WTO is a forum for further negotiations between member countries on issues covered by the agreements;

The WTO is authorized to resolve contradictions and disputes arising between member countries;

The WTO publishes periodic trade policy reviews of member countries.

Russia's relations with the GATT/WTO began to take shape in 1992, when the Russian Federation inherited from the USSR the observer status in the GATT granted to the USSR in May 1990. In 1992, the process of Russia's accession to the GATT as a full member was launched in accordance with Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of May 18, 1992 No. 328 "On the development of relations between the Russian

Federation and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. In order to coordinate the activities of the federal executive authorities on the participation of the Russian Federation in the work of the WTO and the accession process, the Interdepartmental Commission (MB K) on GATT was formed in 1993, its composition and interdepartmental distribution of responsibilities in the main areas of its activity were approved. The lead agency in this negotiation process is the Russian Ministry of Trade. In connection with the change in the institutional status of the GATT and the emergence of the World Trade Organization, this commission was transformed in 1996 into the International Commission for WTO issues (Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of January 12, 1996 No. 17). It currently includes more than 40 ministries and departments of the Russian Federation. In August 1997, on the basis of the said IAC, the Commission of the Government of the Russian Federation on WTO issues was established. On July 16, 1993, the Council of Representatives of the GATT, in accordance with the established procedure, formed the Working Group on Russia's accession to the GATT, and in October 1993, Russia received the status of an associate participant in the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations. Russia's negotiating position on the issue of WTO accession is based on the fact that the conditions for Russia's membership will be as close as possible to the standard ones, excluding infringement of Russia's rights in trade. At the same time, the Russian side is interested in understanding and recognition by all WTO partners of the special transitional nature of the Russian economy. Russia's accession to the WTO is an integral element of the strategic course towards Russia's integration into the world economy as a full member.

An important role in the development of international trade and the law of international trade belongs to the United Nations and its bodies and specialized agencies.

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) is a subsidiary body of the UN General Assembly. UNCITRAL was established in 1966 at the 21st session of the General Assembly to enable the UN to play a more active role in reducing and eliminating legal obstacles to international trade. The mandate given by the UNGA to the Commission as "the central legal body within the UN system in the field of international trade law" is to promote the progressive harmonization and unification of international trade law by:

Coordinating the work of international organizations in this field and encouraging cooperation between them;

Encouraging greater participation in international conventions and greater acceptance of existing model and uniform laws;

Preparing or encouraging the adoption of new international conventions, model and uniform laws, and encouraging the codification and wider acceptance of international trade terms, regulations, customs and practices, in cooperation, where appropriate, with organizations active in the field;

Finding ways and means to ensure uniform interpretation and application of international conventions and uniform laws in the field of international trade;

Collection and dissemination of information on national legislation and modern legal developments, including case law, in the law of international trade;

Establishing and maintaining close cooperation with the UN Conference on Trade and Development, as well as with other UN organizations and specialized agencies dealing with international trade issues;

Taking any other action it deems useful for the performance of its functions.

The Commission determined the basis for its existing long-term program of work at its 11th session in 1978 on the following topics: the international sale of goods; international negotiable documents; international commercial arbitration and conciliation; international transportation of goods; legal implications of the new economic order; industrial contracts; liquidated damages and penalty clauses; universal unit of account for international conventions; legal issues arising from automatic data processing. Additional topics were also identified: provisions protecting parties from the effects of currency fluctuations; bank commercial loans and bank guarantees, general terms and conditions of sale; barter transactions and barter-type transactions; multinational enterprises; security interests in goods, liability for damage caused by goods intended for international trade or being the subject of international trade; most favored nation provisions.

Among the acts prepared by the Commission:

Convention on the Limitation Period in the International Sale of Goods, 1974 and Protocol amending it, 1980, United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, 1980;

USCITRAL Arbitration Rules (1976), UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985);

Convention on the Carriage of Goods by Sea, 1978;

Model Law on Electronic Commerce, 1996.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) was established in 1964 by the General Assembly as a subsidiary body, but has long since grown into an independent autonomous body of the UN. UNCTAD is the main body of the UNGA in the field of trade and development. UNCTAD is the focal point within the United Nations for an integrated approach to development and interrelated issues in the areas of trade, finance, technology, investment and sustainable development.

The main objectives of the Conference are: to maximize the opportunities of developing countries in the field of trade, investment and development and to assist them in meeting the challenges associated with the process of globalization and integration into the world economy on an equitable basis.

To achieve these goals, UNCTAD carries out its activities in the following areas:

Globalization and Development Strategy;

International trade in goods and services and commodity issues;

Investment, technology and enterprise development;

Service Infrastructure for Trade Development and Efficiency;

Least developed, landlocked and island developing countries;

Intersectoral issues.

In its activities, UNCTAD cooperates with the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), the WTO, the International Trade Center (ITC), UNIDO, WIPO and other organizations.

The area of ​​international trade in goods and services, as well as commodity issues, is a very active area for UNCTAD. It assists developing countries, and the least developed among them in particular, in maximizing the positive impact of globalization and liberalization on sustainable development by helping them to effectively integrate into the international trading system.

UNCTAD analyzes the impact of the Uruguay Round agreements on trade and development and assists countries in seizing the opportunities arising from these agreements, in particular by strengthening their export capacity.

The conference promotes the integration of trade, environment and development, encourages diversification in commodity-dependent developing countries and helps them manage trade-related risks.

UNCTAD achieves tangible results in its work. Were developed: Agreement on a global system of trade preferences

between developing countries (1989); Guidelines for International Action on Debt Restructuring (1980); Major New Program of Action for the Least Developed Countries (1981) and Program of Action for the Least Developed Countries for the 1990s (1990). A number of conventions in the field of transport have been adopted.

UNCTAD/WTO International Trade Center (ITC) was created on the basis of an agreement between UNCTAD and GATT in 1967 to provide international assistance to developing countries in expanding their exports. ITC is managed by UNTAD and the WTO jointly and on an equal footing.

ITC is a technical cooperation organization whose mission is to support developing countries and countries with economies in transition, and in particular their business sectors, in their efforts to realize their potential in developing exports and improving import operations in order to achieve ultimately sustainable development.

International trade in commodities is governed by multilateral agreements, many of which were directly negotiated by UNCTAD (international agreements on cocoa, sugar, natural rubber, jute and jute products, tropical timber, tin, olive oil and wheat). International organizations are being created with the participation of importing and exporting countries or only exporters. An example of the latter is the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), which protects the interests of oil-producing countries (mainly developing countries) by harmonizing oil prices and introducing oil production quotas for countries participating in this Organization.

There are also international organizations whose activities are aimed at promoting international trade. These are the International Chamber of Commerce, the International Bureau for the Publication of Customs Tariffs, the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT).

3. International legal regulation of cooperation in the field of trade in food and raw materials

A characteristic feature of the development of the world economy of the 20th century, especially its second half, is the need for international cooperation between states in the field of regulating trade in certain types of food and raw materials. This need was due to varying degrees of development not only of the economies of individual states, but also of individual sectors of their economy.

The regulation of trade in these products aims at balancing the demand and supply of goods on the world market and keeping them at agreed market prices within certain limits. This regulation is carried out by concluding so-called international commodity agreements. Such agreements determine the volume of supplies of food and raw materials to the world market. On the one hand, agreements keep the agreed prices for individual products from falling, and on the other hand, they do not allow overproduction of individual products, that is, they also affect their production.

The first agreements were concluded in the 1930s and 1940s.

The first such agreement was the International Wheat Agreement, which was concluded in 1933. His conclusion was due to the world economic crisis that broke out in 1929-1933. This Agreement determined the quotas for the production and export of wheat by the participating countries. In 1942, the International Wheat Council was established, which carried out coordination functions, in particular on wheat exports. Among other agreements of the 1930s and early 1940s were such as the Agreements on the regulation of the production and export of rubber (1934), tin (1942), sugar (1937), coffee (1940).

The international experience accumulated as a result of cooperation between states on the basis of these agreements has shown the effectiveness of such cooperation. In this regard, in subsequent years, states, both exporters and importers, more or less regularly concluded commodity agreements relating to trade in certain types of food (agricultural) and raw materials.

A number of international commodity agreements are currently in force. Among them are agreements on coffee, cocoa, wheat, cereals, sugar, olive oil, jute and jute products, tropical timber, and tin.

The goals common to all commodity agreements are to stabilize world markets by ensuring a balance between supply and demand, expanding international cooperation in the world market for products, providing intergovernmental consultations, improving the situation in the world economy, developing trade, and also with the aim of establishing fair prices for food and raw materials. products. The parties to these agreements are the states-exporters (manufacturers) and the states-importers of the relevant food and raw materials.

A number of agreements provide for the creation of buffer (stabilization) stocks of certain products, such as tin and natural rubber. With the help of such reserves, sharp fluctuations in the prices of products are prevented and possible crises are prevented both in production and in their trade.

Other agreements, such as for cocoa, provide that member states must report, no later than the end of each year (calendar or agricultural) to the relevant authorities established on the basis of such agreements, information on stocks of products. Such information allows exporting countries to determine their policy in the production of relevant products. In other words, various means are used in international commodity agreements to stabilize supply and demand for food and raw materials.

All international commodity agreements provide for the formation of special international organizations, such as the International Sugar Organization, the International Tin Organization, the International Cocoa Organization, the International Coffee Organization, etc. The main function of these organizations is to exercise control over the implementation of the relevant agreements.

The supreme body of these organizations is an international council, for example: International Sugar Council, International Tin Council, International Cocoa Council, etc. Members of the councils are all parties to the agreements, both exporters and importers. At the same time, a fixed number of votes is established in the councils, which all participants have. These votes are distributed equally among the importing countries. At the same time, each participant has the number of votes depending on the volume of export or import of the corresponding product. Thus, the International Cocoa Agreement of July 16, 1993 provides that exporting members have 1,000 votes. Importing members also have the same number of votes. These votes are distributed among the participants as follows. Each exporting member has five primary votes. The remainder of the votes shall be distributed among all exporting Members in proportion to the average volume of their respective cocoa exports over the preceding three agricultural years. The votes of importing participants are distributed as follows: 100 votes are divided equally among all importing participants. The remainder of the votes shall be distributed among such Members according to the percentage of the average annual cocoa imports for the previous three agricultural years. The agreement states that no member can have more than 400 votes.

The international councils of these organizations have all the powers that are necessary for the implementation of the relevant agreements. The councils meet in regular sessions, which are convened, as a rule, twice a calendar or agricultural year. Council decisions are binding.

In addition to councils, executive committees are created. The members of these committees are elected by the exporting and importing members. The seats in the committees are distributed equally among these participants. Thus, the Executive Committee of the International Cocoa Organization consists of 10 representatives of exporting states and 10 representatives of importing states. He is responsible to the council, constantly monitors the state of the market and recommends to him such measures as the Committee considers appropriate for the implementation of the provisions of the agreement. The Council, in consultation with the Executive Committee, appoints an Executive Director who is the chief officer of the international organization. The executive director appoints the staff. The activities of the executive director and staff are international in nature.

International organizations, their executive directors, staff and experts shall enjoy privileges and immunities in accordance with the agreements concluded by these organizations with States regarding the location of such organizations.

All international organizations established under international commodity agreements cooperate with the Common Fund for Commodities, which is established in accordance with the Common Fund for Commodities Agreement concluded on June 27, 1980.

4. International legal cooperation in the field of monetary and financial relations

It is customary to consider international monetary and financial relations as a whole as opposed to trade. This is connected with the Bretton Woods agreements of 1944, on the basis of which the IMF and IBRD were established in the monetary and financial sphere, on the one hand, and GATT in the trade sphere, on the other.

International monetary and financial relations as special social relations in the field of international economic relations are an important part of the world economy. They manifest themselves in various forms of cooperation between states: in the implementation of foreign trade, the provision of economic and technical assistance, in the field of investment, international transportation, etc. In all these cases, there is a need for the production of certain payment, settlement, credit and other monetary transactions, where money acts as a currency as an international means of payment.

International Monetary and Financial Law- it is a set of international legal principles and norms governing interstate monetary and financial relations, the subjects of which are states and intergovernmental organizations. These relations are based on the principle formulated in the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States of 1974, according to which all States, as equal members of the international community, have the right to participate fully and effectively in the international decision-making process for the settlement of financial and monetary problems and to fairly enjoy the benefits arising from this. (v. 10).

In the sphere of international monetary and financial relations, the main forms of regulation are bilateral and multilateral agreements, as well as decisions of international monetary organizations.

As for bilateral agreements, they are very numerous in this area. Economic cooperation agreements and trade agreements contain provisions relating to monetary and financial relations. A special place is occupied by special agreements: credit and settlement.

Loan agreements determine the volume, forms and conditions for granting loans. Long-term (over five years), medium-term (from one to five years) and short-term (up to one year) loan agreements are distinguished by validity period. Long-term and medium-term agreements are used in the provision of technical assistance in the construction of industrial and other facilities, in the supply of expensive equipment, machinery, etc. Short-term agreements affect mainly the issues of current trade. International credit has two main forms: commodity and monetary. Loans in cash are called loans. Their provision and redemption are made exclusively in cash. Ordinary loans can be repaid not only in cash, but also in commodity form, through the supply of goods.

In the field of international economic turnover, payment, clearing and payment-clearing agreements are known. Payment agreements provide for settlements in the agreed currency, the mechanism for such settlements, and the procedure for providing currency for payments. Clearing agreements are settlements on a non-cash basis by offsetting counterclaims and obligations on special (clearing) accounts with the central banks of the contracting parties. Clearing and payment agreements are clearing settlements with the settlement of the balance in the agreed currency.

Multilateral agreements are becoming increasingly important in the field of monetary and financial relations. Most of these agreements establish uniform norms, being a tool for unification and influencing the formation of national monetary and financial norms. Among such agreements, mention should be made of the Geneva Conventions on the Unification of Bills of Exchange of 1930, the Geneva Convention on the Settlement of Conflict Issues on Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes of 1930 (Russia participates in these conventions), the Geneva Check Convention of 1931 (Russia does not participate), the UN Convention on International bills of exchange and international promissory notes of 1988 (did not enter into force), etc.

Within the framework of the European Union, a series of agreements, including the Maastricht Treaty of 1992, have been concluded, providing for the procedure for mutual settlements in eurocurrency. In the Commonwealth of Independent States, the Agreement on the Establishment of the Payments Union of the CIS Member States (1994) was signed.

In the regulation of international monetary and financial relations, international monetary organizations, funds, and banks play a significant role. At the universal level, these are the IMF and the World Bank. The main goal of the IMF is to coordinate the monetary and financial policies of member states and provide them with loans (short-term, medium-term and partly long-term) to regulate balance of payments and maintain exchange rates. The IMF monitors the operation of the international monetary system, the monetary and exchange rate policies of member countries, and their compliance with the code of conduct in international monetary relations.

As for the World Bank, its main task is to promote sustainable economic growth by encouraging foreign investment for industrial purposes, as well as providing loans for the same purposes (in areas such as agriculture, energy, road construction, etc.). While the World Bank only lends to poor countries, the IMF can do so for any of its member countries.

Regional monetary and credit organizations have become widespread. In Europe, first of all, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development should be mentioned.

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) is an international financial organization established in 1990 with the participation of the USSR to assist the countries of Central and Eastern Europe in carrying out economic and political reforms and forming a market economy. It was founded by 40 countries: all European (except Albania), the USA, Canada, Mexico, Morocco, Egypt, Israel, Japan, New Zealand, Australia, South Korea, as well as the European Economic Community and the European Investment Bank (EIB). As of April 1999, EBRD members are 59 countries, as well as the EU and the EIB.

The supreme body of the EBRD is the Board of Governors, in which each member of the EBRD is represented by one Governor and one Deputy Governor. It determines the main directions of the Bank's activities. The Board of Directors (23 members) is the main executive body responsible for the current issues of the EBRD's work. It is formed as follows: 11 directors - from EU member states, the EU itself and the EIB; 4 - from CEE countries eligible to receive assistance from the EBRD; 4 from other European countries and 4 from non-European countries. The President of the Bank is elected for four years and is responsible for organizing the work of the EBRD in accordance with the instructions of the Board of Directors.

The number of votes of each member is equal to the number of shares to which he has subscribed. EU member countries, the EIB and the EU have a quota of 51% in the authorized capital, CEE countries - 13%, other European countries - 11%, non-European countries - 24%. The United States (10%), Great Britain, Italy, Germany, France, Japan (8.5% each) have the largest shares in the capital. The share of Russia is 4%.

Decisions in the governing bodies of the EBRD require a simple majority of votes. Some issues require a special majority (2 / 3, or 85% of the votes to which members voting are entitled).

The EBRD's activities are aimed at assisting member countries in implementing economic reforms at various stages of the transition to a market economy, as well as promoting the development of private entrepreneurship. At the same time, the EBRD openly announced that it would put forward political requirements and conditions for the provision of funds.

Russia is cooperating closely with the EBRD. Data for 1995-1997 indicate that a third of the EBRD's investments were invested in Russian enterprises, for example, a number of projects were financed in the oil and gas complex of Russia, under the TACIS program, etc.

Among other European financial and credit institutions, it is necessary to mention the European Investment Bank (EIB) and the European Investment Fund (EIF), operating within the European Union, as well as the Nordic Investment Bank (NIB) and the Nordic Development Fund (NDF), created within the Nordic Council ministers.

International financial and credit institutions operating in other regions of the world have basically similar goals and structure. Their main tasks are to support the less developed countries of the world, promote economic growth and cooperation in the respective regions where such organizations operate, provide loans and invest their own funds in order to achieve the economic and social progress of developing Member States, assist in coordinating plans and goals development, etc. The governing bodies of regional financial and credit organizations are boards of governors, boards of directors and presidents.

The largest of the regional financial and credit organizations is the Asian Development Bank (ADB), established in 1965 on the recommendation of the Conference on Asian Economic Cooperation, convened under the auspices of the Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East. Its main goal is to promote economic growth and cooperation in the region of Asia and the Far East.

ADB members are 56 states: 40 regional and 16 non-regional, including the USA, Great Britain, Germany, France and other capitalist countries. The United States and Japan have the largest share in the capital and, accordingly, the number of votes (16% each).

A number of financial and credit organizations operate in the Americas region: the Inter-American Development Bank (IADB), the Inter-American Investment Corporation (MAIC), the Caribbean Development Bank (CBD), the Central American Bank for Economic Integration (CABEI). The largest is the Inter-American Development Bank, established in 1959 to help accelerate economic and social development in Latin America and the Caribbean. Its members are 46 states: 29 regional, including the United States, and 17 non-regional, including the UK, Germany, Italy, France, Japan, etc.

The African Development Bank Group (AFDB), the East African Development Bank (EADB), the Central African Development Bank (BDEAS), the West African Development Bank (BOAD) operate in the African region.

The African Development Bank (ADB) was established in 1964 with the assistance of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Africa. It consists of 52 regional states and 25 non-regional ones, including the largest capitalist countries. In 1972, the African Development Fund was established, and in 1976, the Nigerian Trust Fund, which became part of the African Development Bank Group. All organizations set themselves the task of promoting economic development and social progress of regional member states, financing investment programs and projects, encouraging public and private investments, etc.

To ensure economic development and cooperation between Arab countries, such financial and credit organizations as the Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development (AFESD), the Arab Monetary Fund (AVF), the Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development (KFAED) operate.

Of particular note is the Islamic Development Bank (IDB), established in 1974 to promote the economic development and social progress of member countries and Muslim communities in accordance with Sharia principles. The members of the IDB are 50 states, including from the CIS countries - Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan.

Universal and regional financial institutions provide some positive assistance to the economic growth and social progress of the least developed countries. At the same time, one cannot fail to note that in all these organizations the leading position is occupied by the United States and other large capitalist countries, using their mechanisms to obtain tangible benefits of both an economic and political nature, and to export Western values, ideals and way of life.

5. International transport law

International transport law- a complex part of international law, which includes relations of both public law and (mainly) private law nature.

Historically, only relations arising in the sphere of maritime, air and (to a lesser extent) road transport reach the level of universal regulation in this area. Special agreements (conventions, treaties) apply to water (river), rail, road and pipeline transport.

International transportation usually means the transportation of passengers and cargo between at least two states on the terms (uniform norms) established in international agreements regarding the requirements for transportation documentation, the procedure for passing administrative (customs) formalities, the services provided to the passenger, the conditions for accepting cargo for transportation and issuing it to the recipient, the liability of the carrier, the procedure for filing claims and claims, the procedure for resolving disputes.

In international maritime transport, along with international contractual norms, customary legal norms are widely used. In this case, the definition of the law applicable to maritime transport is of paramount importance.

The Merchant Shipping Code of the Russian Federation of 1999 establishes that the rights and obligations of the parties under a contract for the carriage of goods by sea, a contract for the carriage of passengers by sea, as well as under contracts for time charter, sea towing and marine insurance are determined by the law of the place where the contract is concluded, unless otherwise established by agreement of the parties. . The place of conclusion of the contract is determined by the law of the Russian Federation.

Maritime transportation performed without the carrier providing the entire ship or part of it is issued by a bill of lading, the details of which, the procedure for presenting claims against the carrier, the terms of the carrier's liability based on the principle of liability for fault are defined in the Brussels Convention on the Unification of Certain Rules on Bill of Lading of 1924. In this case, however, "navigational error" (error of the captain, sailor, pilot in navigation or management of the ship) excludes the liability of the sea carrier.

The UN Convention on the Carriage of Goods by Sea, adopted in Hamburg in 1978, amends the 1924 Convention on such issues as extending the scope to the carriage of animals and deck cargo, increasing the carrier's liability limit for the safety of cargo, and detailing the procedure for filing claims against the carrier.

Regular (linear) maritime transportation of goods is usually carried out on the basis of agreements on the organization of permanent sea lines, which can be concluded both by states (governments) and (as a rule) by ship-owning companies. Such agreements define the basic conditions for the operation of the respective lines, and the conditions for maritime liner transportation are determined in the liner bills of lading, relevant rules and tariffs. Ship-owning companies often form, on the basis of an agreement, groups of carriers called liner conferences, with the help of which the largest companies achieve the establishment of high freight rates and other preferential conditions.

The international air transportation of passengers, baggage, cargo and mail is subject to the Warsaw System documents. The basis of this system is the Warsaw Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air of 1929, supplemented by the Hague Protocol of 1955. The Convention applies to carriage carried out between the territories of the States Parties, as well as to carriage when the place of departure and the place of destination are in the territory of the same State Party, and the stopover is provided for in the territory of another state, even if not party to the Convention. The Convention defines the requirements for transportation documents, the rights of the sender to dispose of the cargo along the route, the procedure for issuing cargo at the destination, the carrier's responsibility to passengers and the cargo owner.

According to the Warsaw Convention, the liability of the carrier is based on fault: the carrier must prove that he and the persons appointed by him took all measures to avoid harm, or that they could not be taken. Under the terms of the Warsaw Convention, the limit of the carrier's liability in respect of the death or bodily injury of a passenger is 125,000 French Poincaré gold francs (a franc worth 65.5 mg 0.900 fine gold), for each kilogram of luggage and cargo - 260 francs, for hand luggage - 5 thousand francs. In the Hague Protocol, these limits are doubled. In addition, they can be increased by the carrier upon agreement with the passenger, proof of which is the purchase of a ticket by the passenger. Many leading air carriers (taking advantage of this opportunity) entered into an agreement among themselves (the Montreal Agreement of 1966) to increase the limits of their liability for transportation to the United States, from the United States or through the United States to a limit of 75 thousand US dollars.

In the field of rail transport, the most well-known are the Berne Conventions on the Carriage of Goods by Rail (abbreviated as CIM) and on the Carriage of Passengers by Rail (abbreviated as IPC). Most of the countries of Europe, Asia and North Africa participate in them. In 1966, the IPC Supplementary Agreement on the responsibility of railways for the carriage of passengers was concluded. In 1980, the Conference on the Revision of the Berne Conventions concluded the Agreement on International Carriage by Rail (COTIF). The latter document consolidates the Berne Conventions and the 1966 Supplementary Agreement into a single document with two annexes. Thus, Appendix A defines the conditions for the carriage of passengers, and Appendix B - the conditions for the carriage of goods.

The rates of carriage charges are determined by national and international tariffs. There are deadlines for the delivery of goods. Thus, according to the COTIF rules, the total delivery time for goods at high speed is 400 km, and for low speed cargo - 300 km/day At the same time, the railways retained the right to establish special delivery times for individual messages, as well as additional deadlines in the event of significant difficulties in transportation and other special circumstances.

The maximum amount of liability of railways in case of non-safety of transported goods in COTIF is determined in units of account of the International Monetary Fund - SDR (17 SDR, or 51 old gold francs for 1 kg gross weight).

COTIF rules stipulate that losses caused by delay in delivery are reimbursed to the cargo owner within the limits of three times the carriage charges.

The conclusion of the contract for the international carriage of goods is formalized by drawing up a consignment note in the prescribed form, and the consignor receives a duplicate of the consignment note. Responsibility of railways for non-safety of the cargo occurs in the presence of the carrier's fault, which in a number of cases must be proven by the cargo owner. The non-safety of the cargo must be confirmed by a commercial act. In case of delay in delivery, the railway pays a fine in a certain percentage of the freight charge.

Claims against railways are brought in court, and a claim must first be sent to the carrier. There is a nine-month period for filing claims and lawsuits, and a two-month period for claims for delay in the delivery of goods. The railway has 180 days to consider the claim, during which time the limitation period is suspended.

Many countries have signed bilateral agreements on international freight and passenger traffic.

The rules regarding road transport are contained in the Convention on Road Traffic and in the Protocol on Road Signs and Signals of September 19, 1949 (the version of 1968 is valid, which entered into force in 1977). The Russian Federation participates in these agreements. There is also the Customs Convention on the International Carriage of Goods of 1959 (in 1978 a new edition came into force). RF is a member.

The terms of the contract for the international carriage of goods by road between European countries are determined by the Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road (abbreviated CMR) of May 19, 1956. The majority of European states participate in the Convention. It defines the basic rights and obligations of the cargo owner and carrier during road transportation, the procedure for accepting cargo for transportation and issuing it at the destination. The limit of liability in case of non-safety of the cargo was also established - 25 gold francs for 1 kg gross weight.

In road transportation, it is essential to create guarantees in case of harm to third parties by motor vehicles - a source of increased danger. This is achieved through the introduction of compulsory civil liability insurance, which is provided for both by domestic legislation and a number of international agreements. Thus, bilateral agreements on the organization of road transport concluded with a number of countries provide for compulsory civil liability insurance for international road transport.

Among the relevant international documents in this area, we should highlight the Geneva Convention on Road Traffic of September 19, 1949. In accordance with this Convention, the contracting states, while retaining the right to establish rules for the use of their roads, decide that these roads will be used for international traffic in conditions provided for in this Convention and shall not be obliged to extend the benefits arising from the provisions of this Convention to motor vehicles, trailers or drivers of motor vehicles if they have been in their territory continuously for more than one year.

For the purpose of applying the provisions of this Convention, the term "international traffic" means any traffic involving the crossing of at least one state frontier.

In addition, the parties to the Convention undertake to exchange information necessary to identify drivers who have domestic permits to drive a car and are guilty of violating the rules of international traffic. They also undertake to exchange information necessary to identify the owners of foreign vehicles (or persons in whose name such vehicles were registered) whose actions led to serious traffic accidents.

On September 19, 1949, the Protocol on Road Signs and Signals was concluded in Geneva. It should also be noted the Agreement on the Implementation of a Unified Container Transport System (Budapest, December 3, 1971).

According to this document, the Contracting Parties agreed to create a system for the carriage of goods in domestic and especially international communications, based on the use by the parties of all modes of transport of heavy universal and special containers according to the technical, technological and organizational conditions agreed upon by them, hereinafter referred to as the "single container transport system" . This system should provide for the possibility of developing container transportation of goods also between contracting parties and third countries.

For the transportation of goods by air, the contracting parties will use containers that meet the conditions for such transportation, with the parameters recommended by ISO and IATA (International Air Transport Association).

The contracting parties shall organize a network of regular international container lines of rail, road, water and air transport, linked to domestic container lines, taking into account the national transport needs and the transport structure of the contracting parties, as well as container transfer points to ensure the transfer of containers from one mode of transport to another and between railways with different gauges. In some cases, it is planned to create joint transshipment container points.

The foregoing determines the fact that the MEP occupies a special position in the general system of international law. Experts write that the IEP is of paramount importance for the formation of institutions that govern the international community, and for international law in general. Some even believe that "ninety percent of international law in one form or another is essentially international economic law" (Professor J. Jackson, USA). This assessment may be exaggerated. Nevertheless, practically all branches of international law are indeed connected with the MEP. We saw this when considering human rights. An increasing place is occupied by economic problems in the activities of international organizations, diplomatic missions, in contract law, in maritime and air law, etc.

The role of the IEP is drawing the attention of a growing number of scientists to it. The computer of the UN Library in Geneva produced a list of relevant literature published in the last five years in various countries, which formed a solid pamphlet. All this prompts to pay additional attention to the MEP, despite the limited volume of the textbook. This is also justified by the fact that both scholars and practicing lawyers emphasize that ignorance of the IEP is fraught with negative consequences for the activities of lawyers serving not only business, but also other international relations.

The MEP object is extremely complex. It covers diverse types of relations with significant specifics, namely: trade, financial, investment, transport, etc. Accordingly, the MEP is an exceptionally large and diversified industry, covering such sub-sectors as international trade, financial, investment, transport law.

Russia's vital interests, including security interests, depend on the resolution of these problems. Indicative in this regard is the State Strategy for the Economic Security of the Russian Federation approved by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of April 29, 1996 N 608. The strategy justifiably proceeds from the need for "effective realization of the advantages of the international division of labor, sustainable development of the country in the conditions of its equal integration into world economic relations." The task was set to actively influence the processes taking place in the world that affect the national interests of Russia. It is pointed out that "without ensuring economic security, it is practically impossible to solve any of the tasks facing the country, both domestically and internationally." The importance of law in solving the tasks set is emphasized.

The current state of the world economy poses a serious danger to the world political system as well. On the one hand, there is an unprecedented increase in living standards, scientific and technological progress in a number of countries, and on the other hand, poverty, hunger, and diseases of most of humanity. This state of the world economy poses a threat to political stability.

The globalization of the economy has led to the fact that its management is possible only through the joint efforts of states. Attempts to solve problems taking into account the interests of only some states give negative results.

The joint efforts of states must be based on the law. The MEP performs important functions of maintaining a generally acceptable regime for the functioning of the world economy, protecting long-term common interests, counteracting attempts by individual states to achieve temporary advantages at the expense of others; serves as a tool to mitigate the contradictions between the political goals of individual states and the interests of the world economy.

The IEP promotes predictability in the activities of numerous participants in international economic relations and thereby contributes to the development of these relations, the progress of the world economy. Concepts such as the new economic order and the right to sustainable development have become essential for the development of the MEP.

New economic order

The world economic system is characterized by the decisive influence of the most developed industrial countries. It is determined by the concentration in their hands of the main economic, financial, scientific and technical resources.

Equalization of the status of foreigners with local citizens in economic activities is not possible, as this would endanger the national economy. Suffice it to recall the consequences of the "equal opportunities" and "open doors" regimes common in the past, which were imposed on dependent states.

There is also a special regime, according to which foreigners are granted the rights specifically stipulated in the law or in international treaties, and, finally, preferential treatment, according to which especially favorable conditions are granted to the states of one economic association or neighboring countries. As already mentioned, the granting of this regime to developing countries has become a principle of international economic law.

State in international economic law

In the system of regulation of international economic relations, the central place is occupied by the state. In the economic field, he also owns sovereign rights. However, their effective implementation is possible only if the economic interdependence of the members of the international community is taken into account. Attempts to achieve economic independence in isolation from the community (autarchy) are known in history but have never been successful. World experience shows that the maximum possible economic independence is real only with the active use of economic ties in the interests of the national economy, not to mention the fact that without this there can be no question of the state's influence on the world economy. The active use of economic ties presupposes the corresponding use of international law.

The MEP as a whole reflects the laws of a market economy. However, this does not mean limiting the sovereign rights of the state in the economic sphere. It has the right to nationalize this or that private property, it can oblige citizens to repatriate their foreign investments when national interests so require. So, for example, did Great Britain during the world wars. The US did this in peacetime, in 1968, to prevent further depreciation of the dollar. All investments abroad are considered part of the national treasure.

The question of the role of the state in a market economy has become particularly acute in our time. The development of economic ties, the globalization of the economy, the reduction of border barriers, i.e. liberalization of the regime, gave rise to a discussion about the fall of the role of states and legal regulation. Talk began about a global civil society, subject only to the laws of economic expediency. However, both authoritative scientists and those who are practically involved in international economic and financial relations point to the need for a certain order and purposeful regulation.

Economists often compare the Asian "tigers" with the countries of Africa and Latin America, referring in the first case to the success of a free market economy oriented towards active external relations, and in the second - to the stagnation of the regulated economy.

However, upon closer examination, it turns out that in the countries of Southeast Asia, the role of the state in the economy has never been downplayed. The success was due precisely to the fact that the market and the state did not oppose each other, but interacted for common purposes. The state contributed to the development of the national economy, creating favorable conditions for business activity within the country and outside it.

We are talking about a state-directed market economy. In Japan, they even talk about a "plan-oriented market economic system." It follows from what has been said that it would be wrong to throw overboard the experience of planned economic management in the socialist countries, including the negative experience. It can be used to determine the optimal role of the state in the national economy and foreign relations.

The question of the role of the state in a market economy is of fundamental importance for determining its role and functions in international economic relations, and, consequently, for clarifying the possibilities of the MEP.

International law reflects the trend towards expanding the role of the state in regulating the world economy, including the activities of private individuals. Thus, the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961 fixed such a function of diplomatic representation as the development of relations in the field of economy. The institution of diplomatic protection exercised by the state in relation to its citizens is essential for the development of economic ties.

The state can directly act as a subject of private law relations. The form of joint ventures of states in the field of production, transport, trade, etc. has become widespread. The founders are not only states, but also their administrative-territorial divisions. An example is a joint company established by the border regions of two states for the construction and operation of a bridge across a border reservoir. Joint ventures are commercial in nature and subject to the law of the host country. Nevertheless, the participation of states gives their status some specificity.

The situation is different when the unlawful activity of the corporation is connected with the territory of the state of registration and falls under its jurisdiction, for example, in the case of tolerance of the state authorities to the export of goods, the sale of which is prohibited in it because they are dangerous to health. In this case, the state of incorporation is responsible for not preventing the illegal activities of the corporation.

As for private companies, they, being independent legal entities, are not responsible for the actions of their state. True, there are known cases of imposing liability on companies as a response to a political act of their state. On this basis, for example, Libya nationalized American and British oil companies. This practice has no legal basis.

Companies owned by the state and acting on its behalf enjoy immunity. The state itself is responsible for their activities. In international practice, the question of the civil liability of the state for the debt obligations of a company owned by it and the responsibility of the latter for the debt obligations of its state has repeatedly arisen. The solution to this issue depends on whether the company has the status of an independent legal entity. If she has, then she is responsible only for her own actions.

Transnational corporations

In the scientific literature and practice, such companies are called differently. The term "transnational corporations" is dominant. However, there is increasing use of the term "multinational companies" and sometimes "multinational enterprises". In domestic literature, the term "transnational corporations" (TNCs) is usually used.

If the above concept is aimed at withdrawing TNC contracts from the scope of domestic law by subordinating them to international law, then another concept is designed to solve the same problem by subordinating contracts to a special third law - transnational, consisting of "general principles" of law. Such concepts are contrary to both domestic and international law.

The TNC makes extensive use of means to corrupt the officials of the host country. They have a special "bribery" fund. Therefore, states should have laws providing for the criminal liability of state officials and TNCs for illegal activities.

In 1977, the US passed the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, making it a crime for US citizens to give a bribe to any foreign person in order to win a contract. Companies from countries such as Germany and Japan took advantage of this, and with the help of bribes to officials in the host countries, they won many lucrative contracts from American companies.

In 1996, the Latin American countries that suffered from this practice entered into an agreement on cooperation in the eradication of dirty government business. The agreement qualifies as a crime giving and accepting a bribe when concluding a contract. Moreover, the treaty established that an official should be considered a criminal if he became the owner of funds, the acquisition of which "cannot be reasonably explained on the basis of his legitimate income during the performance of his (administrative) functions." It seems that a law with a similar content would be useful to our country. Supporting the treaty as a whole, the US withdrew, citing that the latter provision was contrary to the principle that a suspect is not required to prove his innocence.

The problem of transnational corporations also exists for our country.

First, Russia is becoming an important field for TNC activity.

Secondly, the legal aspects of TNCs are relevant to joint ventures that are associated both with the states in which they operate and with third-country markets.

The Treaty on the Establishment of the Economic Union (within the framework of the CIS) contains the obligations of the parties to promote "the creation of joint ventures, transnational production associations ..." (Article 12). A number of treaties have been concluded to develop this provision.

Of interest is the experience of China, in which the process of transnationalization of Chinese enterprises was significantly developed in the late 1980s. Among developing countries, China ranked second in terms of investment abroad. At the end of 1994, the number of branches in other countries reached 5.5 thousand. The total amount of property of Chinese TNCs abroad reached 190 billion dollars, the lion's share of which belongs to the Bank of China.

The transnationalization of Chinese firms is explained by a number of factors. In this way, a supply of raw materials is ensured, which is not available or is scarce in the country; the country receives currency and improves export opportunities; advanced technology and equipment arrives; economic and political ties with the respective countries are being strengthened.

At the same time, TNCs pose complex challenges in the field of public administration. First of all, there is the problem of controlling the activities of TNCs, most of whose capital belongs to the state. According to experts, in the name of success, more freedom is needed for the management of corporations, providing support, including the issuance of laws favorable for investment abroad, as well as raising the professional level of personnel in both TNCs and the state apparatus.

In conclusion, it should be noted that, using their influence on states, TNCs seek to increase their status in international relations and gradually achieve considerable results. Thus, the report of the Secretary General of UNCTAD at the IX Conference (1996) speaks of the need to provide corporations with the opportunity to participate in the work of this organization.

In general, the task of regulating the activity of private capital, especially large capital, which is becoming increasingly important in the context of globalization, still needs to be solved. The UN has developed a special program for this purpose. The UN Millennium Declaration provides for the need to provide greater opportunities for the private sector to contribute to the achievement of the goals and implementation of the programs of the Organization.

Dispute Resolution

Dispute resolution is of paramount importance for international economic relations. The level of compliance with the terms of contracts, maintenance of order, respect for the rights of participants depends on this. In this case, we are often talking about the fate of property of great value. The significance of the problem is also emphasized in political international acts. The 1975 CSCE Final Act states that the prompt and fair resolution of international commercial disputes contributes to the expansion and facilitation of trade and economic cooperation, and that arbitration is the most appropriate instrument for this. The significance of these provisions was noted in subsequent acts of the OSCE.

Economic disputes between subjects of international law are resolved in the same manner as other disputes (see Chapter XI). Disputes between individuals and legal entities are subject to national jurisdiction. However, as experience has shown, the domestic courts have not been able to solve the problem properly. Judges are not professionally prepared to deal with complex issues of the IEP, and often turn out to be nationally limited, unbiased. Often this practice caused international complications. Suffice it to recall the practice of American courts, which tried to extend their jurisdiction beyond the limits established by international law.

The agreement contained provisions on most favored nation treatment, non-discrimination, and national treatment. But in general, his tasks were not broad. It was about limiting customs tariffs, which remained at a high pre-war level and served as a serious obstacle to the development of trade. However, under the pressure of life, the GATT was filled with more and more significant content, turning into the main economic association of states.

At regular meetings within the framework of GATT, referred to as rounds, numerous acts were adopted on trade and tariff issues. As a result, they started talking about GATT law. The final stage was the negotiations of the participants during the so-called Uruguay Round, in which 118 states participated. It lasted seven years and ended in 1994 with the signing of the Final Act, which is a kind of code of international trade. Only the main text of the Act is set out on 500 pages. The act contains an extensive set of agreements covering many areas and forming the "legal system of the Uruguay Round".

The main ones are agreements on the establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO), on customs tariffs, trade in goods, trade in services, and on trade-related intellectual property rights. Each of them is associated with a set of detailed agreements. Thus, the agreement on trade in goods is "associated" with agreements on customs valuation, technical barriers to trade, the application of sanitary and phytosanitary measures, the procedure for issuing import licenses, subsidies, anti-dumping measures, investment issues related to trade, trade in textiles and clothing, agricultural products, etc.

The set of documents also includes a memorandum on the dispute settlement procedure, a procedure for monitoring the trade policy of participants, a decision to deepen the harmonization of world economic policy processes, a decision on assistance measures in case of a negative impact of reforms on developing countries dependent on food imports, etc.

All this gives an idea of ​​the breadth of the scope of the WTO. Its main goal is to promote economic cooperation between states in the interests of raising living standards by ensuring full employment, increasing production and trade exchange of goods and services, optimal use of sources of raw materials in order to ensure long-term development, protection and preservation of the environment. This shows that the goals specified in the WTO Charter are of a global and, undoubtedly, positive nature.

In order to achieve these goals, the tasks are set - to achieve greater coherence of trade policies, to promote the economic and political convergence of states through broad control over trade policy, assistance to developing countries and environmental protection. One of the main functions of the WTO is to serve as a forum for the preparation of new agreements in the field of trade and international economic relations. It follows from this that the scope of the WTO goes beyond trade and concerns economic relations in general.

The WTO has a developed organizational structure. The highest body is the Ministerial Conference, which consists of representatives of all member states. It works sessionally, every two years. The Conference establishes subsidiary bodies; makes decisions on all issues necessary for the implementation of the functions of the WTO; provides an official interpretation of the WTO Charter and related agreements.

Decisions of the Ministerial Conference are taken by consensus, i.e. are considered accepted if no one formally declares disagreement with them. Objections during the debate do not actually matter, and it is not easy to speak officially against the will of a large majority. Moreover, art. Article IX of the WTO Charter provides that if consensus is not reached, the resolution may be adopted by a majority. As you can see, the powers of the Ministerial Conference are significant.

The executive body carrying out day-to-day functions is the General Council, which includes representatives of all member states. The General Council meets in sessions between sessions of the Ministerial Conference and performs its functions during these periods. It is, perhaps, the central body in the implementation of the functions of this organization. It manages such important bodies as the Dispute Resolution Authority, the Trade Policy Authority, various councils and committees. Each of the agreements provides for the establishment of an appropriate council or committee for the purpose of its implementation. The decision-making rules of the General Council are the same as those of the Ministerial Conference.

The powers of the Dispute Settlement Authority and the Trade Policy Authority are particularly significant. The first actually represents a special meeting of the General Council, acting as the Dispute Settlement Body. The peculiarity lies in the fact that in such cases the General Council consists of three members who are present.

The procedure for resolving a dispute varies somewhat from agreement to agreement, but in the main it is the same. The main stages: consultations, the report of the investigation team, the appeal, the decision, its implementation. By agreement of the parties, the dispute may be considered by arbitration. In general, the work of the Authority is of a mixed nature, combining elements of conciliation with arbitration.

The Executive Board conducts the day-to-day business of the Foundation. It consists of 24 executive directors. Seven of them are nominated by the countries with the largest contributions to the fund (Great Britain, Germany, China, Saudi Arabia, USA, France, Japan).

When joining the IMF, each state subscribes to a certain share of its capital. This quota determines the number of votes belonging to the state, as well as the amount of assistance that it can count on. It cannot exceed 450% of the quota. The voting procedure, according to the French lawyer A. Pelle, "allows a small number of industrialized states to play a leading role in the functioning of the system."

The World Bank is a complex international entity linked to the UN. Its system includes four autonomous institutions subordinate to the President of the World Bank: the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the International Development Association (IDA), the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA). The overall goal of these institutions is to promote the economic and social development of the less developed members of the UN through the provision of financial and advisory assistance and assistance in training. Within the framework of this common goal, each institution performs its functions.

The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) was established in 1945. The overwhelming majority of states, including Russia and other CIS countries, are its participants. His goals:

• promoting the reconstruction and development of Member States through productive investment;
• encouragement of private and foreign investments by providing guarantees or participation in loans and other investments of private investors;
• stimulating a balanced growth of international trade, as well as maintaining a balanced balance of payments through international investment in the development of production.

The supreme body of the IBRD is the Board of Governors, which consists of representatives of member states. Each of them has the number of votes proportional to the share of the contribution to the capital of the Bank. There are 24 executive directors involved in day-to-day operations, five of whom are appointed by the UK, Germany, USA, France and Japan. The directors elect a president who oversees the day-to-day business of the Bank.

The International Development Association was established as a subsidiary of the IBRD, but has the status of a specialized agency of the UN. Basically, it pursues the same goals as the Bank. The latter provides loans on more favorable terms than ordinary commercial banks, and mainly to repaying states. IDA provides interest-free loans to the poorest countries. Funded by IDA through membership contributions, additional contributions from the richest members, IBRD profits.

The Board of Governors and the Executive Directorate are formed in the same way as the corresponding bodies of the IBRD. Operated by IBRD staff (Russia is not involved).

The International Financial Corporation is an independent specialized agency of the United Nations. The goal is to promote the economic progress of developing countries by encouraging private manufacturing enterprises. In recent years, IFC has stepped up its technical assistance activities. A foreign investment advisory service has been set up. Members of the IFC must be members of the IBRD. Most states participate, including Russia and the CIS countries. The governing bodies of the IBRD are also bodies of the IFC.

Unification of international financial law

The most important role in this area is played by the Geneva Conventions on the Unification of Law Relating to Bills, 1930, and the Geneva Conventions on the Unification of Law Relating to Checks, 1931. The conventions have become widespread and yet have not become universal. They do not include countries of Anglo-American law. As a result, all systems of bills and checks operate in economic relations - Geneva and Anglo-American.

In order to eliminate this situation in 1988, the UN Convention on International Bills of Exchange and International Promissory Notes was adopted (draft prepared by UNCITRAL). Unfortunately, the Convention has failed to reconcile the contradictions and has not yet entered into force.

International investment law is a branch of international economic law, the principles and norms of which regulate the relations of states regarding investment.

The basic principle of international investment law is formulated in the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States as follows: each state has the right "to regulate and control foreign investment within the limits of its national jurisdiction, in accordance with its laws and regulations and in accordance with its national purposes and priorities. None the state should not be forced to grant preferential treatment to foreign investment."

Globalization has led to a significant increase in foreign investment. Accordingly, national and international lawmaking in this area has intensified. In an effort to attract foreign investment, some 45 developing and former socialist countries have adopted new laws or even codes on foreign investment over the past few years. More than 500 bilateral agreements have been concluded on this issue. Thus, the total number of such treaties reaches 200, in which more than 140 states participate.

A number of multilateral treaties containing investment provisions have been concluded: the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Energy Charter, etc. The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund in 1992 published a collection containing approximate general provisions of the relevant laws and treaties (Guidelines on the Treatment of Foreign Direct Investment).

Considering the mentioned laws and treaties, you come to the conclusion that in general they are aimed at liberalizing the legal regime of investments, on the one hand, and at increasing the level of their protection, on the other. Some of them provide foreign investors with national treatment and even free access. Many contain guarantees against uncompensated nationalization and against the prohibition of the free export of currency.

Particularly noteworthy is the fact that most laws and treaties provide for the possibility of considering disputes between a foreign investor and the host state in impartial arbitration. In general, feeling the urgent need for investment, the countries concerned seek to create an optimal regime for foreign investors, which sometimes turns out to be even more favorable than the regime for local investors.

The problem of foreign investment has not been ignored by the legal system of Russia. Certain guarantees are provided to them by the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Article 235). The Law on Foreign Investments contains mainly guarantees provided by the state to foreign investors: legal protection of their activities, compensation in case of nationalization of property, as well as in the event of an unfavorable change in legislation, proper resolution of disputes, etc.

Russia inherited from the USSR more than 10 agreements relating to the protection of foreign investment. Many such agreements have been concluded by Russia itself. Thus, during 2001 it ratified 12 agreements on encouragement and mutual protection of investments. All agreements provide for the provision of national treatment. Investments have been granted a regime "ensuring full and unconditional protection of investments in accordance with the standards adopted in international law" (Article 3 of the Agreement with France). The main attention is paid to the guarantee of foreign investments from non-commercial, i.e. political, risks, risks associated with war, coup d'état, revolution, etc.

Russia's bilateral agreements provide for a rather high level of investment protection, and not only from nationalization. Investors are entitled to compensation for losses, including lost profits, caused to them as a result of illegal actions of state bodies or officials.

An important guarantee of investments are the provisions of international agreements on subrogation, which refers to the replacement of one entity by another in relation to legal claims. In accordance with these provisions, for example, the state that has nationalized foreign property recognizes the transfer of rights by the owner to its state. The Agreement between Russia and Finland states that the party "or its competent authority acquires, by way of subrogation, the appropriate investor rights based on this Agreement..." (Article 10). The peculiarity of subrogation in this case is that the rights of a private person are transferred to the state and protected at the interstate level. There is a transformation of civil law relations into international public law.

In general, the treaties provide a substantial international legal guarantee for foreign investment. Thanks to them, the violation by the host state of the investment contract becomes an international tort. Contracts usually provide for immediate and full compensation, as well as the possibility of submitting a dispute to arbitration.

Investment agreements are based on the principle of reciprocity. But in most cases, investors of only one side actually use the opportunities provided by them. The party in need of investment does not have significant potential for investment abroad. However, sometimes the weak side can also take advantage of these opportunities. Thus, the German government wanted to seize the shares of the Krupa steel plant belonging to the Shah of Iran so that they would not fall into the hands of the Iranian government. However, this was prevented by an investment protection agreement with Iran.

Thus, we can state the existence of a developed system of regulatory regulation of foreign investment. A significant place in it belongs to the norms of customary international law. They are complemented by treaty rules that improve the efficiency of the system by clarifying general rules and identifying specific investment protections.

This system as a whole provides a high level of protection, including:

• ensuring minimum international standards;
• granting the most favored nation treatment and non-discrimination based on nationality;
• ensuring protection and security;
• free transfer of investments and profits;
• inadmissibility of nationalization without immediate and adequate compensation.

In the face of the intensification of the struggle for foreign capital investment markets on the basis of the Seoul Convention of 1985, in 1988, at the initiative of the World Bank, the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (hereinafter referred to as the Guarantee Agency) was established. The overall objective of the Safeguards Agency is to encourage foreign investment for productive purposes, especially in developing countries. This goal is achieved by providing guarantees, including insurance and reinsurance of non-commercial risks for foreign investments. Such risks include a ban on the export of foreign currency, nationalization and similar measures, breach of contract and, of course, war, revolution, internal political unrest. The Agency's guarantees are seen as complementary to, and not as a substitute for, national investment insurance schemes.

Organizationally, the Agency for Guarantees is connected with the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, which, as noted, is part of the World Bank system. Nevertheless, the Safeguards Agency has legal and financial independence, and is also part of the UN system, interacting with it on the basis of an agreement. The connection with the IBRD finds expression in the fact that only members of the Bank can be members of the Guarantee Agency. The number of members exceeds 120 states, including Russia and other CIS countries.

The Guarantee Agency's bodies are the Board of Governors, the Directorate (the Chairman of the Directorate is the IBRD President ex officio) and the President. Each Member State has 177 votes plus one more vote for each additional contribution. As a result, a few capital-exporting countries have as many votes as numerous capital-importing countries. The statutory fund is formed at the expense of members' contributions and additional income from them.

The investor's relationship with the Agency for Guarantees is formalized by a private law contract. The latter obliges the investor to pay an annual insurance premium, defined as a percentage of the amount of the insurance guarantee. For its part, the Guarantee Agency undertakes to pay a certain sum insured, depending on the magnitude of the losses. At the same time, claims against the relevant state are transferred to the Agency for Guarantees in the order of subrogation. The dispute is transformed into an international legal one. Noteworthy is the fact that, thanks to the Agency for Guarantees, a dispute arises not between two states, but between one of them and an international organization, which significantly reduces the possibility of a negative impact of the dispute on the relations of the states interested in it.

Investments in countries with an unstable economic and political system are associated with significant risk. There is a possibility of risk insurance in private insurance companies that require high insurance premiums. As a result, the return on investment decreases, and products lose their competitiveness.

Being interested in the export of national capital, industrialized countries have created instruments that provide insurance at affordable prices, and the associated losses are compensated by the states themselves. In the United States, these issues are dealt with by a special government agency - the Overseas Private Investment Corporation. Disputes between investors and the Corporation are resolved by arbitration. Some states, such as Germany, provide this kind of opportunity only to those who export capital to countries with which agreements on investment protection have been concluded.

The provision of guarantees at reduced insurance rates is a hidden form of government export subsidies. The desire to soften competition in this area encourages developed countries to seek international means of settlement. The Safeguards Agency mentioned is one of the main facilities of this kind.

Nationalization. The nationalization of foreign property is one of the main problems of investment law. The sovereign power of the state also extends to foreign private property, i.e. includes the right to nationalization. Until the end of World War II, perhaps most jurists denied this right and qualified nationalization as expropriation. This is how the nationalization carried out in Russia after the October Revolution was officially qualified.

Today the right to nationalize foreign property is recognized by international law. However, it is subject to certain conditions. Nationalization should not be arbitrary, it should be carried out not in private, but in public interests and be accompanied by immediate and adequate compensation.

As experience shows, compensation costs the state less than breaking off international economic ties. It is no coincidence that the socialist countries of Central and Eastern Europe did not follow the example of Russia in the nationalization of foreign property.

Disputes are resolved by agreement or arbitration.

In the Fromat case in 1982 by the International Chamber of Commerce, Iran argued that the demand for full compensation effectively invalidated the nationalization law, since the state was unable to pay it. The arbitration, however, determined that such issues should not be decided unilaterally by the state, but by arbitration.

There is a so-called creeping nationalization. Conditions are created for a foreign company that force it to cease operations. Well-intentioned government actions, such as the prohibition to reduce surplus labor, sometimes lead to similar results. In terms of its legal consequences, creeping nationalization is equated with ordinary nationalization.

The possibility of nationalization, subject to compensation for the cost of property converted into state ownership and other losses, is provided for by the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (part 2 of article 235). Federal Law No. 160-FZ of July 9, 1999 "On Foreign Investments in the Russian Federation" resolves the issue in accordance with the rules established in international practice. Foreign investments are not subject to nationalization and cannot be subject to requisition or confiscation, except in exceptional cases provided for by law, when these measures are taken in the public interest (Article 8).

If we turn to Russia's international treaties, they contain special resolutions that limit the possibility of nationalization to the utmost. The Agreement with the UK states that the investments of investors of one of the Parties will not be subject to de jure or de facto nationalization, expropriation, requisition or any measures having similar consequences in the territory of the other Party (clause 1 of article 5). It seems that such a resolution does not completely exclude the possibility of nationalization. However, it can only be carried out in case of public necessity, in accordance with the law, be non-discriminatory and be accompanied by adequate compensation.

In the relations between the CIS countries, the problem of nationalization was resolved by the multilateral Agreement on cooperation in the field of investment activity of 1993. Foreign investments enjoy full legal protection and, in principle, are not subject to nationalization. The latter is possible only in exceptional cases provided for by law. At the same time, "prompt, adequate and effective compensation" is paid (Article 7).

During nationalization, the main issues are related to the criteria for full, adequate compensation. In such cases, it is primarily about the market value of the nationalized property. International practice is generally of the opinion that grounds for compensation arise after nationalization, but will include losses incurred as a result of the announcement of the intention to nationalize.

After the Second World War, agreements between states on the payment of a total amount of compensation in case of mass nationalization became widespread. Such agreements reflected a certain compromise. The country - the source of investments refused full and adequate compensation, the nationalizing country refused the rule of equality of foreigners with local citizens.

As is known, as a result of nationalization after the Second World War, citizens of the countries of Central and Eastern Europe either did not receive compensation at all, or received much less than foreigners. By agreeing to pay compensation to citizens of foreign countries, these countries retained their economic ties, which was essential for their national economy.

Having received the total amount of compensation by agreement, the state distributes it among its citizens, whose property has been nationalized. Such amounts are usually significantly less than the real value of the nationalized property. Justifying this, the state that carried out the nationalization usually refers to the difficult state of the economy as a result of war, revolution, etc. It would be wrong, however, to assume that the practice of agreements on the payment of a total amount in compensation for nationalization and taking into account the plight of the state paying it has become a norm of international law. The problem is solved by agreement of the states concerned.

The nationalization of foreign property also raises questions for third states. How should they treat, for example, the products of an enterprise whose legality of nationalization is disputed? Prior to the recognition of the Soviet government, foreign courts more than once satisfied the claims of former owners regarding the exported products of nationalized enterprises. Currently, the US is actively seeking other countries to recognize the illegal nationalization in Cuba.

International economic law in the relations of the CIS countries

The division of the unified economic system of the USSR by the borders of the independent republics gave rise to an urgent need to restore ties on a new, international legal basis. Since 1992, many bilateral and multilateral agreements have been concluded in the field of transport, communications, customs, energy, industrial property, supply of goods, etc. In 1991, most of the CIS countries adopted a Memorandum on joint liability for the debts of the USSR, and the share of each republic in the total debt was determined. In 1992, Russia entered into agreements with a number of republics that provided for the transfer to it of all debts and, accordingly, the assets of the USSR abroad - the so-called zero option.

In 1993, the CIS Charter was adopted, which indicated economic cooperation as one of the main goals in the interests of the comprehensive and balanced economic and social development of the member states within the framework of the common economic space, in the interests of deepening integration. Let us especially note the consolidation of the provision that these processes should proceed on the basis of market relations. In other words, a certain socio-economic system is fixed.

The foregoing gives an idea of ​​the specifics of international economic law in the relations between the CIS countries. It operates in conditions of developing integration.

The supreme bodies of the Economic Union are the supreme bodies of the CIS, the councils of heads of state and heads of government. In 1994, the Interstate Economic Committee was established as a permanent body of the Union, which is a coordinating and executive body. It has the power to make three kinds of decisions:

1. administrative decisions, legally binding;
2. decisions, the binding nature of which must be confirmed by decisions of governments;
3. recommendations.

Within the framework of the Union, there is the CIS Economic Court, established in 1992. It is only responsible for resolving interstate economic disputes, namely:

Additional problems in relations between the CIS countries were caused by the events of 2004-2005. in Georgia, Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan.

A system of integration management bodies has been established: the Interstate Council, the Integration Committee, the Inter-Parliamentary Committee. The peculiarity lies in the competence of the highest body - the Interstate Council. It has the right to make decisions that are legally binding on the bodies and organizations of the participants, as well as decisions that are subject to transformation into national legislation. Moreover, an additional guarantee of their implementation has been created: the parties are obliged to ensure the responsibility of public officials for the implementation of decisions of the integration management bodies (Article 24).

Integration associations of this kind, limited in the number of participants, pave the way for broader associations, and therefore they should be recognized as a natural, resource-saving phenomenon.

At the meeting of the Council of Heads of State - Members of the CIS, dedicated to the 10th anniversary of the Organization, an analytical final report was discussed. Positive results were stated and shortcomings were indicated. The task of improving the forms, methods and mechanisms of interaction has been set. The role of law and other normative means, which need further improvement, is especially emphasized. The issue of ensuring the implementation of the decisions taken is brought to the fore. The task is to continue efforts to harmonize legislation.